2025-2026 Season — Page 53 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2601 | Pohaku 16-1 | 1824 | 41-23 | 64% | 16 | KS |
| 2602 | NPJ Portland 15 National | 1824 | 57-34 | 63% | 15 | OR |
| 2603 | I AM VBC 14-Red | 1824 | 55-24 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 2604 | Ama 212-11-Crush | 1824 | 22-2 | 88% | 11 | TX |
| 2605 | TVS 10 Thay | 1824 | 14-0 | 100% | 10 | TX |
| 2606 | Pgh Elite 18-Elite | 1824 | 38-20 | 66% | 18 | PA |
| 2607 | Club One 18-1 | 1824 | 15-2 | 88% | 18 | MO |
| 2608 | AVB Fire 15-1 black | 1824 | 33-9 | 79% | 15 | MN |
| 2609 | Cajun Elite 14-Laurie/kristen | 1824 | 34-18 | 65% | 14 | LA |
| 2610 | Drive Nation 15-Black | 1824 | 13-7 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 2611 | WSRVC 13-Kaschmitter | 1824 | 29-14 | 66% | 13 | WY |
| 2612 | Wildfire 14-N open | 1824 | 11-9 | 55% | 14 | FL |
| 2613 | TPV 18-Paragon | 1824 | 26-20 | 57% | 18 | TN |
| 2614 | Reef 15-National george | 1823 | 44-16 | 73% | 15 | CA |
| 2615 | InfinitySouth 16-1 | 1823 | 32-3 | 91% | 16 | LA |
| 2616 | BVA 12-S mauricio | 1823 | 45-20 | 69% | 12 | FL |
| 2617 | OT 17-O felix | 1823 | 37-37 | 50% | 17 | FL |
| 2618 | Ohana 17-National | 1823 | 36-28 | 56% | 17 | IA |
| 2619 | Trinity 14 Inferno | 1823 | 46-18 | 72% | 14 | FL |
| 2620 | SMASH 14-S | 1823 | 36-33 | 52% | 14 | MA |
| 2621 | River City Jrs 16 Navy | 1822 | 37-15 | 71% | 16 | IA |
| 2622 | Munciana 14 Falcons | 1822 | 48-23 | 68% | 14 | IN |
| 2623 | Aspire 12-Alpha | 1822 | 42-19 | 69% | 12 | AZ |
| 2624 | Iowa Rockets 14-1 | 1822 | 39-24 | 62% | 14 | IA |
| 2625 | MVA 17-Elite | 1822 | 46-18 | 72% | 17 | MN |
| 2626 | Momentous VBC 15-Antonette | 1822 | 3-15 | 17% | 15 | CA |
| 2627 | Tri-State Elite 13-Gray | 1822 | 35-8 | 81% | 13 | KY |
| 2628 | Rise 15-Purple | 1822 | 45-19 | 70% | 15 | CO |
| 2629 | Mizuno Northern Lights 14-B | 1822 | 47-16 | 75% | 14 | MN |
| 2630 | LAV 16-Regional black | 1822 | 42-4 | 91% | 16 | AL |
| 2631 | Columbia 16-Black | 1822 | 49-35 | 56% | 16 | MD |
| 2632 | TEV 18 Dale | 1821 | 30-5 | 86% | 18 | TN |
| 2633 | 308 Exclusive VBC 18-Gold | 1821 | 30-4 | 88% | 18 | NE |
| 2634 | Texas Pistols West 11-1 | 1821 | 27-13 | 68% | 11 | TX |
| 2635 | CVC 12-Navy | 1821 | 53-18 | 67% | 12 | ND |
| 2636 | Spiketown USA 16.1 | 1821 | 49-16 | 75% | 16 | WI |
| 2637 | Vortex 15-Amy | 1821 | 20-14 | 59% | 15 | UT |
| 2638 | SC Legends 15-Elite | 1821 | 36-16 | 69% | 15 | CA |
| 2639 | A5 Chattanooga 15-1 | 1821 | 48-30 | 62% | 15 | GA |
| 2640 | HIC 16-N keano | 1821 | 22-12 | 65% | 16 | UT |
| 2641 | Black Hills Juniors 16-Black | 1821 | 14-3 | 82% | 16 | WY |
| 2642 | Cincy Classics 15-Red | 1821 | 40-16 | 71% | 15 | OH |
| 2643 | OK Charge 13-Ua tulsa | 1821 | 49-20 | 70% | 13 | OK |
| 2644 | SC Legends 14-Elite | 1821 | 32-16 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 2645 | Mountain1 16-1 taylor | 1821 | 19-14 | 50% | 16 | MT |
| 2646 | VB Factory 14-Moxie | 1821 | 39-7 | 85% | 14 | CA |
| 2647 | NorCal 18-1 black | 1821 | 34-31 | 52% | 18 | CA |
| 2648 | 1st Alliance 17-Red | 1821 | 50-36 | 58% | 17 | IL |
| 2649 | Munciana 13 Stingrays | 1821 | 30-36 | 45% | 13 | IN |
| 2650 | C1VB 15-One grvl | 1821 | 56-17 | 77% | 15 | SC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.