Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 56 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2751 Iowa United 16-2 elite 1813 44-18 71% 16 IA
2752 JAX SKYLINE 18-Royal 1813 30-20 60% 18 FL
2753 Kali 12-F mario 1813 11-7 61% 12 PR
2754 Hawaiian Style 16-Black 1813 19-9 68% 16 HI
2755 SG Elite 17-Roshambo nicki 1813 27-21 56% 17 CA
2756 Bonneville 15-1 1813 7-2 78% 15 ID
2757 Aspire NW 12-1 empire beaverton 1813 5-2 71% 12 WA
2758 Carroll Thunder 12-1 1813 7-0 100% 12
2759 Chicago Elite 12-Elite 1813 34-19 64% 12 IL
2760 Black and Gold 14 1812 9-0 100% 14
2761 APVA 12 Heather 1812 46-5 90% 12 TN
2762 CCJ 17-1 1812 30-13 70% 17 AL
2763 BCS Skyline H 14-Royal 1812 32-27 54% 14 TX
2764 Cajun Elite 14-Laurie/kristen 1812 34-18 65% 14 LA
2765 Coastline 15-Black 1812 54-7 89% 15 NC
2766 Club Fusion 18-1 national 1812 21-12 64% 18 IL
2767 CVBC 16-1s 1812 22-22 50% 16 VA
2768 HJV 13-Elite 1812 35-38 47% 13 TX
2769 Madtown 13-1 national 1812 24-35 41% 13 WI
2770 SC Rockstar 16-Brandon 1812 21-42 33% 16 CA
2771 A4 Volley 15-Cassie 1812 31-24 56% 15 CA
2772 Sideout 15-N matt 1812 56-21 73% 15 NJ
2773 Blue 13-1 1811 30-4 88% 13 MI
2774 H Skyline 17-White 1811 32-16 67% 17 TX
2775 Sky High Adidas 15-Red 1811 45-13 78% 15 IL
2776 Charged Up 15 Royal 1811 23-10 70% 15 MI
2777 FC Elite 18 Navy 1811 34-19 64% 18 WI
2778 Millennium 14-Snook 1811 33-10 77% 14 OH
2779 NPJ Bend 12-Premier 1811 10-6 63% 12 OR
2780 PEAK 14-2 1811 48-34 59% 14 AZ
2781 TW Skyline 17 Royal 1811 43-33 57% 17 TX
2782 VA Elite 16 1811 41-45 47% 16 VA
2783 Intense 13-S - rae/daisha 1811 56-9 85% 13 SC
2784 Club V 15-Prodigy nay 1811 44-35 56% 15 UT
2785 C2 Sports 14-Crown 1811 28-8 78% 14 TN
2786 NorthShore 17 Puffins 1811 36-16 69% 17 MI
2787 RRHEAT 13-1 1811 5-1 83% 13 UT
2788 Black Hills Juniors 16-Black 1811 14-3 82% 16 SD
2789 SPVA 15-Luna 1811 43-6 88% 15 PA
2790 1United 12-N white 1811 34-24 53% 12 TX
2791 Legacy Girls 15 Elite 1811 29-21 58% 15 CA
2792 Mizuno Northern Lights 16-2 1811 5-1 83% 16
2793 SynergyForce 16-2 natl 1811 39-31 56% 16 CA
2794 VVB 16-Austin 1811 10-1 91% 16 CA
2795 WSRVC 13-Kaschmitter 1810 29-14 66% 13
2796 Cape Coast 15 SATURN 1810 25-31 45% 15 FL
2797 Cincy Ice 14-1 teal 1810 49-14 78% 14 OH
2798 Calcasieu Impact 13 1810 29-8 76% 13 LA
2799 CORE Girls 13-Platinum 1810 42-27 61% 13 CA
2800 Empowered 14-Elite black 1810 23-21 52% 14 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.