Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 67 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3301 TXP 14 TOROS 1785 14-3 82% 14 TX
3302 MN CORE 14-1 1785 25-8 76% 14 MN
3303 WACO VBC 14-Ua red 1785 35-8 76% 14 TX
3304 STORM 15-Evie/ryan 1785 8-3 73% 15 CO
3305 SSVBC 18-1 1784 37-15 71% 18 NH
3306 Dallas Premier 14-Black adrean 1784 5-2 71% 14 TX
3307 FAUCONS 16 1784 6-1 86% 16 MA
3308 Quickset 15-Blue 1784 28-4 85% 15 PA
3309 WF Waves 15-Chad 1784 45-7 87% 15 AL
3310 Cincy Ice 11-1 1784 33-12 73% 11 OH
3311 South Central NE 15-Black 1784 15-8 65% 15 NE
3312 Bama Elite 17-E polar bear 1784 36-21 63% 17 AL
3313 Tstreet SN 17-James 1784 37-20 65% 17 NV
3314 CWAVE Kurek 11 1784 28-5 85% 11 OH
3315 AJ 11-Red 1784 37-9 80% 11 LA
3316 Tsunami 18-1e spider 1784 32-23 58% 18 GA
3317 MVP 17-Blue 1784 44-35 56% 17 WI
3318 A5 14-Kianna 1784 62-15 81% 14 GA
3319 Tsunami 12-1e tnt 1784 32-26 55% 12 GA
3320 SA Empire 12 Legacy 1784 37-12 76% 12 TX
3321 Idaho ONE 16-Blue 1784 43-26 61% 16 ID
3322 St. George Aces 14-Gold 1784 10-5 56% 14 UT
3323 EAVC 18-1 1784 4-3 57% 18 NV
3324 Pgh Elite 14-Premier 1784 34-23 60% 14 PA
3325 Sanford Sports 15-Red 1784 37-28 57% 15 SD
3326 MKE Sting 14 Silver 1784 60-26 70% 14 WI
3327 HJV 14-Premier 1784 29-24 55% 14 TX
3328 FIGSV 12-1 1784 32-32 50% 12 CA
3329 MJ 14-Black 1784 37-27 52% 14 MT
3330 AVC 17-Blue 1783 14-7 67% 17 NE
3331 Milwaukee Jr's 15-1 1783 133-155 46% 15 WI
3332 Northern Lights 17-R 1783 57-24 70% 17 MN
3333 OPU 13-1 1783 39-27 59% 13 FL
3334 Monon 13-2e parrots 1783 49-25 66% 13 IN
3335 BRUSA 14-Fiapo 1783 17-22 44% 14 CA
3336 NBVBC 13 1783 32-11 74% 13 MI
3337 STORM 16-1elite 1783 23-7 77% 16 CA
3338 MVC 13 Logan 1783 38-9 81% 13 OH
3339 Hatchet Volleyball Club 14-Black 1783 25-2 93% 14 IN
3340 Millennium 13-Hiser 1783 49-21 70% 13 OH
3341 Champions 18-Col 1783 14-3 82% 18 AL
3342 NPJ Salem 16-Premier 1783 38-12 76% 16 OR
3343 Loudoun Elite Volleyball Club 15-Tony 1783 54-27 66% 15 VA
3344 Titanas 11 1783 15-2 88% 11 PR
3345 Elevation 15-Timberline black 1783 25-11 69% 15 CO
3346 Mets 11-Giovanni 1783 11-3 79% 11 PR
3347 TEVA 15 10 1783 23-11 68% 10 NJ
3348 Arkansas Elite 11-1 1783 30-12 71% 11 AR
3349 Heat 14 Flame 1783 21-8 72% 14 WI
3350 Tribe 15-Vktry white 1783 32-49 40% 15 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.