Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 60 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2951 MN Select 18-2 1803 28-18 61% 18 MN
2952 MAVS KC 14-National 1803 22-25 47% 14 KS
2953 AP 11 adidas 1803 30-13 70% 11 TX
2954 LOBOS 13-Black 1803 44-17 72% 13 CO
2955 Lex United 13 Elite 1803 47-29 62% 13 KY
2956 WAVE 15-Nick 1803 31-9 78% 15 CA
2957 SAVBC 12-1 1803 29-8 78% 12 CA
2958 Areté 16-Navy ethos 1803 37-25 59% 16 TX
2959 SMASH 18 1803 20-11 65% 18 MA
2960 VCN 13-Elite 1803 9-7 56% 13 NE
2961 CUVC 16-Premier 1802 28-37 43% 16 NC
2962 TAV Houston 14-Blue 1802 42-30 58% 14 TX
2963 LTX SELECT 17-Yellow 1802 30-7 81% 17 TX
2964 MCV 16-Kennell/campbell 1802 39-8 83% 16 NC
2965 573 16-Premier n 1802 12-3 80% 16 MO
2966 BRAVO 14-Black 1802 53-20 73% 14 KY
2967 Sanford Sports 17-Red 1802 43-23 65% 17 SD
2968 AVA 17-1 1802 6-2 75% 17 MA
2969 GP 11 National 1802 61-21 74% 11 FL
2970 OT 14-O semei 1802 35-26 57% 14 FL
2971 WD Nation 14-Blue 1802 38-13 75% 14 LA
2972 Legacy 14-3 adidas 1802 41-23 64% 14 MI
2973 Tropics Girls 18-S elite kelli 1802 33-23 59% 18 FL
2974 Fusion 16-Blue 1802 45-35 56% 16 PA
2975 QVA 16-Hydrogen 1802 54-12 82% 16 FL
2976 ARVC 12-Orange 1801 35-4 90% 12 NC
2977 VolleyFX 13 Mystic 1801 57-12 81% 13 NY
2978 AJ 12-Red 1801 37-10 79% 12 LA
2979 Alpha Omega 15 Elite 1801 36-12 75% 15 MO
2980 CVC 13 SILVER 1801 44-16 73% 13 OH
2981 MN North 16-1 navy 1801 59-24 71% 16 MN
2982 EMV 12-National black chris 1801 5-2 71% 12 TX
2983 M2 Volleyball 17-E2 1801 59-24 71% 17 GA
2984 UPONTOP 18-S elite 1801 24-15 62% 18 FL
2985 KNVBC 16-1 showtime 1801 22-17 56% 16 KS
2986 IMGA Ascender Elite 15-1 1801 17-32 35% 15 FL
2987 CT Juniors 15-National 1800 21-14 60% 15 CT
2988 540 VB 13 Elite 1800 44-18 71% 13 VA
2989 Michio Chicago 17-Premier 1800 32-11 74% 17 IL
2990 HPSTL 15-Orange 1800 47-27 61% 15 MO
2991 Rise 16-1 (OV) 1800 35-13 73% 16 OH
2992 MINOI 15-Black 1800 28-20 58% 15 UT
2993 Infinity 16-Green 1800 38-26 59% 16 OH
2994 Horseshoe VBC 14-Red 1800 32-11 71% 14 PA
2995 XP 14-Elite 1 1800 46-19 71% 14 IL
2996 TORCH 15-Katie 1800 33-22 60% 15 CA
2997 Topeka Elite 14-1 1800 27-11 71% 14 KS
2998 IGNITE 14-BLUE 1800 42-15 74% 14 OH
2999 Academy West 18 National 1800 35-24 59% 18 CA
3000 PSVA 16-1 1800 45-24 65% 16 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.