Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 58 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2851 TX LEGACY 15-Adidas 1807 53-18 75% 15 TX
2852 Force 17-1 adidas select 1807 40-8 83% 17 CA
2853 MSVB 12-Blue 1807 14-0 100% 12 AK
2854 CMASS EDGE 17-Black 1807 38-35 52% 17 MA
2855 Northeast 17-2 1807 54-20 73% 17 CT
2856 UVC 12-Black 1807 17-4 77% 12 MA
2857 ID Crush TF 12-Lacey 1807 12-3 71% 12 UT
2858 Arete 16-Navy ethos 1807 20-14 57% 16 TX
2859 H Skyline 12-Black 1807 23-5 82% 12 TX
2860 Paradigm Revolt 17-S 1807 33-8 79% 17
2861 Idaho Peak TODD 16-S 1807 15-10 60% 16
2862 ACAD 18-Red 1807 32-27 54% 18 NY
2863 Rise 17 1807 46-12 79% 17 CA
2864 MJ 12-Orange 1806 26-11 65% 12
2865 Cap City MT 14 National 1806 28-17 60% 14 MT
2866 MAVS 816 16-National 1806 25-16 61% 16 KS
2867 MARIN 14-Green 1806 34-20 63% 14 CA
2868 TAV Houston 16-Blue 1806 36-27 57% 16 TX
2869 NKYVC 18-2 tide 1806 30-24 56% 18 KY
2870 SMASH 18 1806 20-11 65% 18 MA
2871 Yorktown 13 1806 23-3 88% 13 IN
2872 Rocky Elite 12-National 1806 36-15 71% 12 CO
2873 CCVV 13-Fuchsia 1806 34-33 51% 13 FL
2874 VCN 13-Elite 1806 9-7 56% 13 NE
2875 Academy 17 Crystal 1806 29-31 48% 17 NC
2876 501 Volley 14-1 1806 8-2 80% 14 AR
2877 Nestor 14-Luis 1806 7-1 88% 14
2878 PVBC 16-1 1806 5-2 71% 16
2879 VEVA Brave 14-Blue 1806 53-9 85% 14 PA
2880 SA Juniors 14-National 1806 39-16 71% 14 TX
2881 CSDP 14-1 1805 6-3 67% 14
2882 BAVA 14 Waves 1805 51-29 64% 14 MD
2883 FC Elite 16 Navy 1805 27-24 53% 16 WI
2884 FORZA1 NORTH 13 ONE 1805 25-9 74% 13 CA
2885 Elevate Athletics 18 Nike 1805 19-10 66% 18 UT
2886 MN Select 16-3 1805 46-28 62% 16 MN
2887 MN Select 18-2 1805 28-18 61% 18 MN
2888 PSVBC 18 ELITE 1805 58-11 84% 18 WV
2889 Premier 17 Kayano 1805 47-26 64% 17 OH
2890 RVC 15 National 1805 43-28 61% 15 VA
2891 UNION 18-Black 1805 17-23 43% 18 CA
2892 Iowa Impact 13-1 elite 1805 43-22 66% 13 IA
2893 APEX1 18-Black 1805 33-21 61% 18 CA
2894 NP Dragons 13-1 polster 1805 14-3 82% 13 OR
2895 Elevation 12-Stacey 1805 26-15 63% 12 OH
2896 A5 11-Lori 1805 26-19 58% 11 GA
2897 EMV 12-National black chris 1805 5-2 71% 12 TX
2898 BVC 16-1 bandits 1805 7-8 47% 16 DE
2899 Instinct 15-Wild gold 1805 26-22 49% 15 TX
2900 NL 15-Gold 1805 35-9 80% 15
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.