Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 69 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3401 Adrenaline 17-Marty 1780 31-25 55% 17 IA
3402 LOVB 17-Melissa 1780 13-8 62% 17 MI
3403 FTL 15-Fusion hope 1780 26-34 43% 15 FL
3404 SLAM 17-P black 1780 34-19 64% 17 MA
3405 CRUSH 11-Elite 1780 28-4 88% 11 TX
3406 Mizuno Northern Lights 17-2 1780 4-2 67% 17
3407 Cap City MT 16-Select diamonds 1780 29-13 63% 16 MT
3408 AVBC 15-A zuchowski 1779 27-8 77% 15 OH
3409 Loudoun Elite 15 Tony 1779 54-27 66% 15 VA
3410 FC Elite 14-Black 1779 26-6 81% 14 WI
3411 ForceVC 15-1 1779 30-20 60% 15 OH
3412 Mill City 15 1779 35-23 60% 15 MA
3413 MN CORE 14-1 1779 25-8 76% 14 MN
3414 RAGE 16-Toa 1779 46-21 69% 16 CA
3415 SA Empire 12 Legacy 1779 37-12 76% 12 TX
3416 XP 15-Elite 2 1779 56-9 86% 15 IL
3417 Kairos 14 Delta 1779 49-16 75% 14 SD
3418 VAQUERAS 15-F gilbert 1779 18-15 55% 15 PR
3419 LTX SELECT 14-Yellow 1779 30-10 75% 14 TX
3420 Hammerin Hawks 10-1 1779 16-0 89% 10 IA
3421 Dead Frog 15-Green 1779 34-15 69% 15 MI
3422 TEJAS 12-Black kevin 1779 40-14 70% 12 TX
3423 Heat 14 Flame 1779 21-8 72% 14 WI
3424 Zoo City 14 Gators 1779 31-5 86% all
3425 Pgh Elite 14-Premier 1779 34-23 60% 14 PA
3426 Ignite 16 National (WA) 1778 6-2 75% 16 WA
3427 Texas Tornados 14-Adidas 1778 37-13 74% 14 TX
3428 ARVC 17-Black adidas 1778 39-28 58% 17 NM
3429 ECJVC 16-National 1778 33-33 50% 16 NC
3430 FaR Out 12-White 1778 41-4 91% 12 MI
3431 Main Beach 16-Elite 1778 44-22 67% 16 CA
3432 PVA 11 Elite 1778 24-11 67% 11 MO
3433 Pilipa'a Na Wahine VBC 14-1 1778 16-3 84% 14 HI
3434 TXP 14 TOROS 1778 14-3 82% 14 TX
3435 Vancouver VBC 12-1 1778 15-0 100% 12 BC
3436 AJ 11-Red 1778 37-9 80% 11 LA
3437 Turlock Crush 15-Dave 1778 32-20 62% 15 CA
3438 Empower 13-Ignite 1778 44-6 88% 13 CA
3439 CT Juniors 17-National 1778 27-13 68% 17 CT
3440 IV Force 17-Wildpepper 1778 43-21 67% 17 CA
3441 Tstreet SN 17-James 1778 37-20 65% 17 CA
3442 Windthorst 13-Vibe 1778 33-6 80% 13 TX
3443 Monon 17-1o tornados 1778 34-45 43% 17 IN
3444 Iron 14-Black 1777 19-3 86% 14
3445 Boston United 18 National 1777 23-19 55% 18 MA
3446 CI ELITE 18-ALEC 1777 41-9 82% 18 IL
3447 FC Elite 16-White 1777 36-21 63% 16 WI
3448 ECJVC 14-National 1777 36-29 55% 14 NC
3449 EVC 13-National 1777 49-10 83% 13 IL
3450 FUSION 13-Blue 1777 24-8 75% 13 PA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.