Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 79 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3901 SKEVA 15-Blue 1758 30-20 60% 15 KY
3902 Texas One 17-Royal 1758 34-16 68% 17 TX
3903 South Shore Slam 17-Nat 1758 23-11 68% 17 WI
3904 AAVA 12-1 storm 1758 43-12 78% 12 OR
3905 ARVC 12-Black adidas 1758 26-19 58% 12 NM
3906 Big Sky 15-2 1758 40-13 69% 15 MT
3907 GSI 13-Green venice 1758 27-14 66% 13 FL
3908 SVBC 16-Elite 1758 47-10 81% 16 IA
3909 GCVC 17-Lori 1758 27-13 68% 17 IN
3910 EXCEL 12-National blue 1758 32-17 64% 12 TX
3911 JVC 17-1 1758 11-5 69% 17 IN
3912 MVC 15 Britt 1758 41-21 66% 15 OH
3913 Next 13-Blue 1757 28-22 56% 13 OH
3914 SKY Elite 14-Black 1757 23-9 72% 14 PA
3915 APXVB 16 Cassidy 1757 27-17 61% 16 UT
3916 CPA 13 McShane 1757 24-10 71% 13 WA
3917 Buffalo Stampeders-Tre Mann Elite 17-1 1757 49-24 67% 17 FL
3918 BRVA 15-2 1757 23-6 79% 15 VA
3919 American 15-Red 1757 31-38 44% 15 VA
3920 MIDTN 13-BLACK 1757 18-5 78% 13 TN
3921 Midwest Penguins 18-1 1757 30-15 67% 18 WI
3922 MoCo MAVS 18-Red 1757 27-14 66% 18 TX
3923 TXP 14-Black alonso 1757 26-14 65% 14 TX
3924 Tstreet LV 15-Chad 1757 27-29 48% 15 NV
3925 VIRAGO 15 Elite 1757 56-22 72% 15 OK
3926 AJV 13-Molten 1757 34-26 56% 13 TX
3927 915 18-Ruben 1757 40-29 58% 18 TX
3928 HVA Heat 12-Pink 1757 27-7 79% 12 LA
3929 FRVBC 16-Black 1757 15-5 75% 16 CO
3930 Vernal Velocity 13-White 1757 12-7 57% 13 UT
3931 TAV Houston 18-Blue 1757 33-14 70% 18 TX
3932 Delta Valley 15-Blue 1757 22-10 69% 15 CA
3933 Viper Volleyball 18-Kurstan 1757 7-2 78% 18 CA
3934 ACCEL 15-Black mealer 1757 36-11 72% 15 TX
3935 McAllen Fierce 16-1 1757 21-10 68% 16 TX
3936 MVIce 12-P jayne 1757 11-7 55% 12
3937 IMPACT 15-1s 1757 15-2 88% 15 TX
3938 C2 17-1 reg blue meg 1756 28-13 68% 17 TN
3939 Lex United 16 Elite 1756 35-38 48% 16 KY
3940 Boltz 15-Desertaces 1756 59-30 66% 15 AZ
3941 BSVBC 10-Black 1756 20-4 83% 10 IL
3942 MSVB 16-National 1756 22-16 56% 16 AK
3943 SVC 12 Gold 1756 19-2 90% 12 IA
3944 LC Sharks 15-Elite 1756 28-12 70% 15 TX
3945 PV 14-Spartans 1756 16-0 94% 14 MA
3946 ECVC 13-National - kelly 1756 30-8 79% 13 VA
3947 Premier 14-Black ab 1756 26-20 55% 14 TX
3948 Mizuno Northern Lights 16-1 1756 4-1 80% 16
3949 A5 Chattanooga 14-1 1756 34-30 53% 14 TN
3950 3N1 14-Teal 1756 34-3 92% 14 WA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.