2025-2026 Season — Page 81 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4001 | HJV 10 Elite | 1754 | 11-3 | 79% | 10 | TX |
| 4002 | NLVC 16-National | 1754 | 26-12 | 68% | 16 | NJ |
| 4003 | USA South 17-Premier purple | 1754 | 22-27 | 45% | 17 | FL |
| 4004 | Tstreet LV 17-Chris | 1754 | 34-34 | 50% | 17 | NV |
| 4005 | Sky High Adidas 16-Red | 1754 | 42-17 | 71% | 16 | IL |
| 4006 | GSEVC 18-Premier | 1754 | 22-32 | 41% | 18 | NJ |
| 4007 | CALI 15-Blue | 1754 | 38-20 | 66% | 15 | NY |
| 4008 | London Elite 15-American | 1754 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | OH |
| 4009 | South Elite 15-Pipe | 1754 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | PR |
| 4010 | EVA 16-Blue | 1754 | 41-16 | 72% | 16 | KY |
| 4011 | EMV 14-Black rosana | 1754 | 29-11 | 64% | 14 | TX |
| 4012 | Premier 15-Black m | 1754 | 24-16 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 4013 | Basin Elite 15 | 1754 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | UT |
| 4014 | A5 Chattanooga 12-1 | 1754 | 24-5 | 83% | 12 | TN |
| 4015 | TFVC 17-1 | 1753 | 24-7 | 77% | 17 | TN |
| 4016 | PSVC 12-Mary jo | 1753 | 24-8 | 75% | 12 | SC |
| 4017 | Exodus 15-Breeze | 1753 | 20-13 | 61% | 15 | CA |
| 4018 | FC Elite 15-Blue | 1753 | 41-12 | 77% | 15 | WI |
| 4019 | MJVA 14-Elite black | 1753 | 34-21 | 62% | 14 | TN |
| 4020 | MVP 15-Blue | 1753 | 41-41 | 50% | 15 | WI |
| 4021 | 913Athletics 15-National-b | 1753 | 25-11 | 69% | 15 | KS |
| 4022 | KUIKAHI 18-Wahine roshambo | 1753 | 17-2 | 89% | 18 | HI |
| 4023 | FRVBC 12-Black | 1753 | 32-11 | 74% | 12 | CO |
| 4024 | Vision 14-White | 1753 | 27-10 | 73% | 14 | CA |
| 4025 | 805 Elite 17-National | 1753 | 37-16 | 70% | 17 | CA |
| 4026 | Academy 18 Crystal | 1753 | 30-22 | 58% | 18 | NC |
| 4027 | WVC 14-S | 1753 | 25-4 | 86% | 14 | OR |
| 4028 | ECVC 16-National - wayne | 1753 | 27-7 | 79% | 16 | VA |
| 4029 | Top Notch 13-Elite | 1753 | 27-13 | 68% | 13 | IL |
| 4030 | TPV 14-Zulu | 1752 | 43-27 | 61% | 14 | |
| 4031 | Northern Lights 13-2 | 1752 | 44-26 | 63% | 13 | MN |
| 4032 | Ascent 14-Black | 1752 | 28-19 | 60% | 14 | AZ |
| 4033 | CJV 16-Select white | 1752 | 53-10 | 84% | 16 | NC |
| 4034 | EPIC FLB 14-Blue | 1752 | 11-0 | 100% | 14 | OH |
| 4035 | PI RAGE 14-1 gold | 1752 | 22-5 | 81% | 14 | CA |
| 4036 | Riptide 18-Tsunami | 1752 | 47-19 | 71% | 18 | WA |
| 4037 | TNT 17-Platinum | 1752 | 18-12 | 60% | 17 | PA |
| 4038 | 517 Elite 14-Black | 1752 | 36-13 | 73% | 14 | MI |
| 4039 | A5 Gwinnett 14-April | 1752 | 35-14 | 71% | 14 | GA |
| 4040 | 787EV 10-Alexie | 1752 | 13-1 | 93% | 10 | PR |
| 4041 | GRIT 18-Premier | 1752 | 33-9 | 79% | 18 | AL |
| 4042 | Rio Grande Elite 15-1 | 1752 | 15-1 | 94% | 15 | TX |
| 4043 | Katy Stars 16 Elite | 1752 | 39-16 | 71% | 16 | TX |
| 4044 | LOBOS 17-Black | 1752 | 33-16 | 67% | 17 | CO |
| 4045 | Club South 16-Black | 1752 | 22-13 | 63% | 16 | WA |
| 4046 | Inside Out 17-Mizuno black | 1752 | 33-14 | 70% | 17 | MI |
| 4047 | FC Elite 14-White | 1752 | 23-18 | 56% | 14 | WI |
| 4048 | Hoosier Elite Hysteria 13-1 | 1752 | 36-33 | 52% | 13 | IN |
| 4049 | Vision 12-Exv black | 1752 | 24-11 | 65% | 12 | CA |
| 4050 | Coast VA 14-1 | 1752 | 45-23 | 66% | 14 | VA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.