Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 66 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3251 Miami Elite 15 1786 39-29 57% 15 FL
3252 Monon 16-2e medusa 1786 43-42 51% 16 IN
3253 MVP 17-Blue 1786 44-35 56% 17 WI
3254 PacWest 16-Jay 1786 38-21 64% 16 CA
3255 WACO VBC 14-Ua red 1786 35-8 76% 14 TX
3256 Va Wave 18 Tsunami 1786 40-11 78% 18 VA
3257 Mineral Area 11-Alphas black 1786 21-4 84% 11 MO
3258 PEAK 15-2 1786 43-16 73% 15 AZ
3259 AEV 14 National 1786 30-18 63% 14 TX
3260 NYC Impact 15-National 1786 40-18 69% 15 NY
3261 LA6 14-Tina and john 1786 33-7 83% 14 LA
3262 FH 15-Ikaika-annette 1786 28-13 64% 15 TX
3263 Blue Crab 16-Blue 1786 44-11 80% 16 LA
3264 Starlings Tucson 16-Blue 1786 7-1 88% 16 AZ
3265 CEV Sapphire 18-1 1786 22-2 92% 18 OH
3266 Legacy 14-3 adidas 1786 41-23 64% 14 MI
3267 SASVBC G 14 JONAH 1786 49-16 75% 14 HI
3268 Monarcas 13-Dennis 1785 19-3 86% 13
3269 Impulse 14-Red 1785 20-4 83% 14 IL
3270 BRAVO 15-Black 1785 37-13 74% 15 KY
3271 CCJ 16-1 1785 45-19 70% 16 AL
3272 ELLEVATE Academy 14-Steel 1785 56-13 81% 14 LA
3273 PEAK 16-2 1785 33-14 70% 16 AZ
3274 Stars Columbia 14-Becca c 1785 39-19 67% 14 SC
3275 Podio Sports 14-S 1785 37-3 93% 14 WA
3276 1st Alliance 15-Red 1785 39-18 68% 15 IL
3277 BORINQUEN COQUI 17-1f 1785 9-7 56% 17 PR
3278 573 16-Premier n 1785 12-3 80% 16 MO
3279 CVC 17-National (NO) 1785 38-22 63% 17 ND
3280 SCFM6 Sports CIty VB Fighting Mermaids 16-1 1785 32-10 76% 16
3281 BAE 15-Oliver 1785 18-13 58% 15 CA
3282 Crank It 18-Black mike 1784 20-10 67% 18 MI
3283 AZ Sky 16-N1 1784 29-25 54% 16 AZ
3284 Club Cactus 17-Mizuno 1784 37-30 55% 17 AZ
3285 Club Solano 13-Maroon 1784 48-22 69% 13 CA
3286 Club V 18-Prodigy kolton 1784 32-32 50% 18 UT
3287 VA Juniors 13 Elite 1784 53-18 73% 13 VA
3288 Premier Nebraska 18-Black 1784 18-17 51% 18 NE
3289 Sanford Sports 15-Red 1784 37-28 57% 15 SD
3290 SAVBC 13-1 1784 26-19 58% 13 CA
3291 SC Legends 13-Elite 1784 21-14 60% 13 CA
3292 Panda 12-1 1784 28-23 55% 12 CA
3293 Fusion 12-Kris 1784 19-5 70% 12 IL
3294 Dig This 17-Black 1784 35-14 71% 17 NV
3295 CWAVE Kurek 11 1784 28-5 85% 11 OH
3296 UEPA 17-Diamonds 1784 5-1 83% 17 TX
3297 Dig This! VBC 15-Black national 1784 7-2 78% 15 NV
3298 Alpha 14-1 1784 41-28 59% 14 KY
3299 Mintonette Sports 15-3 1784 40-26 61% 15 OH
3300 573 Missouri Juniors 15-C 1784 6-1 86% 15 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.