Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 63 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3101 LVL 12 JES 1795 34-5 87% 12 LA
3102 UVC 13-Evren/damon 1795 42-27 61% 13 CA
3103 Omni 13-N1 1795 33-39 46% 13 AZ
3104 ECJVC 16-National 1795 33-33 50% 16 NC
3105 Team Pineapple 15-Black 1795 39-21 65% 15 IN
3106 Fearless Elite 14-1 1795 36-4 88% 14 AR
3107 JJVA 14 Teal 1794 42-36 54% 14 FL
3108 FTL 15-Fusion hope 1794 26-34 43% 15 FL
3109 Jupiter Elite 12-E 1794 34-29 54% 12 FL
3110 Premier Nebraska 18-Black 1794 18-17 51% 18 NE
3111 TX LEGACY 13-Elite 1794 41-24 59% 13 TX
3112 Club W 16-Wave 1794 30-27 53% 16 NC
3113 MAVA 13-Select 1794 47-35 57% 13 KY
3114 Apex Volleyball Academy 18-Elite 1794 24-13 62% 18 MT
3115 NASA 15-Purple t 1794 50-8 86% 15 AL
3116 FWFIRE 14-P 1794 18-7 64% 14 TX
3117 Mintonette Sports 15-3 1794 40-26 61% 15 OH
3118 Driven 15-Teal 1794 34-9 79% 15 FL
3119 Exodus 14-S prime 1794 15-0 100% 14 CA
3120 Millennium 12-Michel 1794 43-10 81% 12 OH
3121 Vegas United G14-Black 1794 24-11 69% 14 NV
3122 NYC Impact 15-National 1794 36-14 72% 15 NY
3123 ARVC 16-Orange 1794 32-9 78% 16 NC
3124 Prolink 16-Mary ellen 1794 51-20 72% 16 GA
3125 NIVA 15-WHITE 1794 36-14 72% 15 IN
3126 L2 16-2 1793 39-17 70% 16 MI
3127 Infinity 14-Blue 1793 24-6 80% 14 WI
3128 PVBC 16-1 1793 5-2 71% 16 WA
3129 Fusion 12-Kris 1793 19-5 70% 12 UT
3130 Spartan Volleyball 15 1793 11-1 92% 15 UT
3131 Academy 14 Jade 1793 40-16 71% 14 NC
3132 Sunshine 13 Elite 1793 35-20 64% 13 CA
3133 A5 16-Kristina 1793 44-20 69% 16 GA
3134 MichioChicago 15-Blue 1793 22-27 45% 15 IL
3135 Synergy 17 Phoenix 1793 34-29 54% 17 PA
3136 CUVC 16-National2 1793 12-6 67% 16 NC
3137 MAVS 816 13-Premier 1793 24-16 60% 13 KS
3138 Arete 13-Navy ethos 1793 33-30 52% 13 TX
3139 Mem Metro 13-Elite blk 1793 49-28 64% 13 TN
3140 Club V 18-Prodigy dave 1793 39-24 62% 18 UT
3141 LAVA West 16-Molten bm 1793 33-17 66% 16 CA
3142 Idaho ONE 14-Blue 1793 40-36 53% 14 ID
3143 Phoenix 18-1 1793 4-3 57% 18 ON
3144 Columbia 18-Black 1792 43-28 61% 18 MD
3145 FSJ 18 1792 30-8 79% 18 AR
3146 Alpha 15-1 1792 50-26 66% 15 KY
3147 Panda 12-1 1792 28-23 55% 12 CA
3148 ATOMIC 13-Smack premier 1792 48-38 56% 13 AZ
3149 Crank It 18-Black mike 1792 20-10 67% 18 MI
3150 Dunes 15-Black 1792 32-38 46% 15 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.