2025-2026 Season — Page 51 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2501 | TopFlight 18-National bl | 1828 | 10-4 | 71% | 18 | NV |
| 2502 | Academy North 12 National | 1828 | 22-22 | 50% | 12 | CA |
| 2503 | NorthShore 13-Hamilton | 1828 | 35-6 | 85% | 13 | OH |
| 2504 | C1VB 15-One grvl | 1828 | 45-14 | 76% | 15 | SC |
| 2505 | AVA 15-Elite | 1828 | 32-23 | 58% | 15 | NY |
| 2506 | Big Sky 14-John | 1828 | 12-9 | 55% | 14 | MT |
| 2507 | DACAN 14-1 spirit | 1828 | 5-2 | 71% | 14 | |
| 2508 | KEVC 14-1 | 1827 | 35-19 | 65% | 14 | |
| 2509 | I AM VBC 14-Red | 1827 | 55-24 | 70% | 14 | WI |
| 2510 | KC Power 13-2 | 1827 | 36-18 | 67% | 13 | KS |
| 2511 | Ama 212 16-Heat | 1827 | 34-9 | 79% | 16 | TX |
| 2512 | CHAVC 16-Black | 1827 | 34-34 | 50% | 16 | NC |
| 2513 | CVH SELECT 18-1 | 1827 | 12-8 | 60% | 18 | PR |
| 2514 | Goldenwest 15 Asics | 1827 | 40-16 | 71% | 15 | CA |
| 2515 | Tampa North 18-Black | 1827 | 18-24 | 43% | 18 | FL |
| 2516 | 1st Alliance 15-Grey | 1827 | 48-10 | 83% | 15 | IL |
| 2517 | Texas One 16-Royal | 1827 | 39-14 | 74% | 16 | TX |
| 2518 | CVC 10-Black | 1827 | 32-4 | 89% | 10 | OH |
| 2519 | Vaqueras 17-F ruben | 1827 | 9-10 | 47% | 17 | PR |
| 2520 | Top Notch 15-Elite | 1827 | 33-20 | 62% | 15 | IL |
| 2521 | PR Arsenal 14 | 1827 | 10-8 | 56% | 14 | PR |
| 2522 | ID Crush IF 15-Noah | 1827 | 23-9 | 72% | 15 | UT |
| 2523 | SMASH 14-S | 1827 | 36-33 | 52% | 14 | MA |
| 2524 | HP 16-1 | 1827 | 28-32 | 47% | 16 | MI |
| 2525 | Metro VBC 12-Pink | 1827 | 37-24 | 61% | 12 | IN |
| 2526 | PVA 15-National | 1827 | 35-14 | 71% | 15 | SC |
| 2527 | Club South 18-Black | 1826 | 32-16 | 65% | 18 | WA |
| 2528 | Metro 17-Purple | 1826 | 43-25 | 63% | 17 | DC |
| 2529 | SOL 12-1 | 1826 | 25-7 | 78% | 12 | TX |
| 2530 | ThunderVanbc 18-1 | 1826 | 7-1 | 88% | 18 | BC |
| 2531 | ESVBC 17-Warriors | 1826 | 35-4 | 90% | 17 | MD |
| 2532 | HPSTL 11-Orange | 1826 | 37-23 | 60% | 11 | MO |
| 2533 | USA SOUTH 16-Mizuno | 1826 | 36-25 | 59% | 16 | FL |
| 2534 | Iowa United 16-Elite timmerman | 1826 | 6-1 | 86% | 16 | IA |
| 2535 | CVC 14-Navy | 1826 | 54-21 | 68% | 14 | ND |
| 2536 | New WaveS 16-Franky | 1826 | 35-6 | 85% | 16 | FL |
| 2537 | AVC 14-Blue | 1826 | 18-7 | 72% | 14 | VA |
| 2538 | RVC Sparks 17 | 1826 | 33-17 | 65% | 17 | |
| 2539 | CC Force 14-1 crossfire | 1825 | 38-13 | 75% | 14 | TX |
| 2540 | Madtown 12-1 national | 1825 | 43-17 | 72% | 12 | WI |
| 2541 | Mizuno M1 16-1 | 1825 | 37-42 | 47% | 16 | MN |
| 2542 | Wisconsin Elite 17-Elite | 1825 | 34-30 | 53% | 17 | WI |
| 2543 | PSVBA 14-Legacy 1 | 1825 | 61-26 | 70% | 14 | WA |
| 2544 | Sunshine 11-Firecrackers | 1825 | 41-12 | 77% | 11 | CA |
| 2545 | ROCK Volleyball 14-Sky | 1825 | 45-26 | 63% | 14 | WI |
| 2546 | SKY Elite 18-1 | 1825 | 44-14 | 76% | 18 | PA |
| 2547 | SVE 16-1 | 1825 | 48-22 | 69% | 16 | GA |
| 2548 | 208 U12 Elite | 1825 | 48-16 | 75% | 12 | WA |
| 2549 | KIVA 12-Black | 1825 | 55-24 | 70% | 12 | KY |
| 2550 | Sports Academy VBC 18-Premier | 1825 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.