Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 77 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3801 WI Juniors 17-1 1762 43-31 58% 17 WI
3802 VAQUERAS 15-F rafy 1762 28-10 74% 15 PR
3803 Trinity 15-Inferno 1762 35-26 57% 15 FL
3804 WGVC 16-Elite purple 1762 44-10 81% 16 FL
3805 ND Elite 15-Hoyme 1762 26-7 76% 15 ND
3806 Apex 14-National red 1762 12-4 75% 14 MO
3807 TopFlight 15-National bl 1762 14-9 61% 15 NV
3808 Bakersfield 16-Casie 1762 5-4 56% 16 CA
3809 AZ REV 15 Elite (NV) 1762 5-3 63% 15
3810 Everest - MVC 18 1762 4-5 44% 18
3811 SA Juniors 12 Adidas 1762 34-22 61% 12 TX
3812 Absolute 13-Pink 1762 30-33 48% 13 CA
3813 Skyline 15-White cooper 1762 37-17 65% 15 TX
3814 BBV 15-Harry & angie 1761 39-11 78% 15 CA
3815 NPJ Portland 13 National 1761 41-15 73% 13 OR
3816 Heroes 14-Delta 1761 38-14 72% 14 TX
3817 Mt. Hood 14-1 timberline 1761 40-11 78% 14 OR
3818 Paramount VBC 14 Priscilla 1761 34-16 68% 14 VA
3819 RAGE 15-Carmelo 1761 28-32 47% 15 CA
3820 Top Flight 14 Elite 1761 21-26 45% 14 IL
3821 1st Alliance 17-Grey 1761 36-16 69% 17 IL
3822 KNVBC 14 Showtime 1761 17-9 61% 14 KS
3823 FC Elite 17-White 1761 33-24 58% 17 WI
3824 DaKine 14-National pink 1761 31-30 51% 14 WA
3825 L2 17-2 1761 40-26 61% 17 MI
3826 PILIPA'A NA WAHINE 16-Black 18 1761 7-0 100% 16 HI
3827 XTEAM 12-1 1761 9-1 90% 12 CA
3828 UNITED 13-Evren/damon 1761 6-4 60% 13 CA
3829 Zoo City 15 Grizzlies 1761 37-5 88% all
3830 Synergy 13 Lightning 1761 56-15 79% 13 CA
3831 Rize 15-Jake 1760 14-6 70% 15
3832 PRVC 12-Kimi 1760 19-2 90% 12
3833 Ama Xtreme 14-Icons 1760 3-0 100% 14
3834 Netforce 14-Kelly 1760 27-4 87% 14
3835 UNION 14-Green 1760 48-31 61% 14 CA
3836 Wolf Pack 14-Black 1760 29-28 51% 14 MA
3837 Elite 14-National alex 1760 37-25 60% 14 FL
3838 Club Cactus 14-Mizuno 1760 35-23 60% 14 AZ
3839 Warren Sixpack 14-Red 1760 28-9 76% 14 NJ
3840 Sanford Sports 12-Red 1760 33-9 79% 12 SD
3841 AppVC 17-Elite gold 1760 34-19 64% 17 NC
3842 ARMOR 15 Lima 1760 23-24 49% 15 AZ
3843 CHiX 13-PiNK 1760 28-16 64% 13 OH
3844 EliteVBTC 13-Black 1760 26-29 47% 13 OH
3845 DVA 17 Elite 1760 35-18 66% 17 PA
3846 HEAT 16 NATIONAL 1760 48-20 68% 16 OK
3847 SCBandits 17-1 1760 17-7 71% 17 ON
3848 SA Juniors 18 Adidas 1760 38-25 60% 18 TX
3849 VCNebraska 18 Elite 1760 10-14 42% 18 NE
3850 KCV 13 NATIONAL 1760 50-18 74% 13 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.