Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 65 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3201 SMASH 15-S 1789 19-17 53% 15 MA
3202 Apex VBTC 18-Apex red 1789 23-10 70% 18 OH
3203 Hometown Heat 18-Heat 1789 32-7 82% 18 WI
3204 NPJ Portland 17 National 1789 38-44 46% 17 OR
3205 Paradigm Volleyball Club 18 Paradigm Revolution 1789 10-4 71% 18 NY
3206 Tribe 15-Premier cardinal 1789 51-19 73% 15 FL
3207 The Edge 16 Elite 1789 41-14 75% 16 IL
3208 NEVA 16-Blue kalani 1789 36-8 80% 16 UT
3209 Rocky Elite 12-National 1789 41-18 69% 12 CO
3210 Metro VBC 15-Pink 1789 28-34 45% 15 IN
3211 Yorktowne VB 13-Blue 1789 36-8 82% 13 PA
3212 Summit Surge 13-1 1789 20-2 91% 13 TN
3213 Herederas 14-Richmi 1789 10-4 71% 14 PR
3214 Topeka Impact 18-1 1789 21-16 57% 18 MO
3215 Dig This! VB Ohana 16-Black 1789 9-3 75% 16 NV
3216 West Branch Wranglers VBC 17 Wranglers VBC Select 1789 27-3 90% 17 MI
3217 SASVBC G 14 JONAH 1789 49-16 75% 14 HI
3218 Portland VBC 14-1 red 1789 24-11 69% 14 OR
3219 HOV 18 National 1789 16-13 55% 18 VA
3220 Turlock Crush 15-Dave 1789 32-20 62% 15 CA
3221 Tx Alpha Premier 14-Adidas 1789 38-20 66% 14 TX
3222 Circle City 16-White 1789 46-28 62% 16 IN
3223 Sandhills 16-Moe 1789 35-26 57% 16 NC
3224 Club Solano 13-Maroon 1788 48-22 69% 13 CA
3225 HP 17-2 1788 28-37 43% 17 MI
3226 Giants 16-1 1788 30-4 88% 16 MN
3227 Club Sol 13-Teal 1788 34-25 51% 13 UT
3228 360 12-Kaos black 1788 21-10 60% 12 TX
3229 TI Elite 16.2 1788 43-37 54% 16 IN
3230 Alpha 14-1 1788 41-28 59% 14 KY
3231 ACCEL 13-Black lewis 1788 37-12 69% 13 TX
3232 A4 Volley 17-Torrey 1788 38-19 67% 17 CA
3233 Dig This! VBC 15-Black 1788 50-17 75% 15 NV
3234 Elevation 10-Amanda 1 1788 10-1 91% 10 OH
3235 Husky 15-New england red 1788 31-13 70% 15 CT
3236 Illini Elite 18-L maroon 1788 24-1 96% 18 IL
3237 Mets 12-Giovanni 1788 14-9 61% 12 PR
3238 Jax Skyline 14-Black 1788 44-29 60% 14 FL
3239 Circle City 16 Volt 1788 50-23 68% 16 IN
3240 DME Elite 13-1 1788 36-24 60% 13 FL
3241 Countdown 13-Elite 1788 36-24 60% 13 FL
3242 RAGE 16-Toa 1788 46-21 69% 16 CA
3243 Blue Ridge 15-Orange 1788 39-16 71% 15 VA
3244 GP 15 Premier 1788 71-21 77% 15 FL
3245 VA Juniors 13 Elite 1787 53-18 73% 13 VA
3246 ForceVC 15-1 1787 30-20 60% 15 OH
3247 Podio Sports 14-S 1787 37-3 93% 14 WA
3248 Integrity 15-Intense blue 1787 43-23 61% 15 TX
3249 IV Force 17-Wildpepper 1787 43-21 67% 17 CA
3250 Black Canyon 17-S shane 1787 25-5 81% 17 CO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.