Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 52 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2551 FH 14-Ikaika-courtney 1825 14-4 70% 14 TX
2552 adidas DYNASTY 12-1 1825 8-0 100% 12 KS
2553 SoCal Legends 14-Elite 1825 15-5 75% 14 CA
2554 Maunalani 14-Rise daryl 1825 25-3 89% 14 HI
2555 BRVBA Blue Royals 16-Emerald 1825 7-2 78% 16
2556 Summit 16-Blue elite 1825 25-34 42% 16 IN
2557 CT STARS 13-S lidania 1825 19-11 63% 13 CT
2558 Shockwave VB Academy 17-1 1824 4-3 57% 17
2559 Ama 212-11-Crush 1824 22-2 88% 11 TX
2560 Sky High Adidas 14 Onyx 1824 32-23 57% 14 IL
2561 Aspire NW 18-1 empire 1824 23-21 52% 18 WA
2562 COA 13-Kangaroos 1824 28-21 57% 13 IN
2563 COAST 18-2 caio 1824 30-23 57% 18 CA
2564 Ohana 17-National 1824 36-28 56% 17 IA
2565 Piedmont VBC 17 Hype 1824 24-35 41% 17 NC
2566 TEV 18 Dale 1824 30-5 86% 18 TN
2567 WPVC 15-Armour black 1824 45-46 49% 15 FL
2568 Areté 14-Navy ethos 1824 8-5 62% 14 TX
2569 Advantage 16-Teal 1824 29-30 49% 16 NC
2570 Club Sand 16-Leão 1824 37-28 57% 16 UT
2571 Legacy One 13-1 1824 36-19 65% 13 CA
2572 VB Factory 14-Moxie 1824 39-7 85% 14 CA
2573 DVC 16-Elite 1824 23-3 88% 16 OH
2574 Armor Elite 14-National 1824 4-3 57% 14 AZ
2575 Image 16-Black 1824 21-7 66% 16
2576 VUVC 18-Black 1824 16-8 67% 18 NV
2577 Mountain1 16-1 taylor 1823 19-14 50% 16
2578 Cajun Elite 15 Waylon 1823 34-10 77% 15 LA
2579 CinciVB Acad 15-1 1823 33-22 60% 15 OH
2580 Amarillo Xtreme 15 ENP 1823 31-5 86% 15 TX
2581 GSA 15-National 1823 48-17 74% 15 NJ
2582 GJ 15 PREMIER 1823 47-19 71% 15 FL
2583 McAllen Fierce 17-1 1823 41-16 72% 17 TX
2584 Venom 14-Black 1823 48-22 69% 14 AZ
2585 OT 17-O felix 1823 37-37 50% 17 FL
2586 SASVBC 12-Reid 1823 41-9 82% 12 HI
2587 TVS 10 Thay 1823 14-0 100% 10 TX
2588 VALLEY VENOM - 17-1 red 1823 28-10 74% 17 TX
2589 575 16-Wse andres 1823 55-27 67% 16 GA
2590 Lions Cityside 13-1 1823 29-21 58% 13 IL
2591 Tri-State Elite 13-Gray 1823 35-8 81% 13 OH
2592 OPVC 13-Gennett 1823 41-23 64% 13 OH
2593 Drive Nation 15-Black 1823 13-7 65% 15 TX
2594 Skyline 12-Black 1823 31-20 60% 12 TX
2595 oe 14-1 1823 37-7 84% 14 OH
2596 Mintonette Sports 15-2 1823 31-47 40% 15 OH
2597 Iowa Rockets 14-1 1822 39-24 62% 14 IA
2598 Club Integrity 14-1 1822 38-15 72% 14 PA
2599 FVA 17 Inferno 1822 33-9 77% 17 AK
2600 MVSA 15 Charge 1822 44-25 63% 15 MD
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.