Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 79 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3901 Sky High Adidas 16-Red 1758 42-17 71% 16 IL
3902 BONNEVILLE 13-Rae 1758 21-2 88% 13 ID
3903 Junior Jays 14 1758 32-8 80% 14 MN
3904 Coastal 16-1 national 1758 37-14 73% 16 MA
3905 Idaho Force 15-1 1758 16-2 89% 15 UT
3906 Dallas Premier 15-Black megan 1758 6-2 75% 15 TX
3907 Michigan Volleyball Academy 17 MVA - Rise Academy 72 1758 25-27 48% 17 MI
3908 TC ELITE 14-Caley 1758 27-10 73% 14 LA
3909 McAllen Fierce 16-1 1758 21-10 68% 16 TX
3910 Ka Ulukoa 16-Taylor 1758 48-34 59% 16 HI
3911 Lockdown VBC 14-Orioles 1758 35-14 71% 14 MA
3912 DaKine 14-National pink 1758 31-30 51% 14 WA
3913 MVBC 12-Red 1758 23-8 74% 12 NJ
3914 Buckeyefire 13-1 1758 52-13 80% 13 OH
3915 QCA 18-Under armour black 1758 20-6 77% 18 MS
3916 NET 13-Black 1758 34-9 79% 13 AR
3917 Katy United 16 adidas 1758 72-59 55% 16 TX
3918 GSI 17-Green 1757 7-26 21% 17 FL
3919 Northern Lights 11-1 1757 48-23 68% 11 MN
3920 WTX Lightning 13 1757 22-11 67% 13 TX
3921 NLVC 16-National 1757 26-12 68% 16 TX
3922 Vision 14-White 1757 27-10 73% 14 CA
3923 SVA 16 Attack 1757 46-10 82% 16 AZ
3924 MVVC G 13-Black 1757 45-22 67% 13 CA
3925 GCVC 17-Lori 1757 27-13 68% 17 IN
3926 Coqui VBC 16-Slunks 1757 19-13 59% 16 MS
3927 FCA Force 13 1757 25-2 93% 13 KY
3928 ETA1 16-Black 1757 34-4 85% 16 TX
3929 Hartford VBC 18-1 1757 31-10 76% 18 WI
3930 MAVA 14-Select 1757 42-37 53% 14 KY
3931 LBK 14-1 1757 45-15 75% 14 OH
3932 Ne Jrs 14-Gold 1757 19-11 63% 14 NE
3933 KAVA 13 1757 32-6 84% 13 KY
3934 Delta Valley 15-Blue 1757 22-10 69% 15 CA
3935 Idaho Peak BRI 17-S 1757 17-10 61% 17 ID
3936 Nordiques Jr 15 1757 3-2 60% 15 PA
3937 Bandits 14-1 1757 17-1 85% 14 AL
3938 3N1 14-Teal 1757 34-3 92% 14 WA
3939 805 Elite 17-National 1757 37-16 70% 17 CA
3940 Next 13-Blue 1757 28-22 56% 13 OH
3941 Monon 12-2e lions 1757 44-27 62% 12 IN
3942 LevelOne Albany 18-1 1757 36-16 69% 18 OR
3943 Mid City VBC 12-1 1757 11-1 92% 12 CA
3944 Instinct 14-Wild gold 1757 16-8 55% 14 MN
3945 Headlines VBC 16-Navy 1757 26-27 49% 16 OH
3946 MJVA 14-Elite black 1756 34-21 62% 14 TN
3947 AVC CLE 14-White 1756 21-32 40% 14 OH
3948 808AC 15-Gannon 1756 42-28 60% 15 HI
3949 LC Ice 14 1756 33-5 87% 14 LA
3950 AJV 13-Molten 1756 34-26 56% 13 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.