Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 54 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2651 New WaveS 17-Mac 1819 48-22 69% 17 FL
2652 A5 Chattanooga 15-1 1819 42-25 63% 15 TN
2653 Flyers 12-Usa-david 1819 40-16 67% 12 TX
2654 Velocity 15-Black 1819 42-10 81% 15 AR
2655 Academy 16 Jade 1819 45-11 80% 16 NC
2656 MAVS KC 13-1 1819 8-0 100% 13 KS
2657 NLVA 18-1 gold 1819 30-21 59% 18 NC
2658 NorCal 18-1 black 1819 34-31 52% 18 CA
2659 Pgh Elite 18-Elite 1819 38-20 66% 18 PA
2660 VVB 17-Steve n 1819 9-9 50% 17 CA
2661 MJ 16-Black 1818 60-19 72% 16
2662 Ignite 17 Elite 1818 45-30 60% 17 IN
2663 ECVC 14-Pink 1818 50-18 74% 14 VA
2664 EU 17-Black 1818 34-33 51% 17 IN
2665 GP 13 Premier 1818 72-20 78% 13 FL
2666 Impact 16-Black 1818 35-12 74% 16 TX
2667 Pohaku 16-1 1818 33-23 59% 16 KS
2668 TX LEGACY 18 ELITE 1818 35-16 69% 18 TX
2669 864 Elite 16 Ken 1818 65-19 77% 16 SC
2670 AVC 15-Red 1818 32-13 67% 15 VA
2671 DCVA 15-1 1818 10-5 67% 15 NM
2672 Aspire NW 15-1 empire beaverton 1818 6-2 75% 15 WA
2673 Sanford Fargo 16-Ua 1818 37-19 66% 16 ND
2674 AVC 12-1 (NT) 1818 24-11 69% 12 TX
2675 Mizuno Northern Lights 17-1 1818 5-1 83% 17
2676 Club One 18-1 1818 15-2 88% 18 MO
2677 CRU MAX 18 1817 16-6 73% 18
2678 BVA 15 Elite 1817 46-10 82% 15 NC
2679 AVB Fire 18-1 1817 36-6 86% 18 MN
2680 Chargers VBC 13 1817 23-5 82% 13 WI
2681 EVA 15 National 1817 50-15 77% 15 AR
2682 SIVBC 14 Hurricane 1817 37-35 51% 14 WA
2683 Goldenwest 17-Asics 1817 41-18 69% 17 CA
2684 FEVA 15-Brittany 1817 51-17 75% 15 FL
2685 BVA 16-N john 1817 51-28 65% 16 CA
2686 SIVBC 15-Typhoon 1817 32-37 46% 15 WA
2687 FW Fire 16-1 purple 1817 12-4 75% 16 TX
2688 Venom 17-1 1817 16-2 89% 17 TX
2689 Figs Volleyball Club 12-1 1817 12-12 50% 12 CA
2690 1United 15-N black 1817 39-11 71% 15 TX
2691 Jammers 17-Tysen 1816 31-22 58% 17 HI
2692 Elevate Ak 14-Purple 1816 14-3 82% 14 AK
2693 DYNASTY 14 Gold 1816 32-27 54% 14 KS
2694 NOVA Juniors 18-S navy 1816 32-23 58% 18 OH
2695 NPJ Portland 15 National 1816 57-34 63% 15 OR
2696 Adversity-WI 13-1 1816 38-5 88% 13 WI
2697 Husky 14-National 1816 34-26 57% 14 CT
2698 EMV 13-National black chris 1816 3-5 38% 13 TX
2699 DN 17-Black 1816 15-7 58% 17 TX
2700 NRG 13-Ampd white 1816 39-12 76% 13 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.