Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 56 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2751 TC ELITE 14-C 1816 17-3 81% 14 LA
2752 TX LEGACY 15-Adidas 1816 53-18 75% 15 TX
2753 NorthShore 17 Puffins 1816 36-16 69% 17 MI
2754 PVA 15-National 1816 54-41 57% 15 SC
2755 NKYVC 18-2 tide 1816 30-24 56% 18 KY
2756 Lockdown VBC 16-Hawks 1816 35-27 56% 16 MA
2757 RRHEAT 13-1 1816 5-1 83% 13 UT
2758 NRG 13-Ampd white 1816 39-12 76% 13 TX
2759 Coastline 15-Black 1816 54-7 89% 15 NC
2760 SIVBC 14 Hurricane 1816 37-35 51% 14 WA
2761 540 VB 16 Elite 1816 45-28 62% 16 VA
2762 Intense 13-S - rae/daisha 1816 56-9 85% 13 LA
2763 UNION 14-In white 1815 41-7 85% 14 IN
2764 Club V Cache Valley 13-Tierney 1815 25-12 60% 13 UT
2765 NOLA Gabby/Chris 15 1815 76-41 65% 15 LA
2766 Elevate Ak 14-Purple 1815 14-3 82% 14 AK
2767 NOVA Juniors 18-S navy 1815 32-23 58% 18 OH
2768 South County 16-Abby 1815 30-11 73% 16 UT
2769 SMASH 18-S attack 1815 20-16 56% 18 MA
2770 NorthEast Volleyball Club 17-2 1815 54-20 73% 17 CT
2771 Husky 14-National 1815 34-26 57% 14 CT
2772 BORINQUEN COQUI 11-1f 1815 14-5 74% 11 PR
2773 BCS Skyline H 14-Royal 1815 32-27 54% 14 TX
2774 CT STARS 13-S lidania 1815 19-11 63% 13 CT
2775 SC Elite 16-Blue-bo 1815 24-36 40% 16 SC
2776 D Skyline 13-White-gabby 1815 36-24 59% 13 TX
2777 HP 15-1 1814 35-28 56% 15 MI
2778 I AM VBC 12-Red 1814 49-20 71% 12 WI
2779 Madtown 13-1 national 1814 24-35 41% 13 WI
2780 DYNASTY 14 Gold 1814 32-27 54% 14 KS
2781 Madfrog 12-E green 1814 33-10 72% 12 TX
2782 Volley Pro 16-Black - gutor 1814 30-18 61% 16 TX
2783 ACT 16-Quon 1814 36-16 69% 16 CA
2784 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 16-1 1814 6-0 100% 16 MO
2785 UNION 12-Black 1814 58-23 72% 12 IN
2786 FTLUTD Fusion 16-Lia 1814 8-3 73% 16 FL
2787 407 16-Orange 1814 32-57 36% 16 FL
2788 AVB Fire 18-1 1814 36-6 86% 18 MN
2789 Whirlwind Volleyball Club 18-1 1814 22-6 79% 18 NY
2790 Jammers 17-Tysen 1814 31-22 58% 17 HI
2791 BSVBC 15-Black 1814 40-14 74% 15 IL
2792 Bonneville 15-1 1814 7-2 78% 15 WA
2793 Venom 17-1 1814 16-2 89% 17 TX
2794 FORZA1 NORTH 13 ONE 1813 25-9 74% 13 CA
2795 XP 15-Elite 1 1813 53-18 75% 15 IL
2796 Chicago Elite 12-Elite 1813 34-19 64% 12 IL
2797 Chicago Elite 14 Elite 1813 37-34 52% 14 IL
2798 ID Crush TF 12-Lacey 1813 12-3 71% 12 ID
2799 H Skyline 17-White 1813 32-16 67% 17 TX
2800 Sanford Sports 14-Red 1813 48-35 58% 14 SD
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.