Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 60 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2951 Academy West 17 National 1802 38-29 57% 17 CA
2952 Academy West 14-Hp-1 1802 29-23 56% 14 CA
2953 Monsters 15-Elite black 1802 45-10 82% 15 MI
2954 LTX SELECT 17-Yellow 1802 30-7 81% 17 TX
2955 FL Momentum 17-Gold 1802 20-16 56% 17 FL
2956 CSA 17-Navy 1802 25-15 63% 17 CO
2957 Phoenix G16-Black 1802 34-21 62% 16 OH
2958 Rise 16-1 (OV) 1802 35-13 73% 16 OH
2959 SVC 16-1 (NE) 1802 32-11 74% 16
2960 Lex United 13 Elite 1801 47-29 62% 13 KY
2961 Alpha Omega 15 Elite 1801 36-12 75% 15 MO
2962 FaR Out 14 Steel 1801 41-4 91% 14 MI
2963 GSI 14-Green 1801 13-14 48% 14 FL
2964 MAVA 13-Select 1801 47-35 57% 13 KY
2965 TAV Houston 18-Black 1801 23-24 49% 18 TX
2966 RVC Impact 11 1801 48-18 72% 11 VA
2967 Topeka Elite 14-1 1801 27-11 71% 14 KS
2968 Uno Girls 16 Elite 1801 38-23 62% 16 IL
2969 913Athletics 14-National 1801 31-8 79% 14 KS
2970 BSVBC 15-Black 1801 40-14 74% 15 IL
2971 Brownsville Dynamite 13-1 1801 28-4 88% 13 TX
2972 HP 15-1 1801 35-28 56% 15 MI
2973 Club 502 14 1801 34-23 60% 14 KY
2974 808AC 12-Dayne 1801 31-5 86% 12 HI
2975 ID Crush 12-National 1801 8-0 100% 12 ID
2976 HEAT 15-Red 1800 45-14 76% 15 WI
2977 CPA 14 Jordan 1800 25-7 78% 14 WA
2978 FaR Out 14 Onyx 1800 35-15 70% 14 MI
2979 Horseshoe VBC 14-Red 1800 32-11 71% 14 PA
2980 Team Pineapple 18-Black 1800 43-17 72% 18 IN
2981 RSVBC 14-1 1800 50-25 67% 14 WA
2982 The St. James 14 Navy 1800 53-12 82% 14 VA
2983 TXP 17-Black misa 1800 35-24 59% 17 TX
2984 Kairos 12 Alpha 1800 32-29 52% 12 SD
2985 GRIT 16-Premier 1800 31-8 79% 16 AL
2986 MINOI 15-Black 1800 28-20 58% 15 UT
2987 BRUSA 14-Fiapo 1800 17-22 44% 14 CA
2988 SLAM 14-P black 1800 38-10 79% 14 MA
2989 United 17 National 1800 32-12 73% 17 AL
2990 FAUCONS 16 1800 6-1 86% 16
2991 Austin Velocity 16-1 diamond 1800 8-2 80% 16
2992 Empire National 18-1 1800 26-13 67% 18
2993 TNT 13 Roadrunner 1800 44-22 67% 13 PA
2994 IGNITE 14-BLUE 1799 42-15 74% 14 OH
2995 MKE Sting 14 Silver 1799 60-26 70% 14 WI
2996 MODE 17 National 1799 42-26 62% 17 WA
2997 Premier EDGE 14 1799 46-24 65% 14 DE
2998 KNVBC 16-1 showtime 1799 22-17 56% 16 KS
2999 QVA 14-Hydrogen 1799 65-12 84% 14 FL
3000 UPONTOP 13-S elite 1799 27-30 47% 13 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.