2025-2026 Season — Page 62 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3051 | FSJ 18 | 1795 | 30-8 | 79% | 18 | AR |
| 3052 | M2 Volleyball 17-E2 | 1795 | 59-24 | 71% | 17 | GA |
| 3053 | Momentous VBC 16-Tara | 1795 | 15-23 | 39% | 16 | CA |
| 3054 | MODE 16 National | 1795 | 39-15 | 72% | 16 | WA |
| 3055 | SC Elite 16-Blue-bo | 1795 | 24-36 | 40% | 16 | SC |
| 3056 | SERV 17 Select | 1795 | 50-20 | 71% | 17 | VA |
| 3057 | LVL 12 JES | 1795 | 34-5 | 87% | 12 | LA |
| 3058 | Club South 14-1 | 1795 | 28-9 | 76% | 14 | TX |
| 3059 | Laredo Premier 12-Force | 1795 | 24-3 | 86% | 12 | TX |
| 3060 | NEVA 10-1 | 1795 | 17-4 | 81% | 10 | UT |
| 3061 | FIVA 16-Rene | 1795 | 53-16 | 77% | 16 | FL |
| 3062 | DaKine 16-National pink | 1795 | 43-30 | 59% | 16 | WA |
| 3063 | Husky 16-Northeast black | 1795 | 37-10 | 79% | 16 | CT |
| 3064 | BVC 12-1 regional michael | 1795 | 31-8 | 79% | 12 | AL |
| 3065 | United 16 National | 1795 | 34-12 | 74% | 16 | AL |
| 3066 | DIG 11-Black | 1795 | 23-7 | 72% | 11 | TX |
| 3067 | APV 13-National black | 1795 | 25-12 | 66% | 13 | TX |
| 3068 | HOU PVA 14-Mizuno | 1795 | 13-3 | 81% | 14 | |
| 3069 | NLVA 12-1 gold | 1795 | 21-2 | 88% | 12 | NC |
| 3070 | Yorktowne VB 18-Blue | 1795 | 30-16 | 65% | 18 | PA |
| 3071 | Xcel 17-Elite blue | 1794 | 47-16 | 75% | 17 | NC |
| 3072 | Lions 14 Navy | 1794 | 42-13 | 76% | 14 | IL |
| 3073 | Cape Coast 14 CHALLENGER | 1794 | 34-22 | 61% | 14 | FL |
| 3074 | Columbia 18-Black | 1794 | 43-28 | 61% | 18 | MD |
| 3075 | HPSTL 15-Orange | 1794 | 47-27 | 61% | 15 | MO |
| 3076 | SVBC 12-Elite | 1794 | 26-2 | 93% | 12 | IA |
| 3077 | Rocky Elite 15-National | 1794 | 53-15 | 78% | 15 | CO |
| 3078 | Spiketown USA 16.1 | 1794 | 49-16 | 75% | 16 | WI |
| 3079 | 864 Elite 12-Lex | 1794 | 26-5 | 84% | 12 | SC |
| 3080 | Alamo 13-Elite | 1794 | 45-27 | 63% | 13 | TX |
| 3081 | Princeton 15-Black | 1794 | 27-18 | 60% | 15 | NJ |
| 3082 | IMUA 15-National veronica | 1794 | 30-12 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 3083 | Michio Chicago 17-Premier | 1794 | 32-11 | 74% | 17 | IL |
| 3084 | Driven 15-Teal | 1794 | 34-9 | 79% | 15 | FL |
| 3085 | Phoenix 18-1 | 1794 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | AZ |
| 3086 | Academy 14 Jade | 1794 | 40-16 | 71% | 14 | NC |
| 3087 | Wildfire 16-N open | 1794 | 10-26 | 28% | 16 | FL |
| 3088 | 360 12-Kaos black | 1794 | 21-10 | 60% | 12 | TX |
| 3089 | Paradigm Ruckus 15-S | 1794 | 36-11 | 77% | 15 | |
| 3090 | OK PEAK 18-1 | 1794 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | |
| 3091 | Exodus 14-S prime | 1794 | 15-0 | 100% | 14 | CA |
| 3092 | KIVA 15 Silver | 1794 | 60-25 | 71% | 15 | KY |
| 3093 | Spartan Volleyball 15 | 1793 | 11-1 | 92% | 15 | |
| 3094 | C1VB 12-Select grvl | 1793 | 40-4 | 91% | 12 | SC |
| 3095 | Prolink 16-Mary ellen | 1793 | 51-20 | 72% | 16 | GA |
| 3096 | CVBC 13-1s | 1793 | 23-8 | 74% | 13 | VA |
| 3097 | GP 15 Premier | 1793 | 71-21 | 77% | 15 | FL |
| 3098 | NVA 18-Black | 1793 | 23-21 | 52% | 18 | PA |
| 3099 | PSVBC 16 NATIONAL | 1793 | 47-5 | 90% | 16 | WV |
| 3100 | PSVA 16-1 | 1793 | 45-24 | 65% | 16 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.