Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 50 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2451 Kairos 17 Gamma 1832 45-14 76% 17 SD
2452 Elite 13-National cd 1832 39-30 57% 13 FL
2453 AVA 13-Elite 1832 44-15 75% 13 NY
2454 Storm 16-Adidas 1832 41-17 71% 16 AR
2455 United 13-Michelle 1832 11-5 69% 13 CO
2456 Idaho Peak AARON NATIONAL 15-S 1832 13-9 59% 15
2457 Elevate 15-Kari 1832 39-11 78% 15 TX
2458 Rushmore Crossfire 18 1831 8-2 80% 18
2459 ECVC 16-Pink 1831 52-21 71% 16 VA
2460 Sanford Fargo 18-UA 1831 38-23 62% 18 ND
2461 SASVBC G 13 BRYAN 1831 26-15 63% 13 HI
2462 Roots 13-1 green 1831 42-18 70% 13 IA
2463 VA Elite 17 1831 49-34 59% 17 VA
2464 LVL 16 NICK 1831 33-8 80% 16 LA
2465 Maratonistas Volley 10-1 1831 23-6 79% 10 PR
2466 Kalamazoo Force 15 1831 34-21 62% 15 MI
2467 1United 17-N white 1831 29-17 59% 17 TX
2468 VCNebraska 13-Black 1831 14-10 58% 13 NE
2469 Delta Valley 14-Mach aaron 1831 6-2 75% 14 CA
2470 Mizuno Northern Lights 14-B 1831 47-16 75% 14 MN
2471 VBAY AU 17-Mango 1830 6-13 32% 17
2472 FORZA1 NORTH 16 ONE 1830 33-28 54% 16 CA
2473 Team Pineapple 13-Black 1830 38-21 64% 13 IN
2474 JJVA 18 Teal 1830 28-20 58% 18 FL
2475 Innerlight VC 18 GOLD 1830 43-16 73% 18 TN
2476 Buckeye 18-Black national 1830 36-13 72% 18 OH
2477 K1 Volley 10-1 alondra 1830 21-5 81% 10 PR
2478 VAQUERAS 14-F samuel k 1830 22-19 54% 14 PR
2479 SBVC Girls 14-Molten 1830 31-8 79% 14 CA
2480 MVA 14-Chino 1830 44-28 61% 14 FL
2481 USANY Fortitude 16-1 1830 21-19 53% 16 NY
2482 AVC 15-Navy 1830 18-7 69% 15 VA
2483 Columbus 12-1 1830 29-9 71% 12 OH
2484 TAV Houston 17-Black jimmy 1830 6-2 75% 17 TX
2485 MiElite 17-Elite 1830 29-32 48% 17 MI
2486 Cincy Crush 15-1 1829 53-17 76% 15 OH
2487 High Impact 15-List 1829 22-2 92% 15 CO
2488 TX Premier 14-National 1829 36-24 59% 14 TX
2489 Xcel VB 16-1 adidas 1829 23-16 59% 16 TX
2490 RVBC 16-White 1829 34-2 94% 16 PA
2491 Alamo 16-Elite 1 1829 42-14 75% 16 TX
2492 AVC CLE 16-White 1829 36-25 59% 16 OH
2493 TAMPA UNITED VBA 15-Black 1829 50-22 69% 15 FL
2494 DCVA 14-1 1829 13-3 81% 14 NM
2495 Renaissance 15-Black (KE) 1829 37-7 84% 15 PA
2496 MVVC G 17-Red 1829 44-29 60% 17 CA
2497 SF Elite 15-Saga 1829 20-34 37% 15 CA
2498 AVB Fire 15-1 black 1828 33-9 79% 15 MN
2499 DYNASTY 15-Blue 1828 30-25 55% 15 KS
2500 Pilipa'a Na Wahine VBC 18-1 1828 34-8 81% 18 HI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.