2025-2026 Season — Page 73 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3601 | Mizuno Club North Volleyball 16-1 | 1770 | 6-0 | 100% | 16 | |
| 3602 | Storm 12-Gold | 1770 | 19-4 | 83% | 12 | |
| 3603 | Iowa Rockets 16-1 | 1770 | 42-22 | 65% | 16 | IA |
| 3604 | ARVC 18-Orange | 1770 | 39-9 | 81% | 18 | NC |
| 3605 | KIVA 10-Red | 1770 | 57-17 | 77% | 10 | KY |
| 3606 | Dime 14-Premier | 1770 | 41-13 | 76% | 14 | CA |
| 3607 | GP 16 Premier | 1770 | 74-27 | 73% | 16 | FL |
| 3608 | Top Select 17 Top | 1770 | 42-32 | 57% | 17 | FL |
| 3609 | TOP NOTCH 14-Elite | 1770 | 30-16 | 65% | 14 | IL |
| 3610 | RVC 15-Mo | 1770 | 16-15 | 52% | 15 | VA |
| 3611 | Sky High Adidas 17-Red | 1770 | 39-19 | 67% | 17 | IL |
| 3612 | UVC 14-Mehdi/farhad | 1770 | 26-12 | 68% | 14 | MA |
| 3613 | RCVC 17 N | 1770 | 38-14 | 73% | 17 | AL |
| 3614 | Madfrog 11-N white | 1770 | 23-13 | 62% | 11 | TX |
| 3615 | NRG 13-Ampd navy | 1770 | 31-16 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 3616 | Alpha 16-1 | 1770 | 33-31 | 52% | 16 | KY |
| 3617 | TAV 15-Blue (FL-TX mixed) | 1770 | 15-13 | 54% | 15 | TX |
| 3618 | PEAK 12-1 elite | 1770 | 35-22 | 61% | 12 | AZ |
| 3619 | PVC 16-1 | 1770 | 37-23 | 62% | 16 | FL |
| 3620 | TAV 14-Blue (MA) | 1770 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | |
| 3621 | Dallas Premier 15-Black megan | 1770 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | |
| 3622 | CoJrs 12-Mal | 1770 | 17-16 | 52% | 12 | CO |
| 3623 | Anamosa 13 | 1769 | 16-2 | 84% | 13 | IA |
| 3624 | COAST 16-3 izze u | 1769 | 42-16 | 72% | 16 | CA |
| 3625 | ENCORE 15-Navy | 1769 | 25-22 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 3626 | Horseshoe VBC 13-Red | 1769 | 18-11 | 60% | 13 | PA |
| 3627 | MN Attack 18-1 | 1769 | 33-5 | 87% | 18 | MN |
| 3628 | TX432 12-Black | 1769 | 32-19 | 63% | 12 | TX |
| 3629 | ID Crush 16 Bullock | 1769 | 53-22 | 71% | 16 | ID |
| 3630 | AVA TX 11-Adidas | 1769 | 15-4 | 79% | 11 | TX |
| 3631 | AVA TX 12-Adidas | 1769 | 31-14 | 69% | 12 | TX |
| 3632 | Idaho ONE 16-Blue | 1769 | 43-26 | 61% | 16 | ID |
| 3633 | FW Fire 17-1 purple | 1769 | 22-8 | 73% | 17 | TX |
| 3634 | Sunshine 17-La | 1769 | 25-38 | 40% | 17 | CA |
| 3635 | Sunnyside 14-Black | 1769 | 26-6 | 81% | 14 | WA |
| 3636 | EXCEL 13-National blue | 1769 | 34-17 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 3637 | 808AC 16-David | 1769 | 20-10 | 67% | 16 | HI |
| 3638 | DNVB 17-Black | 1769 | 5-4 | 56% | 17 | |
| 3639 | RVC Legends 12 | 1769 | 41-11 | 79% | 12 | |
| 3640 | Krush VBC 12-1 | 1769 | 34-5 | 85% | 12 | MI |
| 3641 | Mililani 14 | 1769 | 30-3 | 83% | 14 | HI |
| 3642 | Shanghai ZYY VBC 15 | 1768 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | |
| 3643 | iSPIKE 14-1 | 1768 | 18-2 | 90% | 14 | OR |
| 3644 | NRG VBC 18-Ampd navy | 1768 | 29-15 | 63% | 18 | TX |
| 3645 | Club OAHO 16-Black | 1768 | 37-11 | 77% | 16 | CA |
| 3646 | EU 12-Black | 1768 | 27-5 | 84% | 12 | IN |
| 3647 | ECVC 13-PINK | 1768 | 50-16 | 76% | 13 | VA |
| 3648 | GP 14 Elite | 1768 | 62-12 | 84% | 14 | FL |
| 3649 | HJV 14-Premier | 1768 | 29-24 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 3650 | Heroes 12 Seal | 1768 | 30-6 | 83% | 12 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.