Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 72 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3551 Club V 17-Prodigy megan 1773 46-28 62% 17 UT
3552 RVT 14-1 surf 1773 37-21 64% 14 NY
3553 Prodigy 13-Red 1773 41-11 79% 13 KY
3554 Ponce Volley 12-Jr 1773 21-5 81% 12 PR
3555 AR Metro 18-National 1773 32-8 80% 18 AR
3556 Tribe 13-Elite white 1773 41-22 65% 13 FL
3557 CI ELITE 18-ALEC 1773 41-9 82% 18 IL
3558 New WaveS 15-Lana 1773 55-23 71% 15 FL
3559 Club Legacy 13-Alpha 1773 28-6 82% 13 NE
3560 DaKine 13-National pink 1773 51-24 68% 13 WA
3561 Princeton 18-1 national 1773 7-2 78% 18 NJ
3562 Alliance 14-Molten 1773 41-24 63% 14 TN
3563 ID Crush 16 Bullock 1773 53-22 71% 16 ID
3564 Xtreme 14-Bratz (LK) 1773 21-3 88% 14 MI
3565 Zona VBC 16-Black 1773 25-22 53% 16 AZ
3566 MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 14 MOCO (MD) Magic 1773 9-6 60% 14 MD
3567 RockCity 18 N1 1773 25-27 48% 18 OH
3568 ATHENA VB 15-1 gold national 1773 45-29 61% 15 OR
3569 SA Juniors 15-National 1773 41-28 59% 15 TX
3570 1W 16-1 elite 1773 29-29 50% 16 WI
3571 Elevate Athletics 16-1 1773 21-27 44% 16 UT
3572 LSV Orange 11 1773 62-57 52% 11 FL
3573 Athena VBC 18 Athena VBC 1773 7-1 88% 18 CA
3574 Marshall JO 12-Orange 1773 15-1 94% 12 MN
3575 ARVC 13-Black 1773 25-4 86% 13 NC
3576 DME Elite 14-1 1773 38-24 61% 14 FL
3577 Greenwich Volleyball Club 17-1 1773 33-23 59% 17 CT
3578 Nona Volleyball Academy 14 14 GIO (FL) 1773 6-5 55% 14 FL
3579 Legacy Volleyball Club 16-1 1772 9-0 100% 16
3580 Countdown 18-Elite 1772 37-18 67% 18 FL
3581 Tri-State Elite 14-Gray 1772 31-10 76% 14 KY
3582 Texas Tornados 14-Adidas 1772 37-13 74% 14 TX
3583 DIG 14-Black - lexi 1772 34-12 68% 14 TX
3584 Dime 14-Premier 1772 41-13 76% 14 CA
3585 CLUB UNION CLUB UNION 12-Red 1772 15-8 52% 12 UT
3586 Ka Ulukoa 12-Larry 1772 45-12 79% 12 HI
3587 ALJRS 15 National 1772 37-10 79% 15 AL
3588 AEV 11 Regional 1772 18-2 90% 11 TX
3589 Core STL 17-Navy 1772 36-21 63% 17 MO
3590 AAVC 16-Black 1772 32-2 94% 16 CA
3591 ETA1 17-Black 1772 33-13 66% 17 TX
3592 PREVA 12-Lourdes 1772 14-11 56% 12 PR
3593 EXCEL 11-White 1772 35-20 64% 11 TX
3594 South County 15-Danelle 1772 27-15 64% 15 UT
3595 ATHENA VB 14-2 black national 1772 32-31 51% 14 OR
3596 EliteVBTC 18-Black 1772 21-28 43% 18 OH
3597 Heroes 13-Seal 1772 34-6 81% 13 TX
3598 TX SPARKS 11-2 audrey 1772 24-3 86% 11 TX
3599 Monon 15-2e rattlers 1771 44-40 52% 15 IN
3600 Bluff Impact 13 Royal 1771 14-0 88% 13 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.