2025-2026 Season — Page 65 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3201 | HPSTL 12-White | 1788 | 47-20 | 69% | 12 | MO |
| 3202 | MCV 16-Kennell/campbell | 1788 | 39-8 | 83% | 16 | NC |
| 3203 | NIVA 13-PURPLE | 1788 | 54-20 | 73% | 13 | IN |
| 3204 | NASA BHM 16-PURPLE | 1788 | 35-21 | 63% | 16 | AL |
| 3205 | SA Juniors 11 Adidas | 1788 | 30-12 | 71% | 11 | TX |
| 3206 | 540 VB 13 Elite | 1788 | 44-18 | 71% | 13 | VA |
| 3207 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 17-Navy | 1788 | 22-2 | 92% | 17 | CO |
| 3208 | NYC Juniors 17-National | 1788 | 45-31 | 59% | 17 | NY |
| 3209 | Elevate Athletics 15-Nike bobbi | 1788 | 8-14 | 36% | 15 | UT |
| 3210 | Sportime 14-Gold | 1788 | 35-32 | 52% | 14 | NY |
| 3211 | A5 16-Kristina | 1788 | 44-20 | 69% | 16 | GA |
| 3212 | Girls 14 | 1788 | 17-1 | 94% | 14 | CA |
| 3213 | ACCEL 13-Black lewis | 1788 | 37-12 | 69% | 13 | TX |
| 3214 | EAVC 18-1 | 1788 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | UT |
| 3215 | Elevation 10-Amanda 1 | 1788 | 10-1 | 91% | 10 | OH |
| 3216 | TI Elite 16.2 | 1788 | 43-37 | 54% | 16 | |
| 3217 | Dallas Premier 14-Black adrean | 1788 | 5-2 | 71% | 14 | |
| 3218 | Absolute 14-White | 1788 | 30-17 | 64% | 14 | CA |
| 3219 | 101 ELite 10-1 elite | 1788 | 45-21 | 68% | 10 | CA |
| 3220 | AVC 17-Blue | 1788 | 14-7 | 67% | 17 | VA |
| 3221 | American 14-Red | 1787 | 45-33 | 58% | 14 | VA |
| 3222 | FC Elite 13-Blue | 1787 | 25-5 | 83% | 13 | WI |
| 3223 | Hanover VC 16-1 | 1787 | 49-14 | 78% | 16 | PA |
| 3224 | MoCo MAVS 15-Red | 1787 | 27-23 | 54% | 15 | TX |
| 3225 | Monon 13-2e parrots | 1787 | 49-25 | 66% | 13 | IN |
| 3226 | MVSA 15 Wild | 1787 | 43-20 | 66% | 15 | MD |
| 3227 | NPJ Portland 17 National | 1787 | 38-44 | 46% | 17 | OR |
| 3228 | Portland VBC 14-1 red | 1787 | 24-11 | 69% | 14 | OR |
| 3229 | Tsunami 18-1e spider | 1787 | 32-23 | 58% | 18 | GA |
| 3230 | WACO VBC 16-Ua black | 1787 | 28-20 | 58% | 16 | TX |
| 3231 | 501 Volley 11-1 national | 1787 | 28-4 | 88% | 11 | AR |
| 3232 | AJ 12-Red | 1787 | 37-10 | 79% | 12 | LA |
| 3233 | HRVC 17-National green | 1787 | 32-16 | 67% | 17 | NC |
| 3234 | Dunes 15-Black | 1787 | 32-38 | 46% | 15 | IN |
| 3235 | Idaho ONE 14-Blue | 1787 | 40-36 | 53% | 14 | ID |
| 3236 | CLUB UNION CLUB UNION 12-Red | 1787 | 13-5 | 54% | 12 | UT |
| 3237 | SMASH 18-S attack | 1787 | 20-16 | 56% | 18 | MA |
| 3238 | HEAT 16-Red | 1787 | 40-23 | 63% | 16 | WI |
| 3239 | Sideout 14-N michelle | 1787 | 55-25 | 69% | 14 | NJ |
| 3240 | Carolina Rogue 13-Black | 1787 | 35-17 | 67% | 13 | SC |
| 3241 | HP 17-2 | 1787 | 28-37 | 43% | 17 | MI |
| 3242 | UEPA 14-D | 1787 | 30-23 | 55% | 14 | TX |
| 3243 | NRG 16-Ampd white | 1787 | 38-13 | 69% | 16 | TX |
| 3244 | Apex VBC 14-1 | 1787 | 5-3 | 63% | 14 | |
| 3245 | Big Sky 12-1 | 1786 | 44-16 | 68% | 12 | MT |
| 3246 | Circle City 16-White | 1786 | 46-28 | 62% | 16 | IN |
| 3247 | ENCORE 12 Navy | 1786 | 34-14 | 71% | 12 | CA |
| 3248 | M2 Volleyball 14-E1 | 1786 | 44-33 | 57% | 14 | GA |
| 3249 | GP 17 Premier | 1786 | 65-27 | 71% | 17 | FL |
| 3250 | Galaxy 14 Ellis | 1786 | 27-6 | 82% | 14 | NC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.