2025-2026 Season — Page 77 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3801 | WI Juniors 17-1 | 1762 | 43-31 | 58% | 17 | WI |
| 3802 | VAQUERAS 15-F rafy | 1762 | 28-10 | 74% | 15 | PR |
| 3803 | Trinity 15-Inferno | 1762 | 35-26 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 3804 | WGVC 16-Elite purple | 1762 | 44-10 | 81% | 16 | FL |
| 3805 | ND Elite 15-Hoyme | 1762 | 26-7 | 76% | 15 | ND |
| 3806 | Apex 14-National red | 1762 | 12-4 | 75% | 14 | MO |
| 3807 | TopFlight 15-National bl | 1762 | 14-9 | 61% | 15 | NV |
| 3808 | Bakersfield 16-Casie | 1762 | 5-4 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 3809 | AZ REV 15 Elite (NV) | 1762 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | |
| 3810 | Everest - MVC 18 | 1762 | 4-5 | 44% | 18 | |
| 3811 | SA Juniors 12 Adidas | 1762 | 34-22 | 61% | 12 | TX |
| 3812 | Absolute 13-Pink | 1762 | 30-33 | 48% | 13 | CA |
| 3813 | Skyline 15-White cooper | 1762 | 37-17 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 3814 | BBV 15-Harry & angie | 1761 | 39-11 | 78% | 15 | CA |
| 3815 | NPJ Portland 13 National | 1761 | 41-15 | 73% | 13 | OR |
| 3816 | Heroes 14-Delta | 1761 | 38-14 | 72% | 14 | TX |
| 3817 | Mt. Hood 14-1 timberline | 1761 | 40-11 | 78% | 14 | OR |
| 3818 | Paramount VBC 14 Priscilla | 1761 | 34-16 | 68% | 14 | VA |
| 3819 | RAGE 15-Carmelo | 1761 | 28-32 | 47% | 15 | CA |
| 3820 | Top Flight 14 Elite | 1761 | 21-26 | 45% | 14 | IL |
| 3821 | 1st Alliance 17-Grey | 1761 | 36-16 | 69% | 17 | IL |
| 3822 | KNVBC 14 Showtime | 1761 | 17-9 | 61% | 14 | KS |
| 3823 | FC Elite 17-White | 1761 | 33-24 | 58% | 17 | WI |
| 3824 | DaKine 14-National pink | 1761 | 31-30 | 51% | 14 | WA |
| 3825 | L2 17-2 | 1761 | 40-26 | 61% | 17 | MI |
| 3826 | PILIPA'A NA WAHINE 16-Black 18 | 1761 | 7-0 | 100% | 16 | HI |
| 3827 | XTEAM 12-1 | 1761 | 9-1 | 90% | 12 | CA |
| 3828 | UNITED 13-Evren/damon | 1761 | 6-4 | 60% | 13 | CA |
| 3829 | Zoo City 15 Grizzlies | 1761 | 37-5 | 88% | all | |
| 3830 | Synergy 13 Lightning | 1761 | 56-15 | 79% | 13 | CA |
| 3831 | Rize 15-Jake | 1760 | 14-6 | 70% | 15 | |
| 3832 | PRVC 12-Kimi | 1760 | 19-2 | 90% | 12 | |
| 3833 | Ama Xtreme 14-Icons | 1760 | 3-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 3834 | Netforce 14-Kelly | 1760 | 27-4 | 87% | 14 | |
| 3835 | UNION 14-Green | 1760 | 48-31 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 3836 | Wolf Pack 14-Black | 1760 | 29-28 | 51% | 14 | MA |
| 3837 | Elite 14-National alex | 1760 | 37-25 | 60% | 14 | FL |
| 3838 | Club Cactus 14-Mizuno | 1760 | 35-23 | 60% | 14 | AZ |
| 3839 | Warren Sixpack 14-Red | 1760 | 28-9 | 76% | 14 | NJ |
| 3840 | Sanford Sports 12-Red | 1760 | 33-9 | 79% | 12 | SD |
| 3841 | AppVC 17-Elite gold | 1760 | 34-19 | 64% | 17 | NC |
| 3842 | ARMOR 15 Lima | 1760 | 23-24 | 49% | 15 | AZ |
| 3843 | CHiX 13-PiNK | 1760 | 28-16 | 64% | 13 | OH |
| 3844 | EliteVBTC 13-Black | 1760 | 26-29 | 47% | 13 | OH |
| 3845 | DVA 17 Elite | 1760 | 35-18 | 66% | 17 | PA |
| 3846 | HEAT 16 NATIONAL | 1760 | 48-20 | 68% | 16 | OK |
| 3847 | SCBandits 17-1 | 1760 | 17-7 | 71% | 17 | ON |
| 3848 | SA Juniors 18 Adidas | 1760 | 38-25 | 60% | 18 | TX |
| 3849 | VCNebraska 18 Elite | 1760 | 10-14 | 42% | 18 | NE |
| 3850 | KCV 13 NATIONAL | 1760 | 50-18 | 74% | 13 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.