Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 70 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3451 Mill City 15 1778 35-23 60% 15 MA
3452 CGSV 16-Harris 1778 19-2 90% 16 OH
3453 LEGACY 14-Elite kuki 1778 46-22 68% 14 FL
3454 Mintonette Sports 14-2 1777 25-45 36% 14 OH
3455 SF TREMORS 14-Palkons 1777 28-17 62% 14 CA
3456 BRAVO 17-Black 1777 38-17 69% 17 KY
3457 SOSVBC 14-N jeff 1777 9-15 38% 14 NY
3458 Spiketown USA 16.3 1777 31-4 89% 16 WI
3459 Max Performance 14-Jaz 1777 39-8 83% 14 MA
3460 360 16-Kaos black 1777 24-18 52% 16 TX
3461 Cap City MT 16-Select diamonds 1777 29-13 63% 16 MT
3462 AZ Sky 16-N1 1777 29-25 54% 16 AZ
3463 Sky High Adidas 17-Red 1777 39-19 67% 17 IL
3464 LEGACY 15-Elite danelli 1777 47-35 57% 15 FL
3465 ECVBA 18-1 1777 36-20 64% 18 CA
3466 RVC 15-Mo 1777 16-15 52% 15 UT
3467 Southwest 12-N tanya 1777 36-23 61% 12 OH
3468 LTX SELECT 14-Yellow 1777 30-10 75% 14 TX
3469 Novus 13-Purple 1777 27-4 84% 13 IL
3470 Emerald Coast 18-National - scott 1777 10-4 71% 18 FL
3471 NPJ Seattle 17-National 1777 50-35 59% 17 WA
3472 ATOMIC 16-Smack elite 1777 49-20 71% 16 AZ
3473 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 14-Blue 1777 37-29 56% 14 FL
3474 AAVC 13-Jm 1776 22-3 88% 13 IL
3475 ND Elite 15-Hoyme 1776 26-7 76% 15 ND
3476 Summit 15-Nat'l blue 1776 5-0 83% 15 TX
3477 ECJVC 14-National 1776 36-29 55% 14 NC
3478 Top Flight 13-Elite 1776 19-19 50% 13 IL
3479 LAVA West 14-Molten ja 1776 29-19 60% 14 CA
3480 FC Elite 16-White 1776 36-21 63% 16 WI
3481 Pipeline VC 16-Empire 1776 4-3 57% 16 IL
3482 Iowa Rockets 16-1 1776 42-22 65% 16 IA
3483 Impact Wāhine 14-1 1776 23-6 79% 14 HI
3484 Milwaukee Jr's 16-1 1776 165-185 47% 16 WI
3485 Putnam 14-A ashland 1776 31-6 84% 14 OH
3486 Sanford Fargo 17-UA 1776 34-23 60% 17 MN
3487 FC Elite 11 Navy 1776 23-4 85% 11 WI
3488 VEVA 18 Elite 1776 16-22 42% 18 FL
3489 GVA 11-Pink 1776 10-6 63% 11 PR
3490 FaR Out 12-White 1776 41-4 91% 12 MI
3491 BVC 18-1 blast 1776 9-6 60% 18 DE
3492 OVBC 14-Purple 1776 19-13 59% 14 WI
3493 NRG 13-Ampd navy 1776 31-16 63% 13 TX
3494 Legends Volleyball Club 13 Legends - Leppla 1776 11-1 92% 13 PR
3495 United VBA 14-Purple 1776 48-16 75% 14 TX
3496 SA Force 17 Darkside 1775 41-24 63% 17 TX
3497 WAVE 17-Casey 1775 30-29 51% 17 CA
3498 Idaho ONE 16-White 1775 40-21 66% 16 ID
3499 WF Waves 13-Dani 1775 11-5 69% 13 AL
3500 CMVBC 14-1 1775 27-15 61% 14 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.