Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 59 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2901 Austin Raptors 12-1 1804 37-9 79% 12 TX
2902 COAST 13-2 sean 1804 37-12 76% 13 CA
2903 CJV 14-Mizuno 1804 33-31 52% 14 NC
2904 Maunalani 14-Rise 1804 37-13 74% 14 HI
2905 Mindset Premier 12-Red 1804 34-4 85% 12 IL
2906 SF TREMORS 17 WOLVERINES 1804 49-32 60% 17 CA
2907 Wisconsin Elite 16-Elite 1804 34-32 52% 16 WI
2908 PVA 17-National summit 1804 34-28 55% 17 PA
2909 MAVS KC 14-National 1804 22-25 47% 14 KS
2910 Sideout 16-N carly 1804 27-23 54% 16 NJ
2911 MAVS KC 18-1 1804 8-0 100% 18 KS
2912 McAllen PREMIER 13-N bandidas 1804 29-13 69% 13 TX
2913 SoCal Legends 17-Elite 1804 19-14 58% 17 CA
2914 PVA 16-National 1804 31-16 66% 16
2915 RRHVB 18-1 annie 1804 23-13 64% 18
2916 Monti Club JO 14-1 1804 29-5 85% 14 MN
2917 Ridgeline 16-1 1803 19-17 50% 16
2918 CJV 18 Mizuno 1803 17-27 39% 18 NC
2919 ARVC 12-Orange 1803 35-4 90% 12 NC
2920 Kokoro Volleyball 17-2 1803 42-28 60% 17 MN
2921 Austin Skyline 16 Royal 1803 26-34 43% 16 TX
2922 CUVC 16-Premier 1803 28-37 43% 16 NC
2923 COA 16-Chaos 1803 38-27 58% 16 IN
2924 CVC 13 SILVER 1803 44-16 73% 13 OH
2925 TAV Houston 14-Blue 1803 42-30 58% 14 TX
2926 Spiketown USA 16.2 1803 52-14 79% 16 WI
2927 Academy West 18 National 1803 35-24 59% 18 CA
2928 RockwoodThunder 15-Carolina 1803 47-16 75% 15 MO
2929 LOBOS 13-Black 1803 44-17 72% 13 CO
2930 XP 14-Elite 1 1803 46-19 71% 14 IL
2931 SAVBC 12-1 1803 29-8 78% 12 CA
2932 OT 15-T choo 1803 40-26 61% 15 FL
2933 QVA 16-Hydrogen 1803 48-11 81% 16 FL
2934 FaR Out 15-Gold 1803 28-22 56% 15 MI
2935 Apex 18-Elite 1803 30-13 67% 18 MT
2936 DIG 14-Black - sab 1803 29-16 57% 14 TX
2937 Adrenaline 14-Doug 1803 33-27 55% 14 IA
2938 AP 11 adidas 1802 30-13 70% 11 TX
2939 BRAVO 14-Black 1802 53-20 73% 14 KY
2940 Dynamite Adidas 18-1 1802 29-12 71% 18 MI
2941 GP 11 National 1802 61-21 74% 11 FL
2942 MATRIX 16 National 1802 48-13 79% 16 CA
2943 Mem Metro 14-Elite blk 1802 46-22 68% 14 TN
2944 NPJ Bend 13-Premier 1802 32-5 86% 13 OR
2945 Pipeline 15-Adidas 1802 25-25 50% 15 CA
2946 Ozark Juniors 13 Elite 1802 62-27 70% 13 AR
2947 SAVBC 16-1 1802 20-9 69% 16 CA
2948 SPVB 16 Elite 1802 15-17 47% 16 IL
2949 TKVBC 18-Legends elite 1802 31-28 53% 18 GA
2950 Zona VBC 16-Black 1802 18-17 51% 16 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.