2025-2026 Season — Page 72 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3551 | Club V 17-Prodigy megan | 1773 | 46-28 | 62% | 17 | UT |
| 3552 | RVT 14-1 surf | 1773 | 37-21 | 64% | 14 | NY |
| 3553 | Prodigy 13-Red | 1773 | 41-11 | 79% | 13 | KY |
| 3554 | Ponce Volley 12-Jr | 1773 | 21-5 | 81% | 12 | PR |
| 3555 | AR Metro 18-National | 1773 | 32-8 | 80% | 18 | AR |
| 3556 | Tribe 13-Elite white | 1773 | 41-22 | 65% | 13 | FL |
| 3557 | CI ELITE 18-ALEC | 1773 | 41-9 | 82% | 18 | IL |
| 3558 | New WaveS 15-Lana | 1773 | 55-23 | 71% | 15 | FL |
| 3559 | Club Legacy 13-Alpha | 1773 | 28-6 | 82% | 13 | NE |
| 3560 | DaKine 13-National pink | 1773 | 51-24 | 68% | 13 | WA |
| 3561 | Princeton 18-1 national | 1773 | 7-2 | 78% | 18 | NJ |
| 3562 | Alliance 14-Molten | 1773 | 41-24 | 63% | 14 | TN |
| 3563 | ID Crush 16 Bullock | 1773 | 53-22 | 71% | 16 | ID |
| 3564 | Xtreme 14-Bratz (LK) | 1773 | 21-3 | 88% | 14 | MI |
| 3565 | Zona VBC 16-Black | 1773 | 25-22 | 53% | 16 | AZ |
| 3566 | MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 14 MOCO (MD) Magic | 1773 | 9-6 | 60% | 14 | MD |
| 3567 | RockCity 18 N1 | 1773 | 25-27 | 48% | 18 | OH |
| 3568 | ATHENA VB 15-1 gold national | 1773 | 45-29 | 61% | 15 | OR |
| 3569 | SA Juniors 15-National | 1773 | 41-28 | 59% | 15 | TX |
| 3570 | 1W 16-1 elite | 1773 | 29-29 | 50% | 16 | WI |
| 3571 | Elevate Athletics 16-1 | 1773 | 21-27 | 44% | 16 | UT |
| 3572 | LSV Orange 11 | 1773 | 62-57 | 52% | 11 | FL |
| 3573 | Athena VBC 18 Athena VBC | 1773 | 7-1 | 88% | 18 | CA |
| 3574 | Marshall JO 12-Orange | 1773 | 15-1 | 94% | 12 | MN |
| 3575 | ARVC 13-Black | 1773 | 25-4 | 86% | 13 | NC |
| 3576 | DME Elite 14-1 | 1773 | 38-24 | 61% | 14 | FL |
| 3577 | Greenwich Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1773 | 33-23 | 59% | 17 | CT |
| 3578 | Nona Volleyball Academy 14 14 GIO (FL) | 1773 | 6-5 | 55% | 14 | FL |
| 3579 | Legacy Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1772 | 9-0 | 100% | 16 | |
| 3580 | Countdown 18-Elite | 1772 | 37-18 | 67% | 18 | FL |
| 3581 | Tri-State Elite 14-Gray | 1772 | 31-10 | 76% | 14 | KY |
| 3582 | Texas Tornados 14-Adidas | 1772 | 37-13 | 74% | 14 | TX |
| 3583 | DIG 14-Black - lexi | 1772 | 34-12 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 3584 | Dime 14-Premier | 1772 | 41-13 | 76% | 14 | CA |
| 3585 | CLUB UNION CLUB UNION 12-Red | 1772 | 15-8 | 52% | 12 | UT |
| 3586 | Ka Ulukoa 12-Larry | 1772 | 45-12 | 79% | 12 | HI |
| 3587 | ALJRS 15 National | 1772 | 37-10 | 79% | 15 | AL |
| 3588 | AEV 11 Regional | 1772 | 18-2 | 90% | 11 | TX |
| 3589 | Core STL 17-Navy | 1772 | 36-21 | 63% | 17 | MO |
| 3590 | AAVC 16-Black | 1772 | 32-2 | 94% | 16 | CA |
| 3591 | ETA1 17-Black | 1772 | 33-13 | 66% | 17 | TX |
| 3592 | PREVA 12-Lourdes | 1772 | 14-11 | 56% | 12 | PR |
| 3593 | EXCEL 11-White | 1772 | 35-20 | 64% | 11 | TX |
| 3594 | South County 15-Danelle | 1772 | 27-15 | 64% | 15 | UT |
| 3595 | ATHENA VB 14-2 black national | 1772 | 32-31 | 51% | 14 | OR |
| 3596 | EliteVBTC 18-Black | 1772 | 21-28 | 43% | 18 | OH |
| 3597 | Heroes 13-Seal | 1772 | 34-6 | 81% | 13 | TX |
| 3598 | TX SPARKS 11-2 audrey | 1772 | 24-3 | 86% | 11 | TX |
| 3599 | Monon 15-2e rattlers | 1771 | 44-40 | 52% | 15 | IN |
| 3600 | Bluff Impact 13 Royal | 1771 | 14-0 | 88% | 13 | MO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.