Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 75 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3701 KIVA 11-Red 1766 37-29 56% 11 KY
3702 Coulee Region Power 15-S 1766 13-3 81% 15 WI
3703 NRG 14-Ampd navy 1766 36-20 61% 14 TX
3704 PJVBC 16 National 1766 43-32 57% 16 WA
3705 PowerPlex 14-Mcquade 1766 36-30 55% 14 IA
3706 Epic United 12-Premier 1766 31-6 82% 12 IL
3707 Vision 16-Blue 1766 35-27 56% 16 CA
3708 Sideout 14-Elite 1766 53-11 83% 14 FL
3709 SMASH 16-S sparks 1766 38-17 69% 16 MA
3710 BBVCL 14 Danny 1766 47-12 80% 14 NV
3711 M2 Volleyball 13-E1 1766 57-22 72% 13 GA
3712 Dig This! VBC 17-Black national 1766 6-1 86% 17 NV
3713 NITRO 14-Blue 1766 22-24 48% 14 TX
3714 Premier 14-Black ab 1766 26-20 55% 14 TX
3715 L2 17-2 1766 40-26 61% 17 MI
3716 NEVA 14-Black rachel 1766 28-2 90% 14 UT
3717 FW Fire 17-1 purple 1766 22-8 73% 17 TX
3718 NRG VBC 18-Ampd navy 1766 29-15 63% 18 TX
3719 oe 11-1 1766 15-2 88% 11 OH
3720 Synergy 17 Neon 1766 52-20 72% 17 PA
3721 MJVA 15-2 1766 12-4 75% 15 TN
3722 MJ 18-Black 1766 60-17 74% 18 MT
3723 TopFlight 17-National bl 1766 9-13 41% 17 NV
3724 VC United 18-1 elite 1766 15-17 47% 18 IL
3725 Rockwood Thunder 13-Navy 1766 41-26 61% 13 MO
3726 CTX Juniors 12 Mizuno 1766 39-21 65% 12 TX
3727 Eden Elite 16 1765 32-7 76% 16 NY
3728 Reach Elite 15-Black 1765 55-11 83% 15 FL
3729 Ne Jrs 16-Black 1765 18-22 45% 16 NE
3730 Dakine 18-National pink 1765 45-25 64% 18 WA
3731 GRIT 18-Premier 1765 33-9 79% 18 AL
3732 Synergy 13 Lightning 1765 56-15 79% 13 PA
3733 ESVBC 13-Stingray 1765 26-7 79% 13 IA
3734 Sharks 15-Navy 1765 38-20 66% 15 AL
3735 TAV 14-Blue (MN) 1765 4-3 57% 14 MN
3736 LA South 14 GOLD 1765 45-8 85% 14 LA
3737 FC Elite 17-White 1765 33-24 58% 17 WI
3738 ACT 15-Henry 1765 35-18 66% 15 CA
3739 DVA 17 Elite 1765 35-18 66% 17 PA
3740 Vibe 14-Katie 1765 27-4 87% 14 GA
3741 AZ REV 15 Elite (NV) 1765 5-3 63% 15 NV
3742 Amarillo Xtreme 17 Gold 1765 19-10 66% 17 TX
3743 Peak Elite 18 1765 48-25 66% 18 PA
3744 NorCal 16-1 black 1765 29-27 52% 16 CA
3745 HP South 11 Premier 1765 41-26 61% 11 MO
3746 Blue Ridge 17-Blue 1765 24-22 52% 17 VA
3747 FUSION 13-Blue 1765 24-8 75% 13 PA
3748 GRIT 16-Green 1765 40-23 63% 16 IN
3749 Wesleyan Academy 16-5 1765 8-0 100% 16 MA
3750 FH 17-Ikaika-daniel 1765 24-16 59% 17 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.