Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 71 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3501 SPVB 18-Red 1775 18-8 69% 18 IL
3502 Spiketown Elevate 12 1775 20-1 95% 12 WI
3503 Rise Volleyball 15-Purple 1775 16-11 59% 15 CA
3504 Top Flight 13-Elite 1775 19-19 50% 13 IL
3505 Tulsa Power 12-1 1775 55-8 85% 12 OK
3506 WF Waves 15-Chad 1775 45-7 87% 15 FL
3507 ETA1 17-Black 1774 33-13 66% 17 TX
3508 Bluff Impact 13 Royal 1774 14-0 88% 13 MO
3509 ATOMIC 16-Smack elite 1774 49-20 71% 16 MI
3510 BEVBC 16-Black 1774 55-17 76% 16 MD
3511 Novus 13-Purple 1774 27-4 84% 13 IL
3512 ForceVC 14-1 1774 29-24 55% 14 OH
3513 Top Caliber 18 Jacque 1774 34-5 87% 18 NC
3514 VEVA 18 Elite 1774 16-22 42% 18 FL
3515 Valley Jrs 16-Black 1774 8-7 53% 16 VA
3516 AAVC 16-Black 1774 32-2 94% 16 CA
3517 ID Peak 18-National cami 1774 13-7 65% 18 ID
3518 AVC 12-Cass 1774 32-11 74% 12 VA
3519 Ponce Volley 12-Jr 1774 21-5 81% 12 PR
3520 Club 801 13-Regional alexis 1774 23-14 55% 13 UT
3521 Sunshine 12-Westside 1774 28-29 49% 12 CA
3522 Max Performance 14-Jaz 1774 39-8 83% 14 MA
3523 WVBA 16-Adidas 1774 45-27 63% 16 WA
3524 The House 17-Premier 1774 26-7 79% 17 CA
3525 AAVC 13-Jm 1774 22-3 88% 13 IL
3526 Empire 16-National kathy 1774 10-6 63% 16 CA
3527 Defensa 16-Jesse 1774 12-2 86% 16
3528 DaKine 13-National pink 1774 51-24 68% 13 WA
3529 Yuba Elite 14-Pink 1774 29-10 74% 14 CA
3530 WBVBC 14-1 erin 1773 40-13 75% 14 OH
3531 SF TREMORS 14-Palkons 1773 28-17 62% 14 CA
3532 Sanford Fargo 17-UA 1773 34-23 60% 17 ND
3533 757 18-Black 1773 30-18 63% 18 VA
3534 RVBC 18-White 1773 28-5 85% 18 PA
3535 NEVA 13-1 1773 14-5 74% 13 UT
3536 BSVBC 16-Blue 1773 42-22 64% 16 IL
3537 SMASH 15-S power 1773 29-17 63% 15 MA
3538 ARVC 13-Black 1773 25-4 86% 13 NC
3539 Omni 13-N1 1773 33-39 46% 13 AZ
3540 GVA 11-Pink 1773 10-6 63% 11 PR
3541 TopFlight 17-National bl 1773 9-13 41% 17 NV
3542 A5 11-1 lori 1773 6-2 75% 11 GA
3543 CC Force 15-1 1773 5-3 63% 15 TX
3544 DCVA 14-N1 katie 1773 6-1 86% 14 NM
3545 Sky High 18-Black 1773 31-15 66% 18 IL
3546 FH 16-Ikaika-marcus 1773 31-14 61% 16 TX
3547 Emerald Coast 18-National - scott 1773 10-4 71% 18 FL
3548 DME Elite 14-1 1773 38-24 61% 14 FL
3549 Mizuno M1 14-1 1773 55-24 70% 14 MN
3550 Preds 15-Girls fierce 1773 11-5 69% 15 ON
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.