Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 77 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3801 Mid City VBC 17-1 1762 7-1 88% 17 CA
3802 KNVBC 14 Showtime 1762 17-9 61% 14 KS
3803 SVBC 16-Elite 1762 49-11 79% 16 IA
3804 UNION 14-Green 1762 48-31 61% 14 IN
3805 Lions Cityside 13-2 1762 37-18 67% 13 IL
3806 HNLV 13-Black 1762 12-10 55% 13 HI
3807 Northern Lights 13-2 1762 48-27 64% 13 MN
3808 North Shore 18 1762 14-4 78% 18 HI
3809 Academy Volleyball Club 15-Markus 1762 33-10 77% 15 SC
3810 HVA Heat 12-Pink 1762 27-7 79% 12 LA
3811 American 15-Red 1762 31-38 44% 15 VA
3812 MAVS KC 18 National 1762 24-16 60% 18 KS
3813 PVA 17-Blue 1761 40-5 89% 17 VA
3814 PILIPA'A NA WAHINE 16-Black 18 1761 7-0 100% 16 HI
3815 PSVC 14-Andria 1761 25-11 69% 14 SC
3816 Apex Volleyball 13 1761 14-3 78% 13 UT
3817 Premier 15-Black m 1761 24-16 60% 15 TX
3818 Elevation 17-Conner 1761 32-28 53% 17 OH
3819 Rize 15-Jake 1761 14-6 70% 15 UT
3820 Slainte 15-Nationals 1761 15-7 68% 15 CA
3821 WI Flight 18 Onyx 1761 33-18 65% 18 WI
3822 Rev 16-1 fury 1761 29-36 45% 16 IN
3823 Club Fusion 14-Black 1761 22-5 81% 14 IL
3824 GP 14 Elite 1761 62-12 84% 14 FL
3825 BBV 15-Harry & angie 1761 39-11 78% 15 CA
3826 Premier Nebraska 14-Silver 1761 25-21 54% 14 NE
3827 NSSC 13-Black s 1761 22-2 92% 13 MO
3828 MoCo MAVS 18-Red 1761 27-14 66% 18 TX
3829 Invasion Volleyball Club 13-1 1761 7-1 88% 13 MO
3830 Horseshoe VBC 13-Red 1761 18-11 60% 13 PA
3831 NPJ Portland 13 National 1761 41-15 73% 13 OR
3832 Inside Out Juniors 18-1 1761 6-2 75% 18 MI
3833 VAQUERAS 18-F ariel 1761 13-15 46% 18 PR
3834 XTEAM 12-1 1761 9-1 90% 12 NV
3835 Madtown 14-2 national 1761 35-25 58% 14 WI
3836 McAllen PREMIER 16 Maverick 1761 27-13 68% 16 TX
3837 Spokane Ignite 14 U14 Ignite Valley (EV) 1760 14-1 93% 14
3838 ATHENA VB 17-2 black national 1760 45-28 62% 17 OR
3839 AppVC 17-Elite gold 1760 34-19 64% 17 NC
3840 PRVC 12-Kimi 1760 19-2 90% 12 WY
3841 ECVC 16-National - wayne 1760 27-7 79% 16 AL
3842 Manhattan Mamba 18-1 1760 36-15 67% 18 KS
3843 COAST 11-1 sydney 1760 26-16 62% 11 CA
3844 CNVKC Mizuno 15-Deardin 1760 25-7 78% 15 MO
3845 Six Pack Legit 16-G suzanne 1760 6-0 100% 16 IA
3846 Mid-Michigan ACES 16 Natalie 1760 16-1 94% 16 MI
3847 Vibe 15-Black 1760 12-10 55% 15 CA
3848 Ark Volley 13-Reg plus 1760 42-7 86% 13 AR
3849 KCV 13 NATIONAL 1760 50-18 74% 13 TX
3850 Skyline 15-White cooper 1760 37-17 65% 15 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.