2025-2026 Season — Page 54 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2651 | DACAN 14-1 spirit | 1821 | 5-2 | 71% | 14 | ON |
| 2652 | DVC 16-Elite | 1820 | 23-3 | 88% | 16 | OH |
| 2653 | Yorktown 13 | 1820 | 23-3 | 88% | 13 | IN |
| 2654 | 101 ELite 10-1 elite | 1820 | 45-21 | 68% | 10 | CA |
| 2655 | TEXSTAR 17 | 1820 | 50-7 | 88% | 17 | TX |
| 2656 | TX Premier 14-National | 1820 | 36-24 | 59% | 14 | TX |
| 2657 | VAQUERAS 15-F gilbert | 1820 | 18-15 | 55% | 15 | PR |
| 2658 | BVA 16-N john | 1820 | 51-28 | 65% | 16 | FL |
| 2659 | Spa City 17 Aqua | 1820 | 48-21 | 70% | 17 | NY |
| 2660 | GP 13 Premier | 1820 | 72-20 | 78% | 13 | FL |
| 2661 | CVH SELECT 18-1 | 1820 | 12-8 | 60% | 18 | PR |
| 2662 | MAVS 816 16-National | 1820 | 25-16 | 61% | 16 | KS |
| 2663 | Maunalani 14-Rise | 1820 | 37-13 | 74% | 14 | HI |
| 2664 | Aspire NW 15-1 empire beaverton | 1820 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | WA |
| 2665 | HOU STELLAR 14-Elite | 1820 | 37-36 | 51% | 14 | TX |
| 2666 | adidas DYNASTY 12-1 | 1820 | 8-0 | 100% | 12 | KS |
| 2667 | FDL Fusion 14-Purple | 1820 | 19-2 | 90% | 14 | WI |
| 2668 | Premier Nebraska 17-Black | 1820 | 27-30 | 47% | 17 | NE |
| 2669 | FC Elite 18 Navy | 1820 | 34-19 | 64% | 18 | WI |
| 2670 | Club Fusion 15-1 national | 1820 | 36-24 | 60% | 15 | IL |
| 2671 | EU 17-Black | 1819 | 34-33 | 51% | 17 | IN |
| 2672 | CinciVB Acad 16-1 | 1819 | 26-29 | 47% | 16 | OH |
| 2673 | Virginia Elite Volleyball Club 16 | 1819 | 41-45 | 47% | 16 | VA |
| 2674 | STVA 13-1 brandon | 1819 | 51-31 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 2675 | Amarillo Xtreme 16 TUF | 1819 | 17-8 | 68% | 16 | TX |
| 2676 | Southern Elite Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1819 | 39-8 | 83% | 14 | AL |
| 2677 | PVA 16-National | 1819 | 31-16 | 66% | 16 | MO |
| 2678 | DCVA 15-1 | 1819 | 10-5 | 67% | 15 | NM |
| 2679 | SKY Elite 18-1 | 1819 | 44-14 | 76% | 18 | PA |
| 2680 | OT 15-T choo | 1819 | 40-26 | 61% | 15 | FL |
| 2681 | Heat 16 Flame | 1819 | 27-5 | 84% | 16 | WI |
| 2682 | Brandywine Volleyball Club 16-1 | 1819 | 19-8 | 70% | 16 | DE |
| 2683 | Club Integrity 14-1 | 1819 | 38-15 | 72% | 14 | PA |
| 2684 | MWVC 14-Janet | 1819 | 12-2 | 86% | 14 | PR |
| 2685 | Dynamite Adidas 18-1 | 1819 | 29-12 | 71% | 18 | MI |
| 2686 | MDJRS 14-Elite black | 1819 | 55-29 | 65% | 14 | MD |
| 2687 | 1United 12-N white | 1819 | 34-24 | 53% | 12 | TX |
| 2688 | OPVC 13-Gennett | 1819 | 41-23 | 64% | 13 | OH |
| 2689 | PSVBA 14-Legacy 1 | 1819 | 61-26 | 70% | 14 | WA |
| 2690 | DN 17-Black | 1819 | 15-7 | 58% | 17 | TX |
| 2691 | Impact 16-Black | 1819 | 35-12 | 74% | 16 | TX |
| 2692 | New WaveS 17-Mac | 1819 | 48-22 | 69% | 17 | FL |
| 2693 | ECEVBC 14-Tornados | 1819 | 58-5 | 89% | 14 | MD |
| 2694 | Millennium 14-Snook | 1819 | 33-10 | 77% | 14 | OH |
| 2695 | VIP 16-Elite | 1819 | 25-8 | 74% | 16 | |
| 2696 | Black and Gold 14 | 1818 | 9-0 | 100% | 14 | NY |
| 2697 | TW Skyline 17 Royal | 1818 | 43-33 | 57% | 17 | TX |
| 2698 | Xtreme 16-Usa braulio | 1818 | 39-17 | 70% | 16 | NJ |
| 2699 | SPVA 15-Luna | 1818 | 43-6 | 88% | 15 | PA |
| 2700 | APEX1 15-Black.gus | 1818 | 41-18 | 69% | 15 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.