2025-2026 Season — Page 61 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3001 | KW Revolution 14-Elite | 1800 | 28-17 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 3002 | Club GSL 14-Elect - bryn | 1800 | 34-22 | 61% | 14 | UT |
| 3003 | FaR Out 14 Onyx | 1800 | 35-15 | 70% | 14 | MI |
| 3004 | C1VB 12-Select grvl | 1800 | 40-4 | 91% | 12 | SC |
| 3005 | NPJ Bend 13-Premier | 1800 | 32-5 | 86% | 13 | OR |
| 3006 | Zero Gravity 16-Black | 1800 | 67-12 | 85% | 16 | OH |
| 3007 | C1VB 13-One | 1800 | 54-11 | 83% | 13 | SC |
| 3008 | Shanghai ZYY VBC 15 | 1800 | 9-2 | 82% | 15 | AZ |
| 3009 | Blue Crab 16-Blue | 1800 | 44-11 | 80% | 16 | LA |
| 3010 | Spiketown USA 16.2 | 1800 | 52-14 | 79% | 16 | WI |
| 3011 | Altitude 15-Black | 1800 | 62-17 | 77% | 15 | AZ |
| 3012 | Cape Coast 14 CHALLENGER | 1799 | 34-22 | 61% | 14 | FL |
| 3013 | HRVC 17-National green | 1799 | 32-16 | 67% | 17 | NC |
| 3014 | SCFM6 Sports CIty VB Fighting Mermaids 16-1 | 1799 | 37-11 | 77% | 16 | CA |
| 3015 | FH 15-Ikaika-annette | 1799 | 28-13 | 64% | 15 | TX |
| 3016 | DaKine 16-National pink | 1799 | 43-30 | 59% | 16 | WA |
| 3017 | FVC 18 Freedom | 1799 | 20-13 | 61% | 18 | NE |
| 3018 | Elevation 11-Long | 1799 | 20-8 | 69% | 11 | OH |
| 3019 | Uno Girls 16 Elite | 1799 | 38-23 | 62% | 16 | IL |
| 3020 | Premier Nebraska 13-Red | 1799 | 21-17 | 55% | 13 | NE |
| 3021 | NMBVB 13-Nelson | 1798 | 12-7 | 63% | 13 | FL |
| 3022 | MVA 17-National | 1798 | 42-20 | 68% | 17 | MD |
| 3023 | CLEVELAND VOLLEYBALL COMPANY 14-Black | 1798 | 19-45 | 30% | 14 | OH |
| 3024 | MoCo MAVS 15-Red | 1798 | 27-23 | 54% | 15 | TX |
| 3025 | KIVA 15 Silver | 1798 | 60-25 | 71% | 15 | KY |
| 3026 | Crystal City Volleyball Club 16 CRYSTAL CITY GARNETS (WE) | 1798 | 26-1 | 93% | 16 | NY |
| 3027 | Rocky Elite 15-National | 1798 | 53-15 | 78% | 15 | CO |
| 3028 | GRIT 14-GREEN | 1798 | 30-5 | 86% | 14 | IN |
| 3029 | BAVA 14 Waves | 1798 | 51-29 | 64% | 14 | MD |
| 3030 | SPVB 16 Elite | 1798 | 15-17 | 47% | 16 | IL |
| 3031 | MJVA 14-1 | 1798 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | TN |
| 3032 | BRYC 16 Royal | 1798 | 57-19 | 75% | 16 | VA |
| 3033 | Stars Columbia 14-Becca c | 1798 | 39-19 | 67% | 14 | SC |
| 3034 | UPONTOP 13-S elite | 1798 | 27-30 | 47% | 13 | FL |
| 3035 | ENCORE 14-Navy wolfpack | 1798 | 38-30 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 3036 | Phoenix G16-Black | 1798 | 34-21 | 62% | 16 | OH |
| 3037 | Pakmen 15-Gold | 1798 | 5-7 | 42% | 15 | ON |
| 3038 | Titans Volleyball Association 16 Hazard | 1798 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | ON |
| 3039 | AP 15-Black | 1797 | 33-14 | 70% | 15 | TX |
| 3040 | Redline 16-Black | 1797 | 37-5 | 88% | 16 | MI |
| 3041 | Monsters 16-Elite black | 1797 | 40-19 | 68% | 16 | MI |
| 3042 | United 16 National | 1797 | 34-12 | 74% | 16 | AL |
| 3043 | Wisconsin Elite 16-Elite | 1797 | 34-32 | 52% | 16 | WI |
| 3044 | South Texas STVA 17-1 jordan | 1797 | 3-6 | 33% | 17 | NV |
| 3045 | Club South 14-1 | 1797 | 28-9 | 76% | 14 | TX |
| 3046 | SMASH 15-S power | 1797 | 29-17 | 63% | 15 | MA |
| 3047 | ACESH 17-1 | 1797 | 7-9 | 44% | 17 | HI |
| 3048 | Emerald Coast Volleyball Club 17 17/18 National - Scott | 1797 | 14-3 | 82% | 17 | AL |
| 3049 | Dakota Summit 12-1 | 1797 | 16-0 | 100% | 12 | ND |
| 3050 | CADO 18 DESTINY | 1797 | 39-14 | 72% | 18 | NY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.