Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 58 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2851 ESVBC 18-Samurai 1810 29-3 91% 18 IA
2852 NorthShore 15 Finley 1810 31-6 84% 15 OH
2853 Mem Metro 14-Elite blk 1810 46-22 68% 14 TN
2854 864 Elite 16 Ken 1810 65-19 77% 16 SC
2855 OPU 16-1 1810 38-14 73% 16 FL
2856 C2 Sports 14-Crown 1810 28-8 78% 14 TN
2857 Fearless 12 1810 37-4 86% 12 IA
2858 TVS 12 Dayron 1810 17-0 100% 12 TX
2859 WBVBC 14-1 erin 1810 40-13 75% 14 OH
2860 Red Rock 15-Harley - redwood city 1810 25-17 60% 15 CA
2861 Princeton 17-1 national 1810 14-10 58% 17 NJ
2862 PEAK 13-3 1809 41-13 75% 13 OK
2863 CORE Girls 13-Platinum 1809 42-27 61% 13 NJ
2864 FVBC 16 National 1809 46-6 85% 16 MD
2865 Colorado Juniors 12-Mal 1809 47-22 68% 12 CO
2866 UNION 18-Black 1809 17-23 43% 18 IN
2867 Crossroads 18 1809 22-11 67% 18 TX
2868 Bama Elite 15-E owls 1809 37-27 58% 15 AL
2869 blue crab volleyball 18 18 Blue Crab (BY) 1809 42-7 84% 18 LA
2870 South County 15-Malia 1809 20-14 59% 15 UT
2871 Shock 14-Ua storm 1809 29-10 74% 14 IL
2872 Austin Skyline 16 Royal 1809 26-34 43% 16 TX
2873 The St. James 14 Navy 1809 53-12 82% 14 VA
2874 575 17-Wse taylor 1809 41-33 55% 17 GA
2875 Legacy Girls 15 Elite 1808 29-21 58% 15 CA
2876 COAST 13-2 sean 1808 37-12 76% 13 CA
2877 Cape Coast 15 SATURN 1808 25-31 45% 15 FL
2878 Iowa Impact 13-1 elite 1808 43-22 66% 13 IA
2879 501 Volley 14-1 1808 8-2 80% 14 AR
2880 UEPA 17-Diamonds 1808 5-1 83% 17 TX
2881 Academy 17 Crystal 1808 29-31 48% 17 NC
2882 808 Athletic Club 12-Dayne 1808 62-11 85% 12 HI
2883 TAV Houston 16-Blue 1808 36-27 57% 16 TX
2884 City Beach 18-Black 1808 50-29 63% 18 CA
2885 Club V 14-Celest 1808 34-15 69% 14 UT
2886 PVC 15-1a 1808 43-23 65% 15 FL
2887 BRUSA Volleyball Club 13-Leanna 1808 19-14 58% 13 CA
2888 NLVA 12-1 gold 1808 21-2 88% 12 NC
2889 MJ 12-Orange 1807 26-11 65% 12 MT
2890 Infinity Volleyball CLub 15-National 1807 14-3 82% 15 TX
2891 Monti Club JO 14-1 1807 29-5 85% 14 MN
2892 Mississippi MATRIX Volleyball 16-National 1807 48-13 79% 16 AL
2893 SF TREMORS 17 WOLVERINES 1807 49-32 60% 17 CA
2894 Team Pineapple 18-Black 1807 43-17 72% 18 IN
2895 CEV Sapphire 18-1 1807 22-2 92% 18 OH
2896 Paradigm Volleyball Club 17 Paradigm Revolt 1807 7-6 54% 17 NY
2897 Empowered 14-Elite black 1807 23-21 52% 14 IN
2898 KNVBC 18-Shazam 1807 28-5 85% 18 KS
2899 Dig This! VBC 15-Black national 1807 7-2 78% 15 NV
2900 CHAVC 15-Black 1806 36-28 56% 15 NC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.