Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 49 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2401 EMV 15-Black marquise 1837 37-18 65% 15 TX
2402 RRHEAT 14-1 shai 1837 23-13 64% 14 UT
2403 757 17-Black 1837 25-43 37% 17 VA
2404 Metro VBC 12-Pink 1837 37-24 61% 12 IN
2405 Apex Volleyball Training Center 13-Apex red 1837 28-8 78% 13 OH
2406 DNVB 18-Red 1837 3-4 43% 18 MA
2407 Lions 14-Blue 1837 41-32 56% 14 IL
2408 Aus Velocity 16-1 diamond 1837 40-27 60% 16 TX
2409 Mindset Premier 15-Red 1837 61-18 77% 15 IL
2410 Rancho Valley 16-Select m 1837 12-5 71% 16 CA
2411 City Beach 14-Black 1837 37-18 67% 14 CA
2412 Sideout 15-Elite 1837 48-17 74% 15 FL
2413 USA SOUTH 16-Mizuno 1837 36-25 59% 16 FL
2414 Avoli 18-F tony 1837 17-9 65% 18 PR
2415 Madfrog 18-N black alford 1837 33-18 63% 18 TX
2416 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 13-Blue 1837 36-27 57% 13 FL
2417 Hawaiian Style 16-Black 1837 19-9 68% 16 HI
2418 Nebraska Juniors VBC 16 Omaha Fusion (GP) (1) 1837 18-7 72% 16 NE
2419 Elevate 15-Kari 1837 39-11 78% 15 SC
2420 SCBandits 15-1 1837 17-7 71% 15 ON
2421 Team Momentum 13-Navy 1836 36-17 68% 13 MO
2422 Laguna Niguel Breakers Volleyball Club 13 Break (SC) (5) 1836 11-1 92% 13 CA
2423 HP Illinois 16-National 1836 44-22 67% 16 MO
2424 ECVC 14-Pink 1836 50-18 74% 14 VA
2425 OPVC 16-Supan 1836 23-36 39% 16 OH
2426 AJV 16-Molten 1836 45-20 69% 16 TX
2427 Heat 15 Red (TX) 1836 28-8 78% 15 TX
2428 Defensa 18-Ezzy 1836 13-2 87% 18 ON
2429 K1 Volley 10-1 alondra 1835 21-5 81% 10 PR
2430 Amarillo Xtreme 14-Icons 1835 29-14 67% 14 TX
2431 Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. 17-National 1835 29-5 85% 17 ME
2432 LVL 16 NICK 1835 33-8 80% 16 LA
2433 South Elite 12-Mariana 1835 13-4 76% 12 PR
2434 Virginia Elite Volleyball Club 17 1835 49-34 59% 17 VA
2435 CCVV 12 FUCHSIA 1835 43-31 58% 12 FL
2436 Club Butte 17-Lacey 1835 8-6 57% 17 ID
2437 NPJ Salem 18 National 1835 34-23 60% 18 OR
2438 RVC Impact 11 1835 48-18 72% 11 TX
2439 Wisconsin Elite 17-Elite 1835 34-30 53% 17 WI
2440 Next 15-Blue 1835 31-29 52% 15 OH
2441 Tampa North 18-Black 1835 18-24 43% 18 FL
2442 TVC 15 1835 29-22 57% 15 CA
2443 Skyline 11-Black 1835 28-14 67% 11 TX
2444 DACAN 16-2 fury 1835 11-3 79% 16 ON
2445 1United 17-N white 1834 29-17 59% 17 TX
2446 Instinct 13-Wild gold 1834 35-6 80% 13 TX
2447 Northern Lights 12-1 1834 61-41 60% 12 MN
2448 Lady Strikers Red 14 1834 26-4 87% 14 CO
2449 CLUB 43 12-1 1834 31-7 82% 12 MN
2450 Apex 12-Elite 1834 23-4 72% 12 MT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.