2025-2026 Season — Page 74 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3651 | TX432 12-Black | 1769 | 32-19 | 63% | 12 | TX |
| 3652 | SVBC Blazers 16 Carter | 1769 | 65-10 | 87% | 16 | SC |
| 3653 | Alpha 16-1 | 1769 | 33-31 | 52% | 16 | KY |
| 3654 | Tsunami 14-1e dun | 1769 | 32-28 | 53% | 14 | GA |
| 3655 | Memphis Volleyball Academy 14-1 | 1768 | 11-5 | 69% | 14 | TN |
| 3656 | Ignite Elite Volleyball 18-Elite | 1768 | 33-12 | 73% | 18 | IN |
| 3657 | Iron 14-Black | 1768 | 19-3 | 86% | 14 | AL |
| 3658 | Arch City 16 | 1768 | 45-30 | 60% | 16 | MO |
| 3659 | AVA TX 12-Adidas | 1768 | 31-14 | 69% | 12 | TX |
| 3660 | CSDP 14-1 | 1768 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | NV |
| 3661 | EU 12-Black | 1768 | 27-5 | 84% | 12 | IN |
| 3662 | NASA 17-Purple j | 1768 | 37-11 | 77% | 17 | AL |
| 3663 | CYVBC Surge 14-Black | 1768 | 26-18 | 59% | 14 | OH |
| 3664 | A5 Chattanooga 16-1 | 1768 | 62-55 | 53% | 16 | GA |
| 3665 | Basin Elite 15 | 1768 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | UT |
| 3666 | Sunnyside 14-Black | 1768 | 26-6 | 81% | 14 | WA |
| 3667 | Aspire 16 Premier | 1768 | 38-23 | 62% | 16 | AZ |
| 3668 | A5 Volleyball Club 16-South | 1768 | 10-0 | 100% | 16 | GA |
| 3669 | Airstrike 14 | 1768 | 53-7 | 88% | 14 | PA |
| 3670 | Momentum Volleyball 18-Jen | 1768 | 33-22 | 60% | 18 | CO |
| 3671 | EXCEL 13-National blue | 1768 | 34-17 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 3672 | Ascent 14-Black | 1768 | 28-19 | 60% | 14 | AZ |
| 3673 | Sunshine 17-La | 1768 | 25-38 | 40% | 17 | CA |
| 3674 | RAGE 15-Carmelo | 1768 | 28-32 | 47% | 15 | CA |
| 3675 | Michigan Volleyball Academy 18 MVA - Rise Academy 82 | 1768 | 25-10 | 71% | 18 | MI |
| 3676 | Surfside 12-Mb elite | 1768 | 32-15 | 68% | 12 | CA |
| 3677 | TOP NOTCH 14-Elite | 1768 | 30-16 | 65% | 14 | MO |
| 3678 | PREVAIL Girls 16-Platinum | 1768 | 40-15 | 73% | 16 | PA |
| 3679 | Mizuno M1 14-1 | 1768 | 55-24 | 70% | 14 | MN |
| 3680 | MWP 16-Purple | 1767 | 38-14 | 73% | 16 | MN |
| 3681 | SNVF 16 KALA | 1767 | 47-35 | 57% | 16 | WA |
| 3682 | Ultimate G16-Blue | 1767 | 47-11 | 81% | 16 | IL |
| 3683 | TAV 16-Gold | 1767 | 33-19 | 59% | 16 | TX |
| 3684 | MAVA 13-Hammerhead | 1767 | 51-10 | 84% | 13 | KY |
| 3685 | Circle City 17 Volt | 1767 | 48-21 | 70% | 17 | IN |
| 3686 | Split Mountain Volleyball Club 15 Split Mountain Kris | 1767 | 14-2 | 88% | 15 | UT |
| 3687 | ARVC 12-Black adidas | 1767 | 26-19 | 58% | 12 | NM |
| 3688 | KIVA 10-Red | 1767 | 57-17 | 77% | 10 | KY |
| 3689 | JET 16 EVERS | 1767 | 30-16 | 65% | 16 | TX |
| 3690 | HJV 10 Elite | 1767 | 22-3 | 88% | 10 | TX |
| 3691 | WD Nation 13-Blue | 1767 | 48-16 | 75% | 13 | LA |
| 3692 | VAQUERAS 15-F rafy | 1767 | 28-10 | 74% | 15 | PR |
| 3693 | Apex Volleyball Academy 16-Elite | 1767 | 21-12 | 58% | 16 | MT |
| 3694 | CJV 14-National navy | 1767 | 41-26 | 61% | 14 | NC |
| 3695 | TEJAS 12-Black kevin | 1767 | 40-14 | 70% | 12 | TX |
| 3696 | YYC Eagles U17 17 YYC Eagles Black | 1767 | 7-0 | 100% | 17 | |
| 3697 | Platform 15-Adidas | 1766 | 27-28 | 48% | 15 | IA |
| 3698 | C1VB 18-One | 1766 | 32-13 | 71% | 18 | SC |
| 3699 | GLVBC 16-Blue | 1766 | 32-8 | 80% | 16 | MI |
| 3700 | Paramount VBC 14 Priscilla | 1766 | 34-16 | 68% | 14 | VA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.