2025-2026 Season — Page 83 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4101 | L2 12-1 | 1750 | 41-15 | 73% | 12 | MI |
| 4102 | IMPACT 17-1s | 1750 | 13-3 | 81% | 17 | TX |
| 4103 | ETA1 16-Black | 1750 | 34-4 | 85% | 16 | TX |
| 4104 | ProPlay 14-Niloofar | 1750 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | CA |
| 4105 | Top Flight 12-Psi sp | 1750 | 7-4 | 64% | 12 | IL |
| 4106 | Phoenix G15-Red | 1750 | 35-12 | 74% | 15 | OH |
| 4107 | BAE 15-Mariah | 1750 | 19-11 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 4108 | Arete 12-Navy ethos | 1750 | 29-21 | 53% | 12 | TX |
| 4109 | Cap City 14-National | 1749 | 8-0 | 80% | 14 | |
| 4110 | CRU MAX 14 | 1749 | 22-13 | 63% | 14 | |
| 4111 | AR SELECT 17-Elite | 1749 | 65-24 | 72% | 17 | AR |
| 4112 | HJV 16-National | 1749 | 28-16 | 64% | 16 | TX |
| 4113 | Miami Hype 16-Prime2 | 1749 | 49-30 | 62% | 16 | FL |
| 4114 | Red Storm 15 National | 1749 | 29-29 | 50% | 15 | LA |
| 4115 | SF TREMORS 15-Wolverines | 1749 | 31-21 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 4116 | SVA 14-Krush | 1749 | 60-9 | 87% | 14 | AZ |
| 4117 | Ultimate G16-Blue | 1749 | 47-11 | 81% | 16 | IL |
| 4118 | JJVA Club 13-C | 1749 | 15-0 | 100% | 13 | FL |
| 4119 | HVC 14-Black | 1749 | 26-4 | 81% | 14 | BC |
| 4120 | Club 217 18-Lainey | 1749 | 32-12 | 73% | 18 | IL |
| 4121 | Idaho ONE 13-Blue | 1749 | 42-15 | 72% | 13 | ID |
| 4122 | Ignite 16-Brooke | 1749 | 25-11 | 69% | 16 | UT |
| 4123 | MN Select 17-Black | 1749 | 51-28 | 65% | 17 | MN |
| 4124 | Tstreet 14-Adam | 1749 | 25-17 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 4125 | Rise Volleyball 14-Purple | 1749 | 7-8 | 47% | 14 | CA |
| 4126 | Dig This! VBC 13-Black | 1749 | 28-8 | 78% | 13 | NV |
| 4127 | Flyers 14-Usa-kevin | 1749 | 28-24 | 52% | 14 | TX |
| 4128 | UVA 15-S elite | 1749 | 5-0 | 100% | 15 | VA |
| 4129 | No Limits 16-Elite | 1749 | 29-22 | 53% | 16 | FL |
| 4130 | Wrecking Crew 13-1 | 1749 | 10-6 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 4131 | Team Pineapple 14-Black | 1749 | 29-15 | 66% | 14 | IN |
| 4132 | AVC CLE 14-White | 1749 | 21-32 | 40% | 14 | OH |
| 4133 | AZ REV 15 Elite (MN) | 1749 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | |
| 4134 | WSRVC 10-Sims | 1748 | 31-3 | 91% | 10 | |
| 4135 | Bandits 14-1 | 1748 | 17-1 | 85% | 14 | |
| 4136 | South Georgia Heat 15-1 | 1748 | 29-4 | 88% | 15 | |
| 4137 | TFSC 14-Phoenix | 1748 | 13-5 | 72% | 14 | |
| 4138 | SWMNVB 16-2 | 1748 | 26-11 | 70% | 16 | |
| 4139 | United VBA 15-Purple | 1748 | 45-21 | 68% | 15 | TX |
| 4140 | Angelo Premier 17 | 1748 | 38-11 | 78% | 17 | TX |
| 4141 | CPA 16 Coupland | 1748 | 32-15 | 68% | 16 | WA |
| 4142 | Shock 18-Ua storm | 1748 | 20-2 | 91% | 18 | IL |
| 4143 | APEX1 15-Black | 1748 | 42-18 | 70% | 15 | CA |
| 4144 | Black Bears 16-1 | 1748 | 47-11 | 80% | 16 | NC |
| 4145 | Eastside 14-A boswell | 1748 | 34-7 | 83% | 14 | OH |
| 4146 | FeVA 16 | 1748 | 43-26 | 62% | 16 | WA |
| 4147 | SBVC Girls 18 Molten | 1748 | 30-13 | 70% | 18 | CA |
| 4148 | Tribe 12-Elite navy | 1748 | 36-16 | 69% | 12 | FL |
| 4149 | VA Elite 18 | 1748 | 34-31 | 52% | 18 | VA |
| 4150 | 3CVBC 14-White | 1748 | 41-15 | 73% | 14 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.