Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 81 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
4001 HJV 10 Elite 1754 11-3 79% 10 TX
4002 NLVC 16-National 1754 26-12 68% 16 NJ
4003 USA South 17-Premier purple 1754 22-27 45% 17 FL
4004 Tstreet LV 17-Chris 1754 34-34 50% 17 NV
4005 Sky High Adidas 16-Red 1754 42-17 71% 16 IL
4006 GSEVC 18-Premier 1754 22-32 41% 18 NJ
4007 CALI 15-Blue 1754 38-20 66% 15 NY
4008 London Elite 15-American 1754 9-2 82% 15 OH
4009 South Elite 15-Pipe 1754 6-2 75% 15 PR
4010 EVA 16-Blue 1754 41-16 72% 16 KY
4011 EMV 14-Black rosana 1754 29-11 64% 14 TX
4012 Premier 15-Black m 1754 24-16 60% 15 TX
4013 Basin Elite 15 1754 9-2 82% 15 UT
4014 A5 Chattanooga 12-1 1754 24-5 83% 12 TN
4015 TFVC 17-1 1753 24-7 77% 17 TN
4016 PSVC 12-Mary jo 1753 24-8 75% 12 SC
4017 Exodus 15-Breeze 1753 20-13 61% 15 CA
4018 FC Elite 15-Blue 1753 41-12 77% 15 WI
4019 MJVA 14-Elite black 1753 34-21 62% 14 TN
4020 MVP 15-Blue 1753 41-41 50% 15 WI
4021 913Athletics 15-National-b 1753 25-11 69% 15 KS
4022 KUIKAHI 18-Wahine roshambo 1753 17-2 89% 18 HI
4023 FRVBC 12-Black 1753 32-11 74% 12 CO
4024 Vision 14-White 1753 27-10 73% 14 CA
4025 805 Elite 17-National 1753 37-16 70% 17 CA
4026 Academy 18 Crystal 1753 30-22 58% 18 NC
4027 WVC 14-S 1753 25-4 86% 14 OR
4028 ECVC 16-National - wayne 1753 27-7 79% 16 VA
4029 Top Notch 13-Elite 1753 27-13 68% 13 IL
4030 TPV 14-Zulu 1752 43-27 61% 14
4031 Northern Lights 13-2 1752 44-26 63% 13 MN
4032 Ascent 14-Black 1752 28-19 60% 14 AZ
4033 CJV 16-Select white 1752 53-10 84% 16 NC
4034 EPIC FLB 14-Blue 1752 11-0 100% 14 OH
4035 PI RAGE 14-1 gold 1752 22-5 81% 14 CA
4036 Riptide 18-Tsunami 1752 47-19 71% 18 WA
4037 TNT 17-Platinum 1752 18-12 60% 17 PA
4038 517 Elite 14-Black 1752 36-13 73% 14 MI
4039 A5 Gwinnett 14-April 1752 35-14 71% 14 GA
4040 787EV 10-Alexie 1752 13-1 93% 10 PR
4041 GRIT 18-Premier 1752 33-9 79% 18 AL
4042 Rio Grande Elite 15-1 1752 15-1 94% 15 TX
4043 Katy Stars 16 Elite 1752 39-16 71% 16 TX
4044 LOBOS 17-Black 1752 33-16 67% 17 CO
4045 Club South 16-Black 1752 22-13 63% 16 WA
4046 Inside Out 17-Mizuno black 1752 33-14 70% 17 MI
4047 FC Elite 14-White 1752 23-18 56% 14 WI
4048 Hoosier Elite Hysteria 13-1 1752 36-33 52% 13 IN
4049 Vision 12-Exv black 1752 24-11 65% 12 CA
4050 Coast VA 14-1 1752 45-23 66% 14 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.