Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 62 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is TAV 16-Black yun with a 2270 Elo rating and 48-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3051 AJ 11-Red 1697 37-9 80% 11 LA
3052 CPA 14 Jordan 1697 21-5 81% 14 WA
3053 Shaka 14-Elite 1696 36-18 67% 14
3054 Pohaku 16-1 1696 19-12 61% 16 KS
3055 ATHENA VB 16-3 gold select 1696 30-8 79% 16 OR
3056 AP 16-Black 1696 25-6 81% 16 TX
3057 Max Performance 16-Jess 1696 37-8 82% 16 MA
3058 Aspire 16 Premier 1696 25-16 61% 16 AB
3059 Core 12-Haney 1696 21-4 81% 12 NJ
3060 NorthShore 15 Finley 1696 23-3 88% 15 CT
3061 UP North Jr's DSN 15-Sel 1696 25-4 86% 15 WI
3062 STVA 15-Navy-1 1696 33-10 77% 15 TX
3063 Cape Fear 15-1 1696 32-12 73% 15 FL
3064 SC Rockstar 15-Lance 1696 19-9 68% 15 CA
3065 Vision 15-White 1696 34-16 68% 15 CA
3066 Boltz 15-Desertaces 1696 41-23 64% 15 AZ
3067 Austin Performance 13-Adidas 1696 5-2 71% 13
3068 Mt. Hood 12-1 timberline 1696 33-13 72% 12 OR
3069 NorthShore 17 Puffins 1696 18-6 75% 17 OH
3070 MN Select 17-Black 1696 25-7 78% 17 MN
3071 CMASS EDGE 18-Blue 1696 26-15 63% 18 MA
3072 JAX SKYLINE 18-Royal 1696 27-18 60% 18 FL
3073 MINOI 14-Grey 1696 19-8 70% 14 UT
3074 FC Elite 14-Grey 1696 27-6 82% 14 WI
3075 Vibe VBC 14-1 1696 10-0 100% 14 CA
3076 ZTV 13-1 select 1696 19-11 61% 13 MT
3077 Monon 14-4r fireball 1696 30-6 83% 14 IN
3078 OK Charge South 14-1 1696 34-12 71% 14 OK
3079 Club GSL 14-Elect - bryn 1696 12-9 57% 14 UT
3080 LBK 14-1 1695 23-4 85% 14
3081 K1V 14u 1695 32-8 80% 14
3082 Elite 14-National tiago 1695 33-10 77% 14
3083 MARIN 15-Black 1695 16-18 47% 15
3084 SFSVC 16-1 shirley 1695 42-17 71% 16
3085 TIV 16-Black 1695 16-8 67% 16
3086 Sonics 16-1 1695 23-2 88% 16 MI
3087 KNVBC 16-1 showtime 1695 18-12 60% 16 KS
3088 AVA 16-Midnight 1695 32-15 68% 16 VA
3089 WAVE 16-Nancy 1695 22-18 55% 16 CA
3090 TEJAS 15-Black josh 1695 16-8 67% 15 TX
3091 MADFROG 12-N green 1695 9-0 100% 12 TX
3092 Roncalli Juniors 12-1 1695 24-5 83% 12 IN
3093 Club Four 12-Boost 1695 21-3 88% 12 IL
3094 PJVBC 12-Elite 1695 30-7 81% 12 WA
3095 Legacy 12-Premier 1695 24-7 77% 12 NY
3096 Infinity 17-Green 1695 26-9 74% 17 TX
3097 Iowa United 17-1 elite 1695 24-23 51% 17 IA
3098 BEVBC 17 Navy 1695 37-20 65% 17 MD
3099 NorStar 17-1 1695 21-16 57% 17 CA
3100 CYVBC Surge 17-Black 1695 13-8 62% 17 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.