Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 82 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4051 VPJ 16-Black 1752 12-4 67% 16
4052 517 Elite 14-Black 1751 36-13 73% 14 MI
4053 AR SELECT 17-Elite 1751 65-24 72% 17 AR
4054 Big Sky 15-2 1751 40-13 69% 15 MT
4055 JJVA 15 Teal 1751 32-49 40% 15 FL
4056 MAVS 816 16-Premier 1751 36-10 78% 16 KS
4057 Anthem United 13-Agape 1751 24-8 75% 13 GA
4058 NE Elite 14-Apex 1751 28-14 67% 14 NE
4059 Miami Hype 14-Prime 1751 44-31 59% 14 FL
4060 TVS 12 Talha 1751 11-0 92% 12 TX
4061 Surfside 14-Mb elite 1751 24-26 48% 14 CA
4062 Laredo Premier 11-Fusion 1751 11-1 92% 11 TX
4063 AV IMPACT 16-Shock 1751 34-12 74% 16 CA
4064 A4 Volley 18-Cassie 1751 32-22 59% 18 CA
4065 OMNI 18 Elite 1751 44-24 65% 18 CA
4066 SETX Boom 12U 1751 19-2 90% 12 TX
4067 Virginia Elite Volleyball Club 18 1751 34-31 52% 18 VA
4068 TPV 14-Zulu 1751 43-27 61% 14 TN
4069 Club Integrity 15-1 1751 42-16 72% 15 PA
4070 VCN 15-Blue 1751 12-3 80% 15 NE
4071 JJVA Club 13-C 1751 15-0 100% 13 FL
4072 Elite 14-National alex 1751 37-25 60% 14 FL
4073 CPA 16 Coupland 1751 32-15 68% 16 WA
4074 Mindset Premier 12-Red 1751 54-10 82% 12 IL
4075 Avidity 12-Ruby 1751 33-8 80% 12 MA
4076 Aleta 17-1 1751 19-17 53% 17 OH
4077 AmeriSports Volleyball Club 11-1 1751 8-7 53% 11 TX
4078 South Georgia Heat 15-1 1750 29-4 88% 15
4079 PSVC 12-Mary jo 1750 24-8 75% 12 SC
4080 Bay Area Eagles 15-G mariah 1750 25-9 74% 15 CA
4081 PRV 15 1750 38-12 76% 15 SC
4082 Sportime 15-Black 1750 37-23 62% 15 NY
4083 Peninsula Wild 16 Peninsula Wild (AK) (117) 1750 8-2 80% 16 AK
4084 Mid City VBC 12-Black 1750 31-16 66% 12 CA
4085 Blue Ridge 16-Orange 1750 34-18 64% 16 VA
4086 VCNebraska 18 Elite 1750 10-14 42% 18 NE
4087 Omni 16-N2 1750 45-18 71% 16 AZ
4088 AJV 15-Helix 1750 46-23 67% 15 TX
4089 KUIKAHI 18-Wahine roshambo 1750 17-2 89% 18 HI
4090 Ignite AZ 13-National 1750 48-44 52% 13 AZ
4091 TAV 14-Gold 1750 22-19 48% 14 TX
4092 CALI 15-Blue 1750 38-20 66% 15 NY
4093 Patriot Volleyball Club 18-1 1750 23-16 59% 18 VA
4094 HJV 16-National 1750 28-16 64% 16 TX
4095 Kairos 15 Beta 1750 29-36 45% 15 SD
4096 Falcon Fire 17-1 1750 23-6 74% 17 MN
4097 Eagan Juniors 14-S 1750 12-3 80% 14 MN
4098 Country Fire 16-1 1750 53-17 75% 16 TX
4099 CTX JR 13-1 1750 9-1 90% 13 TX
4100 COV Team FB 14-1 1750 28-13 68% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.