Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 72 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3551 TeamLVC 18-Black 1773 38-21 64% 18 NY
3552 NE Elite 13-Phoenix 1773 33-14 70% 13 NE
3553 Cutthroat 12-1 1772 13-4 76% 12
3554 ALJRS 15 National 1772 37-10 79% 15
3555 Summit Surge 13-1 1772 20-2 91% 13
3556 OK Charge 14-National 1772 43-18 70% 14 OK
3557 Circle City 16 Volt 1772 50-23 68% 16 IN
3558 CSA 16 Navy 1772 33-13 72% 16 CO
3559 MVA 13-1 1772 34-17 67% 13 FL
3560 NorthShore 15 Finley 1772 31-6 84% 15 OH
3561 Premier EDGE 17 1772 35-27 56% 17 DE
3562 PREVAIL Girls 16-Platinum 1772 40-15 73% 16 PA
3563 SC Rockstar 15-Ghie 1772 44-17 72% 15 CA
3564 TX SPARKS 11-2 audrey 1772 24-3 86% 11 TX
3565 Iowa United 18-1 elite 1772 26-17 60% 18 IA
3566 AEV 11 Regional 1772 18-2 90% 11 TX
3567 Laredo JRS 12-1 navy 1772 41-12 77% 12 TX
3568 South County 17-Erica/kayleigh 1772 13-10 57% 17 RI
3569 Libero 13 HUSKIES 1772 55-24 70% 13 VA
3570 Club V 17-Prodigy megan 1772 46-28 62% 17 UT
3571 Husky 17-Northeast red 1772 38-14 73% 17 CT
3572 MJVA 17-1 1772 8-6 57% 17 TN
3573 RVT 14-1 surf 1772 37-21 64% 14 NY
3574 Dead Frog 16-Black 1772 35-13 73% 16 MI
3575 WAVE 16 TSUNAMI 1772 50-23 68% 16 KY
3576 Viper 17-1 michelle/natalie 1772 11-6 65% 17 CA
3577 Mintonette Sports 14-2 1772 25-45 36% 14 OH
3578 Erie Elite Maui 17 1772 34-3 92% 17 PA
3579 Impact Wāhine 14-1 1771 23-6 79% 14
3580 SWMNVB 16-W 1771 11-5 69% 16
3581 SWMNVB 18-W 1771 13-4 76% 18
3582 Iowa Elite 15-Even 1771 23-3 88% 15 IA
3583 Fusion 16-Blue 1771 45-35 56% 16 PA
3584 Austin Skyline 15-B jose 1771 26-25 51% 15 TX
3585 BHJ 14-Black 1771 27-13 68% 14 SD
3586 DBQ Insanity 13-1 national 1771 47-14 77% 13 IA
3587 EU 13-Black 1771 32-4 89% 13 IN
3588 Putnam 14-A ashland 1771 31-6 84% 14 WV
3589 SA Force 14-Darkside 1771 43-22 65% 14 TX
3590 SA Lightning 16-1 1771 40-27 60% 16 TX
3591 WD Nation 12-Blue 1771 23-5 82% 12 LA
3592 BSVBC 14-Blue 1771 36-13 71% 14 IL
3593 Essex 16-Kmac 1771 21-13 62% 16 NJ
3594 LAVA West 14-Molten ja 1771 29-19 60% 14 CA
3595 DIG 14-Black - lexi 1771 34-12 68% 14 TX
3596 Lions Cityside 13-2 1771 29-13 69% 13 IL
3597 Tri-State Elite 14-Gray 1771 31-10 76% 14 OH
3598 Saratoga 15-Select 1771 51-7 86% 15 NY
3599 Grandlake 14-Kramer 1771 12-0 100% 14 OH
3600 Dubuque Digz 14 1771 21-1 95% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.