2025-2026 Season — Page 63 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3101 | UPONTOP 18-S elite | 1793 | 24-15 | 62% | 18 | FL |
| 3102 | Upontop 15-S elite | 1793 | 34-26 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 3103 | Elevation 11-Peak | 1793 | 37-21 | 64% | 11 | CO |
| 3104 | RVC 14-Liv | 1793 | 18-16 | 53% | 14 | VA |
| 3105 | Elite 16-National alex | 1793 | 42-26 | 62% | 16 | FL |
| 3106 | Arete 13-Navy ethos | 1793 | 33-30 | 52% | 13 | TX |
| 3107 | NMBVB 13-Nelson | 1793 | 12-7 | 63% | 13 | FL |
| 3108 | NRG 11-Ampd navy | 1793 | 28-15 | 62% | 11 | TX |
| 3109 | FWFIRE 14-P | 1793 | 18-7 | 64% | 14 | TX |
| 3110 | Yorktowne VB 13-Blue | 1793 | 36-8 | 82% | 13 | PA |
| 3111 | Jersey Jrs 16-1 | 1793 | 27-19 | 59% | 16 | NJ |
| 3112 | Club 1 16-Skronkstrong | 1793 | 44-25 | 64% | 16 | IL |
| 3113 | BRUSA 13 Leanna | 1792 | 19-14 | 58% | 13 | CA |
| 3114 | FC Elite 11 Navy | 1792 | 19-3 | 86% | 11 | WI |
| 3115 | Giants 16-1 | 1792 | 30-4 | 88% | 16 | KY |
| 3116 | MDJRS 16-Elite black | 1792 | 48-30 | 61% | 16 | MD |
| 3117 | Sunshine 13 Elite | 1792 | 35-20 | 64% | 13 | CA |
| 3118 | SVC NGV 11 Aldin | 1792 | 33-10 | 77% | 11 | GA |
| 3119 | Synergy 17 Phoenix | 1792 | 34-29 | 54% | 17 | CA |
| 3120 | VVA 15-Rita | 1792 | 35-30 | 54% | 15 | CA |
| 3121 | ECVC 12-Nat pc - evie | 1792 | 34-5 | 87% | 12 | VA |
| 3122 | ACT 16-Quon | 1792 | 36-16 | 69% | 16 | CA |
| 3123 | Amarillo Xtreme 13-Impact | 1792 | 28-16 | 64% | 13 | TX |
| 3124 | NEVA 16-Blue kalani | 1792 | 36-8 | 80% | 16 | UT |
| 3125 | Vortex 15-Amy | 1792 | 20-14 | 59% | 15 | UT |
| 3126 | Tribe 15-Premier cardinal | 1792 | 51-19 | 73% | 15 | FL |
| 3127 | Solon Spartans 12-Black | 1792 | 17-2 | 89% | 12 | IA |
| 3128 | L2 16-2 | 1792 | 39-17 | 70% | 16 | MI |
| 3129 | AP 15-Black | 1792 | 33-14 | 70% | 15 | TX |
| 3130 | DME Elite 13-1 | 1792 | 36-24 | 60% | 13 | FL |
| 3131 | CUVC 16-National2 | 1792 | 12-6 | 67% | 16 | NC |
| 3132 | Premier Nebraska 13-Red | 1792 | 21-17 | 55% | 13 | NE |
| 3133 | Tri-State Elite 12-White | 1792 | 39-10 | 80% | 12 | OH |
| 3134 | Wildfire 12-N open | 1792 | 6-12 | 33% | 12 | FL |
| 3135 | Mesa Juniors 18-Black | 1792 | 16-2 | 89% | 18 | |
| 3136 | Houston Stellar 17-Elite | 1792 | 6-1 | 86% | 17 | |
| 3137 | RVA G14 Navy | 1792 | 74-40 | 65% | 14 | AZ |
| 3138 | Metro Performance 14-1 | 1791 | 14-3 | 78% | 14 | |
| 3139 | TFVBC 17-1 | 1791 | 24-6 | 80% | 17 | |
| 3140 | Topeka Impact 18-1 | 1791 | 21-16 | 57% | 18 | |
| 3141 | AVC CLE 12-Red | 1791 | 39-24 | 62% | 12 | OH |
| 3142 | G3VB 16-1 | 1791 | 25-24 | 51% | 16 | OR |
| 3143 | NIVA 15-WHITE | 1791 | 36-14 | 72% | 15 | IN |
| 3144 | Tribe 18-Vktry navy | 1791 | 21-31 | 40% | 18 | FL |
| 3145 | Bay Area Eagles 16-Oliver | 1791 | 30-10 | 75% | 16 | CA |
| 3146 | Reef 17-National brock | 1791 | 30-24 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 3147 | A4 Volley 17-Torrey | 1791 | 38-19 | 67% | 17 | CA |
| 3148 | Countdown 13-Elite | 1791 | 36-24 | 60% | 13 | FL |
| 3149 | A5 14-Kianna | 1791 | 62-15 | 81% | 14 | GA |
| 3150 | AVA 17-1 | 1791 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | MA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.