Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 70 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3451 Southwest 12-N tanya 1777 36-23 61% 12 OH
3452 OVBC 14-Purple 1777 19-13 59% 14 WI
3453 Shockwave 18-Black 1777 9-14 39% 18 KS
3454 LAV 17-National white 1777 43-17 72% 17 AL
3455 Amarillo Xtreme 12-Elite 1777 26-9 74% 12 TX
3456 Mets 12-Giovanni 1777 14-9 61% 12 PR
3457 AR Metro 18-National 1777 32-8 80% 18 MD
3458 HIC 13-N sarah 1777 22-9 63% 13 UT
3459 SMASH 16-Extreme 1777 28-10 74% 16 MA
3460 Alliance 14-Molten 1777 41-24 63% 14 TN
3461 HPRIME 14-Gold 1777 35-22 61% 14 TX
3462 Flyers 14-Usa-john 1777 22-33 39% 14 TX
3463 FH 17-Ikaika-daniel 1777 21-12 62% 17 TX
3464 LEGACY 15-Elite danelli 1777 47-35 57% 15 FL
3465 STVA) South Texas STVA 16-1 madison 1777 2-5 29% 16
3466 CCVB 16-1 1777 3-4 43% 16 CA
3467 MWP 16-Purple 1776 38-14 73% 16
3468 SWMVB 12-1 1776 6-3 43% 12
3469 BRVA 17-1 1776 22-16 58% 17 VA
3470 FRVBC 15-1 black 1776 21-10 68% 15 CO
3471 Paramount VBC 15 Maggie 1776 40-22 65% 15 VA
3472 SA Force 17 Darkside 1776 41-24 63% 17 TX
3473 PVA 17-Blue 1776 34-3 92% 17 VA
3474 CGSV 16-Harris 1776 19-2 90% 16 OH
3475 Boss CLE 14-2 1776 53-22 71% 14 OH
3476 Epic United 12-Premier 1776 31-6 82% 12 IN
3477 Rancho 14-Premier 1776 24-10 71% 14 CA
3478 Quickset 15-Blue 1776 28-4 85% 15 PA
3479 ECVBA 18-1 1776 36-20 64% 18 CA
3480 NKJV 12-Blue 1776 35-16 69% 12 KY
3481 Integrity 15-Intense blue 1776 43-23 61% 15 TX
3482 Victory 15-Nat'l black 1776 6-1 67% 15 TX
3483 NRG 14-Ampd navy 1776 36-20 61% 14 TX
3484 STORM 16-1elite 1776 23-7 77% 16 NY
3485 DIG 15-Black 1776 27-13 61% 15 TX
3486 Rise 15-1 1776 53-14 79% 15 OH
3487 STORM 15-Evie/ryan 1776 8-3 73% 15 CO
3488 TOV 16-Royal 1776 11-4 73% 16
3489 Summit 15-Nat'l blue 1776 5-0 83% 15 TX
3490 Mean 17-S black 1776 9-7 56% 17
3491 CVH SELECT - PR 18-1 1776 3-4 43% 18
3492 C2 14-1 reg blue epley 1775 26-11 70% 14 TN
3493 CJV 12-Regional+ 1775 55-13 81% 12 AR
3494 CSA 18-Navy 1775 16-8 67% 18 CO
3495 MVA 17-National 1775 42-20 68% 17 FL
3496 TEJAS 15-Black mauro 1775 25-33 42% 15 TX
3497 OMNI 16-Power 1775 27-21 56% 16 CA
3498 SPVB 18-Red 1775 18-8 69% 18 IL
3499 Tulsa Power 12-1 1775 55-8 85% 12 OK
3500 TEXSTAR 14 1775 43-15 74% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.