Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 84 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4151 Corpus Christi Storm 17-1 1748 36-13 73% 17 TX
4152 AZ REV 15 Elite (MN) 1748 6-3 67% 15 MN
4153 Bristol Crush 18-Xia 1748 26-2 87% 18 CT
4154 CINCY EAST 13-1 black 1748 52-16 76% 13 OH
4155 TFSC 14-Phoenix 1748 13-5 72% 14 GA
4156 Inside Out 16-Mizuno black 1748 27-20 57% 16 MI
4157 FaR Out 18-Red 1748 29-12 71% 18 MI
4158 CJV 16-Select white 1748 53-10 84% 16 NC
4159 Webo 14-1s talyn 1748 19-3 86% 14 IN
4160 K1V 12U 1748 44-10 81% 12 KY
4161 Hoosier Elite Hysteria 13-1 1748 42-36 54% 13 IN
4162 H Skyline 16 Silver 1748 33-9 79% 16 TX
4163 High Voltage 17-1 1748 35-7 81% 17 MN
4164 Mililani 14 1748 30-3 83% 14 HI
4165 adidas DYNASTY 11-1 1747 7-0 100% 11 KS
4166 Empire 14-Power 1747 29-7 81% 14 CA
4167 Max Performance 16-Jess 1747 42-8 84% 16 MA
4168 STVA) South Texas STVA 16-1 madison 1747 2-5 29% 16 NV
4169 SPVB 15-C-fed 1747 25-30 45% 15 IL
4170 Cincy Classics 13-Red 1747 39-18 68% 13 OH
4171 Rollers 15-Royal 1747 35-13 73% 15 TX
4172 Alliance 13-Molten 1747 39-10 80% 13 TN
4173 Top Flight 12-Psi sp 1747 7-4 64% 12 IL
4174 Sportime 16-Gold 1747 30-26 54% 16 NY
4175 Roncalli Juniors 12-1 1747 24-5 83% 12 IN
4176 Club SyrV 15U Premier 1747 53-17 74% 15 NY
4177 STVA 15-Navy-1 1747 40-18 69% 15 TX
4178 SBVC Girls 18 Molten 1747 30-13 70% 18 CA
4179 KC Power 11-1 1747 29-18 60% 11 KS
4180 SUPERIOR 13-1 adidas 1747 54-11 83% 13 TX
4181 WPVC 16-Armour orange 1747 45-28 62% 16 FL
4182 Pacific West Volleyball Club 17-Travis 1747 48-22 69% 17 CA
4183 Academy West 14-Hp-1 1747 46-51 47% 14 CA
4184 360 15-Kaos black 1747 27-23 51% 15 TX
4185 Core 12-Haney 1747 21-4 81% 12 NJ
4186 SVC 12 Gold 1747 19-2 90% 12 IA
4187 1 Flight 16-1 national 1747 31-19 62% 16 OR
4188 Athlete HQ 18-Stalker 1747 35-18 66% 18 OH
4189 MOD Elite 16-Blue 1747 37-41 47% 16 IL
4190 Black Bears 16-1 1747 47-11 80% 16 NC
4191 C1VB 16-One grvl 1747 53-24 69% 16 SC
4192 MN Select 14-1 1747 31-41 43% 14 MN
4193 RVA 15-Gladden 1747 27-32 46% 15 IA
4194 913Athletics 15-National-b 1747 25-11 69% 15 KS
4195 HRVC Hurricanes 18-1 1747 3-5 38% 18 ON
4196 StarsTJ 14 12 1747 9-2 82% 12 MX
4197 SVC 11-Orange 1746 26-6 81% 11 TN
4198 Colorado Skyline 13-Royal 1746 36-17 68% 13 CO
4199 KIVA 15-Grey 1746 45-20 69% 15 KY
4200 Steel City 16-1 1746 48-23 68% 16 AL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.