Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 83 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4101 L2 12-1 1750 41-15 73% 12 MI
4102 IMPACT 17-1s 1750 13-3 81% 17 TX
4103 ETA1 16-Black 1750 34-4 85% 16 TX
4104 ProPlay 14-Niloofar 1750 6-1 86% 14 CA
4105 Top Flight 12-Psi sp 1750 7-4 64% 12 IL
4106 Phoenix G15-Red 1750 35-12 74% 15 OH
4107 BAE 15-Mariah 1750 19-11 63% 15 CA
4108 Arete 12-Navy ethos 1750 29-21 53% 12 TX
4109 Cap City 14-National 1749 8-0 80% 14
4110 CRU MAX 14 1749 22-13 63% 14
4111 AR SELECT 17-Elite 1749 65-24 72% 17 AR
4112 HJV 16-National 1749 28-16 64% 16 TX
4113 Miami Hype 16-Prime2 1749 49-30 62% 16 FL
4114 Red Storm 15 National 1749 29-29 50% 15 LA
4115 SF TREMORS 15-Wolverines 1749 31-21 60% 15 CA
4116 SVA 14-Krush 1749 60-9 87% 14 AZ
4117 Ultimate G16-Blue 1749 47-11 81% 16 IL
4118 JJVA Club 13-C 1749 15-0 100% 13 FL
4119 HVC 14-Black 1749 26-4 81% 14 BC
4120 Club 217 18-Lainey 1749 32-12 73% 18 IL
4121 Idaho ONE 13-Blue 1749 42-15 72% 13 ID
4122 Ignite 16-Brooke 1749 25-11 69% 16 UT
4123 MN Select 17-Black 1749 51-28 65% 17 MN
4124 Tstreet 14-Adam 1749 25-17 60% 14 CA
4125 Rise Volleyball 14-Purple 1749 7-8 47% 14 CA
4126 Dig This! VBC 13-Black 1749 28-8 78% 13 NV
4127 Flyers 14-Usa-kevin 1749 28-24 52% 14 TX
4128 UVA 15-S elite 1749 5-0 100% 15 VA
4129 No Limits 16-Elite 1749 29-22 53% 16 FL
4130 Wrecking Crew 13-1 1749 10-6 63% 13 TX
4131 Team Pineapple 14-Black 1749 29-15 66% 14 IN
4132 AVC CLE 14-White 1749 21-32 40% 14 OH
4133 AZ REV 15 Elite (MN) 1749 6-3 67% 15
4134 WSRVC 10-Sims 1748 31-3 91% 10
4135 Bandits 14-1 1748 17-1 85% 14
4136 South Georgia Heat 15-1 1748 29-4 88% 15
4137 TFSC 14-Phoenix 1748 13-5 72% 14
4138 SWMNVB 16-2 1748 26-11 70% 16
4139 United VBA 15-Purple 1748 45-21 68% 15 TX
4140 Angelo Premier 17 1748 38-11 78% 17 TX
4141 CPA 16 Coupland 1748 32-15 68% 16 WA
4142 Shock 18-Ua storm 1748 20-2 91% 18 IL
4143 APEX1 15-Black 1748 42-18 70% 15 CA
4144 Black Bears 16-1 1748 47-11 80% 16 NC
4145 Eastside 14-A boswell 1748 34-7 83% 14 OH
4146 FeVA 16 1748 43-26 62% 16 WA
4147 SBVC Girls 18 Molten 1748 30-13 70% 18 CA
4148 Tribe 12-Elite navy 1748 36-16 69% 12 FL
4149 VA Elite 18 1748 34-31 52% 18 VA
4150 3CVBC 14-White 1748 41-15 73% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.