Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 67 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3301 GVC 13-1 (NE) 1783 29-16 64% 13
3302 CRVB 14-1 1783 26-5 84% 14
3303 Black Swamp 15-1 1783 27-9 75% 15 OH
3304 Bama Elite 17-E polar bear 1783 36-21 63% 17 AL
3305 Apex VBTC 18-Apex red 1783 23-10 70% 18 OH
3306 Cincy Classics 16-Red 1783 43-24 64% 16 OH
3307 Arkansas Elite 11-1 1783 30-12 71% 11 AR
3308 ATOMIC 13-Smack premier 1783 48-38 56% 13 MI
3309 CSVC 12-Blue 1783 40-11 78% 12 NC
3310 Elevation 15-Timberline b 1783 16-19 46% 15 CO
3311 HP South 14 Premier 1783 45-25 63% 14 MO
3312 NIVA 12-WHITE 1783 36-11 77% 12 IN
3313 MVC 13 Logan 1783 38-9 81% 13 OH
3314 Sandhills 16-Moe 1783 35-26 57% 16 NC
3315 Top Flight SC 14 Phoenix 1783 36-6 86% 14 SC
3316 Velocity 12-Black 1783 31-5 86% 12 AR
3317 Jax Skyline 14-Black 1783 44-29 60% 14 FL
3318 LAVA West 16-Molten bm 1783 33-17 66% 16 CA
3319 Tx Alpha Premier 14-Adidas 1783 38-20 66% 14 TX
3320 Mets 11-Giovanni 1783 11-3 79% 11 PR
3321 Titanas 11 1783 15-2 88% 11 PR
3322 Rise 15-Purple 1783 29-8 78% 15 CA
3323 St. George Aces 14-Gold 1783 10-5 56% 14 UT
3324 SSVBC 18-1 1783 37-15 71% 18 NH
3325 OPU 13-1 1783 39-27 59% 13 FL
3326 DVC 14-Elite 1783 25-4 86% 14 OH
3327 LEGACY 14-Elite kuki 1783 46-22 68% 14 FL
3328 Cincy Ice 11-1 1783 33-12 73% 11 OH
3329 Hoosier Elite Legacy 14-1 1783 52-33 61% 14 IN
3330 MAVS 816 13-Premier 1783 24-16 60% 13 KS
3331 FH 14-2 ikaika courtney 1783 14-6 70% 14 TX
3332 PVBC 14-1 1783 6-2 75% 14
3333 Pipeline SCVBC 15-Adidas 1783 5-3 63% 15
3334 Millennium 13-Hiser 1783 49-21 70% 13 OH
3335 Downstate 17-Black 1782 59-21 74% 17
3336 South Central NE 15-Black 1782 15-8 65% 15
3337 MJ 14-Black 1782 32-25 52% 14
3338 Downstate 18-Cobras 1782 38-11 78% 18
3339 TEVA 15 10 1782 23-11 68% 10
3340 GVC 17-1 1782 37-26 59% 17
3341 MAVS 816 13-National 1782 31-24 56% 13 KS
3342 NORCO 12-Black 1782 31-17 65% 12 CO
3343 TXP 14 CLOVERS 1782 16-3 80% 14 TX
3344 WD Nation 14-Blue 1782 38-13 75% 14 LA
3345 VVA 13-Meikle 1782 52-19 73% 13 CA
3346 C1VB 13-One 1782 54-11 83% 13 SC
3347 Prodigy 13-Red 1782 41-11 79% 13 NY
3348 Herederas 14-Richmi 1782 10-4 71% 14 PR
3349 WAVE 17-Casey 1782 30-29 51% 17 CA
3350 Boss CLE 12-1 1782 42-27 61% 12 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.