Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 68 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3351 NBVBC 13 1782 32-11 74% 13 MI
3352 TOVC 17-García 1782 7-4 64% 17 CA
3353 WF Waves 13-Dani 1782 11-5 69% 13 FL
3354 Omni 16-N1 1782 34-29 54% 16 AZ
3355 D Skyline 14-White-isabel 1782 32-28 52% 14 TX
3356 Apex 13-National navy 1782 10-15 40% 13 MO
3357 RCVA 18-Girls national 1782 30-11 73% 18
3358 Ignite VBCF 15-National 1782 6-3 67% 15
3359 Metro 17-National 1782 40-29 57% 17 DC
3360 Roadrunner 16 Crimson 1782 42-18 70% 16 TX
3361 RockCity 18 N1 1782 25-27 48% 18 OH
3362 WEVBC 18-1 1781 37-6 86% 18
3363 Iowa Rockets 15-Black 1781 29-8 78% 15 IA
3364 Iowa Elite 17-Even 1781 21-3 84% 17 IA
3365 COAST 16-2 davis 1781 32-33 49% 16 CA
3366 Decatur Force 16 Teal 1781 31-16 66% 16 IN
3367 FDL Fusion 14-Purple 1781 19-2 90% 14 WI
3368 GRIT 14-GREEN 1781 30-5 86% 14 AL
3369 NPJ Salem 16-Premier 1781 38-12 76% 16 OR
3370 NNJ 18 Kuna 1781 32-11 74% 18 NV
3371 PVA 17 National 1781 28-13 68% 17 MO
3372 Vision 15-White 1781 43-28 61% 15 CA
3373 414 12-Blue 1781 28-11 72% 12 WI
3374 414 18-Elite 1781 37-18 67% 18 WI
3375 MSVC 12-Adidas manny 1781 48-13 79% 12 FL
3376 IMGA Ascender Elite 15-1 1781 17-32 35% 15 FL
3377 Black Canyon 17-S shane 1781 25-5 81% 17 CO
3378 Elevation 15-Timberline black 1781 25-11 69% 15 CO
3379 SMASH 15-S 1781 19-17 53% 15 MA
3380 Husky 15-New england red 1781 31-13 70% 15 CT
3381 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 17-National black 1781 19-17 53% 17 NV
3382 Premier Nebraska 12-Black 1781 15-14 52% 12 NE
3383 Tsunami 12-1e tnt 1781 32-26 55% 12 GA
3384 Bay Area Eagles 13-1 1781 47-26 64% 13 CA
3385 Prime Sports 16-1 1781 8-0 100% 16 FL
3386 TI Elite 14-1 ohana 1781 44-24 65% 14
3387 Rocky Elite 16 National 1781 51-17 75% 16 CO
3388 Club Sol 13-Teal 1780 34-25 51% 13
3389 360 16-Kaos black 1780 24-18 52% 16 TX
3390 Blue Royals 12 Jewel 1780 49-12 80% 12 WA
3391 CORE Girls 14-Platinum 1780 37-22 63% 14 CA
3392 Monsters 16-Elite black 1780 40-19 68% 16 MI
3393 MAVA 13-Hammerhead 1780 51-10 84% 13 KY
3394 Spiketown USA 16.3 1780 31-4 89% 16 WI
3395 STL Crossfire 15-Sr1 1780 54-17 75% 15 MO
3396 AAVA 13-1 storm 1780 42-22 66% 13 OR
3397 CVH SELECT 16-1 1780 19-20 49% 16 PR
3398 AJV 17 Molten 1780 47-25 65% 17 TX
3399 575 17-Wse taylor 1780 41-33 55% 17 GA
3400 NYC Juniors 16-National 1780 41-34 55% 16 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.