Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 51 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2501 WPVC 15-Armour black 1829 45-46 49% 15 FL
2502 KC Power 13-2 1829 36-18 67% 13 KS
2503 CVC 14-Navy 1829 54-21 68% 14 ND
2504 Hoosier Elite Volleyball Club 14-1 1829 51-29 64% 14 IN
2505 SVBC 12-Elite 1829 38-2 95% 12 IA
2506 FC Elite 12 Navy 1829 11-4 73% 12 WI
2507 Top Notch 15-Elite 1829 33-20 62% 15 MO
2508 AZ Outlaws VBC 17-1 1829 9-6 60% 17 AZ
2509 Amarillo Xtreme 15 ENP 1829 31-5 86% 15 TX
2510 Advantage 16-Teal 1829 29-30 49% 16 NC
2511 Club Sand 16-Leão 1829 37-28 57% 16 UT
2512 Maunalani 14-Rise daryl 1829 25-3 89% 14 HI
2513 Heat 16 Red (TX) 1829 27-13 68% 16 TX
2514 Husky 16-National 1829 28-28 50% 16 CT
2515 USANY Fortitude 16-1 1829 21-19 53% 16 NY
2516 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 14-N michelle 1828 36-12 75% 14 NJ
2517 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 17-3 1828 10-0 100% 17 KS
2518 ESVBC 17-Warriors 1828 35-4 90% 17 IA
2519 Set It Off 12-1 1828 20-0 100% 12 FL
2520 Metro 11 Travel 1828 48-7 87% 11 DC
2521 CVC 10-Black 1828 32-4 89% 10 OH
2522 High Impact 15-List 1828 22-2 92% 15 MI
2523 AVC 14-Blue 1828 18-7 72% 14 NE
2524 MJ 16-Black 1828 60-19 72% 16 MT
2525 clubSAV 17-Mizuno 1828 17-18 49% 17 GA
2526 TAMPA UNITED VBA 15-Black 1828 50-22 69% 15 FL
2527 Venom Volleyball Club 14-Black 1828 44-21 68% 14 AZ
2528 Elevation 14 Peak 1828 29-27 52% 14 CO
2529 Club South 18-Black 1828 32-16 65% 18 WA
2530 Aspire NW 18-1 empire 1828 23-21 52% 18 OR
2531 Goldenwest 15 Asics 1828 40-16 71% 15 CA
2532 Pipeline 15-Adidas 1828 30-28 52% 15 CA
2533 HPSTL 11-Orange 1828 37-23 60% 11 MO
2534 MVSA 12 Vortex 1828 50-22 69% 12 MD
2535 A5 Chattanooga 17-1 sarah 1828 18-19 49% 17 GA
2536 CHAVC 16-Black 1828 34-34 50% 16 NC
2537 CinciVB Acad 15-1 1828 33-22 60% 15 OH
2538 DCVA 14-1 1827 13-3 81% 14 NM
2539 Fusion 17-Blue 1827 53-24 69% 17 PA
2540 MVVC G 17-Red 1827 44-29 60% 17 CA
2541 Ozark Juniors 18 National 1827 19-12 61% 18 AR
2542 TKVBC 18-Legends elite 1827 31-28 53% 18 GA
2543 Cajun Elite 15 Waylon 1827 34-10 77% 15 LA
2544 NLVA 18-1 gold 1827 30-21 59% 18 NC
2545 Legacy One 13-1 1827 36-19 65% 13 CA
2546 Happy Volley 14 Elite 1827 27-10 73% 14 PA
2547 SIVBC 15-Typhoon 1827 32-37 46% 15 WA
2548 LTX SELECT 15-Yellow 1827 39-8 83% 15 TX
2549 PNW 16-Black (MK) 1827 2-7 22% 16 HI
2550 Vaqueras 17-F ruben 1827 9-10 47% 17 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.