Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 78 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3851 TCVA 15-Green adidas 1760 45-24 65% 15 CO
3852 C1VB 18-One 1760 32-13 71% 18 SC
3853 PSVC 14-Andria 1760 25-11 69% 14 SC
3854 MAVS 816 12-1 1760 20-5 80% 12 KS
3855 RVC 12-Royal 1760 21-4 84% 12 IL
3856 NET 13-Black 1760 34-9 79% 13 AR
3857 PRV 15 1760 28-9 76% 15
3858 KNVBC 18-Shazam 1760 21-3 88% 18 KS
3859 Santa Barbara 14-Molten 1759 6-2 75% 14
3860 WTX Lightning 13 1759 22-11 67% 13
3861 Powell 12-1 1759 13-5 59% 12
3862 Loudoun Elite 17 Quintin 1759 45-26 63% 17 VA
3863 NASA 13-Purple kelly 1759 36-5 86% 13 AL
3864 FC Elite 14-Grey 1759 27-6 82% 14 WI
3865 NEVA 14-Black rachel 1759 28-2 90% 14 UT
3866 PowerPlex 14-Mcquade 1759 29-28 51% 14 IA
3867 Eagles Elite 13-1 1759 17-3 85% 13
3868 Aspire 18 Premier 1759 43-24 64% 18 AB
3869 Austin Skyline 17 Royal 1759 31-26 54% 17 TX
3870 FC Elite 12-White 1759 18-3 86% 12 WI
3871 Amarillo Xtreme 17 Gold 1759 19-10 66% 17 TX
3872 CSNS 13 1759 31-6 84% 13 SC
3873 MAVS KC 18 National 1759 24-16 60% 18 KS
3874 NJ RONIN 16 KATANA 1759 23-15 61% 16 NJ
3875 OCVC 16 Slunks 1759 27-30 47% 16 KY
3876 NCISVBC 15-1 1759 31-25 55% 15 IN
3877 SMV 17-1 black 1759 47-15 76% 17 MN
3878 WI Flight 18 Onyx 1759 33-18 65% 18 WI
3879 501 Volley 12-1 national 1759 37-25 59% 12 AR
3880 AVC 15-Markus 1759 33-10 77% 15 VA
3881 PIRATAS ADN 17-1 1759 6-5 55% 17 PR
3882 Windthorst 13-Dna 1759 27-11 63% 13 TX
3883 ACESZ 18-Black 1759 20-1 95% 18 MI
3884 DVC 15-Purple 1759 17-1 94% 15 OH
3885 PJVBC 16 National 1759 43-32 57% 16 WA
3886 Rev 16-1 fury 1759 29-36 45% 16 IN
3887 Cut Shot VBC 14-1 1759 20-0 100% 14 CA
3888 Miami Hype 14-Prime 1759 44-31 59% 14 FL
3889 Eden Elite 16 1759 32-7 76% 16
3890 Tx Alpha Prem 12-Elite 1759 30-10 73% 12 TX
3891 GSI 17-Green 1759 7-26 21% 17 FL
3892 MJVA 15-2 1759 12-4 75% 15 TN
3893 LES 12 Lindsey 1758 20-3 77% 12
3894 CSA 14 Navy 1758 24-13 65% 14 CO
3895 Madtown 14-2 national 1758 35-25 58% 14 WI
3896 KIVA 15-Grey 1758 45-20 69% 15 KY
3897 OK Charge 10-Ua tulsa 1758 29-3 91% 10 OK
3898 Austin Skyline 17-Black 1758 41-23 64% 17 TX
3899 AVC CLE 13-White 1758 32-27 54% 13 OH
3900 McAllen PREMIER 16 Maverick 1758 27-13 68% 16 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.