Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 55 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2701 TC ELITE 14-C 1816 17-3 81% 14 LA
2702 CVC 12-Navy 1816 53-18 67% 12 ND
2703 FTL 16-Fusion lia 1815 43-20 68% 16 FL
2704 Areté 16-Navy ethos 1815 17-11 61% 16 TX
2705 COLAVOL 17-Black 1815 34-20 63% 17 AL
2706 FC Elite 12 Navy 1815 11-4 73% 12 WI
2707 MAVS KC 15-National 1815 15-15 50% 15 KS
2708 Vision 14-Blue 1815 33-26 56% 14 CA
2709 TCVA 16-Green adidas 1815 50-22 69% 16 CO
2710 Rancho 15 Premier 1815 24-18 57% 15 CA
2711 540 VB 16 Elite 1815 45-28 62% 16 VA
2712 A5 Gwinnett 16-April 1815 51-23 69% 16 GA
2713 LAV 16-Regional black 1815 42-4 91% 16 AL
2714 Arkansas Elite 13-1 1815 45-13 78% 13 AR
2715 Idaho ONE 15-White 1815 49-18 73% 15 ID
2716 AVB Fire 16-1 black 1815 39-12 76% 16 MN
2717 Katy United 14-Molten 1815 45-13 78% 14 TX
2718 Sideout 17-National carly 1815 15-0 100% 17 NJ
2719 BVC 16-Black 1815 56-13 81% 16 WY
2720 FTLUTD Fusion 16-Lia 1815 8-3 73% 16 FL
2721 TPV 18-Paragon 1814 26-20 57% 18
2722 Xcel 14-Elite blue 1814 38-8 83% 14 NC
2723 Colorado Skyline 18 Royal 1814 25-20 56% 18 CO
2724 Elevation 14 Peak 1814 29-27 52% 14 CO
2725 Paramount VBC 13 Sadie 1814 49-19 72% 13 VA
2726 OK Charge 13-Ua tulsa 1814 49-20 70% 13 OK
2727 417 MoJrs 14-Nat black 1814 46-13 78% 14 MO
2728 Katy United 16 adidas 1814 47-30 61% 16 TX
2729 CMVBC 14-1 1814 26-12 68% 14 MO
2730 MWVC 14-Janet 1814 12-2 86% 14 CA
2731 Dynamite 12-Adidas 1814 30-5 86% 12 CA
2732 BORINQUEN COQUI 11-1f 1814 14-5 74% 11 PR
2733 Valkyrie Athletic 11-S 1814 35-5 88% 11 KY
2734 InfinitySouth 16-1 1814 32-3 91% 16 LA
2735 Momentous VBC 15-Antonette 1814 3-15 17% 15 CA
2736 Impact 15-Parks/hannah 1814 22-13 63% 15 MI
2737 Alliance 18-Red 1814 52-14 79% 18 TN
2738 Madfrog 12-E green 1814 33-10 72% 12 TX
2739 Altitude 15-Black 1813 62-17 77% 15 AZ
2740 I AM VBC 12-Red 1813 49-20 71% 12 WI
2741 BSVBC 18-Black 1813 25-13 64% 18 IL
2742 Fearless 12 1813 37-4 86% 12 IA
2743 ECEVBC 14-Tornados 1813 50-4 89% 14 MD
2744 MAVS KC 16 National 1813 12-10 55% 16 KS
2745 MOD Elite 14-Blue 1813 33-23 59% 14 IL
2746 UVA 17 Lynda 1813 44-23 66% 17 VA
2747 OVA 16-Black 1813 47-26 64% 16 FL
2748 UNION 12-Black 1813 58-23 72% 12 CA
2749 407 16-Orange 1813 32-57 36% 16 FL
2750 A4 Volley 16-Tyler 1813 41-24 63% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.