Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 84 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4151 WI Juniors 16-Elite 1748 49-23 68% 16 WI
4152 K1V 12U 1748 44-10 81% 12 KY
4153 Lions West 14-1 1748 33-13 72% 14 IL
4154 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 14-Navy 1748 31-12 72% 14 CO
4155 Prodigy 14-1 premier 1748 36-25 59% 14 NY
4156 516 Elite 12-Black 1748 17-6 74% 12 NY
4157 Momentum 13-Gold 1748 56-18 76% 13 FL
4158 KAVA 13 1748 32-6 84% 13 KY
4159 NKYVC 12-3 typhoon 1748 30-7 81% 12 KY
4160 Omni 15-N2 1748 38-33 54% 15 AZ
4161 Club Sand 17-S 1748 14-5 74% 17 UT
4162 Prodigy 18-Red 1748 28-15 65% 18 NY
4163 LevelOne 18-1 1748 17-2 89% 18
4164 Summit 14-Nat'l blue 1748 5-0 100% 14 TX
4165 Preds 14-Girls validus 1748 10-6 63% 14 ON
4166 SVC 11-Orange 1748 26-6 81% 11 TN
4167 Mesa JuniorsVBCO 18-Black 1747 25-9 74% 18
4168 MVVC 14-Black 1747 41-31 57% 14 CA
4169 H Skyline 16 Silver 1747 33-9 79% 16 TX
4170 MSVBC 15-Navy 1747 63-14 82% 15 AZ
4171 Horseshoe VBC 18-Red 1747 23-11 68% 18 PA
4172 Horseshoe 16-Red 1747 24-13 65% 16 PA
4173 Roncalli Juniors 12-1 1747 24-5 83% 12 IN
4174 WI Juniors 13-1 1747 50-28 64% 13 WI
4175 Digs 16-White 1747 39-17 70% 16 NJ
4176 757 14-Black 1747 37-27 58% 14 VA
4177 Stars 16-Johna 1747 52-19 73% 16 SC
4178 Jax Skyline 14-White 1747 48-18 73% 14 FL
4179 adidas DYNASTY 11-1 1747 7-0 100% 11 KS
4180 Elevation 17-Conner 1747 32-28 53% 17 OH
4181 PVC 14-1a 1747 47-26 64% 14 FL
4182 Idaho Peak ADAM NATIONAL 16 1747 19-10 66% 16
4183 Royal Aces 12 1747 23-4 85% 12
4184 Coast United 17 1747 32-41 44% 17 CA
4185 Lions SWest Prairie 17-1 1747 30-11 73% 17 IL
4186 Xcel Volleyball Club 16-1 adidas 1747 6-2 75% 16 TX
4187 TAV 14-Gold 1747 22-19 48% 14 TX
4188 Chadron Elite 12 1746 5-0 100% 12
4189 WAJ 15-Purple storm purple 1746 21-4 81% 15
4190 OMNI 18 Elite 1746 44-24 65% 18 CA
4191 FaR Out 18-Red 1746 29-12 71% 18 MI
4192 HJV 18 PREMIER 1746 16-18 47% 18 TX
4193 STVA 15-Navy-1 1746 40-18 69% 15 TX
4194 LV 11 Avoli 1746 30-16 64% 11 TX
4195 AVA TX 13-Adidas 1746 27-16 63% 13 TX
4196 Empire 14-Power 1746 29-7 81% 14 CA
4197 SG Elite 17-Roshambo 1746 5-18 22% 17 CA
4198 SMASH 16-S sparks 1746 38-17 69% 16 MA
4199 Syndicate VC 14-1 1746 20-1 95% 14 CA
4200 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 18-National black 1746 20-18 53% 18 NV
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.