Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 81 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4001 SWMNVB 16-W 1754 11-5 69% 16 MN
4002 Idaho ONE 13-Blue 1754 42-15 72% 13 ID
4003 Team Colorado 15-N1 1754 40-15 73% 15 CO
4004 VCN 14-Blue 1754 12-4 75% 14 NE
4005 Barefoot 15-Navy 1754 20-2 91% 15 TX
4006 ProPlay 14-Niloofar 1753 6-1 86% 14 CA
4007 Reef 16-National brendan 1753 48-17 74% 16 CA
4008 Preds 14-Girls validus 1753 10-6 63% 14 OH
4009 Red Storm 15 National 1753 29-29 50% 15 LA
4010 Chi City Elite 16-1 1753 24-29 45% 16 IL
4011 Adversity 15-Adidas 1753 26-40 39% 15 IL
4012 Club Fusion 13-Black 1753 20-3 87% 13 IL
4013 Tstreet 14-Adam 1753 25-17 60% 14 CA
4014 OVA 18-Black 1753 37-16 70% 18 FL
4015 Dig This! VB Ohana 13-Black 1753 5-1 83% 13 NV
4016 No Limits 16-Elite 1753 29-22 53% 16 TX
4017 Amarillo Xtreme 15-1% 1753 30-12 71% 15 TX
4018 808AC 15-Tarann 1753 49-23 68% 15 HI
4019 Alpha 17-1 1753 45-23 66% 17 KY
4020 Jersey Jrs 15-1 1753 18-18 50% 15 NJ
4021 MJVA 14-Elite teal 1753 40-15 73% 14 TN
4022 Velocity 14-Black 1753 31-9 78% 14 MS
4023 VIRAGO 15 Elite 1753 56-22 72% 15 OK
4024 Academy 17-E riptide 1753 45-40 53% 17 IN
4025 Synergy 14 Blaze 1753 29-32 48% 14 PA
4026 MOVA 18-M 1752 26-9 74% 18 OH
4027 Tstreet Volleyball Club 16-Caitie 1752 30-26 54% 16 CA
4028 Club South 16-Black 1752 22-13 63% 16 WA
4029 L2 12-1 1752 41-15 73% 12 MI
4030 DCVA 14-N1 katie 1752 6-1 86% 14 CO
4031 OCTANE PENN YORK 16-1 1752 9-0 100% 16 MA
4032 DNVB 16-Red 1752 2-5 29% 16 MA
4033 SoFLO 14-Premier 1752 59-11 84% 14 FL
4034 787EV 10-Alexie 1752 13-1 93% 10 PR
4035 CPA 13 McShane 1752 24-10 71% 13 WA
4036 Pannix 13-Black 1752 17-6 74% 13 NC
4037 FRVBC 12-Black 1752 32-11 74% 12 CO
4038 SF TREMORS 15-Wolverines 1752 31-21 60% 15 CA
4039 EPIC FLB 14-Blue 1752 11-0 100% 14 OH
4040 Club Solano 11 Maroon 1752 41-25 62% 11 CA
4041 Lubbock Impact Volleyball 13-Black 1752 25-10 71% 13 TX
4042 rising all stars 14 1752 6-0 100% 14 IL
4043 SMV 16-2 silver 1752 52-18 74% 16 MN
4044 CRU MAX 14 1752 22-13 63% 14 WA
4045 RRHeat 16-1 hanna 1752 27-18 60% 16 UT
4046 Digs 16-White 1752 39-17 70% 16 NJ
4047 SKY Elite 14-Black 1752 23-9 72% 14 PA
4048 LC Sharks 15-Elite 1752 28-12 70% 15 TX
4049 Anthem United 14-Agape 1752 24-13 65% 14 GA
4050 SCBandits 17-1 1752 17-7 71% 17 ON
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.