Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 57 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2801 RVC 15 National 1813 43-28 61% 15 VA
2802 SOSVBC 15-N matt 1813 22-10 69% 15 NY
2803 Sky High Adidas 14 Onyx 1813 32-23 57% 14 IL
2804 Rise 17 1813 46-12 79% 17 OK
2805 Aspire 14-1 black 1812 45-22 67% 14 AB
2806 Chargers VBC 13 1812 23-5 82% 13 WI
2807 NMB 13-Gold nelson 1812 24-15 62% 13 FL
2808 EMV 13-National black chris 1812 3-5 38% 13 TX
2809 PVA 17-National summit 1812 34-28 55% 17 NY
2810 Paradigm Revolt 17-S 1812 33-8 79% 17 NY
2811 Amazons 16-Mambas 1812 41-19 68% 16 AZ
2812 Idaho ONE 12-Blue 1812 47-12 77% 12 ID
2813 Instinct 15-Wild gold 1812 26-22 49% 15 TX
2814 APVA 12 Heather 1812 46-5 90% 12 TN
2815 UVA 17 Lynda 1812 44-23 66% 17 CA
2816 Adrenaline 14-Doug 1812 33-27 55% 14 IA
2817 GSI 14-Green 1812 13-14 48% 14 FL
2818 TFVC 15-1 1812 41-21 66% 15 TN
2819 Flyers 12-Usa-david 1812 40-16 67% 12 TX
2820 Metro 14-Purple 1811 18-11 62% 14 DC
2821 Flyers 13-Usa-john 1811 23-38 36% 13 TX
2822 Arkansas Elite 13-1 1811 45-13 78% 13 AR
2823 New Pal VBC 13-1 polster 1811 9-0 100% 13 IN
2824 Katy United 17 adidas 1811 51-19 72% 17 TX
2825 OK PEAK 18-1 1811 3-4 43% 18 OK
2826 FTL 16-Fusion lia 1811 43-20 68% 16 FL
2827 FEVA 15-Brittany 1811 51-17 75% 15 FL
2828 RUSHX 18 1811 10-2 83% 18 WY
2829 NPJ Bend 12-Premier 1811 10-6 63% 12 OR
2830 Club V Cache Valley 16 1811 21-15 58% 16 UT
2831 PR Arsenal 14 1811 10-8 56% 14 PR
2832 PSVA 15-1 1811 39-23 63% 15 FL
2833 MODE 17 National 1811 42-26 62% 17 WA
2834 Xcel 14-Elite blue 1811 38-8 83% 14 NC
2835 Valkyrie Athletic 11-S 1811 35-5 88% 11 KY
2836 MARIN 17-Black 1811 34-33 51% 17 CA
2837 NL 15-Gold 1811 35-9 80% 15 MI
2838 A5 Calhoun 13-Red 1810 59-12 83% 13 GA
2839 HJV 13-Elite 1810 35-38 47% 13 TX
2840 Peninsula Wild 13 Peninsula Wild Cohos (AK) 1810 14-4 78% 13 AK
2841 JAX SKYLINE 18-Royal 1810 30-20 60% 18 FL
2842 WACO VBC 14-Ua black 1810 33-19 63% 14 TX
2843 Elevation 12-Stacey 1810 26-15 63% 12 OH
2844 APEX1 18-Black 1810 33-21 61% 18 CA
2845 SLAM 14-P black 1810 38-10 79% 14 MA
2846 Upontop 15-S elite 1810 34-26 57% 15 FL
2847 GRIT 16-Premier 1810 31-8 79% 16 AL
2848 H Skyline 12-Black 1810 23-5 82% 12 TX
2849 SA Juniors 14-National 1810 39-16 71% 14 TX
2850 Club Fusion 18-1 national 1810 21-12 64% 18 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.