2025-2026 Season — Page 80 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3951 | BSVBC 10-Black | 1756 | 20-4 | 83% | 10 | IL |
| 3952 | Sanford Sports 12-Red | 1756 | 33-9 | 79% | 12 | SD |
| 3953 | Prime Time 12-Pandas | 1756 | 30-7 | 81% | 12 | IL |
| 3954 | Texas One 17-Royal | 1756 | 34-16 | 68% | 17 | TX |
| 3955 | Alamo 16-Elite 2 | 1756 | 36-20 | 64% | 16 | TX |
| 3956 | Midwest Penguins 18-1 | 1756 | 30-15 | 67% | 18 | WI |
| 3957 | Austin Skyline 16-B ellie | 1756 | 22-19 | 54% | 16 | TX |
| 3958 | VVA 14-Catalan | 1756 | 30-30 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 3959 | Aspire 18 Premier | 1756 | 43-24 | 64% | 18 | AZ |
| 3960 | PREVA 14-Joshua | 1756 | 14-15 | 48% | 14 | PR |
| 3961 | Powell 12-1 | 1756 | 13-5 | 59% | 12 | MT |
| 3962 | Lubbock Impact Volleyball 15-Black | 1756 | 21-15 | 58% | 15 | TX |
| 3963 | Ama Xtreme 13-Shock | 1756 | 6-0 | 100% | 13 | |
| 3964 | RVC 12-Royal | 1756 | 21-4 | 84% | 12 | IL |
| 3965 | Cut Shot VBC 14-1 | 1755 | 20-0 | 100% | 14 | CA |
| 3966 | TNT 17-Platinum | 1755 | 18-12 | 60% | 17 | PA |
| 3967 | H Skyline 14-Silver | 1755 | 20-7 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 3968 | NorthShore 15 Hammerheads | 1755 | 33-25 | 57% | 15 | MI |
| 3969 | FSJ 11-1 regional plus | 1755 | 35-7 | 81% | 11 | AR |
| 3970 | PVC 14-1a | 1755 | 47-26 | 64% | 14 | FL |
| 3971 | UVA 14-Jel | 1755 | 33-15 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 3972 | GSI 13-Green venice | 1755 | 27-14 | 66% | 13 | FL |
| 3973 | Top Notch 13-Elite | 1755 | 27-13 | 68% | 13 | MO |
| 3974 | BAE 15-Mariah | 1755 | 19-11 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 3975 | Juggernaut 15-National1 | 1755 | 54-30 | 64% | 15 | CO |
| 3976 | ACESZ 18-Black | 1755 | 20-1 | 95% | 18 | MI |
| 3977 | Idaho Peak 16-S jayde | 1755 | 17-11 | 61% | 16 | ID |
| 3978 | Tstreet LV 17-Chris | 1755 | 34-34 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 3979 | NJ RONIN 16 KATANA | 1755 | 23-15 | 61% | 16 | NJ |
| 3980 | MT NW 12 Elite | 1755 | 33-8 | 80% | 12 | MT |
| 3981 | MVIce 12-P jayne | 1755 | 11-7 | 55% | 12 | ID |
| 3982 | Metro Volleyball Club 14-North | 1755 | 48-23 | 66% | 14 | DC |
| 3983 | EMV 14-Black rosana | 1755 | 29-11 | 64% | 14 | TX |
| 3984 | CSNS 13 | 1755 | 31-6 | 84% | 13 | SC |
| 3985 | FOCUS 17 18-Christy | 1754 | 27-5 | 84% | 17 | |
| 3986 | Omaha Volleyball Club 14 OVC Black | 1754 | 15-5 | 75% | 14 | |
| 3987 | South Elite 15-Pipe | 1754 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | PR |
| 3988 | 1st Alliance 17-Grey | 1754 | 36-16 | 69% | 17 | IL |
| 3989 | MVP 15-Blue | 1754 | 41-41 | 50% | 15 | WI |
| 3990 | GSEVC 18-Premier | 1754 | 22-32 | 41% | 18 | NJ |
| 3991 | 915 18-Ruben | 1754 | 40-29 | 58% | 18 | TX |
| 3992 | Katy Stars 16 Elite | 1754 | 39-16 | 71% | 16 | TX |
| 3993 | LVL 13 ABBY | 1754 | 33-14 | 70% | 13 | LA |
| 3994 | EP Elite 11-Smack | 1754 | 25-13 | 61% | 11 | TX |
| 3995 | EVA 16-Blue | 1754 | 41-16 | 72% | 16 | KY |
| 3996 | Nebraska ONE 15-Black | 1754 | 16-13 | 55% | 15 | NE |
| 3997 | Iowa One 13-Aly | 1754 | 22-3 | 88% | 13 | IA |
| 3998 | United VBA 15-Purple | 1754 | 45-21 | 68% | 15 | TX |
| 3999 | G3VB 18-1 | 1754 | 36-32 | 53% | 18 | OR |
| 4000 | PI RAGE 14-1 gold | 1754 | 22-5 | 81% | 14 | MN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.