Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 80 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3951 RRHeat 16-1 hanna 1756 27-18 60% 16 UT
3952 OCVBC 14-1 1755 25-5 83% 14 NJ
3953 VVA 14-Catalan 1755 30-30 50% 14 CA
3954 UVA 14-Jel 1755 33-15 69% 14 VA
3955 Alliance 15-Regional 1755 23-4 85% 15 TN
3956 Austin Skyline 16-B ellie 1755 22-19 54% 16 TX
3957 Club One AZ 13-Titanium 1755 40-25 62% 13 AZ
3958 Crossfire VBC 18-Blaze 1755 29-4 85% 18 MN
3959 Headlines VBC 16-Navy 1755 26-27 49% 16 OH
3960 MOVA 18-M 1755 26-9 74% 18 OH
3961 SVA 16 Attack 1755 46-10 82% 16 AZ
3962 TNT 12-Detonators 1755 35-14 71% 12 PA
3963 573 18-National a 1755 21-5 78% 18 MO
3964 ACT 15-Henry 1755 35-18 66% 15 CA
3965 Juggernaut 15-National1 1755 54-30 64% 15 CO
3966 Iowa One 13-Aly 1755 22-3 88% 13 IA
3967 LBK 14-1 1755 45-15 75% 14 OH
3968 VAQUERAS 18-F ariel 1755 13-15 46% 18 PR
3969 LC Ice 14 1755 33-5 87% 14 LA
3970 Club Fusion 13-Black 1755 20-3 87% 13 IL
3971 Coastal 16-1 national 1755 37-14 73% 16 MA
3972 Surfside 14-Mb elite 1755 24-26 48% 14 CA
3973 Aleta 17-1 1755 19-17 53% 17 OH
3974 H Skyline 14-Silver 1755 20-7 67% 14 TX
3975 Oiler Attack 13-Black 1755 17-1 94% 13 OH
3976 Reef VBC 15-National george 1755 9-1 90% 15 CA
3977 Barefoot 15-Navy 1755 20-2 91% 15 TX
3978 Instinct 14-Wild gold 1755 16-8 55% 14 TX
3979 Idaho Peak BRI 17-S 1755 11-6 61% 17
3980 Tremont Turks 16 1755 27-4 87% 16
3981 Idaho Peak 16-S jayde 1755 17-11 61% 16
3982 Ama Xtreme 13-Shock 1755 6-0 100% 13
3983 High Voltage 17-1 1755 35-7 81% 17 MN
3984 MVVC G 13-Black 1755 45-22 67% 13 CA
3985 Slainte 15-Nationals 1755 15-7 68% 15 CA
3986 SynergyForce 13-2 natl 1755 28-20 58% 13 CA
3987 Laguna Niguel Breakers 13-1 1755 31-13 70% 13 CA
3988 Slainte 14-White 1755 32-4 89% 14 CA
3989 Vibe 15-Black 1755 12-10 55% 15 CA
3990 Nordiques Jr 15 1754 3-2 60% 15
3991 Junior Jays 14 1754 32-8 80% 14
3992 NIVA 14-WHITE 1754 35-13 73% 14 IN
3993 Anthem United 14-Agape 1754 24-13 65% 14 GA
3994 MJVA 14-Elite teal 1754 40-15 73% 14 TN
3995 EliteVBTC 14-Blue 1754 41-24 63% 14 OH
3996 HP South 14-Diamond 1754 38-16 68% 14 MO
3997 Buckeyefire 13-1 1754 52-13 80% 13 OH
3998 FSJ 11-1 regional plus 1754 35-7 81% 11 AR
3999 Amarillo Xtreme 15-1% 1754 30-12 71% 15 TX
4000 Chi City Elite 16-1 1754 24-29 45% 16 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.