Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 73 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3601 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 16-1 1770 6-0 100% 16
3602 Storm 12-Gold 1770 19-4 83% 12
3603 Iowa Rockets 16-1 1770 42-22 65% 16 IA
3604 ARVC 18-Orange 1770 39-9 81% 18 NC
3605 KIVA 10-Red 1770 57-17 77% 10 KY
3606 Dime 14-Premier 1770 41-13 76% 14 CA
3607 GP 16 Premier 1770 74-27 73% 16 FL
3608 Top Select 17 Top 1770 42-32 57% 17 FL
3609 TOP NOTCH 14-Elite 1770 30-16 65% 14 IL
3610 RVC 15-Mo 1770 16-15 52% 15 VA
3611 Sky High Adidas 17-Red 1770 39-19 67% 17 IL
3612 UVC 14-Mehdi/farhad 1770 26-12 68% 14 MA
3613 RCVC 17 N 1770 38-14 73% 17 AL
3614 Madfrog 11-N white 1770 23-13 62% 11 TX
3615 NRG 13-Ampd navy 1770 31-16 63% 13 TX
3616 Alpha 16-1 1770 33-31 52% 16 KY
3617 TAV 15-Blue (FL-TX mixed) 1770 15-13 54% 15 TX
3618 PEAK 12-1 elite 1770 35-22 61% 12 AZ
3619 PVC 16-1 1770 37-23 62% 16 FL
3620 TAV 14-Blue (MA) 1770 5-4 56% 14
3621 Dallas Premier 15-Black megan 1770 6-2 75% 15
3622 CoJrs 12-Mal 1770 17-16 52% 12 CO
3623 Anamosa 13 1769 16-2 84% 13 IA
3624 COAST 16-3 izze u 1769 42-16 72% 16 CA
3625 ENCORE 15-Navy 1769 25-22 53% 15 CA
3626 Horseshoe VBC 13-Red 1769 18-11 60% 13 PA
3627 MN Attack 18-1 1769 33-5 87% 18 MN
3628 TX432 12-Black 1769 32-19 63% 12 TX
3629 ID Crush 16 Bullock 1769 53-22 71% 16 ID
3630 AVA TX 11-Adidas 1769 15-4 79% 11 TX
3631 AVA TX 12-Adidas 1769 31-14 69% 12 TX
3632 Idaho ONE 16-Blue 1769 43-26 61% 16 ID
3633 FW Fire 17-1 purple 1769 22-8 73% 17 TX
3634 Sunshine 17-La 1769 25-38 40% 17 CA
3635 Sunnyside 14-Black 1769 26-6 81% 14 WA
3636 EXCEL 13-National blue 1769 34-17 63% 13 TX
3637 808AC 16-David 1769 20-10 67% 16 HI
3638 DNVB 17-Black 1769 5-4 56% 17
3639 RVC Legends 12 1769 41-11 79% 12
3640 Krush VBC 12-1 1769 34-5 85% 12 MI
3641 Mililani 14 1769 30-3 83% 14 HI
3642 Shanghai ZYY VBC 15 1768 9-2 82% 15
3643 iSPIKE 14-1 1768 18-2 90% 14 OR
3644 NRG VBC 18-Ampd navy 1768 29-15 63% 18 TX
3645 Club OAHO 16-Black 1768 37-11 77% 16 CA
3646 EU 12-Black 1768 27-5 84% 12 IN
3647 ECVC 13-PINK 1768 50-16 76% 13 VA
3648 GP 14 Elite 1768 62-12 84% 14 FL
3649 HJV 14-Premier 1768 29-24 55% 14 TX
3650 Heroes 12 Seal 1768 30-6 83% 12 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.