Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 64 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3151 Northern Lights 17-R 1791 55-21 72% 17 MN
3152 Coqui VBC 16-Slunks 1791 16-8 67% 16 MS
3153 ARVC 16-Orange 1790 32-9 78% 16 NC
3154 Club V 18-Prodigy dave 1790 39-24 62% 18 UT
3155 Culver VBC 16-1 1790 19-1 95% 16 OR
3156 Mater Dei Jr Cats 12-Bender 1790 15-3 83% 12 IN
3157 MOD Elite 17-Gold 1790 26-25 51% 17 IL
3158 PSVA 15-1 1790 39-23 63% 15 FL
3159 The Edge 16 Elite 1790 41-14 75% 16 IL
3160 JJVA 14 Teal 1790 42-36 54% 14 FL
3161 Florida Conquer 14-National 1790 48-14 77% 14 FL
3162 Idaho ONE 14-Navy 1790 32-16 64% 14 ID
3163 Club GSL 14-Elect - bryn 1790 34-22 61% 14 UT
3164 NPJ Seattle 17-National 1790 50-35 59% 17 WA
3165 TX LEGACY 13-Elite 1790 41-24 59% 13 TX
3166 Elevation 11-Long 1790 20-8 69% 11 OH
3167 Infinity 16-Green 1790 38-26 59% 16 OH
3168 ADSV 11-Elite 1790 12-7 63% 11 CA
3169 Alpha 15-1 1790 50-26 66% 15 KY
3170 Preds 16-Girls havoc 1790 9-0 100% 16 ON
3171 KW Revolution 14-Elite 1790 28-17 62% 14 TX
3172 Dig This! VB Ohana 16-Black 1790 9-3 75% 16 KY
3173 APV 17-National black 1789 24-20 52% 17 TX
3174 BRAVO 17-Black 1789 38-17 69% 17 KY
3175 HEAT 13-Elite 1789 68-18 79% 13 FL
3176 Arkansas Elite 12-1 1789 42-14 74% 12 AR
3177 BRVA 14-2 1789 22-4 85% 14 VA
3178 CSA 15 Navy 1789 25-11 69% 15 CO
3179 FC Elite 15-Black 1789 29-2 94% 15 WI
3180 Manhattan Mamba 15-1 1789 36-10 77% 15 KS
3181 HOV 18 National 1789 16-13 55% 18 VA
3182 MVA 14-National 1789 39-15 70% 14 FL
3183 Valley Flames 13-Black 1789 36-14 72% 13 TX
3184 Mem Metro 13-Elite blk 1789 49-28 64% 13 TN
3185 New WAVE 14 Tsunami 1789 35-19 65% 14 IL
3186 NASA 15-Purple t 1789 50-8 86% 15 AL
3187 Rhythm 14 Lauryn 1789 37-20 65% 14 TN
3188 Texas Fury 16-Legacy 1789 39-27 59% 16 TX
3189 VAQUERAS 12-F ruben 1789 21-6 78% 12 PR
3190 Idaho ONE 12-Blue 1789 47-12 77% 12 ID
3191 MichioChicago 15-Blue 1789 22-27 45% 15 IL
3192 Jupiter Elite 12-E 1789 34-29 54% 12 FL
3193 Metro VBC 15-Pink 1789 28-34 45% 15 IN
3194 knights 14 1789 6-3 60% 14 NY
3195 Hometown Heat 18-Heat 1789 32-7 82% 18 WI
3196 CVH SELECT - PR 17-1 1789 5-3 63% 17
3197 NITRO 16-Blue 1788 36-22 62% 16
3198 Champions 18-Col 1788 14-3 82% 18
3199 CHiX 16-PiNK 1788 30-45 40% 16 OH
3200 Aus Velocity 16-1 diamond 1788 28-22 56% 16 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.