Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 73 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3601 SA Juniors 17 National 1771 46-23 67% 17 TX
3602 BSVBC 16-Blue 1771 42-22 64% 16 IL
3603 FH 16-Ikaika-marcus 1771 31-14 61% 16 TX
3604 Circle City 17-White 1771 55-30 65% 17 IN
3605 Boltz 15-Desertaces 1771 59-30 66% 15 AZ
3606 1st Alliance 17-Scarlet 1771 45-15 75% 17 IL
3607 Ark Jrs 16-National 1771 36-13 73% 16 AR
3608 Top Select 17 Top 1771 42-32 57% 17 FL
3609 LES 12 Lindsey 1771 20-3 77% 12 AL
3610 Vibe VBC 12 Vibe, Jrs Alamo 1 1771 18-2 90% 12 CA
3611 HIC 12-N lisi 1771 15-5 68% 12 UT
3612 PR Arsenal 11-Cocolo 1771 10-2 83% 11 PR
3613 MemphisVBAcademy 18-Red 1771 33-11 75% 18 MS
3614 MN Attack 18-1 1771 33-5 87% 18 MN
3615 ADS Volleyball 11 Elite 1771 37-14 71% 11 TX
3616 DNVB 17-Black 1771 5-4 56% 17 MA
3617 MSVB 13-R rachel/keira 1771 12-6 67% 13 AK
3618 Cutthroat 12-1 1771 13-4 76% 12 MT
3619 PVC 16-1 1771 37-23 62% 16 FL
3620 Cajunland 17-N 1770 25-5 83% 17 LA
3621 Winks 17 1770 16-3 84% 17 FL
3622 Heroes 12 Seal 1770 30-6 83% 12 TX
3623 OK Charge 14-National 1770 43-18 70% 14 OK
3624 Paradigm Volleyball Club 15 Paradigm Ruckus 1770 9-5 64% 15 NY
3625 FC Elite 14-Grey 1770 27-6 82% 14 WI
3626 Girls 14 1770 31-8 79% 14 CA
3627 Preds 15-Girls fierce 1770 11-5 69% 15 OH
3628 UNION 14-In grey 1770 44-5 90% 14 IN
3629 MWVC 12-Lizardi 1770 21-4 84% 12 PR
3630 Coast Volleyball Club 16-3 izze u 1770 42-16 72% 16 CA
3631 ECVC 13-PINK 1770 50-16 76% 13 VA
3632 AVA TX 11-Adidas 1770 15-4 79% 11 TX
3633 WAVE 16 TSUNAMI 1770 50-23 68% 16 KY
3634 Trinity 15-Inferno 1769 35-26 57% 15 FL
3635 SOSVBC 14-N michelle 1769 19-13 59% 14 NY
3636 SMV 17-1 black 1769 47-15 76% 17 MN
3637 Decatur Force 16 Teal 1769 31-16 66% 16 IN
3638 SOSVBC 13-N carly 1769 17-6 74% 13 NY
3639 TX432 15-Black 1769 25-14 64% 15 TX
3640 PJVBC 12-National 1769 46-16 74% 12 WA
3641 ProPlay 17-Amanda 1769 53-27 66% 17 CA
3642 Krush VBC 12-1 1769 34-5 85% 12 MO
3643 Knights Volleyball Club 17 knights Dallas 1769 9-2 82% 17 ID
3644 Oiler Attack 13-Black 1769 17-1 94% 13 OH
3645 Kali 10-F yousef 1769 16-8 67% 10 PR
3646 HEAT 14-National ryan 1769 43-12 78% 14 CA
3647 501 Volley 15-1 national 1769 35-32 52% 15 AR
3648 OVA 13-G elite 1769 43-29 60% 13 AZ
3649 Anamosa 13 1769 16-2 84% 13 IA
3650 PEAK 12-1 elite 1769 35-22 61% 12 OK
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.