Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 76 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3751 ECVC 13-National - kelly 1765 30-8 79% 13 AL
3752 BHJ 16-Green 1765 24-8 75% 16 SD
3753 Storm 12-Black 1764 47-14 77% 12 CO
3754 EU 13-Black 1764 32-4 89% 13 IN
3755 Buffalo Stampeders-Tre Mann Elite 17-1 1764 55-25 69% 17 FL
3756 Warren Sixpack 14-Red 1764 28-9 76% 14 NJ
3757 CJV 16-National white 1764 32-23 58% 16 NC
3758 Top Flight 14 Elite 1764 21-26 45% 14 IL
3759 TAV 14-Blue (MA) 1764 5-4 56% 14 MA
3760 Piedmont VBC 15 Chill 1764 33-33 50% 15 NC
3761 Angels Elite 14-1 1764 22-12 65% 14 CA
3762 NP Dragons 11-1 lindman 1764 11-0 100% 11 IN
3763 TCVA 15-Green adidas 1764 45-24 65% 15 TX
3764 Eagles Elite 13-1 1764 17-3 85% 13 IN
3765 Top Caliber 18 Jacque 1764 34-5 87% 18 NC
3766 3N1 13-Teal 1764 42-17 71% 13 WA
3767 Academy 18 Crystal 1764 30-22 58% 18 NC
3768 Heroes 14-Delta 1764 38-14 72% 14 TX
3769 Vision 18-Blue 1764 36-21 63% 18 CA
3770 EliteVBTC 14-Blue 1764 41-24 63% 14 OH
3771 Coast United 16 1764 33-32 51% 16 SC
3772 TXPW 11-1 1764 7-2 70% 11
3773 M2 Volleyball 14-E2 1763 51-17 75% 14 GA
3774 SKEVA 15-Blue 1763 30-20 60% 15 KY
3775 SVA 14-Krush 1763 60-9 87% 14 AZ
3776 K2 13-Stars 1763 31-14 69% 13 TN
3777 FC Elite 15-Blue 1763 41-12 77% 15 WI
3778 FeVA 16 1763 43-26 62% 16 WA
3779 RockCity 15 N2 1763 58-19 75% 15 OH
3780 TopFlight 15-National bl 1763 14-9 61% 15 NV
3781 HP South 14-Diamond 1763 38-16 68% 14 MO
3782 UPVBC 17 Elite 1763 32-30 51% 17 OK
3783 Illini Elite 15-Black 1763 33-35 49% 15 IL
3784 APXVB 16 Cassidy 1763 27-17 61% 16 UT
3785 PV 14-Spartans 1763 16-0 94% 14 IA
3786 CLVC 14-Black 1763 45-20 69% 14 NC
3787 A5 12-Laura 1763 43-29 60% 12 GA
3788 Temecula Viper 14-1 jo/kelly 1763 30-11 73% 14 CA
3789 DIG 15-Black 1763 30-17 59% 15 TX
3790 Iowa Select 18 Mizuno 1763 28-10 74% 18 IA
3791 MSVB 16-National 1763 22-16 56% 16 AK
3792 SPVA 16-Galaxy 1762 47-15 76% 16 PA
3793 SynergyForce 13-2 natl 1762 28-20 58% 13 CA
3794 WGVC 16-Elite purple 1762 44-10 81% 16 FL
3795 PR Select 17-Elite 1762 8-10 44% 17 PR
3796 Thumb Fusion 17 1762 5-2 71% 17 MI
3797 MSVBC 15-Navy 1762 63-14 82% 15 AZ
3798 ACCEL 15-Black mealer 1762 36-11 72% 15 TX
3799 GVA 16-Black 1762 10-7 59% 16 PR
3800 NEVA 13-1 1762 14-5 74% 13 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.