Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 74 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3651 Monon 15-2e rattlers 1768 44-40 52% 15 IN
3652 SVBC Blazers 16 Carter 1768 65-10 87% 16 SC
3653 Vegas United G14-Black 1768 20-8 71% 14 NV
3654 Core STL 17-Navy 1768 36-21 63% 17 MO
3655 1st Alliance 17-Scarlet 1768 45-15 75% 17 IL
3656 Tribe 13-Elite white 1768 41-22 65% 13 FL
3657 417 MoJrs 14 Elite 1768 30-14 68% 14 MO
3658 1W 16-1 elite 1768 29-29 50% 16 WI
3659 Winks 17 1768 16-3 84% 17 FL
3660 501 Volley 15-1 national 1768 35-32 52% 15 AR
3661 MWVC 12-Lizardi 1768 21-4 84% 12 CA
3662 RRHEAT 17-1 jaz 1768 12-7 63% 17 UT
3663 ProPlay 17-Amanda 1768 53-27 66% 17 CA
3664 Surfside 12-Mb elite 1768 32-15 68% 12 CA
3665 OCVC 14-Slunks 1768 30-18 63% 14 KY
3666 PJVBC 12-National 1768 46-16 74% 12 WA
3667 Ark Jrs 16-National 1768 36-13 73% 16 AR
3668 1United 16-N white-g 1768 28-13 60% 16 TX
3669 Vibe 14-Katie 1768 27-4 87% 14 CA
3670 EXCEL 11-White 1768 35-20 64% 11 TX
3671 Vibe VBC 16-1 1768 7-2 78% 16 CA
3672 BRUSA 16-2 william 1768 13-7 65% 16 CA
3673 FeVA 13 (BG) 1768 35-11 76% 13 WI
3674 New WaveS 15-Lana 1768 55-23 71% 15 FL
3675 Marshall JO 12-Orange 1767 15-1 94% 12
3676 Ne Jrs 16-Black 1767 18-14 56% 16
3677 ATHENA VB 15-1 gold national 1767 45-29 61% 15 OR
3678 Cajunland 17-N 1767 25-5 83% 17 LA
3679 CJV 14-National navy 1767 41-26 61% 14 NC
3680 Circle City 17 Volt 1767 48-21 70% 17 IN
3681 FRVBC 14-1 black 1767 23-11 68% 14 CO
3682 M2 Volleyball 13-E1 1767 57-22 72% 13 GA
3683 Prime 16-Adidas o 1767 29-27 52% 16 CA
3684 SA Juniors 17 National 1767 46-23 67% 17 TX
3685 VC United 18-1 elite 1767 15-17 47% 18 IL
3686 407 18-Orange 1767 20-20 50% 18 FL
3687 Kali 10-F yousef 1767 16-8 67% 10 PR
3688 Rockwood Thunder 13-Navy 1767 41-26 61% 13 MO
3689 Heroes 13-Seal 1767 34-6 81% 13 TX
3690 Maine Jrs 14-Gold 1767 41-5 89% 14 ME
3691 DN 13-Red 1767 15-8 65% 13 TX
3692 Delaware United 15-Navy 1767 26-27 49% 15 DE
3693 Idaho Peak KATELYN NATIONAL 17-S 1767 7-3 70% 17
3694 TAV 16-Blue (NV) 1767 5-2 71% 16
3695 Wesleyan Academy 16-5 1767 8-0 100% 16
3696 Rocks 12-Mcandrews 1766 15-5 75% 12
3697 City 14-Gold 1766 37-19 66% 14 CA
3698 CVC 14-Black 1766 20-51 28% 14 OH
3699 PREVA 14-Joshua 1766 14-15 48% 14 PR
3700 Webo 14-1s talyn 1766 19-3 86% 14 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.