Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 63 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3101 UPONTOP 18-S elite 1793 24-15 62% 18 FL
3102 Upontop 15-S elite 1793 34-26 57% 15 FL
3103 Elevation 11-Peak 1793 37-21 64% 11 CO
3104 RVC 14-Liv 1793 18-16 53% 14 VA
3105 Elite 16-National alex 1793 42-26 62% 16 FL
3106 Arete 13-Navy ethos 1793 33-30 52% 13 TX
3107 NMBVB 13-Nelson 1793 12-7 63% 13 FL
3108 NRG 11-Ampd navy 1793 28-15 62% 11 TX
3109 FWFIRE 14-P 1793 18-7 64% 14 TX
3110 Yorktowne VB 13-Blue 1793 36-8 82% 13 PA
3111 Jersey Jrs 16-1 1793 27-19 59% 16 NJ
3112 Club 1 16-Skronkstrong 1793 44-25 64% 16 IL
3113 BRUSA 13 Leanna 1792 19-14 58% 13 CA
3114 FC Elite 11 Navy 1792 19-3 86% 11 WI
3115 Giants 16-1 1792 30-4 88% 16 KY
3116 MDJRS 16-Elite black 1792 48-30 61% 16 MD
3117 Sunshine 13 Elite 1792 35-20 64% 13 CA
3118 SVC NGV 11 Aldin 1792 33-10 77% 11 GA
3119 Synergy 17 Phoenix 1792 34-29 54% 17 CA
3120 VVA 15-Rita 1792 35-30 54% 15 CA
3121 ECVC 12-Nat pc - evie 1792 34-5 87% 12 VA
3122 ACT 16-Quon 1792 36-16 69% 16 CA
3123 Amarillo Xtreme 13-Impact 1792 28-16 64% 13 TX
3124 NEVA 16-Blue kalani 1792 36-8 80% 16 UT
3125 Vortex 15-Amy 1792 20-14 59% 15 UT
3126 Tribe 15-Premier cardinal 1792 51-19 73% 15 FL
3127 Solon Spartans 12-Black 1792 17-2 89% 12 IA
3128 L2 16-2 1792 39-17 70% 16 MI
3129 AP 15-Black 1792 33-14 70% 15 TX
3130 DME Elite 13-1 1792 36-24 60% 13 FL
3131 CUVC 16-National2 1792 12-6 67% 16 NC
3132 Premier Nebraska 13-Red 1792 21-17 55% 13 NE
3133 Tri-State Elite 12-White 1792 39-10 80% 12 OH
3134 Wildfire 12-N open 1792 6-12 33% 12 FL
3135 Mesa Juniors 18-Black 1792 16-2 89% 18
3136 Houston Stellar 17-Elite 1792 6-1 86% 17
3137 RVA G14 Navy 1792 74-40 65% 14 AZ
3138 Metro Performance 14-1 1791 14-3 78% 14
3139 TFVBC 17-1 1791 24-6 80% 17
3140 Topeka Impact 18-1 1791 21-16 57% 18
3141 AVC CLE 12-Red 1791 39-24 62% 12 OH
3142 G3VB 16-1 1791 25-24 51% 16 OR
3143 NIVA 15-WHITE 1791 36-14 72% 15 IN
3144 Tribe 18-Vktry navy 1791 21-31 40% 18 FL
3145 Bay Area Eagles 16-Oliver 1791 30-10 75% 16 CA
3146 Reef 17-National brock 1791 30-24 56% 17 CA
3147 A4 Volley 17-Torrey 1791 38-19 67% 17 CA
3148 Countdown 13-Elite 1791 36-24 60% 13 FL
3149 A5 14-Kianna 1791 62-15 81% 14 GA
3150 AVA 17-1 1791 6-2 75% 17 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.