2025-2026 Season — Page 66 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3251 | Miami Elite 15 | 1786 | 39-29 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 3252 | Monon 16-2e medusa | 1786 | 43-42 | 51% | 16 | IN |
| 3253 | MVP 17-Blue | 1786 | 44-35 | 56% | 17 | WI |
| 3254 | PacWest 16-Jay | 1786 | 38-21 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 3255 | WACO VBC 14-Ua red | 1786 | 35-8 | 76% | 14 | TX |
| 3256 | Va Wave 18 Tsunami | 1786 | 40-11 | 78% | 18 | VA |
| 3257 | Mineral Area 11-Alphas black | 1786 | 21-4 | 84% | 11 | MO |
| 3258 | PEAK 15-2 | 1786 | 43-16 | 73% | 15 | AZ |
| 3259 | AEV 14 National | 1786 | 30-18 | 63% | 14 | TX |
| 3260 | NYC Impact 15-National | 1786 | 40-18 | 69% | 15 | NY |
| 3261 | LA6 14-Tina and john | 1786 | 33-7 | 83% | 14 | LA |
| 3262 | FH 15-Ikaika-annette | 1786 | 28-13 | 64% | 15 | TX |
| 3263 | Blue Crab 16-Blue | 1786 | 44-11 | 80% | 16 | LA |
| 3264 | Starlings Tucson 16-Blue | 1786 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | AZ |
| 3265 | CEV Sapphire 18-1 | 1786 | 22-2 | 92% | 18 | OH |
| 3266 | Legacy 14-3 adidas | 1786 | 41-23 | 64% | 14 | MI |
| 3267 | SASVBC G 14 JONAH | 1786 | 49-16 | 75% | 14 | HI |
| 3268 | Monarcas 13-Dennis | 1785 | 19-3 | 86% | 13 | |
| 3269 | Impulse 14-Red | 1785 | 20-4 | 83% | 14 | IL |
| 3270 | BRAVO 15-Black | 1785 | 37-13 | 74% | 15 | KY |
| 3271 | CCJ 16-1 | 1785 | 45-19 | 70% | 16 | AL |
| 3272 | ELLEVATE Academy 14-Steel | 1785 | 56-13 | 81% | 14 | LA |
| 3273 | PEAK 16-2 | 1785 | 33-14 | 70% | 16 | AZ |
| 3274 | Stars Columbia 14-Becca c | 1785 | 39-19 | 67% | 14 | SC |
| 3275 | Podio Sports 14-S | 1785 | 37-3 | 93% | 14 | WA |
| 3276 | 1st Alliance 15-Red | 1785 | 39-18 | 68% | 15 | IL |
| 3277 | BORINQUEN COQUI 17-1f | 1785 | 9-7 | 56% | 17 | PR |
| 3278 | 573 16-Premier n | 1785 | 12-3 | 80% | 16 | MO |
| 3279 | CVC 17-National (NO) | 1785 | 38-22 | 63% | 17 | ND |
| 3280 | SCFM6 Sports CIty VB Fighting Mermaids 16-1 | 1785 | 32-10 | 76% | 16 | |
| 3281 | BAE 15-Oliver | 1785 | 18-13 | 58% | 15 | CA |
| 3282 | Crank It 18-Black mike | 1784 | 20-10 | 67% | 18 | MI |
| 3283 | AZ Sky 16-N1 | 1784 | 29-25 | 54% | 16 | AZ |
| 3284 | Club Cactus 17-Mizuno | 1784 | 37-30 | 55% | 17 | AZ |
| 3285 | Club Solano 13-Maroon | 1784 | 48-22 | 69% | 13 | CA |
| 3286 | Club V 18-Prodigy kolton | 1784 | 32-32 | 50% | 18 | UT |
| 3287 | VA Juniors 13 Elite | 1784 | 53-18 | 73% | 13 | VA |
| 3288 | Premier Nebraska 18-Black | 1784 | 18-17 | 51% | 18 | NE |
| 3289 | Sanford Sports 15-Red | 1784 | 37-28 | 57% | 15 | SD |
| 3290 | SAVBC 13-1 | 1784 | 26-19 | 58% | 13 | CA |
| 3291 | SC Legends 13-Elite | 1784 | 21-14 | 60% | 13 | CA |
| 3292 | Panda 12-1 | 1784 | 28-23 | 55% | 12 | CA |
| 3293 | Fusion 12-Kris | 1784 | 19-5 | 70% | 12 | IL |
| 3294 | Dig This 17-Black | 1784 | 35-14 | 71% | 17 | NV |
| 3295 | CWAVE Kurek 11 | 1784 | 28-5 | 85% | 11 | OH |
| 3296 | UEPA 17-Diamonds | 1784 | 5-1 | 83% | 17 | TX |
| 3297 | Dig This! VBC 15-Black national | 1784 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | NV |
| 3298 | Alpha 14-1 | 1784 | 41-28 | 59% | 14 | KY |
| 3299 | Mintonette Sports 15-3 | 1784 | 40-26 | 61% | 15 | OH |
| 3300 | 573 Missouri Juniors 15-C | 1784 | 6-1 | 86% | 15 | MO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.