Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 62 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3051 Instinct 11-Wild gold 1797 25-11 69% 11 TX
3052 Elite 16-National alex 1797 42-26 62% 16 FL
3053 360 Volleyball Club 15 15 HP Elite 1797 3-4 43% 15 TX
3054 Rhythm 14 Lauryn 1797 37-20 65% 14 TN
3055 Metro VBC 13-Pink 1797 39-26 60% 13 IN
3056 PSVBC 16 NATIONAL 1797 47-5 90% 16 WV
3057 Blue 13-1 1796 30-4 88% 13 MI
3058 Monon 16-2e medusa 1796 43-42 51% 16 IN
3059 Alamo 13-Elite 1796 45-27 63% 13 TX
3060 Manhattan Mamba 15-1 1796 36-10 77% 15 KS
3061 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 15-Navy 1796 50-23 68% 15 CO
3062 Bay Area Eagles 16-Oliver 1796 30-10 75% 16 CA
3063 COA 16-Chaos 1796 38-27 58% 16 IN
3064 HOU PVA 14-Mizuno 1796 13-3 81% 14 TX
3065 Club 1 16-Skronkstrong 1796 44-25 64% 16 IL
3066 Kairos 12 Alpha 1796 32-29 52% 12 SD
3067 APV 13-National black 1796 25-12 66% 13 TX
3068 IMUA 15-National veronica 1796 30-12 71% 15 CA
3069 DIG 11-Black 1796 23-7 72% 11 TX
3070 MDJRS 16-Elite black 1796 48-30 61% 16 MD
3071 NASA BHM 16-PURPLE 1796 35-21 63% 16 AL
3072 CVH SELECT 16-1 1796 19-20 49% 16 PR
3073 Peake Volleyball Academy 16-Blue 1796 37-3 93% 16 VA
3074 TNT 13 Roadrunner 1796 44-22 67% 13 PA
3075 Club 502 14 1796 34-23 60% 14 KY
3076 NYCLBVC 13-Blue 1796 35-6 85% 13 NJ
3077 Jersey Jrs 16-1 1796 27-19 59% 16 NJ
3078 DACAN 18-1 1796 4-3 57% 18 ON
3079 Hanover VC 16-1 1795 49-14 78% 16 PA
3080 CCJ 17-1 1795 30-13 70% 17 LA
3081 Circle City 14-White 1795 50-25 67% 14 IN
3082 CCJ 16-1 1795 45-19 70% 16 LA
3083 SVC NGV 11 Aldin 1795 33-10 77% 11 GA
3084 TAV 16-Blue (NV) 1795 5-2 71% 16 NV
3085 Xcel 17-Elite blue 1795 47-16 75% 17 NC
3086 VAQUERAS 12-F ruben 1795 21-6 78% 12 PR
3087 Club Boom 16 Club Boom 1795 44-21 68% 16 NC
3088 NRG 11-Ampd navy 1795 28-15 62% 11 TX
3089 Elevate Athletics 15-Nike bobbi 1795 8-14 36% 15 UT
3090 Yorktowne VB 18-Blue 1795 30-16 65% 18 PA
3091 Husky 16-Northeast black 1795 37-10 79% 16 CT
3092 G3VB 16-1 1795 25-24 51% 16 OR
3093 TFVC 17-1 1795 48-13 79% 17 TN
3094 Princeton 15-Black 1795 27-18 60% 15 NJ
3095 Wildfire 16-N open 1795 10-26 28% 16 FL
3096 NEVA 10-1 1795 17-4 81% 10 PR
3097 NITRO 16-Blue 1795 36-22 62% 16 TX
3098 Absolute 14-White 1795 30-17 64% 14 CA
3099 QVA 14-Hydrogen 1795 65-12 84% 14 FL
3100 Roseville Volleyball Club 18 Roseville Joy 1795 19-3 86% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.