2025-2026 Season — Page 58 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2851 | TX LEGACY 15-Adidas | 1807 | 53-18 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 2852 | Force 17-1 adidas select | 1807 | 40-8 | 83% | 17 | CA |
| 2853 | MSVB 12-Blue | 1807 | 14-0 | 100% | 12 | AK |
| 2854 | CMASS EDGE 17-Black | 1807 | 38-35 | 52% | 17 | MA |
| 2855 | Northeast 17-2 | 1807 | 54-20 | 73% | 17 | CT |
| 2856 | UVC 12-Black | 1807 | 17-4 | 77% | 12 | MA |
| 2857 | ID Crush TF 12-Lacey | 1807 | 12-3 | 71% | 12 | UT |
| 2858 | Arete 16-Navy ethos | 1807 | 20-14 | 57% | 16 | TX |
| 2859 | H Skyline 12-Black | 1807 | 23-5 | 82% | 12 | TX |
| 2860 | Paradigm Revolt 17-S | 1807 | 33-8 | 79% | 17 | |
| 2861 | Idaho Peak TODD 16-S | 1807 | 15-10 | 60% | 16 | |
| 2862 | ACAD 18-Red | 1807 | 32-27 | 54% | 18 | NY |
| 2863 | Rise 17 | 1807 | 46-12 | 79% | 17 | CA |
| 2864 | MJ 12-Orange | 1806 | 26-11 | 65% | 12 | |
| 2865 | Cap City MT 14 National | 1806 | 28-17 | 60% | 14 | MT |
| 2866 | MAVS 816 16-National | 1806 | 25-16 | 61% | 16 | KS |
| 2867 | MARIN 14-Green | 1806 | 34-20 | 63% | 14 | CA |
| 2868 | TAV Houston 16-Blue | 1806 | 36-27 | 57% | 16 | TX |
| 2869 | NKYVC 18-2 tide | 1806 | 30-24 | 56% | 18 | KY |
| 2870 | SMASH 18 | 1806 | 20-11 | 65% | 18 | MA |
| 2871 | Yorktown 13 | 1806 | 23-3 | 88% | 13 | IN |
| 2872 | Rocky Elite 12-National | 1806 | 36-15 | 71% | 12 | CO |
| 2873 | CCVV 13-Fuchsia | 1806 | 34-33 | 51% | 13 | FL |
| 2874 | VCN 13-Elite | 1806 | 9-7 | 56% | 13 | NE |
| 2875 | Academy 17 Crystal | 1806 | 29-31 | 48% | 17 | NC |
| 2876 | 501 Volley 14-1 | 1806 | 8-2 | 80% | 14 | AR |
| 2877 | Nestor 14-Luis | 1806 | 7-1 | 88% | 14 | |
| 2878 | PVBC 16-1 | 1806 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | |
| 2879 | VEVA Brave 14-Blue | 1806 | 53-9 | 85% | 14 | PA |
| 2880 | SA Juniors 14-National | 1806 | 39-16 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 2881 | CSDP 14-1 | 1805 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | |
| 2882 | BAVA 14 Waves | 1805 | 51-29 | 64% | 14 | MD |
| 2883 | FC Elite 16 Navy | 1805 | 27-24 | 53% | 16 | WI |
| 2884 | FORZA1 NORTH 13 ONE | 1805 | 25-9 | 74% | 13 | CA |
| 2885 | Elevate Athletics 18 Nike | 1805 | 19-10 | 66% | 18 | UT |
| 2886 | MN Select 16-3 | 1805 | 46-28 | 62% | 16 | MN |
| 2887 | MN Select 18-2 | 1805 | 28-18 | 61% | 18 | MN |
| 2888 | PSVBC 18 ELITE | 1805 | 58-11 | 84% | 18 | WV |
| 2889 | Premier 17 Kayano | 1805 | 47-26 | 64% | 17 | OH |
| 2890 | RVC 15 National | 1805 | 43-28 | 61% | 15 | VA |
| 2891 | UNION 18-Black | 1805 | 17-23 | 43% | 18 | CA |
| 2892 | Iowa Impact 13-1 elite | 1805 | 43-22 | 66% | 13 | IA |
| 2893 | APEX1 18-Black | 1805 | 33-21 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 2894 | NP Dragons 13-1 polster | 1805 | 14-3 | 82% | 13 | OR |
| 2895 | Elevation 12-Stacey | 1805 | 26-15 | 63% | 12 | OH |
| 2896 | A5 11-Lori | 1805 | 26-19 | 58% | 11 | GA |
| 2897 | EMV 12-National black chris | 1805 | 5-2 | 71% | 12 | TX |
| 2898 | BVC 16-1 bandits | 1805 | 7-8 | 47% | 16 | DE |
| 2899 | Instinct 15-Wild gold | 1805 | 26-22 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 2900 | NL 15-Gold | 1805 | 35-9 | 80% | 15 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.