Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 52 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2551 Alliance 18-Red 1827 52-14 79% 18 CA
2552 KCV 11 NATIONAL 1827 45-11 80% 11 TX
2553 T4VBC 15-Elite 1827 48-12 80% 15 TX
2554 Sharks Volleyball Club 18-Navy 1826 12-6 67% 18 FL
2555 MPV 18 National 1826 33-21 61% 18 UT
2556 NYC Juniors 13-National 1826 50-19 72% 13 NY
2557 Innerlight VC 18 GOLD 1826 43-16 73% 18 TN
2558 Goldenwest 17-Asics 1826 41-18 69% 17 CA
2559 Sideout 17-National carly 1826 15-0 100% 17 NY
2560 Infinity 17-Green 1826 48-17 74% 17 OH
2561 ThunderVanbc 18-1 1826 7-1 88% 18 WA
2562 New WaveS 16-Franky 1826 35-6 85% 16 FL
2563 Pursuit 18 National 1826 34-11 74% 18 MO
2564 TX LEGACY 18 ELITE 1826 35-16 69% 18 TX
2565 HP 16-1 1826 28-32 47% 16 MI
2566 Piedmont VBC 17 Hype 1826 24-35 41% 17 NC
2567 KIVA 12-Black 1826 55-24 70% 12 KY
2568 TopFlight 18-National bl 1826 10-4 71% 18 NV
2569 AJ 15-Gold 1826 37-12 76% 15 LA
2570 Sunshine 11-Firecrackers 1825 41-12 77% 11 CA
2571 Ignite 17 Elite 1825 45-30 60% 17 IN
2572 Idaho ONE 14-Gray 1825 37-7 84% 14 ID
2573 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 17-Navy 1825 47-17 73% 17 CO
2574 864 Elite 13-Carla 1825 45-9 83% 13 SC
2575 Elevate 15-Odd ducks 1825 63-17 79% 15 WI
2576 Big Sky 14-John 1825 12-9 55% 14 MT
2577 COAST 18-2 caio 1825 30-23 57% 18 CA
2578 Madtown 12-1 national 1825 43-17 72% 12 WI
2579 SF TREMORS 13-Wolverines 1825 32-25 56% 13 CA
2580 AVA 15-Elite 1825 32-23 58% 15 NY
2581 Rev 13-1 storm 1825 49-27 64% 13 IN
2582 SASVBC 12-Reid 1825 41-9 82% 12 HI
2583 SMASH Volleyball Club 15 1825 14-16 47% 15 MA
2584 Ignite 16 National (SC) 1825 65-46 59% 16 AZ
2585 MVA 14-Chino 1825 44-28 61% 14 FL
2586 Paramount VBC 13 Sadie 1825 49-19 72% 13 VA
2587 FVC 16-1 1825 31-11 70% 16 MT
2588 Next Gen 15-Gold 1825 45-12 76% 15 MO
2589 CC Force 14-1 crossfire 1825 38-13 75% 14 TX
2590 Premier 17 Kayano 1825 47-26 64% 17 OH
2591 NorthShore 13-Hamilton 1825 35-6 85% 13 OH
2592 Triangle 17-Blue 1825 45-33 58% 17 NC
2593 Catalyst 16-Green 1825 38-13 73% 16 TX
2594 GJ 15 PREMIER 1825 47-19 71% 15 FL
2595 Columbus 12-1 1825 29-9 71% 12 MT
2596 AVC 15-Red 1825 32-13 67% 15 PA
2597 Image 16-Black 1825 21-7 66% 16
2598 208 U12 Elite 1824 48-16 75% 12 ID
2599 Skyline 12-Black 1824 31-20 60% 12 TX
2600 Velocity 15-Black 1824 42-10 81% 15 MS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.