Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 49 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2401 Blue Royals 15 Platinum 1835 45-19 70% 15 WA
2402 ARVC 14-Red adidas 1835 27-17 61% 14 NM
2403 EMV 15-Black marquise 1835 37-18 65% 15 TX
2404 GJ 18 ADIDAS 1835 38-19 67% 18 FL
2405 Metro 11 Travel 1835 41-5 89% 11 DC
2406 Wildfire 14-N marcos 1835 30-36 45% 14 FL
2407 MPV 18 National 1835 33-21 61% 18 UT
2408 River City Jrs 16 Navy 1835 31-13 70% 16 NE
2409 SoCal VBC 15-Beacons 1835 32-28 53% 15 CA
2410 WVBA 15-Adidas 1835 32-30 52% 15 WA
2411 Academy West 11-National 1835 33-21 61% 11 CA
2412 Grandlake 17-A henkle 1835 12-0 100% 17 OH
2413 Dead Frog 17-Black 1835 39-15 72% 17 MI
2414 DACAN 16-2 fury 1835 11-3 79% 16
2415 Rhythm 17 Grant 1835 38-28 56% 17 TN
2416 AZ REV 15-Black 1834 52-14 79% 15 AZ
2417 AZ SKY 11-Gold 1834 42-22 66% 11 AZ
2418 CLUB 43 12-1 1834 31-7 82% 12 MN
2419 COA 15-Gophers 1834 32-25 56% 15 IN
2420 MKE Sting 15 Silver 1834 60-25 71% 15 WI
2421 MODE 15 Premier 1834 28-16 64% 15 WA
2422 SC Rockstar 15-Lance 1834 31-21 60% 15 CA
2423 Sideout 15-Elite 1834 48-17 74% 15 FL
2424 LAV 15-Regional black 1834 41-4 91% 15 AL
2425 HP Illinois 16-National 1834 44-22 67% 16 IL
2426 Husky 16-National 1834 28-28 50% 16 CT
2427 CALI 14-Black 1834 43-25 63% 14 NY
2428 Madfrog 18-N black alford 1834 33-18 63% 18 TX
2429 DNVB 18-Red 1834 3-4 43% 18
2430 CCVV 12 FUCHSIA 1833 43-31 58% 12 FL
2431 Dig This! VBC 15-Black 1833 34-4 89% 15 NV
2432 Elevation 13-Peak 1833 30-34 47% 13 CO
2433 Ozark Juniors 18 National 1833 19-12 61% 18 AR
2434 RAGE 18 CARMELO 1833 33-24 58% 18 CA
2435 SNVF 18 SECRET 1833 46-20 69% 18 WA
2436 Wisconsin Blaze 16-Black 1833 50-16 76% 16 WI
2437 T4VBC 15-Elite 1833 48-12 80% 15 TX
2438 Avoli 18-F tony 1833 17-9 65% 18 PR
2439 Club 801 17-National callie 1833 43-21 67% 17 UT
2440 CVA 15-1 kelly 1833 32-10 76% 15 IA
2441 TeamLVC 15-Black 1833 43-24 63% 15 NY
2442 A5 Chattanooga 17-1 sarah 1833 18-19 49% 17 TN
2443 TVC 15 1833 29-22 57% 15 CA
2444 Instinct 13-Wild gold 1833 35-6 80% 13 TX
2445 VUVC 16-Black 1833 15-8 65% 16 NV
2446 Munciana 13 Stingrays 1833 30-36 45% 13 IN
2447 ProPlay 15 Gracee 1832 44-27 62% 15 CA
2448 OVA 15-Black 1832 44-33 57% 15 FL
2449 VA Elite 15 1832 53-40 56% 15 VA
2450 757 17-Black 1832 25-43 37% 17 VA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.