2025-2026 Season — Page 60 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2951 | MN Select 18-2 | 1803 | 28-18 | 61% | 18 | MN |
| 2952 | MAVS KC 14-National | 1803 | 22-25 | 47% | 14 | KS |
| 2953 | AP 11 adidas | 1803 | 30-13 | 70% | 11 | TX |
| 2954 | LOBOS 13-Black | 1803 | 44-17 | 72% | 13 | CO |
| 2955 | Lex United 13 Elite | 1803 | 47-29 | 62% | 13 | KY |
| 2956 | WAVE 15-Nick | 1803 | 31-9 | 78% | 15 | CA |
| 2957 | SAVBC 12-1 | 1803 | 29-8 | 78% | 12 | CA |
| 2958 | Areté 16-Navy ethos | 1803 | 37-25 | 59% | 16 | TX |
| 2959 | SMASH 18 | 1803 | 20-11 | 65% | 18 | MA |
| 2960 | VCN 13-Elite | 1803 | 9-7 | 56% | 13 | NE |
| 2961 | CUVC 16-Premier | 1802 | 28-37 | 43% | 16 | NC |
| 2962 | TAV Houston 14-Blue | 1802 | 42-30 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 2963 | LTX SELECT 17-Yellow | 1802 | 30-7 | 81% | 17 | TX |
| 2964 | MCV 16-Kennell/campbell | 1802 | 39-8 | 83% | 16 | NC |
| 2965 | 573 16-Premier n | 1802 | 12-3 | 80% | 16 | MO |
| 2966 | BRAVO 14-Black | 1802 | 53-20 | 73% | 14 | KY |
| 2967 | Sanford Sports 17-Red | 1802 | 43-23 | 65% | 17 | SD |
| 2968 | AVA 17-1 | 1802 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | MA |
| 2969 | GP 11 National | 1802 | 61-21 | 74% | 11 | FL |
| 2970 | OT 14-O semei | 1802 | 35-26 | 57% | 14 | FL |
| 2971 | WD Nation 14-Blue | 1802 | 38-13 | 75% | 14 | LA |
| 2972 | Legacy 14-3 adidas | 1802 | 41-23 | 64% | 14 | MI |
| 2973 | Tropics Girls 18-S elite kelli | 1802 | 33-23 | 59% | 18 | FL |
| 2974 | Fusion 16-Blue | 1802 | 45-35 | 56% | 16 | PA |
| 2975 | QVA 16-Hydrogen | 1802 | 54-12 | 82% | 16 | FL |
| 2976 | ARVC 12-Orange | 1801 | 35-4 | 90% | 12 | NC |
| 2977 | VolleyFX 13 Mystic | 1801 | 57-12 | 81% | 13 | NY |
| 2978 | AJ 12-Red | 1801 | 37-10 | 79% | 12 | LA |
| 2979 | Alpha Omega 15 Elite | 1801 | 36-12 | 75% | 15 | MO |
| 2980 | CVC 13 SILVER | 1801 | 44-16 | 73% | 13 | OH |
| 2981 | MN North 16-1 navy | 1801 | 59-24 | 71% | 16 | MN |
| 2982 | EMV 12-National black chris | 1801 | 5-2 | 71% | 12 | TX |
| 2983 | M2 Volleyball 17-E2 | 1801 | 59-24 | 71% | 17 | GA |
| 2984 | UPONTOP 18-S elite | 1801 | 24-15 | 62% | 18 | FL |
| 2985 | KNVBC 16-1 showtime | 1801 | 22-17 | 56% | 16 | KS |
| 2986 | IMGA Ascender Elite 15-1 | 1801 | 17-32 | 35% | 15 | FL |
| 2987 | CT Juniors 15-National | 1800 | 21-14 | 60% | 15 | CT |
| 2988 | 540 VB 13 Elite | 1800 | 44-18 | 71% | 13 | VA |
| 2989 | Michio Chicago 17-Premier | 1800 | 32-11 | 74% | 17 | IL |
| 2990 | HPSTL 15-Orange | 1800 | 47-27 | 61% | 15 | MO |
| 2991 | Rise 16-1 (OV) | 1800 | 35-13 | 73% | 16 | OH |
| 2992 | MINOI 15-Black | 1800 | 28-20 | 58% | 15 | UT |
| 2993 | Infinity 16-Green | 1800 | 38-26 | 59% | 16 | OH |
| 2994 | Horseshoe VBC 14-Red | 1800 | 32-11 | 71% | 14 | PA |
| 2995 | XP 14-Elite 1 | 1800 | 46-19 | 71% | 14 | IL |
| 2996 | TORCH 15-Katie | 1800 | 33-22 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 2997 | Topeka Elite 14-1 | 1800 | 27-11 | 71% | 14 | KS |
| 2998 | IGNITE 14-BLUE | 1800 | 42-15 | 74% | 14 | OH |
| 2999 | Academy West 18 National | 1800 | 35-24 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 3000 | PSVA 16-1 | 1800 | 45-24 | 65% | 16 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.