2025-2026 Season — Page 84 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4151 | WI Juniors 16-Elite | 1748 | 49-23 | 68% | 16 | WI |
| 4152 | K1V 12U | 1748 | 44-10 | 81% | 12 | KY |
| 4153 | Lions West 14-1 | 1748 | 33-13 | 72% | 14 | IL |
| 4154 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 14-Navy | 1748 | 31-12 | 72% | 14 | CO |
| 4155 | Prodigy 14-1 premier | 1748 | 36-25 | 59% | 14 | NY |
| 4156 | 516 Elite 12-Black | 1748 | 17-6 | 74% | 12 | NY |
| 4157 | Momentum 13-Gold | 1748 | 56-18 | 76% | 13 | FL |
| 4158 | KAVA 13 | 1748 | 32-6 | 84% | 13 | KY |
| 4159 | NKYVC 12-3 typhoon | 1748 | 30-7 | 81% | 12 | KY |
| 4160 | Omni 15-N2 | 1748 | 38-33 | 54% | 15 | AZ |
| 4161 | Club Sand 17-S | 1748 | 14-5 | 74% | 17 | UT |
| 4162 | Prodigy 18-Red | 1748 | 28-15 | 65% | 18 | NY |
| 4163 | LevelOne 18-1 | 1748 | 17-2 | 89% | 18 | |
| 4164 | Summit 14-Nat'l blue | 1748 | 5-0 | 100% | 14 | TX |
| 4165 | Preds 14-Girls validus | 1748 | 10-6 | 63% | 14 | ON |
| 4166 | SVC 11-Orange | 1748 | 26-6 | 81% | 11 | TN |
| 4167 | Mesa JuniorsVBCO 18-Black | 1747 | 25-9 | 74% | 18 | |
| 4168 | MVVC 14-Black | 1747 | 41-31 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 4169 | H Skyline 16 Silver | 1747 | 33-9 | 79% | 16 | TX |
| 4170 | MSVBC 15-Navy | 1747 | 63-14 | 82% | 15 | AZ |
| 4171 | Horseshoe VBC 18-Red | 1747 | 23-11 | 68% | 18 | PA |
| 4172 | Horseshoe 16-Red | 1747 | 24-13 | 65% | 16 | PA |
| 4173 | Roncalli Juniors 12-1 | 1747 | 24-5 | 83% | 12 | IN |
| 4174 | WI Juniors 13-1 | 1747 | 50-28 | 64% | 13 | WI |
| 4175 | Digs 16-White | 1747 | 39-17 | 70% | 16 | NJ |
| 4176 | 757 14-Black | 1747 | 37-27 | 58% | 14 | VA |
| 4177 | Stars 16-Johna | 1747 | 52-19 | 73% | 16 | SC |
| 4178 | Jax Skyline 14-White | 1747 | 48-18 | 73% | 14 | FL |
| 4179 | adidas DYNASTY 11-1 | 1747 | 7-0 | 100% | 11 | KS |
| 4180 | Elevation 17-Conner | 1747 | 32-28 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 4181 | PVC 14-1a | 1747 | 47-26 | 64% | 14 | FL |
| 4182 | Idaho Peak ADAM NATIONAL 16 | 1747 | 19-10 | 66% | 16 | |
| 4183 | Royal Aces 12 | 1747 | 23-4 | 85% | 12 | |
| 4184 | Coast United 17 | 1747 | 32-41 | 44% | 17 | CA |
| 4185 | Lions SWest Prairie 17-1 | 1747 | 30-11 | 73% | 17 | IL |
| 4186 | Xcel Volleyball Club 16-1 adidas | 1747 | 6-2 | 75% | 16 | TX |
| 4187 | TAV 14-Gold | 1747 | 22-19 | 48% | 14 | TX |
| 4188 | Chadron Elite 12 | 1746 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | |
| 4189 | WAJ 15-Purple storm purple | 1746 | 21-4 | 81% | 15 | |
| 4190 | OMNI 18 Elite | 1746 | 44-24 | 65% | 18 | CA |
| 4191 | FaR Out 18-Red | 1746 | 29-12 | 71% | 18 | MI |
| 4192 | HJV 18 PREMIER | 1746 | 16-18 | 47% | 18 | TX |
| 4193 | STVA 15-Navy-1 | 1746 | 40-18 | 69% | 15 | TX |
| 4194 | LV 11 Avoli | 1746 | 30-16 | 64% | 11 | TX |
| 4195 | AVA TX 13-Adidas | 1746 | 27-16 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 4196 | Empire 14-Power | 1746 | 29-7 | 81% | 14 | CA |
| 4197 | SG Elite 17-Roshambo | 1746 | 5-18 | 22% | 17 | CA |
| 4198 | SMASH 16-S sparks | 1746 | 38-17 | 69% | 16 | MA |
| 4199 | Syndicate VC 14-1 | 1746 | 20-1 | 95% | 14 | CA |
| 4200 | Top Flight Volleyball Academy 18-National black | 1746 | 20-18 | 53% | 18 | NV |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.