Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 78 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3851 ProPlay Volleyball Club 16-Nicky 1760 38-15 72% 16 CA
3852 573 18-National a 1760 21-5 78% 18 MO
3853 Ga Fusion 13-1 1760 43-5 90% 13 GA
3854 REACH VOLLEYBALL CLUB 17 REACH ULTRA (CA) 1760 17-4 77% 17 PA
3855 RCVC 17 N 1760 38-14 73% 17 TN
3856 Mt. Hood 14-1 timberline 1760 40-11 78% 14 OR
3857 Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. 14-Gold 1760 37-4 90% 14 ME
3858 AAVA 12-1 storm 1760 43-12 78% 12 OR
3859 Austin Skyline 17-Black 1760 41-23 64% 17 TX
3860 TAV Houston 18-Blue 1760 33-14 70% 18 TX
3861 Tx Alpha Prem 12-Elite 1760 30-10 73% 12 TX
3862 Atomic Force 14-1 1760 17-3 81% 14 MN
3863 EliteVBTC 13-Black 1760 26-29 47% 13 OH
3864 Club Cactus 14-Mizuno 1760 35-23 60% 14 AZ
3865 SA Juniors 18 Adidas 1760 38-25 60% 18 TX
3866 Austin Skyline 17 Royal 1760 31-26 54% 17 TX
3867 Club Fusion 14-Heat spring 1760 12-1 92% 14 IL
3868 SA Juniors 12 Adidas 1760 34-22 61% 12 TX
3869 Wrecking Crew 13-1 1760 10-6 63% 13 TX
3870 BRUSA 16-2 william 1760 13-7 65% 16 CA
3871 CHiX 13-PiNK 1760 28-16 64% 13 OH
3872 Ama Xtreme 14-Icons 1760 3-0 100% 14
3873 Leaside Volleyball Club 14 Leaside Strikers 1760 8-8 50% 14 ON
3874 IMPACT 15-1s 1759 15-2 88% 15 TX
3875 Kulia 16-S 1759 8-3 73% 16 HI
3876 Miami Hype 16-Prime2 1759 49-30 62% 16 FL
3877 Viper Volleyball 18-Kurstan 1759 7-2 78% 18 NV
3878 OK Charge 10-Ua tulsa 1759 29-3 91% 10 OK
3879 New York Elite Volleyball 17-Black 1759 34-16 68% 17 NY
3880 DBQ Insanity 13-1 national 1759 47-14 77% 13 IA
3881 NCISVBC 15-1 1759 31-25 55% 15 IN
3882 Laguna Niguel Breakers 13-1 1759 31-13 70% 13 CA
3883 FW Fire 12-Purple 1759 19-7 70% 12 TX
3884 AVA TX 14-Adidas 1759 28-16 64% 14 TX
3885 501 Volley 12-1 national 1759 37-25 59% 12 AR
3886 SC Legends 12-Elite 1759 39-21 65% 12 CA
3887 Apex 14-National red 1759 12-4 75% 14 MO
3888 Loudoun Elite Volleyball Club 17-Quintin 1759 45-26 63% 17 VA
3889 USA South 17-Premier purple 1759 22-27 45% 17 FL
3890 HRVC 16-National green 1759 32-19 63% 16 NC
3891 Windthorst 13-Dna 1759 27-11 63% 13 TX
3892 PIRATAS ADN 17-1 1759 6-5 55% 17 PR
3893 Wolf Pack 14-Black 1759 29-28 51% 14 TX
3894 MAVS 816 12-1 1759 20-5 80% 12 KS
3895 AVC CLE 13-White 1759 32-27 54% 13 OH
3896 Nuevo Leon 17 NLJuvenil Mayor 1759 8-2 80% 17
3897 OCVC 16 Slunks 1758 27-30 47% 16 CA
3898 MC 16-1 shepherd 1758 29-6 71% 16 MT
3899 Crossfire VBC 18-Blaze 1758 29-4 85% 18 WI
3900 Slainte 14-White 1758 32-4 89% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.