Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 82 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4051 VPJ 16-Black 1752 12-4 67% 16
4052 NL 17-Gold 1752 37-7 84% 17
4053 CTX JR 13-1 1752 9-1 90% 13
4054 DAKOTA APEX 14-1 1751 35-8 73% 14
4055 Premier 16-1 blue 1751 51-15 75% 16
4056 FUSION 12-Blue 1751 25-4 86% 12 MN
4057 BVA - Lions 13-Elite 1751 22-16 58% 13 IL
4058 Kokoro Volleyball 14-2 1751 49-21 70% 14 MN
4059 Club Velocity 16-1 1751 18-9 67% 16 AR
4060 MT NW 12 Elite 1751 33-8 80% 12 MT
4061 ProPlay 16 Nicky 1751 38-15 72% 16 CA
4062 SNVF 16 KALA 1751 47-35 57% 16 WA
4063 Tstreet 13-Erika 1751 28-23 55% 13 CA
4064 TVS 12 Talha 1751 11-0 92% 12 TX
4065 Tstreet 16-Caitie 1751 30-26 54% 16 CA
4066 HRVC 16-National green 1751 32-19 63% 16 NC
4067 Jersey Jrs 15-1 1751 18-18 50% 15 NJ
4068 AVA TX 14-Adidas 1751 28-16 64% 14 TX
4069 Bay Area Eagles 15-G mariah 1751 25-9 74% 15 CA
4070 Rancho 18-Premier 1751 23-17 57% 18 CA
4071 Dime 12-Premier 1751 48-21 70% 12 CA
4072 Omni 16-N2 1751 45-18 71% 16 AZ
4073 Laredo Premier 11-Fusion 1751 11-1 92% 11 TX
4074 Prime Time 12-Pandas 1751 30-7 81% 12 IL
4075 AVC 12-Navy 1751 20-11 65% 12 VA
4076 TeamLVC Girls 16-Black 1751 4-6 40% 16 NY
4077 Lockdown VBC 14-Orioles 1751 35-14 71% 14 MA
4078 McHenry C. Jr's 12-Select 1751 30-12 71% 12 IL
4079 TC ELITE 14-Caley 1751 27-10 73% 14 LA
4080 Bristol Crush 18-Xia 1751 26-2 87% 18 CT
4081 Xtreme 14-Bratz (LK) 1751 21-3 88% 14 MI
4082 FPVC 15-Ren national 1751 8-0 100% 15 CA
4083 MC 16-1 shepherd 1750 29-6 71% 16
4084 Carolina CHAOS 17 Royal 1750 35-33 51% 17 NC
4085 Sportime 17-Gold 1750 40-33 55% 17 NY
4086 ATHENA VB 17-2 black national 1750 45-28 62% 17 OR
4087 CoJrs 14-Steve 1750 18-14 56% 14 CO
4088 MAVA 14-Select 1750 42-37 53% 14 KY
4089 A5 12-Laura 1750 43-29 60% 12 GA
4090 Pannix 13-Black 1750 17-6 74% 13 NC
4091 Lex United 15 Elite 1750 32-36 47% 15 KY
4092 Excel NW 15-1 lux 1750 40-31 56% 15 WA
4093 FC United 14-Black 1750 19-3 86% 14 MO
4094 OVA 18-Black 1750 37-16 70% 18 FL
4095 SETX Boom 12U 1750 19-2 90% 12 TX
4096 RISE 14 Regional 1750 40-15 73% 14 CA
4097 Velocity 14-Black 1750 31-9 78% 14 AR
4098 Mid City VBC 12-Black 1750 31-16 66% 12 CA
4099 Avidity 12-Ruby 1750 33-8 80% 12 MA
4100 VVA 12-Haluska 1750 34-16 68% 12 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.