Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 50 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2451 RVBC 16-White 1834 34-2 94% 16 PA
2452 CVBC 16-1s 1834 22-22 50% 16 IN
2453 Alamo 14-Elite 2 1834 60-24 71% 14 TX
2454 GSA 15-National 1834 48-17 74% 15 NJ
2455 RVJ 18 Nationals 1834 33-9 79% 18 VA
2456 Metro 17-Purple 1833 43-25 63% 17 DC
2457 HEAT 12-Red (BG) 1833 23-6 79% 12 WI
2458 BSVBC 18-Black 1833 32-14 68% 18 IL
2459 Elite 13-National cd 1833 39-30 57% 13 FL
2460 CJV 16-National navy 1833 31-25 55% 16 NC
2461 Cincy Crush 15-1 1833 53-17 76% 15 OH
2462 Club 801 17-National callie 1833 43-21 67% 17 UT
2463 DYNASTY 15-Blue 1833 30-25 55% 15 KS
2464 TAV 14-Blue (NT) 1833 11-10 52% 14 TX
2465 TAV Houston 17-Black jimmy 1833 6-2 75% 17 TX
2466 MiElite 15-National 1833 41-15 73% 15 MI
2467 Katy United 14-Molten 1832 45-13 78% 14 TX
2468 IMUA 14-National sina 1832 42-13 76% 14 CA
2469 KEVC 14-1 1832 35-19 65% 14 MN
2470 Buckeye 18-Black national 1832 36-13 72% 18 OH
2471 Mizuno M1 16-1 1832 37-42 47% 16 MN
2472 SF Elite 15-Saga 1832 20-34 37% 15 CA
2473 Maratonistas Volley 10-1 1832 23-6 79% 10 PR
2474 Sports Academy VBC 18-Premier 1832 5-3 63% 18 CA
2475 Summit 16-Blue elite 1832 25-34 42% 16 IN
2476 JJVA 18 Teal 1832 28-20 58% 18 FL
2477 oe 14-1 1831 37-7 84% 14 OH
2478 Delta Valley 14-Mach aaron 1831 6-2 75% 14 CA
2479 Wisconsin Blaze 16-Black 1831 50-16 76% 16 WI
2480 Elevation 13-Peak 1831 30-34 47% 13 CO
2481 HOU STELLAR 15-Elite 1831 36-28 56% 15 TX
2482 Team Pineapple 13-Black 1831 38-21 64% 13 IN
2483 Storm 16-Adidas 1831 41-17 71% 16 AR
2484 575 16-Wse andres 1831 55-27 67% 16 GA
2485 ROCK Volleyball 14-Sky 1831 45-26 63% 14 PA
2486 Mintonette Sports 15-2 1831 31-47 40% 15 OH
2487 CALI 14-Black 1831 43-25 63% 14 NY
2488 Ama 212 16-Heat 1831 34-9 79% 16 TX
2489 ARVC 14-Red adidas 1831 27-17 61% 14 NM
2490 AZ REV 16 Premier 1830 48-68 41% 16 AZ
2491 Pilipa'a Na Wahine VBC 18-1 1830 34-8 81% 18 HI
2492 AVA 13-Elite 1830 44-15 75% 13 NY
2493 Kali 12-F mario 1830 11-7 61% 12 PR
2494 Tampa North 16-Black 1830 32-32 50% 16 FL
2495 Sportime 15-Gold 1830 31-27 53% 15 NY
2496 Rushmore Crossfire 18 1830 8-2 80% 18 MT
2497 NNJ 18 Kuna 1830 46-13 78% 18 NV
2498 Charged Up 15 Royal 1830 23-10 70% 15 MI
2499 Kairos 17 Gamma 1830 45-14 76% 17 SD
2500 Wildfire 14-N marcos 1829 30-36 45% 14 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.