2025-2026 Season — Page 52 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2551 | FH 14-Ikaika-courtney | 1825 | 14-4 | 70% | 14 | TX |
| 2552 | adidas DYNASTY 12-1 | 1825 | 8-0 | 100% | 12 | KS |
| 2553 | SoCal Legends 14-Elite | 1825 | 15-5 | 75% | 14 | CA |
| 2554 | Maunalani 14-Rise daryl | 1825 | 25-3 | 89% | 14 | HI |
| 2555 | BRVBA Blue Royals 16-Emerald | 1825 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | |
| 2556 | Summit 16-Blue elite | 1825 | 25-34 | 42% | 16 | IN |
| 2557 | CT STARS 13-S lidania | 1825 | 19-11 | 63% | 13 | CT |
| 2558 | Shockwave VB Academy 17-1 | 1824 | 4-3 | 57% | 17 | |
| 2559 | Ama 212-11-Crush | 1824 | 22-2 | 88% | 11 | TX |
| 2560 | Sky High Adidas 14 Onyx | 1824 | 32-23 | 57% | 14 | IL |
| 2561 | Aspire NW 18-1 empire | 1824 | 23-21 | 52% | 18 | WA |
| 2562 | COA 13-Kangaroos | 1824 | 28-21 | 57% | 13 | IN |
| 2563 | COAST 18-2 caio | 1824 | 30-23 | 57% | 18 | CA |
| 2564 | Ohana 17-National | 1824 | 36-28 | 56% | 17 | IA |
| 2565 | Piedmont VBC 17 Hype | 1824 | 24-35 | 41% | 17 | NC |
| 2566 | TEV 18 Dale | 1824 | 30-5 | 86% | 18 | TN |
| 2567 | WPVC 15-Armour black | 1824 | 45-46 | 49% | 15 | FL |
| 2568 | Areté 14-Navy ethos | 1824 | 8-5 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 2569 | Advantage 16-Teal | 1824 | 29-30 | 49% | 16 | NC |
| 2570 | Club Sand 16-Leão | 1824 | 37-28 | 57% | 16 | UT |
| 2571 | Legacy One 13-1 | 1824 | 36-19 | 65% | 13 | CA |
| 2572 | VB Factory 14-Moxie | 1824 | 39-7 | 85% | 14 | CA |
| 2573 | DVC 16-Elite | 1824 | 23-3 | 88% | 16 | OH |
| 2574 | Armor Elite 14-National | 1824 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | AZ |
| 2575 | Image 16-Black | 1824 | 21-7 | 66% | 16 | |
| 2576 | VUVC 18-Black | 1824 | 16-8 | 67% | 18 | NV |
| 2577 | Mountain1 16-1 taylor | 1823 | 19-14 | 50% | 16 | |
| 2578 | Cajun Elite 15 Waylon | 1823 | 34-10 | 77% | 15 | LA |
| 2579 | CinciVB Acad 15-1 | 1823 | 33-22 | 60% | 15 | OH |
| 2580 | Amarillo Xtreme 15 ENP | 1823 | 31-5 | 86% | 15 | TX |
| 2581 | GSA 15-National | 1823 | 48-17 | 74% | 15 | NJ |
| 2582 | GJ 15 PREMIER | 1823 | 47-19 | 71% | 15 | FL |
| 2583 | McAllen Fierce 17-1 | 1823 | 41-16 | 72% | 17 | TX |
| 2584 | Venom 14-Black | 1823 | 48-22 | 69% | 14 | AZ |
| 2585 | OT 17-O felix | 1823 | 37-37 | 50% | 17 | FL |
| 2586 | SASVBC 12-Reid | 1823 | 41-9 | 82% | 12 | HI |
| 2587 | TVS 10 Thay | 1823 | 14-0 | 100% | 10 | TX |
| 2588 | VALLEY VENOM - 17-1 red | 1823 | 28-10 | 74% | 17 | TX |
| 2589 | 575 16-Wse andres | 1823 | 55-27 | 67% | 16 | GA |
| 2590 | Lions Cityside 13-1 | 1823 | 29-21 | 58% | 13 | IL |
| 2591 | Tri-State Elite 13-Gray | 1823 | 35-8 | 81% | 13 | OH |
| 2592 | OPVC 13-Gennett | 1823 | 41-23 | 64% | 13 | OH |
| 2593 | Drive Nation 15-Black | 1823 | 13-7 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 2594 | Skyline 12-Black | 1823 | 31-20 | 60% | 12 | TX |
| 2595 | oe 14-1 | 1823 | 37-7 | 84% | 14 | OH |
| 2596 | Mintonette Sports 15-2 | 1823 | 31-47 | 40% | 15 | OH |
| 2597 | Iowa Rockets 14-1 | 1822 | 39-24 | 62% | 14 | IA |
| 2598 | Club Integrity 14-1 | 1822 | 38-15 | 72% | 14 | PA |
| 2599 | FVA 17 Inferno | 1822 | 33-9 | 77% | 17 | AK |
| 2600 | MVSA 15 Charge | 1822 | 44-25 | 63% | 15 | MD |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.