Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 61 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3001 MJVA 14-1 1799 6-1 86% 14 TN
3002 Instinct 11-Wild gold 1799 25-11 69% 11 TX
3003 VVB 18-Marj 1799 19-2 90% 18 CA
3004 EVA 17 Elite 1799 38-22 63% 17 AR
3005 Illini Elite 18-L maroon 1798 24-1 96% 18 IL
3006 FVC 18 Freedom 1798 20-13 61% 18 CA
3007 WAVE 15-Nick 1798 31-9 78% 15 CA
3008 Tropics Girls 18-S elite kelli 1798 33-23 59% 18 FL
3009 Zero Gravity 16-Black 1798 67-12 85% 16 OH
3010 CT Juniors 15-National 1798 21-14 60% 15 CT
3011 Metro VBC 13-Pink 1798 39-26 60% 13 IN
3012 Pakmen 15-Gold 1798 5-7 42% 15 ON
3013 Northern Lights 17-B 1798 43-27 61% 17 MN
3014 Mizuno Northern Lights 16-B 1798 4-2 67% 16
3015 Sanford Sports 17-Red 1798 43-23 65% 17 SD
3016 CADO 18 DESTINY 1797 39-14 72% 18 NY
3017 AVC 16-1 1797 61-39 58% 16 VA
3018 KC Power 15-4 1797 31-10 76% 15 KS
3019 Jammers 12-Black 1797 48-19 72% 12 HI
3020 Circle City 14-White 1797 50-25 67% 14 IN
3021 Club W 16-Wave 1797 30-27 53% 16 NC
3022 Fearless Elite 14-1 1797 36-4 88% 14 AR
3023 FRVBC 16-2 red 1797 26-14 65% 16 CO
3024 Millennium 12-Michel 1797 43-10 81% 12 OH
3025 VolleyFX 13 Mystic 1797 57-12 81% 13 NY
3026 NYCLBVC 13-Blue 1797 35-6 85% 13 NY
3027 OT 14-O semei 1797 35-26 57% 14 FL
3028 Redline 16-Black 1797 37-5 88% 16 MI
3029 Reef 15-National george 1797 35-15 70% 15 CA
3030 Team Pineapple 15-Black 1797 39-21 65% 15 IN
3031 TORCH 15-Katie 1797 33-22 60% 15 CA
3032 TEXSTAR 16 1797 43-17 72% 16 TX
3033 Club V 14-Celest 1797 34-15 69% 14 UT
3034 South County 15-Malia 1797 20-14 59% 15 RI
3035 Metro 14-Purple 1797 18-11 62% 14 DC
3036 Dakota Summit 12-1 1796 16-0 100% 12
3037 Sideout 17-N justin 1796 40-28 59% 17 NJ
3038 Bama Elite 15-E owls 1796 37-27 58% 15 AL
3039 BRYC 16 Royal 1796 57-19 75% 16 VA
3040 Cincy Classics 15-Red 1796 40-16 71% 15 OH
3041 ENCORE 14-Navy wolfpack 1796 38-30 56% 14 CA
3042 EVRC 17-Wyatt 1796 28-3 90% 17 IN
3043 Colorado Juniors 17-Tara/amy 1796 18-8 69% 17 CO
3044 A5 11-1 1796 7-2 78% 11 GA
3045 Flyers 13-Usa-john 1796 23-38 36% 13 TX
3046 Viper 14-1 jo/kelly 1796 17-3 85% 14 CA
3047 DACAN 18-1 1796 4-3 57% 18
3048 ACESH 17-1 1796 7-9 44% 17 HI
3049 USA South 16-Premier purple 1796 28-26 52% 16 FL
3050 Amarillo Xtreme 16 TUF 1795 17-8 68% 16 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.