Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 57 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2801 HOU STELLAR 14-Elite 1810 33-32 51% 14 TX
2802 Pursuit 18 National 1810 34-11 74% 18 MO
2803 Sanford Sports 14-Red 1810 48-35 58% 14 SD
2804 NEVA 13-Blue kalani 1810 21-4 72% 13 UT
2805 Club V Cache Valley 13-Tierney 1810 17-7 59% 13 UT
2806 South County 16-Abby 1810 30-11 73% 16 RI
2807 808 Athletic Club 16-David 1810 25-6 81% 16 HI
2808 A4 Volley 17-Jon 1810 31-26 54% 17 CA
2809 OPU 16-1 1810 38-14 73% 16 FL
2810 Infinity 17-Green 1810 48-17 74% 17 OH
2811 Heat 16 Flame 1810 27-5 84% 16 WI
2812 PNW 16-Black (MK) 1810 2-7 22% 16
2813 RUSHX 18 1810 10-2 83% 18
2814 CHAVC 15-Black 1810 36-28 56% 15 NC
2815 Amazons 16-Mambas 1809 41-19 68% 16 AZ
2816 Happy Volley 14 Elite 1809 27-10 73% 14 PA
2817 MN North 16-1 navy 1809 59-24 71% 16 MN
2818 Northern Lights 12-1 1809 56-36 61% 12 MN
2819 Princeton 17-1 national 1809 14-10 58% 17 NJ
2820 PVC 15-1a 1809 43-23 65% 15 FL
2821 A5 Calhoun 13-Red 1809 59-12 83% 13 GA
2822 Colorado Juniors 13-Tammy 1809 26-10 72% 13 CO
2823 Xtreme 16-Usa braulio 1809 39-17 70% 16 NJ
2824 XP 15-Elite 1 1809 53-18 75% 15 IL
2825 Infinity 14-Blue 1809 24-6 80% 14 WI
2826 CJV 16-National navy 1808 31-25 55% 16 NC
2827 City Beach 18-Black 1808 50-29 63% 18 CA
2828 Aspire 14-1 black 1808 45-22 67% 14 AB
2829 PEAK 13-3 1808 41-13 75% 13 AZ
2830 TXP 18-Black alex 1808 20-25 44% 18 TX
2831 Triangle 17-Blue 1808 45-33 58% 17 NC
2832 Volley Pro 16-Black - gutor 1808 30-18 61% 16 TX
2833 WACO VBC 14-Ua black 1808 33-19 63% 14 TX
2834 Katy United 17 adidas 1808 51-19 72% 17 TX
2835 ESVBC 18-Samurai 1808 29-3 91% 18 MD
2836 Club V Cache Valley 16 1808 21-15 58% 16 UT
2837 Tstreet IE 14-Cynthia 1808 28-19 60% 14 CA
2838 Lockdown VBC 16-Hawks 1808 35-27 56% 16 MA
2839 Sideout 13-N carly 1808 49-23 68% 13 NJ
2840 NMB 13-Gold nelson 1808 24-15 62% 13 FL
2841 Red Rock 15-Harley - redwood city 1808 25-17 60% 15 CA
2842 D Skyline 13-White-gabby 1808 36-24 59% 13 TX
2843 Fresno Heat HEAT 14-National ryan 1808 22-3 88% 14 CA
2844 APEX1 15-Black.gus 1807 41-18 69% 15 CA
2845 Crossroads 18 1807 22-11 67% 18 TX
2846 EliteVBTC 16-Blue 1807 40-30 57% 16 OH
2847 FVBC 16 National 1807 46-6 85% 16 MD
2848 MARIN 17-Black 1807 34-33 51% 17 CA
2849 Texas Fury 15 Legacy 1807 55-26 68% 15 TX
2850 Academy 12-O bobcats 1807 44-31 59% 12 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.