2025-2026 Season — Page 75 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3701 | KIVA 11-Red | 1766 | 37-29 | 56% | 11 | KY |
| 3702 | Coulee Region Power 15-S | 1766 | 13-3 | 81% | 15 | WI |
| 3703 | NRG 14-Ampd navy | 1766 | 36-20 | 61% | 14 | TX |
| 3704 | PJVBC 16 National | 1766 | 43-32 | 57% | 16 | WA |
| 3705 | PowerPlex 14-Mcquade | 1766 | 36-30 | 55% | 14 | IA |
| 3706 | Epic United 12-Premier | 1766 | 31-6 | 82% | 12 | IL |
| 3707 | Vision 16-Blue | 1766 | 35-27 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 3708 | Sideout 14-Elite | 1766 | 53-11 | 83% | 14 | FL |
| 3709 | SMASH 16-S sparks | 1766 | 38-17 | 69% | 16 | MA |
| 3710 | BBVCL 14 Danny | 1766 | 47-12 | 80% | 14 | NV |
| 3711 | M2 Volleyball 13-E1 | 1766 | 57-22 | 72% | 13 | GA |
| 3712 | Dig This! VBC 17-Black national | 1766 | 6-1 | 86% | 17 | NV |
| 3713 | NITRO 14-Blue | 1766 | 22-24 | 48% | 14 | TX |
| 3714 | Premier 14-Black ab | 1766 | 26-20 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 3715 | L2 17-2 | 1766 | 40-26 | 61% | 17 | MI |
| 3716 | NEVA 14-Black rachel | 1766 | 28-2 | 90% | 14 | UT |
| 3717 | FW Fire 17-1 purple | 1766 | 22-8 | 73% | 17 | TX |
| 3718 | NRG VBC 18-Ampd navy | 1766 | 29-15 | 63% | 18 | TX |
| 3719 | oe 11-1 | 1766 | 15-2 | 88% | 11 | OH |
| 3720 | Synergy 17 Neon | 1766 | 52-20 | 72% | 17 | PA |
| 3721 | MJVA 15-2 | 1766 | 12-4 | 75% | 15 | TN |
| 3722 | MJ 18-Black | 1766 | 60-17 | 74% | 18 | MT |
| 3723 | TopFlight 17-National bl | 1766 | 9-13 | 41% | 17 | NV |
| 3724 | VC United 18-1 elite | 1766 | 15-17 | 47% | 18 | IL |
| 3725 | Rockwood Thunder 13-Navy | 1766 | 41-26 | 61% | 13 | MO |
| 3726 | CTX Juniors 12 Mizuno | 1766 | 39-21 | 65% | 12 | TX |
| 3727 | Eden Elite 16 | 1765 | 32-7 | 76% | 16 | NY |
| 3728 | Reach Elite 15-Black | 1765 | 55-11 | 83% | 15 | FL |
| 3729 | Ne Jrs 16-Black | 1765 | 18-22 | 45% | 16 | NE |
| 3730 | Dakine 18-National pink | 1765 | 45-25 | 64% | 18 | WA |
| 3731 | GRIT 18-Premier | 1765 | 33-9 | 79% | 18 | AL |
| 3732 | Synergy 13 Lightning | 1765 | 56-15 | 79% | 13 | PA |
| 3733 | ESVBC 13-Stingray | 1765 | 26-7 | 79% | 13 | IA |
| 3734 | Sharks 15-Navy | 1765 | 38-20 | 66% | 15 | AL |
| 3735 | TAV 14-Blue (MN) | 1765 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | MN |
| 3736 | LA South 14 GOLD | 1765 | 45-8 | 85% | 14 | LA |
| 3737 | FC Elite 17-White | 1765 | 33-24 | 58% | 17 | WI |
| 3738 | ACT 15-Henry | 1765 | 35-18 | 66% | 15 | CA |
| 3739 | DVA 17 Elite | 1765 | 35-18 | 66% | 17 | PA |
| 3740 | Vibe 14-Katie | 1765 | 27-4 | 87% | 14 | GA |
| 3741 | AZ REV 15 Elite (NV) | 1765 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | NV |
| 3742 | Amarillo Xtreme 17 Gold | 1765 | 19-10 | 66% | 17 | TX |
| 3743 | Peak Elite 18 | 1765 | 48-25 | 66% | 18 | PA |
| 3744 | NorCal 16-1 black | 1765 | 29-27 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 3745 | HP South 11 Premier | 1765 | 41-26 | 61% | 11 | MO |
| 3746 | Blue Ridge 17-Blue | 1765 | 24-22 | 52% | 17 | VA |
| 3747 | FUSION 13-Blue | 1765 | 24-8 | 75% | 13 | PA |
| 3748 | GRIT 16-Green | 1765 | 40-23 | 63% | 16 | IN |
| 3749 | Wesleyan Academy 16-5 | 1765 | 8-0 | 100% | 16 | MA |
| 3750 | FH 17-Ikaika-daniel | 1765 | 24-16 | 59% | 17 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.