Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 53 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2601 Pohaku 16-1 1824 41-23 64% 16 KS
2602 NPJ Portland 15 National 1824 57-34 63% 15 OR
2603 I AM VBC 14-Red 1824 55-24 70% 14 WI
2604 Ama 212-11-Crush 1824 22-2 88% 11 TX
2605 TVS 10 Thay 1824 14-0 100% 10 TX
2606 Pgh Elite 18-Elite 1824 38-20 66% 18 PA
2607 Club One 18-1 1824 15-2 88% 18 MO
2608 AVB Fire 15-1 black 1824 33-9 79% 15 MN
2609 Cajun Elite 14-Laurie/kristen 1824 34-18 65% 14 LA
2610 Drive Nation 15-Black 1824 13-7 65% 15 TX
2611 WSRVC 13-Kaschmitter 1824 29-14 66% 13 WY
2612 Wildfire 14-N open 1824 11-9 55% 14 FL
2613 TPV 18-Paragon 1824 26-20 57% 18 TN
2614 Reef 15-National george 1823 44-16 73% 15 CA
2615 InfinitySouth 16-1 1823 32-3 91% 16 LA
2616 BVA 12-S mauricio 1823 45-20 69% 12 FL
2617 OT 17-O felix 1823 37-37 50% 17 FL
2618 Ohana 17-National 1823 36-28 56% 17 IA
2619 Trinity 14 Inferno 1823 46-18 72% 14 FL
2620 SMASH 14-S 1823 36-33 52% 14 MA
2621 River City Jrs 16 Navy 1822 37-15 71% 16 IA
2622 Munciana 14 Falcons 1822 48-23 68% 14 IN
2623 Aspire 12-Alpha 1822 42-19 69% 12 AZ
2624 Iowa Rockets 14-1 1822 39-24 62% 14 IA
2625 MVA 17-Elite 1822 46-18 72% 17 MN
2626 Momentous VBC 15-Antonette 1822 3-15 17% 15 CA
2627 Tri-State Elite 13-Gray 1822 35-8 81% 13 KY
2628 Rise 15-Purple 1822 45-19 70% 15 CO
2629 Mizuno Northern Lights 14-B 1822 47-16 75% 14 MN
2630 LAV 16-Regional black 1822 42-4 91% 16 AL
2631 Columbia 16-Black 1822 49-35 56% 16 MD
2632 TEV 18 Dale 1821 30-5 86% 18 TN
2633 308 Exclusive VBC 18-Gold 1821 30-4 88% 18 NE
2634 Texas Pistols West 11-1 1821 27-13 68% 11 TX
2635 CVC 12-Navy 1821 53-18 67% 12 ND
2636 Spiketown USA 16.1 1821 49-16 75% 16 WI
2637 Vortex 15-Amy 1821 20-14 59% 15 UT
2638 SC Legends 15-Elite 1821 36-16 69% 15 CA
2639 A5 Chattanooga 15-1 1821 48-30 62% 15 GA
2640 HIC 16-N keano 1821 22-12 65% 16 UT
2641 Black Hills Juniors 16-Black 1821 14-3 82% 16 WY
2642 Cincy Classics 15-Red 1821 40-16 71% 15 OH
2643 OK Charge 13-Ua tulsa 1821 49-20 70% 13 OK
2644 SC Legends 14-Elite 1821 32-16 67% 14 CA
2645 Mountain1 16-1 taylor 1821 19-14 50% 16 MT
2646 VB Factory 14-Moxie 1821 39-7 85% 14 CA
2647 NorCal 18-1 black 1821 34-31 52% 18 CA
2648 1st Alliance 17-Red 1821 50-36 58% 17 IL
2649 Munciana 13 Stingrays 1821 30-36 45% 13 IN
2650 C1VB 15-One grvl 1821 56-17 77% 15 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.