2025-2026 Season — Page 80 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3951 | RRHeat 16-1 hanna | 1756 | 27-18 | 60% | 16 | UT |
| 3952 | OCVBC 14-1 | 1755 | 25-5 | 83% | 14 | NJ |
| 3953 | VVA 14-Catalan | 1755 | 30-30 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 3954 | UVA 14-Jel | 1755 | 33-15 | 69% | 14 | VA |
| 3955 | Alliance 15-Regional | 1755 | 23-4 | 85% | 15 | TN |
| 3956 | Austin Skyline 16-B ellie | 1755 | 22-19 | 54% | 16 | TX |
| 3957 | Club One AZ 13-Titanium | 1755 | 40-25 | 62% | 13 | AZ |
| 3958 | Crossfire VBC 18-Blaze | 1755 | 29-4 | 85% | 18 | MN |
| 3959 | Headlines VBC 16-Navy | 1755 | 26-27 | 49% | 16 | OH |
| 3960 | MOVA 18-M | 1755 | 26-9 | 74% | 18 | OH |
| 3961 | SVA 16 Attack | 1755 | 46-10 | 82% | 16 | AZ |
| 3962 | TNT 12-Detonators | 1755 | 35-14 | 71% | 12 | PA |
| 3963 | 573 18-National a | 1755 | 21-5 | 78% | 18 | MO |
| 3964 | ACT 15-Henry | 1755 | 35-18 | 66% | 15 | CA |
| 3965 | Juggernaut 15-National1 | 1755 | 54-30 | 64% | 15 | CO |
| 3966 | Iowa One 13-Aly | 1755 | 22-3 | 88% | 13 | IA |
| 3967 | LBK 14-1 | 1755 | 45-15 | 75% | 14 | OH |
| 3968 | VAQUERAS 18-F ariel | 1755 | 13-15 | 46% | 18 | PR |
| 3969 | LC Ice 14 | 1755 | 33-5 | 87% | 14 | LA |
| 3970 | Club Fusion 13-Black | 1755 | 20-3 | 87% | 13 | IL |
| 3971 | Coastal 16-1 national | 1755 | 37-14 | 73% | 16 | MA |
| 3972 | Surfside 14-Mb elite | 1755 | 24-26 | 48% | 14 | CA |
| 3973 | Aleta 17-1 | 1755 | 19-17 | 53% | 17 | OH |
| 3974 | H Skyline 14-Silver | 1755 | 20-7 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 3975 | Oiler Attack 13-Black | 1755 | 17-1 | 94% | 13 | OH |
| 3976 | Reef VBC 15-National george | 1755 | 9-1 | 90% | 15 | CA |
| 3977 | Barefoot 15-Navy | 1755 | 20-2 | 91% | 15 | TX |
| 3978 | Instinct 14-Wild gold | 1755 | 16-8 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 3979 | Idaho Peak BRI 17-S | 1755 | 11-6 | 61% | 17 | |
| 3980 | Tremont Turks 16 | 1755 | 27-4 | 87% | 16 | |
| 3981 | Idaho Peak 16-S jayde | 1755 | 17-11 | 61% | 16 | |
| 3982 | Ama Xtreme 13-Shock | 1755 | 6-0 | 100% | 13 | |
| 3983 | High Voltage 17-1 | 1755 | 35-7 | 81% | 17 | MN |
| 3984 | MVVC G 13-Black | 1755 | 45-22 | 67% | 13 | CA |
| 3985 | Slainte 15-Nationals | 1755 | 15-7 | 68% | 15 | CA |
| 3986 | SynergyForce 13-2 natl | 1755 | 28-20 | 58% | 13 | CA |
| 3987 | Laguna Niguel Breakers 13-1 | 1755 | 31-13 | 70% | 13 | CA |
| 3988 | Slainte 14-White | 1755 | 32-4 | 89% | 14 | CA |
| 3989 | Vibe 15-Black | 1755 | 12-10 | 55% | 15 | CA |
| 3990 | Nordiques Jr 15 | 1754 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | |
| 3991 | Junior Jays 14 | 1754 | 32-8 | 80% | 14 | |
| 3992 | NIVA 14-WHITE | 1754 | 35-13 | 73% | 14 | IN |
| 3993 | Anthem United 14-Agape | 1754 | 24-13 | 65% | 14 | GA |
| 3994 | MJVA 14-Elite teal | 1754 | 40-15 | 73% | 14 | TN |
| 3995 | EliteVBTC 14-Blue | 1754 | 41-24 | 63% | 14 | OH |
| 3996 | HP South 14-Diamond | 1754 | 38-16 | 68% | 14 | MO |
| 3997 | Buckeyefire 13-1 | 1754 | 52-13 | 80% | 13 | OH |
| 3998 | FSJ 11-1 regional plus | 1754 | 35-7 | 81% | 11 | AR |
| 3999 | Amarillo Xtreme 15-1% | 1754 | 30-12 | 71% | 15 | TX |
| 4000 | Chi City Elite 16-1 | 1754 | 24-29 | 45% | 16 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.