Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 61 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
3001 KW Revolution 14-Elite 1800 28-17 62% 14 TX
3002 Club GSL 14-Elect - bryn 1800 34-22 61% 14 UT
3003 FaR Out 14 Onyx 1800 35-15 70% 14 MI
3004 C1VB 12-Select grvl 1800 40-4 91% 12 SC
3005 NPJ Bend 13-Premier 1800 32-5 86% 13 OR
3006 Zero Gravity 16-Black 1800 67-12 85% 16 OH
3007 C1VB 13-One 1800 54-11 83% 13 SC
3008 Shanghai ZYY VBC 15 1800 9-2 82% 15 AZ
3009 Blue Crab 16-Blue 1800 44-11 80% 16 LA
3010 Spiketown USA 16.2 1800 52-14 79% 16 WI
3011 Altitude 15-Black 1800 62-17 77% 15 AZ
3012 Cape Coast 14 CHALLENGER 1799 34-22 61% 14 FL
3013 HRVC 17-National green 1799 32-16 67% 17 NC
3014 SCFM6 Sports CIty VB Fighting Mermaids 16-1 1799 37-11 77% 16 CA
3015 FH 15-Ikaika-annette 1799 28-13 64% 15 TX
3016 DaKine 16-National pink 1799 43-30 59% 16 WA
3017 FVC 18 Freedom 1799 20-13 61% 18 NE
3018 Elevation 11-Long 1799 20-8 69% 11 OH
3019 Uno Girls 16 Elite 1799 38-23 62% 16 IL
3020 Premier Nebraska 13-Red 1799 21-17 55% 13 NE
3021 NMBVB 13-Nelson 1798 12-7 63% 13 FL
3022 MVA 17-National 1798 42-20 68% 17 MD
3023 CLEVELAND VOLLEYBALL COMPANY 14-Black 1798 19-45 30% 14 OH
3024 MoCo MAVS 15-Red 1798 27-23 54% 15 TX
3025 KIVA 15 Silver 1798 60-25 71% 15 KY
3026 Crystal City Volleyball Club 16 CRYSTAL CITY GARNETS (WE) 1798 26-1 93% 16 NY
3027 Rocky Elite 15-National 1798 53-15 78% 15 CO
3028 GRIT 14-GREEN 1798 30-5 86% 14 IN
3029 BAVA 14 Waves 1798 51-29 64% 14 MD
3030 SPVB 16 Elite 1798 15-17 47% 16 IL
3031 MJVA 14-1 1798 6-1 86% 14 TN
3032 BRYC 16 Royal 1798 57-19 75% 16 VA
3033 Stars Columbia 14-Becca c 1798 39-19 67% 14 SC
3034 UPONTOP 13-S elite 1798 27-30 47% 13 FL
3035 ENCORE 14-Navy wolfpack 1798 38-30 56% 14 CA
3036 Phoenix G16-Black 1798 34-21 62% 16 OH
3037 Pakmen 15-Gold 1798 5-7 42% 15 ON
3038 Titans Volleyball Association 16 Hazard 1798 4-1 80% 16 ON
3039 AP 15-Black 1797 33-14 70% 15 TX
3040 Redline 16-Black 1797 37-5 88% 16 MI
3041 Monsters 16-Elite black 1797 40-19 68% 16 MI
3042 United 16 National 1797 34-12 74% 16 AL
3043 Wisconsin Elite 16-Elite 1797 34-32 52% 16 WI
3044 South Texas STVA 17-1 jordan 1797 3-6 33% 17 NV
3045 Club South 14-1 1797 28-9 76% 14 TX
3046 SMASH 15-S power 1797 29-17 63% 15 MA
3047 ACESH 17-1 1797 7-9 44% 17 HI
3048 Emerald Coast Volleyball Club 17 17/18 National - Scott 1797 14-3 82% 17 AL
3049 Dakota Summit 12-1 1797 16-0 100% 12 ND
3050 CADO 18 DESTINY 1797 39-14 72% 18 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.