Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 55 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2701 Cap City MT 14 National 1818 36-17 63% 14 MT
2702 OVA 16-Black 1818 47-26 64% 16 FL
2703 Prime Volleyball 14 Prime SILVER 1818 12-5 67% 14 UT
2704 San Gabriel Elite Volleyball Club 17-Roshambo nicki 1818 27-21 56% 17 CA
2705 A4 Volley 16-Tyler 1818 41-24 63% 16 CA
2706 SC Rockstar 16-Brandon 1818 21-42 33% 16 CA
2707 Coquille Gators 13 Gators - Matt (BY) 1818 32-6 84% 13 LA
2708 A5 11-Lori 1818 26-19 58% 11 GA
2709 AVA 13-Premier 1 1818 34-5 87% 13 NY
2710 A5 Gwinnett 16-April 1818 51-23 69% 16 GA
2711 VBAY AU 17-Mango 1818 6-13 32% 17 AL
2712 Carroll Thunder 12-1 1818 7-0 100% 12 IA
2713 Texas Fury 15 Legacy 1818 55-26 68% 15 TX
2714 WVBA 14-Adidas 1818 48-22 69% 14 WA
2715 Colorado Skyline 18 Royal 1818 25-20 56% 18 CO
2716 A4 Volley 15-Cassie 1818 31-24 56% 15 CA
2717 K2 12 Rainhas 1818 33-12 73% 12 TN
2718 CCVV 13-Fuchsia 1818 34-33 51% 13 FL
2719 MN Select 13-1 1818 40-28 59% 13 MN
2720 VALLEY VENOM - 17-1 red 1818 28-10 74% 17 TX
2721 FC Elite 16 Navy 1818 32-34 48% 16 WI
2722 Impact 15-Parks/hannah 1817 22-13 63% 15 MI
2723 Club V 15-Prodigy nay 1817 44-35 56% 15 UT
2724 VVA 15-Rita 1817 35-30 54% 15 CA
2725 Vision 14-Blue 1817 33-26 56% 14 CA
2726 MAVS KC 15-National 1817 15-15 50% 15 KS
2727 TCVA 16-Green adidas 1817 50-22 69% 16 TX
2728 Sanford Fargo 16-Ua 1817 37-19 66% 16 MN
2729 Elevation 16-Vic 1817 26-33 44% 16 OH
2730 Austin Skyline Juniors 16 16 Black Ellie 1817 10-6 63% 16 TX
2731 Idaho ONE 15-White 1817 49-18 73% 15 ID
2732 SERV 17 Select 1817 50-20 71% 17 VA
2733 Iowa United 16-2 elite 1817 44-18 71% 16 IA
2734 NEVA 13-Blue kalani 1817 21-4 72% 13 UT
2735 Sky High Adidas 15-Red 1817 45-13 78% 15 IL
2736 McAllen Fierce 17-1 1817 41-16 72% 17 TX
2737 BVA 15 Elite 1817 46-10 82% 15 NC
2738 Hammerin Hawks 10-1 1816 30-0 94% 10 IA
2739 CHiX 16-PiNK 1816 30-45 40% 16 OH
2740 808AC 16-David 1816 45-16 74% 16 HI
2741 NPJ Salem 14 National 1816 37-36 51% 14 OR
2742 MN Select 16-3 1816 46-28 62% 16 MN
2743 A4 Volley 17-Jon 1816 31-26 54% 17 CA
2744 EVA 15 National 1816 50-15 77% 15 AR
2745 417 MoJrs 14-Nat black 1816 46-13 78% 14 MO
2746 Dynamite 12-Adidas 1816 30-5 86% 12 MI
2747 WF Elite 14-Black 1816 32-8 76% 14 TX
2748 AVC 12-1 (NT) 1816 24-11 69% 12 TX
2749 Cincy Ice 14-1 teal 1816 49-14 78% 14 OH
2750 COLAVOL 17-Black 1816 34-20 63% 17 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.