Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 64 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3151 Culver VBC 16-1 1792 19-1 95% 16 OR
3152 UEPA 14-D 1792 30-23 55% 14 TX
3153 Cincy Classics 16-Red 1792 43-24 64% 16 OH
3154 VVB 17-Steve n 1792 22-27 45% 17 GA
3155 CVBC 13-1s 1791 23-8 74% 13 IN
3156 Mineral Area 11-Alphas black 1791 21-4 84% 11 MO
3157 Ignite VBCF 15-National 1791 6-3 67% 15 NV
3158 United 14-Bhm national 1791 36-13 73% 14 AL
3159 Tri-State Elite 12-White 1791 39-10 80% 12 KY
3160 414 12-Blue 1791 28-11 72% 12 WI
3161 Crossfire Volleyball 17-1 1791 34-30 53% 17 MN
3162 TXP 17-Black misa 1791 35-24 59% 17 TX
3163 Solon Spartans 12-Black 1791 17-2 89% 12 IA
3164 KC Power 15-4 1791 31-10 76% 15 KS
3165 FC Elite 15-Black 1791 29-2 94% 15 WI
3166 Northern Lights 14-R 1791 48-14 77% 14 MN
3167 Valley Flames 13-Black 1791 36-14 72% 13 TX
3168 Arkansas Elite 12-1 1791 42-14 74% 12 AR
3169 Empire National 18-1 1791 26-13 67% 18 CA
3170 GP 17 Premier 1791 65-27 71% 17 FL
3171 Nuevo Leon 16 NL Juvenil Menor 1791 10-0 100% 16
3172 Impulse 14-Red 1790 20-4 83% 14 IN
3173 NRG 16-Ampd white 1790 38-13 69% 16 TX
3174 DVC 15-Purple 1790 17-1 94% 15 OH
3175 SMASH 16-Extreme 1790 28-10 74% 16 MA
3176 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 16-N carly 1790 10-16 38% 16 NJ
3177 Mater Dei Jr Cats 12-Bender 1790 15-3 83% 12 IN
3178 AVC CLE 12-Red 1790 39-24 62% 12 OH
3179 Wildfire 12-N open 1790 6-12 33% 12 FL
3180 864 Elite 12-Lex 1790 26-5 84% 12 SC
3181 Monarcas 13-Dennis 1790 19-3 86% 13 PR
3182 SA Juniors 11 Adidas 1790 30-12 71% 11 TX
3183 M2 Volleyball 14-E1 1790 44-33 57% 14 GA
3184 MAVS KC 18-1 1790 8-0 100% 18 KS
3185 FRVBC 16-Black 1790 15-5 75% 16 CO
3186 Rocky Elite 16 National 1790 51-17 75% 16 CO
3187 Bay Area Eagles 13-1 1790 47-26 64% 13 CA
3188 Idaho ONE 14-Navy 1790 32-16 64% 14 ID
3189 RVC 14-Liv 1790 18-16 53% 14 UT
3190 ENCORE 12 Navy 1790 34-14 71% 12 CA
3191 MVSA 15 Wild 1790 43-20 66% 15 MD
3192 Dig This 17-Black 1789 35-14 71% 17 NV
3193 MVA 14-National 1789 39-15 70% 14 MT
3194 NIVA 13-PURPLE 1789 54-20 73% 13 IN
3195 Alexandria Volleyball Club, MN 15-1 1789 33-8 80% 15 MN
3196 Roadrunner 16 Crimson 1789 42-18 70% 16 TX
3197 NYC Juniors 16-National 1789 41-34 55% 16 NY
3198 WACO VBC 16-Ua black 1789 28-20 58% 16 TX
3199 APV 17-National black 1789 24-20 52% 17 TX
3200 OMNI 16-Power 1789 27-21 56% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.