Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 83 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4101 Club 217 18-Lainey 1750 32-12 73% 18 IL
4102 NASA 13-Purple kelly 1750 36-5 86% 13 AL
4103 Prodigy 18-Red 1750 28-15 65% 18 KY
4104 Prodigy 14-1 premier 1750 36-25 59% 14 NY
4105 TEJAS 15-Black josh 1750 35-20 59% 15 TX
4106 TNT 12-Detonators 1750 35-14 71% 12 PA
4107 WVC 14-S 1749 25-4 86% 14 AL
4108 Carolina CHAOS 17 Royal 1749 35-33 51% 17 NC
4109 NIVA 14-WHITE 1749 35-13 73% 14 IN
4110 Cajun Elite 13 Beau 1749 33-16 67% 13 LA
4111 VVA 12-Haluska 1749 34-16 68% 12 CA
4112 A5 Chattanooga 14-1 1749 38-35 52% 14 GA
4113 Tribe 12-Elite navy 1749 36-16 69% 12 FL
4114 Southwest Wyoming Volleyball Club 12 SWVC RS12-PYER 1749 6-6 50% 12 WY
4115 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 18-National black 1749 20-18 53% 18 NV
4116 805 Elite 15-National 1749 36-16 69% 15 CA
4117 WSRVC 10-Sims 1749 31-3 91% 10 WY
4118 Riptide 18-Tsunami 1749 47-19 71% 18 ID
4119 MN Select 17-Black 1749 51-28 65% 17 MN
4120 Mill City 16-Orange 1749 23-16 59% 16 MA
4121 UVA 15-S elite 1749 5-0 100% 15 LA
4122 Inside Out 17-Mizuno black 1749 33-14 70% 17 MI
4123 L2 Volleyball Club 15 L2 251 1749 36-7 84% 15 MI
4124 FC United 14-Black 1749 19-3 86% 14 MO
4125 Royal Aces 12 1749 23-4 85% 12 IA
4126 CVC 15 ROYAL 1749 41-14 75% 15 OH
4127 516 Elite 12-Black 1749 17-6 74% 12 NY
4128 Shockwave 17-1 1749 7-10 35% 17 MI
4129 South Shore Slam 17-Nat 1749 23-11 68% 17 WI
4130 Phoenix G15-Red 1749 35-12 74% 15 OH
4131 Excel NW 15-1 lux 1749 40-31 56% 15 WA
4132 Oak Creek K-Force 13U 1749 37-8 82% 13 WI
4133 Scarborough Synergy VC 15 Synergy Titanium 1749 3-2 60% 15
4134 IMPACT 17-1s 1748 13-3 81% 17 TX
4135 DG Warriors 15-Gold 1748 48-16 75% 15 OH
4136 SWMNVB 16-2 1748 26-11 70% 16 MN
4137 SOSVBC 16-N carly 1748 17-7 71% 16 NY
4138 Tstreet Volleyball Club 13-Erika 1748 28-23 55% 13 CA
4139 Premier 16-1 blue 1748 51-15 75% 16 AL
4140 HEAT 16 NATIONAL 1748 52-22 68% 16 OK
4141 Galena Chaos 13U 1748 15-2 88% 13 IA
4142 Summit 14-Nat'l blue 1748 5-0 100% 14 TX
4143 Vegas United G18-Black 1748 32-24 57% 18 NV
4144 NKYVC 12-3 typhoon 1748 30-7 81% 12 KY
4145 DN 13-Red 1748 15-8 65% 13 TX
4146 Sportime 17-Gold 1748 40-33 55% 17 NY
4147 Horseshoe VBC 18-Red 1748 23-11 68% 18 PA
4148 NorStar 14-Teal 1748 30-21 59% 14 CA
4149 GRIT 12-Elite 1748 28-6 80% 12 AL
4150 BVC 14-Kim 1748 24-18 57% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.