Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 62 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3051 FSJ 18 1795 30-8 79% 18 AR
3052 M2 Volleyball 17-E2 1795 59-24 71% 17 GA
3053 Momentous VBC 16-Tara 1795 15-23 39% 16 CA
3054 MODE 16 National 1795 39-15 72% 16 WA
3055 SC Elite 16-Blue-bo 1795 24-36 40% 16 SC
3056 SERV 17 Select 1795 50-20 71% 17 VA
3057 LVL 12 JES 1795 34-5 87% 12 LA
3058 Club South 14-1 1795 28-9 76% 14 TX
3059 Laredo Premier 12-Force 1795 24-3 86% 12 TX
3060 NEVA 10-1 1795 17-4 81% 10 UT
3061 FIVA 16-Rene 1795 53-16 77% 16 FL
3062 DaKine 16-National pink 1795 43-30 59% 16 WA
3063 Husky 16-Northeast black 1795 37-10 79% 16 CT
3064 BVC 12-1 regional michael 1795 31-8 79% 12 AL
3065 United 16 National 1795 34-12 74% 16 AL
3066 DIG 11-Black 1795 23-7 72% 11 TX
3067 APV 13-National black 1795 25-12 66% 13 TX
3068 HOU PVA 14-Mizuno 1795 13-3 81% 14
3069 NLVA 12-1 gold 1795 21-2 88% 12 NC
3070 Yorktowne VB 18-Blue 1795 30-16 65% 18 PA
3071 Xcel 17-Elite blue 1794 47-16 75% 17 NC
3072 Lions 14 Navy 1794 42-13 76% 14 IL
3073 Cape Coast 14 CHALLENGER 1794 34-22 61% 14 FL
3074 Columbia 18-Black 1794 43-28 61% 18 MD
3075 HPSTL 15-Orange 1794 47-27 61% 15 MO
3076 SVBC 12-Elite 1794 26-2 93% 12 IA
3077 Rocky Elite 15-National 1794 53-15 78% 15 CO
3078 Spiketown USA 16.1 1794 49-16 75% 16 WI
3079 864 Elite 12-Lex 1794 26-5 84% 12 SC
3080 Alamo 13-Elite 1794 45-27 63% 13 TX
3081 Princeton 15-Black 1794 27-18 60% 15 NJ
3082 IMUA 15-National veronica 1794 30-12 71% 15 CA
3083 Michio Chicago 17-Premier 1794 32-11 74% 17 IL
3084 Driven 15-Teal 1794 34-9 79% 15 FL
3085 Phoenix 18-1 1794 4-3 57% 18 AZ
3086 Academy 14 Jade 1794 40-16 71% 14 NC
3087 Wildfire 16-N open 1794 10-26 28% 16 FL
3088 360 12-Kaos black 1794 21-10 60% 12 TX
3089 Paradigm Ruckus 15-S 1794 36-11 77% 15
3090 OK PEAK 18-1 1794 3-4 43% 18
3091 Exodus 14-S prime 1794 15-0 100% 14 CA
3092 KIVA 15 Silver 1794 60-25 71% 15 KY
3093 Spartan Volleyball 15 1793 11-1 92% 15
3094 C1VB 12-Select grvl 1793 40-4 91% 12 SC
3095 Prolink 16-Mary ellen 1793 51-20 72% 16 GA
3096 CVBC 13-1s 1793 23-8 74% 13 VA
3097 GP 15 Premier 1793 71-21 77% 15 FL
3098 NVA 18-Black 1793 23-21 52% 18 PA
3099 PSVBC 16 NATIONAL 1793 47-5 90% 16 WV
3100 PSVA 16-1 1793 45-24 65% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.