2025-2026 Season — Page 55 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2701 | TC ELITE 14-C | 1816 | 17-3 | 81% | 14 | LA |
| 2702 | CVC 12-Navy | 1816 | 53-18 | 67% | 12 | ND |
| 2703 | FTL 16-Fusion lia | 1815 | 43-20 | 68% | 16 | FL |
| 2704 | Areté 16-Navy ethos | 1815 | 17-11 | 61% | 16 | TX |
| 2705 | COLAVOL 17-Black | 1815 | 34-20 | 63% | 17 | AL |
| 2706 | FC Elite 12 Navy | 1815 | 11-4 | 73% | 12 | WI |
| 2707 | MAVS KC 15-National | 1815 | 15-15 | 50% | 15 | KS |
| 2708 | Vision 14-Blue | 1815 | 33-26 | 56% | 14 | CA |
| 2709 | TCVA 16-Green adidas | 1815 | 50-22 | 69% | 16 | CO |
| 2710 | Rancho 15 Premier | 1815 | 24-18 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 2711 | 540 VB 16 Elite | 1815 | 45-28 | 62% | 16 | VA |
| 2712 | A5 Gwinnett 16-April | 1815 | 51-23 | 69% | 16 | GA |
| 2713 | LAV 16-Regional black | 1815 | 42-4 | 91% | 16 | AL |
| 2714 | Arkansas Elite 13-1 | 1815 | 45-13 | 78% | 13 | AR |
| 2715 | Idaho ONE 15-White | 1815 | 49-18 | 73% | 15 | ID |
| 2716 | AVB Fire 16-1 black | 1815 | 39-12 | 76% | 16 | MN |
| 2717 | Katy United 14-Molten | 1815 | 45-13 | 78% | 14 | TX |
| 2718 | Sideout 17-National carly | 1815 | 15-0 | 100% | 17 | NJ |
| 2719 | BVC 16-Black | 1815 | 56-13 | 81% | 16 | WY |
| 2720 | FTLUTD Fusion 16-Lia | 1815 | 8-3 | 73% | 16 | FL |
| 2721 | TPV 18-Paragon | 1814 | 26-20 | 57% | 18 | |
| 2722 | Xcel 14-Elite blue | 1814 | 38-8 | 83% | 14 | NC |
| 2723 | Colorado Skyline 18 Royal | 1814 | 25-20 | 56% | 18 | CO |
| 2724 | Elevation 14 Peak | 1814 | 29-27 | 52% | 14 | CO |
| 2725 | Paramount VBC 13 Sadie | 1814 | 49-19 | 72% | 13 | VA |
| 2726 | OK Charge 13-Ua tulsa | 1814 | 49-20 | 70% | 13 | OK |
| 2727 | 417 MoJrs 14-Nat black | 1814 | 46-13 | 78% | 14 | MO |
| 2728 | Katy United 16 adidas | 1814 | 47-30 | 61% | 16 | TX |
| 2729 | CMVBC 14-1 | 1814 | 26-12 | 68% | 14 | MO |
| 2730 | MWVC 14-Janet | 1814 | 12-2 | 86% | 14 | CA |
| 2731 | Dynamite 12-Adidas | 1814 | 30-5 | 86% | 12 | CA |
| 2732 | BORINQUEN COQUI 11-1f | 1814 | 14-5 | 74% | 11 | PR |
| 2733 | Valkyrie Athletic 11-S | 1814 | 35-5 | 88% | 11 | KY |
| 2734 | InfinitySouth 16-1 | 1814 | 32-3 | 91% | 16 | LA |
| 2735 | Momentous VBC 15-Antonette | 1814 | 3-15 | 17% | 15 | CA |
| 2736 | Impact 15-Parks/hannah | 1814 | 22-13 | 63% | 15 | MI |
| 2737 | Alliance 18-Red | 1814 | 52-14 | 79% | 18 | TN |
| 2738 | Madfrog 12-E green | 1814 | 33-10 | 72% | 12 | TX |
| 2739 | Altitude 15-Black | 1813 | 62-17 | 77% | 15 | AZ |
| 2740 | I AM VBC 12-Red | 1813 | 49-20 | 71% | 12 | WI |
| 2741 | BSVBC 18-Black | 1813 | 25-13 | 64% | 18 | IL |
| 2742 | Fearless 12 | 1813 | 37-4 | 86% | 12 | IA |
| 2743 | ECEVBC 14-Tornados | 1813 | 50-4 | 89% | 14 | MD |
| 2744 | MAVS KC 16 National | 1813 | 12-10 | 55% | 16 | KS |
| 2745 | MOD Elite 14-Blue | 1813 | 33-23 | 59% | 14 | IL |
| 2746 | UVA 17 Lynda | 1813 | 44-23 | 66% | 17 | VA |
| 2747 | OVA 16-Black | 1813 | 47-26 | 64% | 16 | FL |
| 2748 | UNION 12-Black | 1813 | 58-23 | 72% | 12 | CA |
| 2749 | 407 16-Orange | 1813 | 32-57 | 36% | 16 | FL |
| 2750 | A4 Volley 16-Tyler | 1813 | 41-24 | 63% | 16 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.