2025-2026 Season — Page 59 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2901 | Austin Raptors 12-1 | 1804 | 37-9 | 79% | 12 | TX |
| 2902 | COAST 13-2 sean | 1804 | 37-12 | 76% | 13 | CA |
| 2903 | CJV 14-Mizuno | 1804 | 33-31 | 52% | 14 | NC |
| 2904 | Maunalani 14-Rise | 1804 | 37-13 | 74% | 14 | HI |
| 2905 | Mindset Premier 12-Red | 1804 | 34-4 | 85% | 12 | IL |
| 2906 | SF TREMORS 17 WOLVERINES | 1804 | 49-32 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 2907 | Wisconsin Elite 16-Elite | 1804 | 34-32 | 52% | 16 | WI |
| 2908 | PVA 17-National summit | 1804 | 34-28 | 55% | 17 | PA |
| 2909 | MAVS KC 14-National | 1804 | 22-25 | 47% | 14 | KS |
| 2910 | Sideout 16-N carly | 1804 | 27-23 | 54% | 16 | NJ |
| 2911 | MAVS KC 18-1 | 1804 | 8-0 | 100% | 18 | KS |
| 2912 | McAllen PREMIER 13-N bandidas | 1804 | 29-13 | 69% | 13 | TX |
| 2913 | SoCal Legends 17-Elite | 1804 | 19-14 | 58% | 17 | CA |
| 2914 | PVA 16-National | 1804 | 31-16 | 66% | 16 | |
| 2915 | RRHVB 18-1 annie | 1804 | 23-13 | 64% | 18 | |
| 2916 | Monti Club JO 14-1 | 1804 | 29-5 | 85% | 14 | MN |
| 2917 | Ridgeline 16-1 | 1803 | 19-17 | 50% | 16 | |
| 2918 | CJV 18 Mizuno | 1803 | 17-27 | 39% | 18 | NC |
| 2919 | ARVC 12-Orange | 1803 | 35-4 | 90% | 12 | NC |
| 2920 | Kokoro Volleyball 17-2 | 1803 | 42-28 | 60% | 17 | MN |
| 2921 | Austin Skyline 16 Royal | 1803 | 26-34 | 43% | 16 | TX |
| 2922 | CUVC 16-Premier | 1803 | 28-37 | 43% | 16 | NC |
| 2923 | COA 16-Chaos | 1803 | 38-27 | 58% | 16 | IN |
| 2924 | CVC 13 SILVER | 1803 | 44-16 | 73% | 13 | OH |
| 2925 | TAV Houston 14-Blue | 1803 | 42-30 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 2926 | Spiketown USA 16.2 | 1803 | 52-14 | 79% | 16 | WI |
| 2927 | Academy West 18 National | 1803 | 35-24 | 59% | 18 | CA |
| 2928 | RockwoodThunder 15-Carolina | 1803 | 47-16 | 75% | 15 | MO |
| 2929 | LOBOS 13-Black | 1803 | 44-17 | 72% | 13 | CO |
| 2930 | XP 14-Elite 1 | 1803 | 46-19 | 71% | 14 | IL |
| 2931 | SAVBC 12-1 | 1803 | 29-8 | 78% | 12 | CA |
| 2932 | OT 15-T choo | 1803 | 40-26 | 61% | 15 | FL |
| 2933 | QVA 16-Hydrogen | 1803 | 48-11 | 81% | 16 | FL |
| 2934 | FaR Out 15-Gold | 1803 | 28-22 | 56% | 15 | MI |
| 2935 | Apex 18-Elite | 1803 | 30-13 | 67% | 18 | MT |
| 2936 | DIG 14-Black - sab | 1803 | 29-16 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 2937 | Adrenaline 14-Doug | 1803 | 33-27 | 55% | 14 | IA |
| 2938 | AP 11 adidas | 1802 | 30-13 | 70% | 11 | TX |
| 2939 | BRAVO 14-Black | 1802 | 53-20 | 73% | 14 | KY |
| 2940 | Dynamite Adidas 18-1 | 1802 | 29-12 | 71% | 18 | MI |
| 2941 | GP 11 National | 1802 | 61-21 | 74% | 11 | FL |
| 2942 | MATRIX 16 National | 1802 | 48-13 | 79% | 16 | CA |
| 2943 | Mem Metro 14-Elite blk | 1802 | 46-22 | 68% | 14 | TN |
| 2944 | NPJ Bend 13-Premier | 1802 | 32-5 | 86% | 13 | OR |
| 2945 | Pipeline 15-Adidas | 1802 | 25-25 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 2946 | Ozark Juniors 13 Elite | 1802 | 62-27 | 70% | 13 | AR |
| 2947 | SAVBC 16-1 | 1802 | 20-9 | 69% | 16 | CA |
| 2948 | SPVB 16 Elite | 1802 | 15-17 | 47% | 16 | IL |
| 2949 | TKVBC 18-Legends elite | 1802 | 31-28 | 53% | 18 | GA |
| 2950 | Zona VBC 16-Black | 1802 | 18-17 | 51% | 16 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.