Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 59 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2901 Monsters 15-Elite black 1806 45-10 82% 15 MI
2902 RSVBC 14-1 1806 50-25 67% 14 WA
2903 Kokoro Volleyball 17-2 1806 42-28 60% 17 MN
2904 MAVS KC 16 National 1806 12-10 55% 16 KS
2905 Nestor 14-Luis 1806 7-1 88% 14 CA
2906 UVC 12-Black 1806 17-4 77% 12 TX
2907 TEXSTAR 16 1806 43-17 72% 16 TX
2908 Ridgeline 16-1 1806 19-17 50% 16 MT
2909 Tribe 18-Vktry navy 1806 21-31 40% 18 FL
2910 Academy 12-O bobcats 1806 44-31 59% 12 IN
2911 CJV 18 Mizuno 1806 17-27 39% 18 NC
2912 Lake Crystal VB Club 13 Lake Crystal VB Club 1806 10-1 91% 13 MN
2913 Aspire NW 12-1 empire beaverton 1806 5-2 71% 12 WA
2914 ACAD 18-Red 1806 32-27 54% 18 NY
2915 RockwoodThunder 15-Carolina 1806 47-16 75% 15 MO
2916 Top Flight SC 14 Phoenix 1806 36-6 86% 14 SC
2917 Milwaukee Jr's 17-1 1805 128-106 55% 17 WI
2918 EliteVBTC 16-Blue 1805 40-30 57% 16 OH
2919 ELLEVATE Academy 14-Steel 1805 56-13 81% 14 LA
2920 DIG 14-Black - sab 1805 29-16 57% 14 TX
2921 FaR Out 14 Steel 1805 41-4 91% 14 MI
2922 Austin Raptors 12-1 1805 37-9 79% 12 TX
2923 TXP 18-Black alex 1805 20-25 44% 18 TX
2924 knights 14 1805 6-3 60% 14 ID
2925 ID Crush 12-National 1805 8-0 100% 12 ID
2926 McAllen PREMIER 13-N bandidas 1805 29-13 69% 13 TX
2927 MARIN 14-Green 1805 34-20 63% 14 CA
2928 MODE 16 National 1805 39-15 72% 16 WA
2929 BVC 12-1 regional michael 1804 31-8 79% 12 AL
2930 United 17 National 1804 32-12 73% 17 AL
2931 Elevate Athletics 18 Nike 1804 19-10 66% 18 UT
2932 Ozark Juniors 13 Elite 1804 62-27 70% 13 AR
2933 Michigan Volleyball Academy 13 MVA - Rise Academy 31 (LK) 1804 31-16 66% 13 MI
2934 Jammers 12-Black 1804 48-19 72% 12 HI
2935 Vision 15-White 1804 43-28 61% 15 CA
2936 Force 17-1 adidas select 1804 40-8 83% 17 MI
2937 USA South 16-Premier purple 1804 28-26 52% 16 FL
2938 CMASS EDGE 17-Black 1804 38-35 52% 17 MA
2939 PacWest 16-Jay 1804 38-21 64% 16 CA
2940 FaR Out 15-Gold 1804 28-22 56% 15 MI
2941 EVA 17 Elite 1804 38-22 63% 17 AR
2942 TAV Houston 18-Black 1804 23-24 49% 18 TX
2943 Laredo Premier 12-Force 1804 24-3 86% 12 TX
2944 PSVBC 18 ELITE 1804 58-11 84% 18 WV
2945 CJV 14-Mizuno 1804 33-31 52% 14 NC
2946 FRVBC 16-2 red 1803 26-14 65% 16 CO
2947 FIVA 16-Rene 1803 53-16 77% 16 FL
2948 Brownsville Dynamite 13-1 1803 28-4 88% 13 TX
2949 Tstreet IE 14-Cynthia 1803 28-19 60% 14 CA
2950 SAVBC 16-1 1803 20-9 69% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.