2025-2026 Season — Page 67 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3301 | TXP 14 TOROS | 1785 | 14-3 | 82% | 14 | TX |
| 3302 | MN CORE 14-1 | 1785 | 25-8 | 76% | 14 | MN |
| 3303 | WACO VBC 14-Ua red | 1785 | 35-8 | 76% | 14 | TX |
| 3304 | STORM 15-Evie/ryan | 1785 | 8-3 | 73% | 15 | CO |
| 3305 | SSVBC 18-1 | 1784 | 37-15 | 71% | 18 | NH |
| 3306 | Dallas Premier 14-Black adrean | 1784 | 5-2 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 3307 | FAUCONS 16 | 1784 | 6-1 | 86% | 16 | MA |
| 3308 | Quickset 15-Blue | 1784 | 28-4 | 85% | 15 | PA |
| 3309 | WF Waves 15-Chad | 1784 | 45-7 | 87% | 15 | AL |
| 3310 | Cincy Ice 11-1 | 1784 | 33-12 | 73% | 11 | OH |
| 3311 | South Central NE 15-Black | 1784 | 15-8 | 65% | 15 | NE |
| 3312 | Bama Elite 17-E polar bear | 1784 | 36-21 | 63% | 17 | AL |
| 3313 | Tstreet SN 17-James | 1784 | 37-20 | 65% | 17 | NV |
| 3314 | CWAVE Kurek 11 | 1784 | 28-5 | 85% | 11 | OH |
| 3315 | AJ 11-Red | 1784 | 37-9 | 80% | 11 | LA |
| 3316 | Tsunami 18-1e spider | 1784 | 32-23 | 58% | 18 | GA |
| 3317 | MVP 17-Blue | 1784 | 44-35 | 56% | 17 | WI |
| 3318 | A5 14-Kianna | 1784 | 62-15 | 81% | 14 | GA |
| 3319 | Tsunami 12-1e tnt | 1784 | 32-26 | 55% | 12 | GA |
| 3320 | SA Empire 12 Legacy | 1784 | 37-12 | 76% | 12 | TX |
| 3321 | Idaho ONE 16-Blue | 1784 | 43-26 | 61% | 16 | ID |
| 3322 | St. George Aces 14-Gold | 1784 | 10-5 | 56% | 14 | UT |
| 3323 | EAVC 18-1 | 1784 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | NV |
| 3324 | Pgh Elite 14-Premier | 1784 | 34-23 | 60% | 14 | PA |
| 3325 | Sanford Sports 15-Red | 1784 | 37-28 | 57% | 15 | SD |
| 3326 | MKE Sting 14 Silver | 1784 | 60-26 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 3327 | HJV 14-Premier | 1784 | 29-24 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 3328 | FIGSV 12-1 | 1784 | 32-32 | 50% | 12 | CA |
| 3329 | MJ 14-Black | 1784 | 37-27 | 52% | 14 | MT |
| 3330 | AVC 17-Blue | 1783 | 14-7 | 67% | 17 | NE |
| 3331 | Milwaukee Jr's 15-1 | 1783 | 133-155 | 46% | 15 | WI |
| 3332 | Northern Lights 17-R | 1783 | 57-24 | 70% | 17 | MN |
| 3333 | OPU 13-1 | 1783 | 39-27 | 59% | 13 | FL |
| 3334 | Monon 13-2e parrots | 1783 | 49-25 | 66% | 13 | IN |
| 3335 | BRUSA 14-Fiapo | 1783 | 17-22 | 44% | 14 | CA |
| 3336 | NBVBC 13 | 1783 | 32-11 | 74% | 13 | MI |
| 3337 | STORM 16-1elite | 1783 | 23-7 | 77% | 16 | CA |
| 3338 | MVC 13 Logan | 1783 | 38-9 | 81% | 13 | OH |
| 3339 | Hatchet Volleyball Club 14-Black | 1783 | 25-2 | 93% | 14 | IN |
| 3340 | Millennium 13-Hiser | 1783 | 49-21 | 70% | 13 | OH |
| 3341 | Champions 18-Col | 1783 | 14-3 | 82% | 18 | AL |
| 3342 | NPJ Salem 16-Premier | 1783 | 38-12 | 76% | 16 | OR |
| 3343 | Loudoun Elite Volleyball Club 15-Tony | 1783 | 54-27 | 66% | 15 | VA |
| 3344 | Titanas 11 | 1783 | 15-2 | 88% | 11 | PR |
| 3345 | Elevation 15-Timberline black | 1783 | 25-11 | 69% | 15 | CO |
| 3346 | Mets 11-Giovanni | 1783 | 11-3 | 79% | 11 | PR |
| 3347 | TEVA 15 10 | 1783 | 23-11 | 68% | 10 | NJ |
| 3348 | Arkansas Elite 11-1 | 1783 | 30-12 | 71% | 11 | AR |
| 3349 | Heat 14 Flame | 1783 | 21-8 | 72% | 14 | WI |
| 3350 | Tribe 15-Vktry white | 1783 | 32-49 | 40% | 15 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.