Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 53 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2601 PowerPlex 18-Wieland 1822 20-20 50% 18 IA
2602 Trinity 14 Inferno 1822 46-18 72% 14 FL
2603 Tampa North 16-Black 1822 32-32 50% 16 FL
2604 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 17-3 1822 10-0 100% 17 KS
2605 Rev 13-1 storm 1822 49-27 64% 13 IN
2606 MVA 17-Elite 1822 46-18 72% 17 FL
2607 Set It Off 12-1 1822 20-0 100% 12 IA
2608 Texas Pistols West 11-1 1821 27-13 68% 11
2609 Club Fusion 15-1 national 1821 36-24 60% 15 IL
2610 MDJRS 14-Elite black 1821 55-29 65% 14 MD
2611 Munciana 14 Falcons 1821 48-23 68% 14 IN
2612 MVSA 12 Vortex 1821 50-22 69% 12 MD
2613 MN Select 13-1 1821 40-28 59% 13 MN
2614 KCV 11 NATIONAL 1821 45-11 80% 11 TX
2615 Idaho ONE 14-Gray 1821 37-7 84% 14 ID
2616 MiElite 15-National 1821 41-15 73% 15 MI
2617 Elevation 16-Vic 1821 26-33 44% 16 OH
2618 Spiketown VBC 18-1 1821 12-7 63% 18 WI
2619 LTX SELECT 15-Yellow 1821 39-8 83% 15 TX
2620 Elevate 15-Odd ducks 1821 63-17 79% 15 WI
2621 Shock 14-Ua storm 1821 29-10 74% 14 IL
2622 Mizuno Northern Lights 15-2 1821 4-1 80% 15
2623 Team Momentum 13-Navy 1821 36-17 68% 13 MO
2624 K2 12 Rainhas 1820 33-12 73% 12 TN
2625 CinciVB Acad 16-1 1820 26-29 47% 16 OH
2626 Catalyst 16-Green 1820 38-13 73% 16 TX
2627 HOU STELLAR 15-Elite 1820 32-25 56% 15 TX
2628 UNION 14-In white 1820 41-7 85% 14 CA
2629 Premier Nebraska 17-Black 1820 27-30 47% 17 NE
2630 SF TREMORS 13-Wolverines 1820 32-25 56% 13 CA
2631 BVA 12-S mauricio 1820 45-20 69% 12 CA
2632 Sportime 15-Gold 1820 31-27 53% 15 NY
2633 WVBA 14-Adidas 1820 48-22 69% 14 WA
2634 IVBA 16-Ren 1820 25-23 52% 16 MS
2635 AVA 13-Premier 1 1820 34-5 87% 13 NY
2636 WF Elite 14-Black 1820 32-8 76% 14 TX
2637 VIP 16-Elite 1820 25-8 74% 16
2638 SEV 16-1 1820 39-10 80% 16 AL
2639 AJ 15-Gold 1820 37-12 76% 15 LA
2640 TFVBC 15-1 1819 19-5 79% 15
2641 Fusion 17-Blue 1819 53-24 69% 17 PA
2642 Aspire 12-Alpha 1819 42-19 69% 12 AB
2643 Chicago Elite 14 Elite 1819 37-34 52% 14 IL
2644 NPJ Salem 14 National 1819 37-36 51% 14 OR
2645 Next Gen 15-Gold 1819 45-12 76% 15 MO
2646 Spa City 17 Aqua 1819 48-21 70% 17 NY
2647 STVA 13-1 brandon 1819 51-31 61% 13 TX
2648 Shockwave 14-Black 1819 41-26 61% 14 KS
2649 TEXSTAR 17 1819 50-7 88% 17 TX
2650 IMUA 14-National sina 1819 42-13 76% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.