Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 66 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3251 EVRC 17-Wyatt 1787 28-3 90% 17 IN
3252 FC Elite 13-Blue 1787 25-5 83% 13 WI
3253 PVBC 14-1 1787 6-2 75% 14 WA
3254 Amarillo Xtreme 13-Impact 1787 28-16 64% 13 TX
3255 LA6 14-Tina and john 1787 33-7 83% 14 LA
3256 RCVA 18-Girls national 1787 30-11 73% 18 VA
3257 HEAT 13-Elite 1787 68-18 79% 13 FL
3258 501 Volley 11-1 national 1787 28-4 88% 11 AR
3259 Big Sky 12-1 1787 44-16 68% 12 MT
3260 Starlings Tucson 16-Blue 1787 7-1 88% 16 CA
3261 ID Peak 18-National cami 1787 13-7 65% 18 UT
3262 MARIN 16-Black 1787 51-25 67% 16 CA
3263 COAST 16-2 davis 1787 32-33 49% 16 CA
3264 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 14-Navy 1787 55-25 69% 14 CO
3265 HPSTL 12-White 1787 47-20 69% 12 MO
3266 CVC 17-National (NO) 1787 38-22 63% 17 ND
3267 ECVC 12-Nat pc - evie 1787 34-5 87% 12 AL
3268 SAVBC 13-1 1787 26-19 58% 13 CA
3269 HP South 14 Premier 1787 45-25 63% 14 MO
3270 CVH SELECT - PR 18-1 1786 3-4 43% 18 LA
3271 D Skyline 14-White-isabel 1786 32-28 52% 14 TX
3272 Iowa Elite 17-Even 1786 21-3 84% 17 IA
3273 STL Crossfire 15-Sr1 1786 54-17 75% 15 MO
3274 XP 15-Elite 2 1786 56-9 86% 15 IL
3275 FW Fire 16-1 purple 1786 18-7 72% 16 TX
3276 Metro Volleyball Club 17-National 1786 40-29 57% 17 DC
3277 CPA 14 Jordan 1786 25-7 78% 14 WA
3278 Lions Starved Rock 16-Red 1786 66-46 59% 16 IL
3279 Bay Area Eagles 15-Oliver 1786 49-27 64% 15 CA
3280 Sportime 14-Gold 1786 35-32 52% 14 NY
3281 Dead Frog 15-Green 1786 34-15 69% 15 MI
3282 Florida Conquer 14-National 1786 48-14 77% 14 FL
3283 Texas Fury 16-Legacy 1785 39-27 59% 16 TX
3284 573 Missouri Juniors 15-C 1785 6-1 86% 15 MO
3285 PVA 17 National 1785 28-13 68% 17 MO
3286 Miami Elite 15 1785 39-29 57% 15 FL
3287 Saratoga 15-Select 1785 51-7 86% 15 NY
3288 SLAM 17-P black 1785 34-19 64% 17 MA
3289 Pilipa'a Na Wahine VBC 14-1 1785 16-3 84% 14 HI
3290 Main Beach 16-Elite 1785 44-22 67% 16 CA
3291 NKJV 12-Blue 1785 35-16 69% 12 KY
3292 NYC Juniors Volleyball 17-National 1785 42-27 61% 17 NY
3293 SA Lightning 16-1 1785 40-27 60% 16 TX
3294 Elevation 11-Peak 1785 37-21 64% 11 CO
3295 913Athletics 14-National 1785 31-8 79% 14 KS
3296 Iowa Elite 15-Even 1785 23-3 88% 15 IA
3297 Black Swamp 15-1 1785 27-9 75% 15 OH
3298 NORCO 12-Black 1785 31-17 65% 12 CO
3299 Top Flight Volleyball Academy 17-National black 1785 19-17 53% 17 NV
3300 BRAVO 15-Black 1785 37-13 74% 15 KY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.