2025-2026 Season — Page 76 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3751 | ECVC 13-National - kelly | 1765 | 30-8 | 79% | 13 | AL |
| 3752 | BHJ 16-Green | 1765 | 24-8 | 75% | 16 | SD |
| 3753 | Storm 12-Black | 1764 | 47-14 | 77% | 12 | CO |
| 3754 | EU 13-Black | 1764 | 32-4 | 89% | 13 | IN |
| 3755 | Buffalo Stampeders-Tre Mann Elite 17-1 | 1764 | 55-25 | 69% | 17 | FL |
| 3756 | Warren Sixpack 14-Red | 1764 | 28-9 | 76% | 14 | NJ |
| 3757 | CJV 16-National white | 1764 | 32-23 | 58% | 16 | NC |
| 3758 | Top Flight 14 Elite | 1764 | 21-26 | 45% | 14 | IL |
| 3759 | TAV 14-Blue (MA) | 1764 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | MA |
| 3760 | Piedmont VBC 15 Chill | 1764 | 33-33 | 50% | 15 | NC |
| 3761 | Angels Elite 14-1 | 1764 | 22-12 | 65% | 14 | CA |
| 3762 | NP Dragons 11-1 lindman | 1764 | 11-0 | 100% | 11 | IN |
| 3763 | TCVA 15-Green adidas | 1764 | 45-24 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 3764 | Eagles Elite 13-1 | 1764 | 17-3 | 85% | 13 | IN |
| 3765 | Top Caliber 18 Jacque | 1764 | 34-5 | 87% | 18 | NC |
| 3766 | 3N1 13-Teal | 1764 | 42-17 | 71% | 13 | WA |
| 3767 | Academy 18 Crystal | 1764 | 30-22 | 58% | 18 | NC |
| 3768 | Heroes 14-Delta | 1764 | 38-14 | 72% | 14 | TX |
| 3769 | Vision 18-Blue | 1764 | 36-21 | 63% | 18 | CA |
| 3770 | EliteVBTC 14-Blue | 1764 | 41-24 | 63% | 14 | OH |
| 3771 | Coast United 16 | 1764 | 33-32 | 51% | 16 | SC |
| 3772 | TXPW 11-1 | 1764 | 7-2 | 70% | 11 | |
| 3773 | M2 Volleyball 14-E2 | 1763 | 51-17 | 75% | 14 | GA |
| 3774 | SKEVA 15-Blue | 1763 | 30-20 | 60% | 15 | KY |
| 3775 | SVA 14-Krush | 1763 | 60-9 | 87% | 14 | AZ |
| 3776 | K2 13-Stars | 1763 | 31-14 | 69% | 13 | TN |
| 3777 | FC Elite 15-Blue | 1763 | 41-12 | 77% | 15 | WI |
| 3778 | FeVA 16 | 1763 | 43-26 | 62% | 16 | WA |
| 3779 | RockCity 15 N2 | 1763 | 58-19 | 75% | 15 | OH |
| 3780 | TopFlight 15-National bl | 1763 | 14-9 | 61% | 15 | NV |
| 3781 | HP South 14-Diamond | 1763 | 38-16 | 68% | 14 | MO |
| 3782 | UPVBC 17 Elite | 1763 | 32-30 | 51% | 17 | OK |
| 3783 | Illini Elite 15-Black | 1763 | 33-35 | 49% | 15 | IL |
| 3784 | APXVB 16 Cassidy | 1763 | 27-17 | 61% | 16 | UT |
| 3785 | PV 14-Spartans | 1763 | 16-0 | 94% | 14 | IA |
| 3786 | CLVC 14-Black | 1763 | 45-20 | 69% | 14 | NC |
| 3787 | A5 12-Laura | 1763 | 43-29 | 60% | 12 | GA |
| 3788 | Temecula Viper 14-1 jo/kelly | 1763 | 30-11 | 73% | 14 | CA |
| 3789 | DIG 15-Black | 1763 | 30-17 | 59% | 15 | TX |
| 3790 | Iowa Select 18 Mizuno | 1763 | 28-10 | 74% | 18 | IA |
| 3791 | MSVB 16-National | 1763 | 22-16 | 56% | 16 | AK |
| 3792 | SPVA 16-Galaxy | 1762 | 47-15 | 76% | 16 | PA |
| 3793 | SynergyForce 13-2 natl | 1762 | 28-20 | 58% | 13 | CA |
| 3794 | WGVC 16-Elite purple | 1762 | 44-10 | 81% | 16 | FL |
| 3795 | PR Select 17-Elite | 1762 | 8-10 | 44% | 17 | PR |
| 3796 | Thumb Fusion 17 | 1762 | 5-2 | 71% | 17 | MI |
| 3797 | MSVBC 15-Navy | 1762 | 63-14 | 82% | 15 | AZ |
| 3798 | ACCEL 15-Black mealer | 1762 | 36-11 | 72% | 15 | TX |
| 3799 | GVA 16-Black | 1762 | 10-7 | 59% | 16 | PR |
| 3800 | NEVA 13-1 | 1762 | 14-5 | 74% | 13 | PR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.