2025-2026 Season — Page 71 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3501 | Monon 17-1o tornados | 1775 | 34-45 | 43% | 17 | IN |
| 3502 | Vernal Velocity 13-White | 1775 | 12-7 | 57% | 13 | UT |
| 3503 | New WAVE 14 Tsunami | 1775 | 35-19 | 65% | 14 | IL |
| 3504 | American 14-Red | 1775 | 45-33 | 58% | 14 | VA |
| 3505 | Grandlake 14-Kramer | 1775 | 12-0 | 100% | 14 | OH |
| 3506 | Victory 15-Nat'l black | 1775 | 6-1 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 3507 | Essex 16-Kmac | 1775 | 21-13 | 62% | 16 | NJ |
| 3508 | Dead Frog 16-Black | 1775 | 35-13 | 73% | 16 | MI |
| 3509 | MVC 15 Britt | 1775 | 41-21 | 66% | 15 | OH |
| 3510 | Husky 17-Northeast red | 1775 | 38-14 | 73% | 17 | CT |
| 3511 | Madfrog 11-N white | 1775 | 23-13 | 62% | 11 | TX |
| 3512 | Mesa JuniorsVBCO 18-Black | 1775 | 41-11 | 79% | 18 | CO |
| 3513 | 757 18-Black | 1775 | 30-18 | 63% | 18 | VA |
| 3514 | Galaxy 14 Ellis | 1775 | 27-6 | 82% | 14 | NC |
| 3515 | Greenwich Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1775 | 24-14 | 63% | 13 | CT |
| 3516 | Windthorst 13-Vibe | 1775 | 33-6 | 80% | 13 | TX |
| 3517 | Mean 17-S black | 1775 | 9-7 | 56% | 17 | MI |
| 3518 | Absolute 13-Pink | 1775 | 30-33 | 48% | 13 | CA |
| 3519 | Apex VBC MO 14-1 | 1775 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | MO |
| 3520 | GP 16 Premier | 1775 | 74-27 | 73% | 16 | FL |
| 3521 | ForceVC 14-1 | 1775 | 29-24 | 55% | 14 | OH |
| 3522 | Defensa 16-Jesse | 1775 | 12-2 | 86% | 16 | ON |
| 3523 | Erie Elite Maui 17 | 1774 | 34-3 | 92% | 17 | OH |
| 3524 | Prime Volleyball Club 16-Adidas o | 1774 | 29-27 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 3525 | Iowa United 18-1 elite | 1774 | 26-17 | 60% | 18 | IA |
| 3526 | 407 18-Orange | 1774 | 20-20 | 50% | 18 | FL |
| 3527 | CJV 12-Regional+ | 1774 | 55-13 | 81% | 12 | AR |
| 3528 | BSVBC 14-Blue | 1774 | 36-13 | 71% | 14 | IL |
| 3529 | TEXSTAR 14 | 1774 | 43-15 | 74% | 14 | TX |
| 3530 | Libero Volleyball Club 13-Huskies | 1774 | 48-23 | 68% | 13 | VA |
| 3531 | Mizuno M1 15-1 | 1774 | 32-33 | 49% | 15 | MN |
| 3532 | C2 17-1 reg blue meg | 1774 | 28-13 | 68% | 17 | TN |
| 3533 | ENCORE 15-Navy | 1774 | 25-22 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 3534 | Delaware United Volleyball Club 15-Navy | 1774 | 26-27 | 49% | 15 | DE |
| 3535 | NIVA 12-WHITE | 1774 | 36-11 | 77% | 12 | IN |
| 3536 | CRVB 14-1 | 1774 | 26-5 | 84% | 14 | TN |
| 3537 | Amarillo Xtreme 12-Elite | 1774 | 26-9 | 74% | 12 | TX |
| 3538 | Laredo JRS 12-1 navy | 1774 | 41-12 | 77% | 12 | TX |
| 3539 | A5 11-1 lori | 1774 | 6-2 | 75% | 11 | GA |
| 3540 | NE Elite 13-Phoenix | 1774 | 33-14 | 70% | 13 | NE |
| 3541 | Academy Volleyball Club 12-Cass | 1774 | 32-11 | 74% | 12 | SC |
| 3542 | Kokoro Volleyball 15-1 | 1774 | 58-67 | 46% | 15 | MN |
| 3543 | Digs 16-Red | 1774 | 43-25 | 63% | 16 | NJ |
| 3544 | Momentous VBC 16-Tara | 1774 | 15-23 | 39% | 16 | CA |
| 3545 | SA Force 14-Darkside | 1774 | 43-22 | 65% | 14 | TX |
| 3546 | EXCEL 12-National blue | 1774 | 32-17 | 64% | 12 | TX |
| 3547 | Impact Volleyball Club 15-1 | 1773 | 48-36 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 3548 | Storm 12-Gold | 1773 | 19-4 | 83% | 12 | |
| 3549 | 417 MoJrs 14 Elite | 1773 | 30-14 | 68% | 14 | MO |
| 3550 | Circle City 18-White | 1773 | 39-15 | 72% | 18 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.