Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 54 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2651 DACAN 14-1 spirit 1821 5-2 71% 14 ON
2652 DVC 16-Elite 1820 23-3 88% 16 OH
2653 Yorktown 13 1820 23-3 88% 13 IN
2654 101 ELite 10-1 elite 1820 45-21 68% 10 CA
2655 TEXSTAR 17 1820 50-7 88% 17 TX
2656 TX Premier 14-National 1820 36-24 59% 14 TX
2657 VAQUERAS 15-F gilbert 1820 18-15 55% 15 PR
2658 BVA 16-N john 1820 51-28 65% 16 FL
2659 Spa City 17 Aqua 1820 48-21 70% 17 NY
2660 GP 13 Premier 1820 72-20 78% 13 FL
2661 CVH SELECT 18-1 1820 12-8 60% 18 PR
2662 MAVS 816 16-National 1820 25-16 61% 16 KS
2663 Maunalani 14-Rise 1820 37-13 74% 14 HI
2664 Aspire NW 15-1 empire beaverton 1820 6-2 75% 15 WA
2665 HOU STELLAR 14-Elite 1820 37-36 51% 14 TX
2666 adidas DYNASTY 12-1 1820 8-0 100% 12 KS
2667 FDL Fusion 14-Purple 1820 19-2 90% 14 WI
2668 Premier Nebraska 17-Black 1820 27-30 47% 17 NE
2669 FC Elite 18 Navy 1820 34-19 64% 18 WI
2670 Club Fusion 15-1 national 1820 36-24 60% 15 IL
2671 EU 17-Black 1819 34-33 51% 17 IN
2672 CinciVB Acad 16-1 1819 26-29 47% 16 OH
2673 Virginia Elite Volleyball Club 16 1819 41-45 47% 16 VA
2674 STVA 13-1 brandon 1819 51-31 61% 13 TX
2675 Amarillo Xtreme 16 TUF 1819 17-8 68% 16 TX
2676 Southern Elite Volleyball Club 14-1 1819 39-8 83% 14 AL
2677 PVA 16-National 1819 31-16 66% 16 MO
2678 DCVA 15-1 1819 10-5 67% 15 NM
2679 SKY Elite 18-1 1819 44-14 76% 18 PA
2680 OT 15-T choo 1819 40-26 61% 15 FL
2681 Heat 16 Flame 1819 27-5 84% 16 WI
2682 Brandywine Volleyball Club 16-1 1819 19-8 70% 16 DE
2683 Club Integrity 14-1 1819 38-15 72% 14 PA
2684 MWVC 14-Janet 1819 12-2 86% 14 PR
2685 Dynamite Adidas 18-1 1819 29-12 71% 18 MI
2686 MDJRS 14-Elite black 1819 55-29 65% 14 MD
2687 1United 12-N white 1819 34-24 53% 12 TX
2688 OPVC 13-Gennett 1819 41-23 64% 13 OH
2689 PSVBA 14-Legacy 1 1819 61-26 70% 14 WA
2690 DN 17-Black 1819 15-7 58% 17 TX
2691 Impact 16-Black 1819 35-12 74% 16 TX
2692 New WaveS 17-Mac 1819 48-22 69% 17 FL
2693 ECEVBC 14-Tornados 1819 58-5 89% 14 MD
2694 Millennium 14-Snook 1819 33-10 77% 14 OH
2695 VIP 16-Elite 1819 25-8 74% 16
2696 Black and Gold 14 1818 9-0 100% 14 NY
2697 TW Skyline 17 Royal 1818 43-33 57% 17 TX
2698 Xtreme 16-Usa braulio 1818 39-17 70% 16 NJ
2699 SPVA 15-Luna 1818 43-6 88% 15 PA
2700 APEX1 15-Black.gus 1818 41-18 69% 15 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.