2025-2026 Season — Page 78 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3851 | ProPlay Volleyball Club 16-Nicky | 1760 | 38-15 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 3852 | 573 18-National a | 1760 | 21-5 | 78% | 18 | MO |
| 3853 | Ga Fusion 13-1 | 1760 | 43-5 | 90% | 13 | GA |
| 3854 | REACH VOLLEYBALL CLUB 17 REACH ULTRA (CA) | 1760 | 17-4 | 77% | 17 | PA |
| 3855 | RCVC 17 N | 1760 | 38-14 | 73% | 17 | TN |
| 3856 | Mt. Hood 14-1 timberline | 1760 | 40-11 | 78% | 14 | OR |
| 3857 | Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. 14-Gold | 1760 | 37-4 | 90% | 14 | ME |
| 3858 | AAVA 12-1 storm | 1760 | 43-12 | 78% | 12 | OR |
| 3859 | Austin Skyline 17-Black | 1760 | 41-23 | 64% | 17 | TX |
| 3860 | TAV Houston 18-Blue | 1760 | 33-14 | 70% | 18 | TX |
| 3861 | Tx Alpha Prem 12-Elite | 1760 | 30-10 | 73% | 12 | TX |
| 3862 | Atomic Force 14-1 | 1760 | 17-3 | 81% | 14 | MN |
| 3863 | EliteVBTC 13-Black | 1760 | 26-29 | 47% | 13 | OH |
| 3864 | Club Cactus 14-Mizuno | 1760 | 35-23 | 60% | 14 | AZ |
| 3865 | SA Juniors 18 Adidas | 1760 | 38-25 | 60% | 18 | TX |
| 3866 | Austin Skyline 17 Royal | 1760 | 31-26 | 54% | 17 | TX |
| 3867 | Club Fusion 14-Heat spring | 1760 | 12-1 | 92% | 14 | IL |
| 3868 | SA Juniors 12 Adidas | 1760 | 34-22 | 61% | 12 | TX |
| 3869 | Wrecking Crew 13-1 | 1760 | 10-6 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 3870 | BRUSA 16-2 william | 1760 | 13-7 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 3871 | CHiX 13-PiNK | 1760 | 28-16 | 64% | 13 | OH |
| 3872 | Ama Xtreme 14-Icons | 1760 | 3-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 3873 | Leaside Volleyball Club 14 Leaside Strikers | 1760 | 8-8 | 50% | 14 | ON |
| 3874 | IMPACT 15-1s | 1759 | 15-2 | 88% | 15 | TX |
| 3875 | Kulia 16-S | 1759 | 8-3 | 73% | 16 | HI |
| 3876 | Miami Hype 16-Prime2 | 1759 | 49-30 | 62% | 16 | FL |
| 3877 | Viper Volleyball 18-Kurstan | 1759 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | NV |
| 3878 | OK Charge 10-Ua tulsa | 1759 | 29-3 | 91% | 10 | OK |
| 3879 | New York Elite Volleyball 17-Black | 1759 | 34-16 | 68% | 17 | NY |
| 3880 | DBQ Insanity 13-1 national | 1759 | 47-14 | 77% | 13 | IA |
| 3881 | NCISVBC 15-1 | 1759 | 31-25 | 55% | 15 | IN |
| 3882 | Laguna Niguel Breakers 13-1 | 1759 | 31-13 | 70% | 13 | CA |
| 3883 | FW Fire 12-Purple | 1759 | 19-7 | 70% | 12 | TX |
| 3884 | AVA TX 14-Adidas | 1759 | 28-16 | 64% | 14 | TX |
| 3885 | 501 Volley 12-1 national | 1759 | 37-25 | 59% | 12 | AR |
| 3886 | SC Legends 12-Elite | 1759 | 39-21 | 65% | 12 | CA |
| 3887 | Apex 14-National red | 1759 | 12-4 | 75% | 14 | MO |
| 3888 | Loudoun Elite Volleyball Club 17-Quintin | 1759 | 45-26 | 63% | 17 | VA |
| 3889 | USA South 17-Premier purple | 1759 | 22-27 | 45% | 17 | FL |
| 3890 | HRVC 16-National green | 1759 | 32-19 | 63% | 16 | NC |
| 3891 | Windthorst 13-Dna | 1759 | 27-11 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 3892 | PIRATAS ADN 17-1 | 1759 | 6-5 | 55% | 17 | PR |
| 3893 | Wolf Pack 14-Black | 1759 | 29-28 | 51% | 14 | TX |
| 3894 | MAVS 816 12-1 | 1759 | 20-5 | 80% | 12 | KS |
| 3895 | AVC CLE 13-White | 1759 | 32-27 | 54% | 13 | OH |
| 3896 | Nuevo Leon 17 NLJuvenil Mayor | 1759 | 8-2 | 80% | 17 | |
| 3897 | OCVC 16 Slunks | 1758 | 27-30 | 47% | 16 | CA |
| 3898 | MC 16-1 shepherd | 1758 | 29-6 | 71% | 16 | MT |
| 3899 | Crossfire VBC 18-Blaze | 1758 | 29-4 | 85% | 18 | WI |
| 3900 | Slainte 14-White | 1758 | 32-4 | 89% | 14 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.