2025-2026 Season — Page 53 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2601 | PowerPlex 18-Wieland | 1822 | 20-20 | 50% | 18 | IA |
| 2602 | Trinity 14 Inferno | 1822 | 46-18 | 72% | 14 | FL |
| 2603 | Tampa North 16-Black | 1822 | 32-32 | 50% | 16 | FL |
| 2604 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 17-3 | 1822 | 10-0 | 100% | 17 | KS |
| 2605 | Rev 13-1 storm | 1822 | 49-27 | 64% | 13 | IN |
| 2606 | MVA 17-Elite | 1822 | 46-18 | 72% | 17 | FL |
| 2607 | Set It Off 12-1 | 1822 | 20-0 | 100% | 12 | IA |
| 2608 | Texas Pistols West 11-1 | 1821 | 27-13 | 68% | 11 | |
| 2609 | Club Fusion 15-1 national | 1821 | 36-24 | 60% | 15 | IL |
| 2610 | MDJRS 14-Elite black | 1821 | 55-29 | 65% | 14 | MD |
| 2611 | Munciana 14 Falcons | 1821 | 48-23 | 68% | 14 | IN |
| 2612 | MVSA 12 Vortex | 1821 | 50-22 | 69% | 12 | MD |
| 2613 | MN Select 13-1 | 1821 | 40-28 | 59% | 13 | MN |
| 2614 | KCV 11 NATIONAL | 1821 | 45-11 | 80% | 11 | TX |
| 2615 | Idaho ONE 14-Gray | 1821 | 37-7 | 84% | 14 | ID |
| 2616 | MiElite 15-National | 1821 | 41-15 | 73% | 15 | MI |
| 2617 | Elevation 16-Vic | 1821 | 26-33 | 44% | 16 | OH |
| 2618 | Spiketown VBC 18-1 | 1821 | 12-7 | 63% | 18 | WI |
| 2619 | LTX SELECT 15-Yellow | 1821 | 39-8 | 83% | 15 | TX |
| 2620 | Elevate 15-Odd ducks | 1821 | 63-17 | 79% | 15 | WI |
| 2621 | Shock 14-Ua storm | 1821 | 29-10 | 74% | 14 | IL |
| 2622 | Mizuno Northern Lights 15-2 | 1821 | 4-1 | 80% | 15 | |
| 2623 | Team Momentum 13-Navy | 1821 | 36-17 | 68% | 13 | MO |
| 2624 | K2 12 Rainhas | 1820 | 33-12 | 73% | 12 | TN |
| 2625 | CinciVB Acad 16-1 | 1820 | 26-29 | 47% | 16 | OH |
| 2626 | Catalyst 16-Green | 1820 | 38-13 | 73% | 16 | TX |
| 2627 | HOU STELLAR 15-Elite | 1820 | 32-25 | 56% | 15 | TX |
| 2628 | UNION 14-In white | 1820 | 41-7 | 85% | 14 | CA |
| 2629 | Premier Nebraska 17-Black | 1820 | 27-30 | 47% | 17 | NE |
| 2630 | SF TREMORS 13-Wolverines | 1820 | 32-25 | 56% | 13 | CA |
| 2631 | BVA 12-S mauricio | 1820 | 45-20 | 69% | 12 | CA |
| 2632 | Sportime 15-Gold | 1820 | 31-27 | 53% | 15 | NY |
| 2633 | WVBA 14-Adidas | 1820 | 48-22 | 69% | 14 | WA |
| 2634 | IVBA 16-Ren | 1820 | 25-23 | 52% | 16 | MS |
| 2635 | AVA 13-Premier 1 | 1820 | 34-5 | 87% | 13 | NY |
| 2636 | WF Elite 14-Black | 1820 | 32-8 | 76% | 14 | TX |
| 2637 | VIP 16-Elite | 1820 | 25-8 | 74% | 16 | |
| 2638 | SEV 16-1 | 1820 | 39-10 | 80% | 16 | AL |
| 2639 | AJ 15-Gold | 1820 | 37-12 | 76% | 15 | LA |
| 2640 | TFVBC 15-1 | 1819 | 19-5 | 79% | 15 | |
| 2641 | Fusion 17-Blue | 1819 | 53-24 | 69% | 17 | PA |
| 2642 | Aspire 12-Alpha | 1819 | 42-19 | 69% | 12 | AB |
| 2643 | Chicago Elite 14 Elite | 1819 | 37-34 | 52% | 14 | IL |
| 2644 | NPJ Salem 14 National | 1819 | 37-36 | 51% | 14 | OR |
| 2645 | Next Gen 15-Gold | 1819 | 45-12 | 76% | 15 | MO |
| 2646 | Spa City 17 Aqua | 1819 | 48-21 | 70% | 17 | NY |
| 2647 | STVA 13-1 brandon | 1819 | 51-31 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 2648 | Shockwave 14-Black | 1819 | 41-26 | 61% | 14 | KS |
| 2649 | TEXSTAR 17 | 1819 | 50-7 | 88% | 17 | TX |
| 2650 | IMUA 14-National sina | 1819 | 42-13 | 76% | 14 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.