2025-2026 Season — Page 70 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3451 | Southwest 12-N tanya | 1777 | 36-23 | 61% | 12 | OH |
| 3452 | OVBC 14-Purple | 1777 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | WI |
| 3453 | Shockwave 18-Black | 1777 | 9-14 | 39% | 18 | KS |
| 3454 | LAV 17-National white | 1777 | 43-17 | 72% | 17 | AL |
| 3455 | Amarillo Xtreme 12-Elite | 1777 | 26-9 | 74% | 12 | TX |
| 3456 | Mets 12-Giovanni | 1777 | 14-9 | 61% | 12 | PR |
| 3457 | AR Metro 18-National | 1777 | 32-8 | 80% | 18 | MD |
| 3458 | HIC 13-N sarah | 1777 | 22-9 | 63% | 13 | UT |
| 3459 | SMASH 16-Extreme | 1777 | 28-10 | 74% | 16 | MA |
| 3460 | Alliance 14-Molten | 1777 | 41-24 | 63% | 14 | TN |
| 3461 | HPRIME 14-Gold | 1777 | 35-22 | 61% | 14 | TX |
| 3462 | Flyers 14-Usa-john | 1777 | 22-33 | 39% | 14 | TX |
| 3463 | FH 17-Ikaika-daniel | 1777 | 21-12 | 62% | 17 | TX |
| 3464 | LEGACY 15-Elite danelli | 1777 | 47-35 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 3465 | STVA) South Texas STVA 16-1 madison | 1777 | 2-5 | 29% | 16 | |
| 3466 | CCVB 16-1 | 1777 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | CA |
| 3467 | MWP 16-Purple | 1776 | 38-14 | 73% | 16 | |
| 3468 | SWMVB 12-1 | 1776 | 6-3 | 43% | 12 | |
| 3469 | BRVA 17-1 | 1776 | 22-16 | 58% | 17 | VA |
| 3470 | FRVBC 15-1 black | 1776 | 21-10 | 68% | 15 | CO |
| 3471 | Paramount VBC 15 Maggie | 1776 | 40-22 | 65% | 15 | VA |
| 3472 | SA Force 17 Darkside | 1776 | 41-24 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 3473 | PVA 17-Blue | 1776 | 34-3 | 92% | 17 | VA |
| 3474 | CGSV 16-Harris | 1776 | 19-2 | 90% | 16 | OH |
| 3475 | Boss CLE 14-2 | 1776 | 53-22 | 71% | 14 | OH |
| 3476 | Epic United 12-Premier | 1776 | 31-6 | 82% | 12 | IN |
| 3477 | Rancho 14-Premier | 1776 | 24-10 | 71% | 14 | CA |
| 3478 | Quickset 15-Blue | 1776 | 28-4 | 85% | 15 | PA |
| 3479 | ECVBA 18-1 | 1776 | 36-20 | 64% | 18 | CA |
| 3480 | NKJV 12-Blue | 1776 | 35-16 | 69% | 12 | KY |
| 3481 | Integrity 15-Intense blue | 1776 | 43-23 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 3482 | Victory 15-Nat'l black | 1776 | 6-1 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 3483 | NRG 14-Ampd navy | 1776 | 36-20 | 61% | 14 | TX |
| 3484 | STORM 16-1elite | 1776 | 23-7 | 77% | 16 | NY |
| 3485 | DIG 15-Black | 1776 | 27-13 | 61% | 15 | TX |
| 3486 | Rise 15-1 | 1776 | 53-14 | 79% | 15 | OH |
| 3487 | STORM 15-Evie/ryan | 1776 | 8-3 | 73% | 15 | CO |
| 3488 | TOV 16-Royal | 1776 | 11-4 | 73% | 16 | |
| 3489 | Summit 15-Nat'l blue | 1776 | 5-0 | 83% | 15 | TX |
| 3490 | Mean 17-S black | 1776 | 9-7 | 56% | 17 | |
| 3491 | CVH SELECT - PR 18-1 | 1776 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | |
| 3492 | C2 14-1 reg blue epley | 1775 | 26-11 | 70% | 14 | TN |
| 3493 | CJV 12-Regional+ | 1775 | 55-13 | 81% | 12 | AR |
| 3494 | CSA 18-Navy | 1775 | 16-8 | 67% | 18 | CO |
| 3495 | MVA 17-National | 1775 | 42-20 | 68% | 17 | FL |
| 3496 | TEJAS 15-Black mauro | 1775 | 25-33 | 42% | 15 | TX |
| 3497 | OMNI 16-Power | 1775 | 27-21 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 3498 | SPVB 18-Red | 1775 | 18-8 | 69% | 18 | IL |
| 3499 | Tulsa Power 12-1 | 1775 | 55-8 | 85% | 12 | OK |
| 3500 | TEXSTAR 14 | 1775 | 43-15 | 74% | 14 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.