Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 65 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3201 HPSTL 12-White 1788 47-20 69% 12 MO
3202 MCV 16-Kennell/campbell 1788 39-8 83% 16 NC
3203 NIVA 13-PURPLE 1788 54-20 73% 13 IN
3204 NASA BHM 16-PURPLE 1788 35-21 63% 16 AL
3205 SA Juniors 11 Adidas 1788 30-12 71% 11 TX
3206 540 VB 13 Elite 1788 44-18 71% 13 VA
3207 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 17-Navy 1788 22-2 92% 17 CO
3208 NYC Juniors 17-National 1788 45-31 59% 17 NY
3209 Elevate Athletics 15-Nike bobbi 1788 8-14 36% 15 UT
3210 Sportime 14-Gold 1788 35-32 52% 14 NY
3211 A5 16-Kristina 1788 44-20 69% 16 GA
3212 Girls 14 1788 17-1 94% 14 CA
3213 ACCEL 13-Black lewis 1788 37-12 69% 13 TX
3214 EAVC 18-1 1788 4-3 57% 18 UT
3215 Elevation 10-Amanda 1 1788 10-1 91% 10 OH
3216 TI Elite 16.2 1788 43-37 54% 16
3217 Dallas Premier 14-Black adrean 1788 5-2 71% 14
3218 Absolute 14-White 1788 30-17 64% 14 CA
3219 101 ELite 10-1 elite 1788 45-21 68% 10 CA
3220 AVC 17-Blue 1788 14-7 67% 17 VA
3221 American 14-Red 1787 45-33 58% 14 VA
3222 FC Elite 13-Blue 1787 25-5 83% 13 WI
3223 Hanover VC 16-1 1787 49-14 78% 16 PA
3224 MoCo MAVS 15-Red 1787 27-23 54% 15 TX
3225 Monon 13-2e parrots 1787 49-25 66% 13 IN
3226 MVSA 15 Wild 1787 43-20 66% 15 MD
3227 NPJ Portland 17 National 1787 38-44 46% 17 OR
3228 Portland VBC 14-1 red 1787 24-11 69% 14 OR
3229 Tsunami 18-1e spider 1787 32-23 58% 18 GA
3230 WACO VBC 16-Ua black 1787 28-20 58% 16 TX
3231 501 Volley 11-1 national 1787 28-4 88% 11 AR
3232 AJ 12-Red 1787 37-10 79% 12 LA
3233 HRVC 17-National green 1787 32-16 67% 17 NC
3234 Dunes 15-Black 1787 32-38 46% 15 IN
3235 Idaho ONE 14-Blue 1787 40-36 53% 14 ID
3236 CLUB UNION CLUB UNION 12-Red 1787 13-5 54% 12 UT
3237 SMASH 18-S attack 1787 20-16 56% 18 MA
3238 HEAT 16-Red 1787 40-23 63% 16 WI
3239 Sideout 14-N michelle 1787 55-25 69% 14 NJ
3240 Carolina Rogue 13-Black 1787 35-17 67% 13 SC
3241 HP 17-2 1787 28-37 43% 17 MI
3242 UEPA 14-D 1787 30-23 55% 14 TX
3243 NRG 16-Ampd white 1787 38-13 69% 16 TX
3244 Apex VBC 14-1 1787 5-3 63% 14
3245 Big Sky 12-1 1786 44-16 68% 12 MT
3246 Circle City 16-White 1786 46-28 62% 16 IN
3247 ENCORE 12 Navy 1786 34-14 71% 12 CA
3248 M2 Volleyball 14-E1 1786 44-33 57% 14 GA
3249 GP 17 Premier 1786 65-27 71% 17 FL
3250 Galaxy 14 Ellis 1786 27-6 82% 14 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.