Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 80 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3951 BSVBC 10-Black 1756 20-4 83% 10 IL
3952 Sanford Sports 12-Red 1756 33-9 79% 12 SD
3953 Prime Time 12-Pandas 1756 30-7 81% 12 IL
3954 Texas One 17-Royal 1756 34-16 68% 17 TX
3955 Alamo 16-Elite 2 1756 36-20 64% 16 TX
3956 Midwest Penguins 18-1 1756 30-15 67% 18 WI
3957 Austin Skyline 16-B ellie 1756 22-19 54% 16 TX
3958 VVA 14-Catalan 1756 30-30 50% 14 CA
3959 Aspire 18 Premier 1756 43-24 64% 18 AZ
3960 PREVA 14-Joshua 1756 14-15 48% 14 PR
3961 Powell 12-1 1756 13-5 59% 12 MT
3962 Lubbock Impact Volleyball 15-Black 1756 21-15 58% 15 TX
3963 Ama Xtreme 13-Shock 1756 6-0 100% 13
3964 RVC 12-Royal 1756 21-4 84% 12 IL
3965 Cut Shot VBC 14-1 1755 20-0 100% 14 CA
3966 TNT 17-Platinum 1755 18-12 60% 17 PA
3967 H Skyline 14-Silver 1755 20-7 67% 14 TX
3968 NorthShore 15 Hammerheads 1755 33-25 57% 15 MI
3969 FSJ 11-1 regional plus 1755 35-7 81% 11 AR
3970 PVC 14-1a 1755 47-26 64% 14 FL
3971 UVA 14-Jel 1755 33-15 69% 14 CA
3972 GSI 13-Green venice 1755 27-14 66% 13 FL
3973 Top Notch 13-Elite 1755 27-13 68% 13 MO
3974 BAE 15-Mariah 1755 19-11 63% 15 CA
3975 Juggernaut 15-National1 1755 54-30 64% 15 CO
3976 ACESZ 18-Black 1755 20-1 95% 18 MI
3977 Idaho Peak 16-S jayde 1755 17-11 61% 16 ID
3978 Tstreet LV 17-Chris 1755 34-34 50% 17 CA
3979 NJ RONIN 16 KATANA 1755 23-15 61% 16 NJ
3980 MT NW 12 Elite 1755 33-8 80% 12 MT
3981 MVIce 12-P jayne 1755 11-7 55% 12 ID
3982 Metro Volleyball Club 14-North 1755 48-23 66% 14 DC
3983 EMV 14-Black rosana 1755 29-11 64% 14 TX
3984 CSNS 13 1755 31-6 84% 13 SC
3985 FOCUS 17 18-Christy 1754 27-5 84% 17
3986 Omaha Volleyball Club 14 OVC Black 1754 15-5 75% 14
3987 South Elite 15-Pipe 1754 6-2 75% 15 PR
3988 1st Alliance 17-Grey 1754 36-16 69% 17 IL
3989 MVP 15-Blue 1754 41-41 50% 15 WI
3990 GSEVC 18-Premier 1754 22-32 41% 18 NJ
3991 915 18-Ruben 1754 40-29 58% 18 TX
3992 Katy Stars 16 Elite 1754 39-16 71% 16 TX
3993 LVL 13 ABBY 1754 33-14 70% 13 LA
3994 EP Elite 11-Smack 1754 25-13 61% 11 TX
3995 EVA 16-Blue 1754 41-16 72% 16 KY
3996 Nebraska ONE 15-Black 1754 16-13 55% 15 NE
3997 Iowa One 13-Aly 1754 22-3 88% 13 IA
3998 United VBA 15-Purple 1754 45-21 68% 15 TX
3999 G3VB 18-1 1754 36-32 53% 18 OR
4000 PI RAGE 14-1 gold 1754 22-5 81% 14 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.