2025-2026 Season — Page 66 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3251 | EVRC 17-Wyatt | 1787 | 28-3 | 90% | 17 | IN |
| 3252 | FC Elite 13-Blue | 1787 | 25-5 | 83% | 13 | WI |
| 3253 | PVBC 14-1 | 1787 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | WA |
| 3254 | Amarillo Xtreme 13-Impact | 1787 | 28-16 | 64% | 13 | TX |
| 3255 | LA6 14-Tina and john | 1787 | 33-7 | 83% | 14 | LA |
| 3256 | RCVA 18-Girls national | 1787 | 30-11 | 73% | 18 | VA |
| 3257 | HEAT 13-Elite | 1787 | 68-18 | 79% | 13 | FL |
| 3258 | 501 Volley 11-1 national | 1787 | 28-4 | 88% | 11 | AR |
| 3259 | Big Sky 12-1 | 1787 | 44-16 | 68% | 12 | MT |
| 3260 | Starlings Tucson 16-Blue | 1787 | 7-1 | 88% | 16 | CA |
| 3261 | ID Peak 18-National cami | 1787 | 13-7 | 65% | 18 | UT |
| 3262 | MARIN 16-Black | 1787 | 51-25 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 3263 | COAST 16-2 davis | 1787 | 32-33 | 49% | 16 | CA |
| 3264 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 14-Navy | 1787 | 55-25 | 69% | 14 | CO |
| 3265 | HPSTL 12-White | 1787 | 47-20 | 69% | 12 | MO |
| 3266 | CVC 17-National (NO) | 1787 | 38-22 | 63% | 17 | ND |
| 3267 | ECVC 12-Nat pc - evie | 1787 | 34-5 | 87% | 12 | AL |
| 3268 | SAVBC 13-1 | 1787 | 26-19 | 58% | 13 | CA |
| 3269 | HP South 14 Premier | 1787 | 45-25 | 63% | 14 | MO |
| 3270 | CVH SELECT - PR 18-1 | 1786 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | LA |
| 3271 | D Skyline 14-White-isabel | 1786 | 32-28 | 52% | 14 | TX |
| 3272 | Iowa Elite 17-Even | 1786 | 21-3 | 84% | 17 | IA |
| 3273 | STL Crossfire 15-Sr1 | 1786 | 54-17 | 75% | 15 | MO |
| 3274 | XP 15-Elite 2 | 1786 | 56-9 | 86% | 15 | IL |
| 3275 | FW Fire 16-1 purple | 1786 | 18-7 | 72% | 16 | TX |
| 3276 | Metro Volleyball Club 17-National | 1786 | 40-29 | 57% | 17 | DC |
| 3277 | CPA 14 Jordan | 1786 | 25-7 | 78% | 14 | WA |
| 3278 | Lions Starved Rock 16-Red | 1786 | 66-46 | 59% | 16 | IL |
| 3279 | Bay Area Eagles 15-Oliver | 1786 | 49-27 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 3280 | Sportime 14-Gold | 1786 | 35-32 | 52% | 14 | NY |
| 3281 | Dead Frog 15-Green | 1786 | 34-15 | 69% | 15 | MI |
| 3282 | Florida Conquer 14-National | 1786 | 48-14 | 77% | 14 | FL |
| 3283 | Texas Fury 16-Legacy | 1785 | 39-27 | 59% | 16 | TX |
| 3284 | 573 Missouri Juniors 15-C | 1785 | 6-1 | 86% | 15 | MO |
| 3285 | PVA 17 National | 1785 | 28-13 | 68% | 17 | MO |
| 3286 | Miami Elite 15 | 1785 | 39-29 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 3287 | Saratoga 15-Select | 1785 | 51-7 | 86% | 15 | NY |
| 3288 | SLAM 17-P black | 1785 | 34-19 | 64% | 17 | MA |
| 3289 | Pilipa'a Na Wahine VBC 14-1 | 1785 | 16-3 | 84% | 14 | HI |
| 3290 | Main Beach 16-Elite | 1785 | 44-22 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 3291 | NKJV 12-Blue | 1785 | 35-16 | 69% | 12 | KY |
| 3292 | NYC Juniors Volleyball 17-National | 1785 | 42-27 | 61% | 17 | NY |
| 3293 | SA Lightning 16-1 | 1785 | 40-27 | 60% | 16 | TX |
| 3294 | Elevation 11-Peak | 1785 | 37-21 | 64% | 11 | CO |
| 3295 | 913Athletics 14-National | 1785 | 31-8 | 79% | 14 | KS |
| 3296 | Iowa Elite 15-Even | 1785 | 23-3 | 88% | 15 | IA |
| 3297 | Black Swamp 15-1 | 1785 | 27-9 | 75% | 15 | OH |
| 3298 | NORCO 12-Black | 1785 | 31-17 | 65% | 12 | CO |
| 3299 | Top Flight Volleyball Academy 17-National black | 1785 | 19-17 | 53% | 17 | NV |
| 3300 | BRAVO 15-Black | 1785 | 37-13 | 74% | 15 | KY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.