Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 75 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3701 Arch City 16 1766 45-30 60% 16 MO
3702 Countdown 18-Elite 1766 37-18 67% 18 FL
3703 OVA 13-G elite 1766 43-29 60% 13 FL
3704 RVC Impact 13 1766 40-14 74% 13 VA
3705 Synergy 17 Neon 1766 52-20 72% 17 CA
3706 Digs 16-Red 1766 43-25 63% 16 NJ
3707 JET 16 EVERS 1766 30-16 65% 16 TX
3708 UNION 14-In grey 1766 44-5 90% 14 CA
3709 Sharks 15-Navy 1766 38-20 66% 15 FL
3710 PR Select 17-Elite 1766 8-10 44% 17 PR
3711 New York Elite 17-Black 1766 37-20 65% 17 NY
3712 3N1 13-Teal 1766 42-17 71% 13 WA
3713 C1VB 15-One 1766 11-3 79% 15 SC
3714 Princeton 18-1 national 1766 7-2 78% 18 NJ
3715 Arete 16-Navy 1766 32-9 78% 16 TX
3716 BVC 16-1 1766 40-20 67% 16 DE
3717 Pacific West 17-Travis 1766 9-0 100% 17
3718 NSSC 13-Black s 1766 22-2 92% 13 MO
3719 NASA 17-Purple j 1766 37-11 77% 17 AL
3720 BHJ 16-Green 1766 15-6 71% 16 SD
3721 MJ 18-Black 1765 60-17 74% 18
3722 Aspire 16 Premier 1765 38-23 62% 16 AB
3723 CLVC 14-Black 1765 45-20 69% 14 NC
3724 BBVCL 14 Danny 1765 47-12 80% 14 NV
3725 Circle City 18-White 1765 39-15 72% 18 IN
3726 G3VB 18-1 1765 36-32 53% 18 OR
3727 MVBC 12-Red 1765 23-8 74% 12 CA
3728 Reach Elite 15-Black 1765 55-11 83% 15 FL
3729 Tribe 15-Vktry white 1765 32-49 40% 15 FL
3730 UPVBC 17 Elite 1765 32-30 51% 17 OK
3731 Vision 18-Blue 1765 36-21 63% 18 CA
3732 GLVBC 16-Blue 1765 32-8 80% 16 MI
3733 Ka Ulukoa 12-Larry 1765 45-12 79% 12 HI
3734 HIC 12-N lisi 1765 15-5 68% 12 UT
3735 South County 15-Danelle 1765 27-15 64% 15 RI
3736 Dig This 15-Black 1765 16-13 55% 15 NV
3737 Sky High Adidas 17-Onyx 1765 41-17 71% 17 IL
3738 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 14-Blue 1765 37-29 56% 14 FL
3739 Tsunami 14-1e dun 1765 32-28 53% 14 GA
3740 United 14-Bhm national 1765 36-13 73% 14 AL
3741 ESVBC 13-Stingray 1765 26-7 79% 13 MD
3742 PR Arsenal 11-Cocolo 1765 10-2 83% 11 PR
3743 Peak Elite 18 1765 48-25 66% 18 PA
3744 Mizuno Northern Lights 15-B 1765 5-1 83% 15
3745 Six Pack Legit 16-G suzanne 1765 6-0 100% 16
3746 TXPW 11-1 1765 7-2 70% 11
3747 Circle City 17-White 1765 55-30 65% 17 IN
3748 CTX Juniors 12 Mizuno 1765 39-21 65% 12 TX
3749 VCN 14-Blue 1765 12-4 75% 14 NE
3750 Impact Vball Club 15 1764 40-7 83% 15
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.