2025-2026 Season — Page 70 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3451 | Mill City 15 | 1778 | 35-23 | 60% | 15 | MA |
| 3452 | CGSV 16-Harris | 1778 | 19-2 | 90% | 16 | OH |
| 3453 | LEGACY 14-Elite kuki | 1778 | 46-22 | 68% | 14 | FL |
| 3454 | Mintonette Sports 14-2 | 1777 | 25-45 | 36% | 14 | OH |
| 3455 | SF TREMORS 14-Palkons | 1777 | 28-17 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 3456 | BRAVO 17-Black | 1777 | 38-17 | 69% | 17 | KY |
| 3457 | SOSVBC 14-N jeff | 1777 | 9-15 | 38% | 14 | NY |
| 3458 | Spiketown USA 16.3 | 1777 | 31-4 | 89% | 16 | WI |
| 3459 | Max Performance 14-Jaz | 1777 | 39-8 | 83% | 14 | MA |
| 3460 | 360 16-Kaos black | 1777 | 24-18 | 52% | 16 | TX |
| 3461 | Cap City MT 16-Select diamonds | 1777 | 29-13 | 63% | 16 | MT |
| 3462 | AZ Sky 16-N1 | 1777 | 29-25 | 54% | 16 | AZ |
| 3463 | Sky High Adidas 17-Red | 1777 | 39-19 | 67% | 17 | IL |
| 3464 | LEGACY 15-Elite danelli | 1777 | 47-35 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 3465 | ECVBA 18-1 | 1777 | 36-20 | 64% | 18 | CA |
| 3466 | RVC 15-Mo | 1777 | 16-15 | 52% | 15 | UT |
| 3467 | Southwest 12-N tanya | 1777 | 36-23 | 61% | 12 | OH |
| 3468 | LTX SELECT 14-Yellow | 1777 | 30-10 | 75% | 14 | TX |
| 3469 | Novus 13-Purple | 1777 | 27-4 | 84% | 13 | IL |
| 3470 | Emerald Coast 18-National - scott | 1777 | 10-4 | 71% | 18 | FL |
| 3471 | NPJ Seattle 17-National | 1777 | 50-35 | 59% | 17 | WA |
| 3472 | ATOMIC 16-Smack elite | 1777 | 49-20 | 71% | 16 | AZ |
| 3473 | Florida's Sports Coast Elite 14-Blue | 1777 | 37-29 | 56% | 14 | FL |
| 3474 | AAVC 13-Jm | 1776 | 22-3 | 88% | 13 | IL |
| 3475 | ND Elite 15-Hoyme | 1776 | 26-7 | 76% | 15 | ND |
| 3476 | Summit 15-Nat'l blue | 1776 | 5-0 | 83% | 15 | TX |
| 3477 | ECJVC 14-National | 1776 | 36-29 | 55% | 14 | NC |
| 3478 | Top Flight 13-Elite | 1776 | 19-19 | 50% | 13 | IL |
| 3479 | LAVA West 14-Molten ja | 1776 | 29-19 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 3480 | FC Elite 16-White | 1776 | 36-21 | 63% | 16 | WI |
| 3481 | Pipeline VC 16-Empire | 1776 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | IL |
| 3482 | Iowa Rockets 16-1 | 1776 | 42-22 | 65% | 16 | IA |
| 3483 | Impact Wāhine 14-1 | 1776 | 23-6 | 79% | 14 | HI |
| 3484 | Milwaukee Jr's 16-1 | 1776 | 165-185 | 47% | 16 | WI |
| 3485 | Putnam 14-A ashland | 1776 | 31-6 | 84% | 14 | OH |
| 3486 | Sanford Fargo 17-UA | 1776 | 34-23 | 60% | 17 | MN |
| 3487 | FC Elite 11 Navy | 1776 | 23-4 | 85% | 11 | WI |
| 3488 | VEVA 18 Elite | 1776 | 16-22 | 42% | 18 | FL |
| 3489 | GVA 11-Pink | 1776 | 10-6 | 63% | 11 | PR |
| 3490 | FaR Out 12-White | 1776 | 41-4 | 91% | 12 | MI |
| 3491 | BVC 18-1 blast | 1776 | 9-6 | 60% | 18 | DE |
| 3492 | OVBC 14-Purple | 1776 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | WI |
| 3493 | NRG 13-Ampd navy | 1776 | 31-16 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 3494 | Legends Volleyball Club 13 Legends - Leppla | 1776 | 11-1 | 92% | 13 | PR |
| 3495 | United VBA 14-Purple | 1776 | 48-16 | 75% | 14 | TX |
| 3496 | SA Force 17 Darkside | 1775 | 41-24 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 3497 | WAVE 17-Casey | 1775 | 30-29 | 51% | 17 | CA |
| 3498 | Idaho ONE 16-White | 1775 | 40-21 | 66% | 16 | ID |
| 3499 | WF Waves 13-Dani | 1775 | 11-5 | 69% | 13 | AL |
| 3500 | CMVBC 14-1 | 1775 | 27-15 | 61% | 14 | MO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.