Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 74 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3651 TX432 12-Black 1769 32-19 63% 12 TX
3652 SVBC Blazers 16 Carter 1769 65-10 87% 16 SC
3653 Alpha 16-1 1769 33-31 52% 16 KY
3654 Tsunami 14-1e dun 1769 32-28 53% 14 GA
3655 Memphis Volleyball Academy 14-1 1768 11-5 69% 14 TN
3656 Ignite Elite Volleyball 18-Elite 1768 33-12 73% 18 IN
3657 Iron 14-Black 1768 19-3 86% 14 AL
3658 Arch City 16 1768 45-30 60% 16 MO
3659 AVA TX 12-Adidas 1768 31-14 69% 12 TX
3660 CSDP 14-1 1768 6-3 67% 14 NV
3661 EU 12-Black 1768 27-5 84% 12 IN
3662 NASA 17-Purple j 1768 37-11 77% 17 AL
3663 CYVBC Surge 14-Black 1768 26-18 59% 14 OH
3664 A5 Chattanooga 16-1 1768 62-55 53% 16 GA
3665 Basin Elite 15 1768 9-2 82% 15 UT
3666 Sunnyside 14-Black 1768 26-6 81% 14 WA
3667 Aspire 16 Premier 1768 38-23 62% 16 AZ
3668 A5 Volleyball Club 16-South 1768 10-0 100% 16 GA
3669 Airstrike 14 1768 53-7 88% 14 PA
3670 Momentum Volleyball 18-Jen 1768 33-22 60% 18 CO
3671 EXCEL 13-National blue 1768 34-17 63% 13 TX
3672 Ascent 14-Black 1768 28-19 60% 14 AZ
3673 Sunshine 17-La 1768 25-38 40% 17 CA
3674 RAGE 15-Carmelo 1768 28-32 47% 15 CA
3675 Michigan Volleyball Academy 18 MVA - Rise Academy 82 1768 25-10 71% 18 MI
3676 Surfside 12-Mb elite 1768 32-15 68% 12 CA
3677 TOP NOTCH 14-Elite 1768 30-16 65% 14 MO
3678 PREVAIL Girls 16-Platinum 1768 40-15 73% 16 PA
3679 Mizuno M1 14-1 1768 55-24 70% 14 MN
3680 MWP 16-Purple 1767 38-14 73% 16 MN
3681 SNVF 16 KALA 1767 47-35 57% 16 WA
3682 Ultimate G16-Blue 1767 47-11 81% 16 IL
3683 TAV 16-Gold 1767 33-19 59% 16 TX
3684 MAVA 13-Hammerhead 1767 51-10 84% 13 KY
3685 Circle City 17 Volt 1767 48-21 70% 17 IN
3686 Split Mountain Volleyball Club 15 Split Mountain Kris 1767 14-2 88% 15 UT
3687 ARVC 12-Black adidas 1767 26-19 58% 12 NM
3688 KIVA 10-Red 1767 57-17 77% 10 KY
3689 JET 16 EVERS 1767 30-16 65% 16 TX
3690 HJV 10 Elite 1767 22-3 88% 10 TX
3691 WD Nation 13-Blue 1767 48-16 75% 13 LA
3692 VAQUERAS 15-F rafy 1767 28-10 74% 15 PR
3693 Apex Volleyball Academy 16-Elite 1767 21-12 58% 16 MT
3694 CJV 14-National navy 1767 41-26 61% 14 NC
3695 TEJAS 12-Black kevin 1767 40-14 70% 12 TX
3696 YYC Eagles U17 17 YYC Eagles Black 1767 7-0 100% 17
3697 Platform 15-Adidas 1766 27-28 48% 15 IA
3698 C1VB 18-One 1766 32-13 71% 18 SC
3699 GLVBC 16-Blue 1766 32-8 80% 16 MI
3700 Paramount VBC 14 Priscilla 1766 34-16 68% 14 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.