Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 76 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3751 TAV 14-Blue (MN) 1764 4-3 57% 14
3752 Coastal VBC 14 Navy 1764 36-13 73% 14 MD
3753 LA South 14 GOLD 1764 45-8 85% 14 LA
3754 Sideout 14-Elite 1764 53-11 83% 14 FL
3755 ATHENA VB 14-2 black national 1764 32-31 51% 14 OR
3756 NP Dragons 11-1 lindman 1764 11-0 100% 11 OR
3757 EliteVBTC 18-Black 1764 21-28 43% 18 OH
3758 M2 Volleyball 14-E2 1764 51-17 75% 14 GA
3759 Spirit 12-Elite 1764 12-0 100% 12 OH
3760 Iowa Select 18 Mizuno 1764 28-10 74% 18 IA
3761 Platform 15-Adidas 1764 25-23 51% 15 IA
3762 Ga Fusion 13-1 1764 38-4 90% 13 GA
3763 NorthShore 18-Sea pigs 1764 33-12 73% 18 MI
3764 FCA Force 13 1764 25-2 93% 13 KY
3765 CYVBC Surge 14-Black 1764 26-18 59% 14 OH
3766 Apex 16-Elite 1764 27-12 64% 16 MT
3767 SPVA 16-Galaxy 1764 47-15 76% 16 PA
3768 Piedmont VBC 15 Chill 1764 33-33 50% 15 NC
3769 Coast United 16 1764 33-32 51% 16 CA
3770 VEVA Fury 15-Blue 1764 48-20 71% 15 PA
3771 PREVA 12-Lourdes 1764 14-11 56% 12 PR
3772 Premier Nebraska 14-Silver 1764 25-21 54% 14 NE
3773 NITRO 14-Blue 1763 22-24 48% 14
3774 Ark Volley 13-Reg plus 1763 42-7 86% 13
3775 North Shore 18 1763 14-4 78% 18 CT
3776 Monon 12-2e lions 1763 44-27 62% 12 IN
3777 HP South 11 Premier 1763 41-26 61% 11 MO
3778 Dakine 18-National pink 1763 45-25 64% 18 WA
3779 MemphisVBAcademy 18-Red 1763 33-11 75% 18 MS
3780 MOD Elite 16-Blue 1763 26-30 46% 16 IL
3781 KIVA 11-Red 1763 37-29 56% 11 KY
3782 Idaho ONE 16-White 1763 40-21 66% 16 ID
3783 BONNEVILLE 13-Rae 1763 21-2 88% 13 ID
3784 SEVC 14-1 1763 45-14 76% 14 AL
3785 TAV 16-Gold 1763 33-19 59% 16 TX
3786 Club Legacy 13-Alpha 1763 28-6 82% 13 NE
3787 Dig This! VB Ohana 13-Black 1763 5-1 83% 13 KY
3788 oe 11-1 1763 15-2 88% 11 OH
3789 HNLV 13-Black 1763 12-10 55% 13
3790 NorCal 16-1 black 1763 29-27 52% 16 CA
3791 QCA 18-Under armour black 1762 20-6 77% 18
3792 K2 13-Stars 1762 31-14 69% 13 TN
3793 COAST 11-1 sydney 1762 26-16 62% 11 CA
3794 Crossfire 17-1 1762 38-48 44% 17 MN
3795 Club Fusion 14-Black 1762 22-5 81% 14 IL
3796 CJV 16-National white 1762 32-23 58% 16 NC
3797 Coulee Region Power 15-S 1762 13-3 81% 15 WI
3798 CNVKC Mizuno 15-Deardin 1762 25-7 78% 15 MO
3799 Synergy 14 Blaze 1762 29-32 48% 14 CA
3800 TX432 15-Black 1762 20-13 61% 15 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.