2025-2026 Season — Page 50 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2451 | RVBC 16-White | 1834 | 34-2 | 94% | 16 | PA |
| 2452 | CVBC 16-1s | 1834 | 22-22 | 50% | 16 | IN |
| 2453 | Alamo 14-Elite 2 | 1834 | 60-24 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 2454 | GSA 15-National | 1834 | 48-17 | 74% | 15 | NJ |
| 2455 | RVJ 18 Nationals | 1834 | 33-9 | 79% | 18 | VA |
| 2456 | Metro 17-Purple | 1833 | 43-25 | 63% | 17 | DC |
| 2457 | HEAT 12-Red (BG) | 1833 | 23-6 | 79% | 12 | WI |
| 2458 | BSVBC 18-Black | 1833 | 32-14 | 68% | 18 | IL |
| 2459 | Elite 13-National cd | 1833 | 39-30 | 57% | 13 | FL |
| 2460 | CJV 16-National navy | 1833 | 31-25 | 55% | 16 | NC |
| 2461 | Cincy Crush 15-1 | 1833 | 53-17 | 76% | 15 | OH |
| 2462 | Club 801 17-National callie | 1833 | 43-21 | 67% | 17 | UT |
| 2463 | DYNASTY 15-Blue | 1833 | 30-25 | 55% | 15 | KS |
| 2464 | TAV 14-Blue (NT) | 1833 | 11-10 | 52% | 14 | TX |
| 2465 | TAV Houston 17-Black jimmy | 1833 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | TX |
| 2466 | MiElite 15-National | 1833 | 41-15 | 73% | 15 | MI |
| 2467 | Katy United 14-Molten | 1832 | 45-13 | 78% | 14 | TX |
| 2468 | IMUA 14-National sina | 1832 | 42-13 | 76% | 14 | CA |
| 2469 | KEVC 14-1 | 1832 | 35-19 | 65% | 14 | MN |
| 2470 | Buckeye 18-Black national | 1832 | 36-13 | 72% | 18 | OH |
| 2471 | Mizuno M1 16-1 | 1832 | 37-42 | 47% | 16 | MN |
| 2472 | SF Elite 15-Saga | 1832 | 20-34 | 37% | 15 | CA |
| 2473 | Maratonistas Volley 10-1 | 1832 | 23-6 | 79% | 10 | PR |
| 2474 | Sports Academy VBC 18-Premier | 1832 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | CA |
| 2475 | Summit 16-Blue elite | 1832 | 25-34 | 42% | 16 | IN |
| 2476 | JJVA 18 Teal | 1832 | 28-20 | 58% | 18 | FL |
| 2477 | oe 14-1 | 1831 | 37-7 | 84% | 14 | OH |
| 2478 | Delta Valley 14-Mach aaron | 1831 | 6-2 | 75% | 14 | CA |
| 2479 | Wisconsin Blaze 16-Black | 1831 | 50-16 | 76% | 16 | WI |
| 2480 | Elevation 13-Peak | 1831 | 30-34 | 47% | 13 | CO |
| 2481 | HOU STELLAR 15-Elite | 1831 | 36-28 | 56% | 15 | TX |
| 2482 | Team Pineapple 13-Black | 1831 | 38-21 | 64% | 13 | IN |
| 2483 | Storm 16-Adidas | 1831 | 41-17 | 71% | 16 | AR |
| 2484 | 575 16-Wse andres | 1831 | 55-27 | 67% | 16 | GA |
| 2485 | ROCK Volleyball 14-Sky | 1831 | 45-26 | 63% | 14 | PA |
| 2486 | Mintonette Sports 15-2 | 1831 | 31-47 | 40% | 15 | OH |
| 2487 | CALI 14-Black | 1831 | 43-25 | 63% | 14 | NY |
| 2488 | Ama 212 16-Heat | 1831 | 34-9 | 79% | 16 | TX |
| 2489 | ARVC 14-Red adidas | 1831 | 27-17 | 61% | 14 | NM |
| 2490 | AZ REV 16 Premier | 1830 | 48-68 | 41% | 16 | AZ |
| 2491 | Pilipa'a Na Wahine VBC 18-1 | 1830 | 34-8 | 81% | 18 | HI |
| 2492 | AVA 13-Elite | 1830 | 44-15 | 75% | 13 | NY |
| 2493 | Kali 12-F mario | 1830 | 11-7 | 61% | 12 | PR |
| 2494 | Tampa North 16-Black | 1830 | 32-32 | 50% | 16 | FL |
| 2495 | Sportime 15-Gold | 1830 | 31-27 | 53% | 15 | NY |
| 2496 | Rushmore Crossfire 18 | 1830 | 8-2 | 80% | 18 | MT |
| 2497 | NNJ 18 Kuna | 1830 | 46-13 | 78% | 18 | NV |
| 2498 | Charged Up 15 Royal | 1830 | 23-10 | 70% | 15 | MI |
| 2499 | Kairos 17 Gamma | 1830 | 45-14 | 76% | 17 | SD |
| 2500 | Wildfire 14-N marcos | 1829 | 30-36 | 45% | 14 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.