2025-2026 Season — Page 54 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2651 | New WaveS 17-Mac | 1819 | 48-22 | 69% | 17 | FL |
| 2652 | A5 Chattanooga 15-1 | 1819 | 42-25 | 63% | 15 | TN |
| 2653 | Flyers 12-Usa-david | 1819 | 40-16 | 67% | 12 | TX |
| 2654 | Velocity 15-Black | 1819 | 42-10 | 81% | 15 | AR |
| 2655 | Academy 16 Jade | 1819 | 45-11 | 80% | 16 | NC |
| 2656 | MAVS KC 13-1 | 1819 | 8-0 | 100% | 13 | KS |
| 2657 | NLVA 18-1 gold | 1819 | 30-21 | 59% | 18 | NC |
| 2658 | NorCal 18-1 black | 1819 | 34-31 | 52% | 18 | CA |
| 2659 | Pgh Elite 18-Elite | 1819 | 38-20 | 66% | 18 | PA |
| 2660 | VVB 17-Steve n | 1819 | 9-9 | 50% | 17 | CA |
| 2661 | MJ 16-Black | 1818 | 60-19 | 72% | 16 | |
| 2662 | Ignite 17 Elite | 1818 | 45-30 | 60% | 17 | IN |
| 2663 | ECVC 14-Pink | 1818 | 50-18 | 74% | 14 | VA |
| 2664 | EU 17-Black | 1818 | 34-33 | 51% | 17 | IN |
| 2665 | GP 13 Premier | 1818 | 72-20 | 78% | 13 | FL |
| 2666 | Impact 16-Black | 1818 | 35-12 | 74% | 16 | TX |
| 2667 | Pohaku 16-1 | 1818 | 33-23 | 59% | 16 | KS |
| 2668 | TX LEGACY 18 ELITE | 1818 | 35-16 | 69% | 18 | TX |
| 2669 | 864 Elite 16 Ken | 1818 | 65-19 | 77% | 16 | SC |
| 2670 | AVC 15-Red | 1818 | 32-13 | 67% | 15 | VA |
| 2671 | DCVA 15-1 | 1818 | 10-5 | 67% | 15 | NM |
| 2672 | Aspire NW 15-1 empire beaverton | 1818 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | WA |
| 2673 | Sanford Fargo 16-Ua | 1818 | 37-19 | 66% | 16 | ND |
| 2674 | AVC 12-1 (NT) | 1818 | 24-11 | 69% | 12 | TX |
| 2675 | Mizuno Northern Lights 17-1 | 1818 | 5-1 | 83% | 17 | |
| 2676 | Club One 18-1 | 1818 | 15-2 | 88% | 18 | MO |
| 2677 | CRU MAX 18 | 1817 | 16-6 | 73% | 18 | |
| 2678 | BVA 15 Elite | 1817 | 46-10 | 82% | 15 | NC |
| 2679 | AVB Fire 18-1 | 1817 | 36-6 | 86% | 18 | MN |
| 2680 | Chargers VBC 13 | 1817 | 23-5 | 82% | 13 | WI |
| 2681 | EVA 15 National | 1817 | 50-15 | 77% | 15 | AR |
| 2682 | SIVBC 14 Hurricane | 1817 | 37-35 | 51% | 14 | WA |
| 2683 | Goldenwest 17-Asics | 1817 | 41-18 | 69% | 17 | CA |
| 2684 | FEVA 15-Brittany | 1817 | 51-17 | 75% | 15 | FL |
| 2685 | BVA 16-N john | 1817 | 51-28 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 2686 | SIVBC 15-Typhoon | 1817 | 32-37 | 46% | 15 | WA |
| 2687 | FW Fire 16-1 purple | 1817 | 12-4 | 75% | 16 | TX |
| 2688 | Venom 17-1 | 1817 | 16-2 | 89% | 17 | TX |
| 2689 | Figs Volleyball Club 12-1 | 1817 | 12-12 | 50% | 12 | CA |
| 2690 | 1United 15-N black | 1817 | 39-11 | 71% | 15 | TX |
| 2691 | Jammers 17-Tysen | 1816 | 31-22 | 58% | 17 | HI |
| 2692 | Elevate Ak 14-Purple | 1816 | 14-3 | 82% | 14 | AK |
| 2693 | DYNASTY 14 Gold | 1816 | 32-27 | 54% | 14 | KS |
| 2694 | NOVA Juniors 18-S navy | 1816 | 32-23 | 58% | 18 | OH |
| 2695 | NPJ Portland 15 National | 1816 | 57-34 | 63% | 15 | OR |
| 2696 | Adversity-WI 13-1 | 1816 | 38-5 | 88% | 13 | WI |
| 2697 | Husky 14-National | 1816 | 34-26 | 57% | 14 | CT |
| 2698 | EMV 13-National black chris | 1816 | 3-5 | 38% | 13 | TX |
| 2699 | DN 17-Black | 1816 | 15-7 | 58% | 17 | TX |
| 2700 | NRG 13-Ampd white | 1816 | 39-12 | 76% | 13 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.