Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 70 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is TAV 16-Black yun with a 2270 Elo rating and 48-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3451 Empire 12 National 1685 31-12 72% 12 CA
3452 Spa City 12-Aqua 1685 27-8 77% 12 NY
3453 MVP 17-Blue 1685 31-23 57% 17 WI
3454 Roots 11-1 green 1685 24-7 77% 11 IA
3455 TX SPARKS 11-2 audrey 1685 26-4 84% 11 TX
3456 BRVA 14-2 1685 22-4 85% 14 VA
3457 AP 14-Baden 1685 23-26 47% 14 TX
3458 Chicago Elite 14 Elite 1685 14-22 39% 14 IL
3459 Northern Lights 14-R 1685 15-2 88% 14 MN
3460 Webfoot 14-Elite 1685 26-19 58% 14 OR
3461 Southland 14-Black 1685 29-9 74% 14 LA
3462 SoCal Legends 17-Elite 1685 10-5 67% 17
3463 LBK 12-1 1685 31-10 76% 12
3464 EXCEL 13-National white 1685 10-6 63% 13 TX
3465 SAVBC 13-1 1685 21-14 60% 13 HI
3466 FC Elite 11 Navy 1685 23-4 85% 11 WI
3467 FEVA 11-Danny 1685 26-5 84% 11 FL
3468 Roots 14-3 maple 1685 28-5 85% 14 IA
3469 3CVBC 14-White 1685 39-14 74% 14 TX
3470 Aspire NW 14-1 beaverton 1685 26-12 68% 14 WA
3471 Alamo 14-Gold 1 1685 34-17 67% 14 TX
3472 Iowa Rockets 14-1 1685 35-18 66% 14 IA
3473 CJ Heat 15-National 1684 13-1 93% 15
3474 MARIN 15-Green 1684 24-11 69% 15
3475 KEVC 16-1 1684 17-5 77% 16
3476 Bristol Crush 18-Xia 1684 20-2 83% 18 CT
3477 NYC VBA 16-Broadway 1684 34-23 60% 16 NY
3478 BVA 16-Elite 1684 23-6 79% 16 CA
3479 Mizuno Northern Lights 16-B 1684 19-4 83% 16 MN
3480 VUVC 16-Black 1684 15-8 65% 16 NV
3481 NKYVC 16-2 tide 1684 20-19 51% 16 KY
3482 ESVC 16-Black 1684 27-8 77% 16 AL
3483 1st Alliance 16 Crimson 1684 23-7 77% 16 IL
3484 NSVBC 15-Select black 1684 29-6 83% 15 WI
3485 VEVA 15 Elite 1684 26-9 74% 15 PA
3486 SBVC Girls 15 Molten 1684 26-10 72% 15 CA
3487 Bay Area Eagles 15-Oliver 1684 20-8 71% 15 CA
3488 Surfside 15-Pv elite 1684 19-9 68% 15 CA
3489 SIVBC 12 Monsoon 1684 34-13 72% 12 WA
3490 SMVA 12-1 1684 24-5 77% 12 AL
3491 Brazos Valley One 17 1684 25-11 69% 17 TX
3492 TeamLVC 17-Black 1684 29-19 60% 17 NY
3493 SMASH 17-S 1684 15-9 63% 17 MA
3494 PEAK 17-1 elite 1684 16-5 76% 17 AZ
3495 Venom 13-Black 1684 47-15 76% 13 AZ
3496 ECVC 13-PINK 1684 28-10 74% 13 FL
3497 GCVC 14 Silver 1684 22-22 50% 14 OH
3498 ENCORE 14-Navy kimmy 1684 29-6 83% 14 CA
3499 KeAloha 14-1 jaws 1684 26-5 84% 14 IN
3500 Apex VBTC 13-Apex red 1684 21-6 78% 13 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.