2025-2026 Season — Page 81 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4001 | SWMNVB 16-W | 1754 | 11-5 | 69% | 16 | MN |
| 4002 | Idaho ONE 13-Blue | 1754 | 42-15 | 72% | 13 | ID |
| 4003 | Team Colorado 15-N1 | 1754 | 40-15 | 73% | 15 | CO |
| 4004 | VCN 14-Blue | 1754 | 12-4 | 75% | 14 | NE |
| 4005 | Barefoot 15-Navy | 1754 | 20-2 | 91% | 15 | TX |
| 4006 | ProPlay 14-Niloofar | 1753 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | CA |
| 4007 | Reef 16-National brendan | 1753 | 48-17 | 74% | 16 | CA |
| 4008 | Preds 14-Girls validus | 1753 | 10-6 | 63% | 14 | OH |
| 4009 | Red Storm 15 National | 1753 | 29-29 | 50% | 15 | LA |
| 4010 | Chi City Elite 16-1 | 1753 | 24-29 | 45% | 16 | IL |
| 4011 | Adversity 15-Adidas | 1753 | 26-40 | 39% | 15 | IL |
| 4012 | Club Fusion 13-Black | 1753 | 20-3 | 87% | 13 | IL |
| 4013 | Tstreet 14-Adam | 1753 | 25-17 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 4014 | OVA 18-Black | 1753 | 37-16 | 70% | 18 | FL |
| 4015 | Dig This! VB Ohana 13-Black | 1753 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | NV |
| 4016 | No Limits 16-Elite | 1753 | 29-22 | 53% | 16 | TX |
| 4017 | Amarillo Xtreme 15-1% | 1753 | 30-12 | 71% | 15 | TX |
| 4018 | 808AC 15-Tarann | 1753 | 49-23 | 68% | 15 | HI |
| 4019 | Alpha 17-1 | 1753 | 45-23 | 66% | 17 | KY |
| 4020 | Jersey Jrs 15-1 | 1753 | 18-18 | 50% | 15 | NJ |
| 4021 | MJVA 14-Elite teal | 1753 | 40-15 | 73% | 14 | TN |
| 4022 | Velocity 14-Black | 1753 | 31-9 | 78% | 14 | MS |
| 4023 | VIRAGO 15 Elite | 1753 | 56-22 | 72% | 15 | OK |
| 4024 | Academy 17-E riptide | 1753 | 45-40 | 53% | 17 | IN |
| 4025 | Synergy 14 Blaze | 1753 | 29-32 | 48% | 14 | PA |
| 4026 | MOVA 18-M | 1752 | 26-9 | 74% | 18 | OH |
| 4027 | Tstreet Volleyball Club 16-Caitie | 1752 | 30-26 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 4028 | Club South 16-Black | 1752 | 22-13 | 63% | 16 | WA |
| 4029 | L2 12-1 | 1752 | 41-15 | 73% | 12 | MI |
| 4030 | DCVA 14-N1 katie | 1752 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | CO |
| 4031 | OCTANE PENN YORK 16-1 | 1752 | 9-0 | 100% | 16 | MA |
| 4032 | DNVB 16-Red | 1752 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | MA |
| 4033 | SoFLO 14-Premier | 1752 | 59-11 | 84% | 14 | FL |
| 4034 | 787EV 10-Alexie | 1752 | 13-1 | 93% | 10 | PR |
| 4035 | CPA 13 McShane | 1752 | 24-10 | 71% | 13 | WA |
| 4036 | Pannix 13-Black | 1752 | 17-6 | 74% | 13 | NC |
| 4037 | FRVBC 12-Black | 1752 | 32-11 | 74% | 12 | CO |
| 4038 | SF TREMORS 15-Wolverines | 1752 | 31-21 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 4039 | EPIC FLB 14-Blue | 1752 | 11-0 | 100% | 14 | OH |
| 4040 | Club Solano 11 Maroon | 1752 | 41-25 | 62% | 11 | CA |
| 4041 | Lubbock Impact Volleyball 13-Black | 1752 | 25-10 | 71% | 13 | TX |
| 4042 | rising all stars 14 | 1752 | 6-0 | 100% | 14 | IL |
| 4043 | SMV 16-2 silver | 1752 | 52-18 | 74% | 16 | MN |
| 4044 | CRU MAX 14 | 1752 | 22-13 | 63% | 14 | WA |
| 4045 | RRHeat 16-1 hanna | 1752 | 27-18 | 60% | 16 | UT |
| 4046 | Digs 16-White | 1752 | 39-17 | 70% | 16 | NJ |
| 4047 | SKY Elite 14-Black | 1752 | 23-9 | 72% | 14 | PA |
| 4048 | LC Sharks 15-Elite | 1752 | 28-12 | 70% | 15 | TX |
| 4049 | Anthem United 14-Agape | 1752 | 24-13 | 65% | 14 | GA |
| 4050 | SCBandits 17-1 | 1752 | 17-7 | 71% | 17 | ON |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.