2025-2026 Season — Page 82 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4051 | VPJ 16-Black | 1752 | 12-4 | 67% | 16 | |
| 4052 | 517 Elite 14-Black | 1751 | 36-13 | 73% | 14 | MI |
| 4053 | AR SELECT 17-Elite | 1751 | 65-24 | 72% | 17 | AR |
| 4054 | Big Sky 15-2 | 1751 | 40-13 | 69% | 15 | MT |
| 4055 | JJVA 15 Teal | 1751 | 32-49 | 40% | 15 | FL |
| 4056 | MAVS 816 16-Premier | 1751 | 36-10 | 78% | 16 | KS |
| 4057 | Anthem United 13-Agape | 1751 | 24-8 | 75% | 13 | GA |
| 4058 | NE Elite 14-Apex | 1751 | 28-14 | 67% | 14 | NE |
| 4059 | Miami Hype 14-Prime | 1751 | 44-31 | 59% | 14 | FL |
| 4060 | TVS 12 Talha | 1751 | 11-0 | 92% | 12 | TX |
| 4061 | Surfside 14-Mb elite | 1751 | 24-26 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 4062 | Laredo Premier 11-Fusion | 1751 | 11-1 | 92% | 11 | TX |
| 4063 | AV IMPACT 16-Shock | 1751 | 34-12 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 4064 | A4 Volley 18-Cassie | 1751 | 32-22 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 4065 | OMNI 18 Elite | 1751 | 44-24 | 65% | 18 | CA |
| 4066 | SETX Boom 12U | 1751 | 19-2 | 90% | 12 | TX |
| 4067 | Virginia Elite Volleyball Club 18 | 1751 | 34-31 | 52% | 18 | VA |
| 4068 | TPV 14-Zulu | 1751 | 43-27 | 61% | 14 | TN |
| 4069 | Club Integrity 15-1 | 1751 | 42-16 | 72% | 15 | PA |
| 4070 | VCN 15-Blue | 1751 | 12-3 | 80% | 15 | NE |
| 4071 | JJVA Club 13-C | 1751 | 15-0 | 100% | 13 | FL |
| 4072 | Elite 14-National alex | 1751 | 37-25 | 60% | 14 | FL |
| 4073 | CPA 16 Coupland | 1751 | 32-15 | 68% | 16 | WA |
| 4074 | Mindset Premier 12-Red | 1751 | 54-10 | 82% | 12 | IL |
| 4075 | Avidity 12-Ruby | 1751 | 33-8 | 80% | 12 | MA |
| 4076 | Aleta 17-1 | 1751 | 19-17 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 4077 | AmeriSports Volleyball Club 11-1 | 1751 | 8-7 | 53% | 11 | TX |
| 4078 | South Georgia Heat 15-1 | 1750 | 29-4 | 88% | 15 | |
| 4079 | PSVC 12-Mary jo | 1750 | 24-8 | 75% | 12 | SC |
| 4080 | Bay Area Eagles 15-G mariah | 1750 | 25-9 | 74% | 15 | CA |
| 4081 | PRV 15 | 1750 | 38-12 | 76% | 15 | SC |
| 4082 | Sportime 15-Black | 1750 | 37-23 | 62% | 15 | NY |
| 4083 | Peninsula Wild 16 Peninsula Wild (AK) (117) | 1750 | 8-2 | 80% | 16 | AK |
| 4084 | Mid City VBC 12-Black | 1750 | 31-16 | 66% | 12 | CA |
| 4085 | Blue Ridge 16-Orange | 1750 | 34-18 | 64% | 16 | VA |
| 4086 | VCNebraska 18 Elite | 1750 | 10-14 | 42% | 18 | NE |
| 4087 | Omni 16-N2 | 1750 | 45-18 | 71% | 16 | AZ |
| 4088 | AJV 15-Helix | 1750 | 46-23 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 4089 | KUIKAHI 18-Wahine roshambo | 1750 | 17-2 | 89% | 18 | HI |
| 4090 | Ignite AZ 13-National | 1750 | 48-44 | 52% | 13 | AZ |
| 4091 | TAV 14-Gold | 1750 | 22-19 | 48% | 14 | TX |
| 4092 | CALI 15-Blue | 1750 | 38-20 | 66% | 15 | NY |
| 4093 | Patriot Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1750 | 23-16 | 59% | 18 | VA |
| 4094 | HJV 16-National | 1750 | 28-16 | 64% | 16 | TX |
| 4095 | Kairos 15 Beta | 1750 | 29-36 | 45% | 15 | SD |
| 4096 | Falcon Fire 17-1 | 1750 | 23-6 | 74% | 17 | MN |
| 4097 | Eagan Juniors 14-S | 1750 | 12-3 | 80% | 14 | MN |
| 4098 | Country Fire 16-1 | 1750 | 53-17 | 75% | 16 | TX |
| 4099 | CTX JR 13-1 | 1750 | 9-1 | 90% | 13 | TX |
| 4100 | COV Team FB 14-1 | 1750 | 28-13 | 68% | 14 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.