Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 71 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3501 Monon 17-1o tornados 1775 34-45 43% 17 IN
3502 Vernal Velocity 13-White 1775 12-7 57% 13 UT
3503 New WAVE 14 Tsunami 1775 35-19 65% 14 IL
3504 American 14-Red 1775 45-33 58% 14 VA
3505 Grandlake 14-Kramer 1775 12-0 100% 14 OH
3506 Victory 15-Nat'l black 1775 6-1 67% 15 TX
3507 Essex 16-Kmac 1775 21-13 62% 16 NJ
3508 Dead Frog 16-Black 1775 35-13 73% 16 MI
3509 MVC 15 Britt 1775 41-21 66% 15 OH
3510 Husky 17-Northeast red 1775 38-14 73% 17 CT
3511 Madfrog 11-N white 1775 23-13 62% 11 TX
3512 Mesa JuniorsVBCO 18-Black 1775 41-11 79% 18 CO
3513 757 18-Black 1775 30-18 63% 18 VA
3514 Galaxy 14 Ellis 1775 27-6 82% 14 NC
3515 Greenwich Volleyball Club 13-1 1775 24-14 63% 13 CT
3516 Windthorst 13-Vibe 1775 33-6 80% 13 TX
3517 Mean 17-S black 1775 9-7 56% 17 MI
3518 Absolute 13-Pink 1775 30-33 48% 13 CA
3519 Apex VBC MO 14-1 1775 5-3 63% 14 MO
3520 GP 16 Premier 1775 74-27 73% 16 FL
3521 ForceVC 14-1 1775 29-24 55% 14 OH
3522 Defensa 16-Jesse 1775 12-2 86% 16 ON
3523 Erie Elite Maui 17 1774 34-3 92% 17 OH
3524 Prime Volleyball Club 16-Adidas o 1774 29-27 52% 16 CA
3525 Iowa United 18-1 elite 1774 26-17 60% 18 IA
3526 407 18-Orange 1774 20-20 50% 18 FL
3527 CJV 12-Regional+ 1774 55-13 81% 12 AR
3528 BSVBC 14-Blue 1774 36-13 71% 14 IL
3529 TEXSTAR 14 1774 43-15 74% 14 TX
3530 Libero Volleyball Club 13-Huskies 1774 48-23 68% 13 VA
3531 Mizuno M1 15-1 1774 32-33 49% 15 MN
3532 C2 17-1 reg blue meg 1774 28-13 68% 17 TN
3533 ENCORE 15-Navy 1774 25-22 53% 15 CA
3534 Delaware United Volleyball Club 15-Navy 1774 26-27 49% 15 DE
3535 NIVA 12-WHITE 1774 36-11 77% 12 IN
3536 CRVB 14-1 1774 26-5 84% 14 TN
3537 Amarillo Xtreme 12-Elite 1774 26-9 74% 12 TX
3538 Laredo JRS 12-1 navy 1774 41-12 77% 12 TX
3539 A5 11-1 lori 1774 6-2 75% 11 GA
3540 NE Elite 13-Phoenix 1774 33-14 70% 13 NE
3541 Academy Volleyball Club 12-Cass 1774 32-11 74% 12 SC
3542 Kokoro Volleyball 15-1 1774 58-67 46% 15 MN
3543 Digs 16-Red 1774 43-25 63% 16 NJ
3544 Momentous VBC 16-Tara 1774 15-23 39% 16 CA
3545 SA Force 14-Darkside 1774 43-22 65% 14 TX
3546 EXCEL 12-National blue 1774 32-17 64% 12 TX
3547 Impact Volleyball Club 15-1 1773 48-36 57% 15 TX
3548 Storm 12-Gold 1773 19-4 83% 12
3549 417 MoJrs 14 Elite 1773 30-14 68% 14 MO
3550 Circle City 18-White 1773 39-15 72% 18 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.