2025-2026 Season — Page 49 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2401 | EMV 15-Black marquise | 1837 | 37-18 | 65% | 15 | TX |
| 2402 | RRHEAT 14-1 shai | 1837 | 23-13 | 64% | 14 | UT |
| 2403 | 757 17-Black | 1837 | 25-43 | 37% | 17 | VA |
| 2404 | Metro VBC 12-Pink | 1837 | 37-24 | 61% | 12 | IN |
| 2405 | Apex Volleyball Training Center 13-Apex red | 1837 | 28-8 | 78% | 13 | OH |
| 2406 | DNVB 18-Red | 1837 | 3-4 | 43% | 18 | MA |
| 2407 | Lions 14-Blue | 1837 | 41-32 | 56% | 14 | IL |
| 2408 | Aus Velocity 16-1 diamond | 1837 | 40-27 | 60% | 16 | TX |
| 2409 | Mindset Premier 15-Red | 1837 | 61-18 | 77% | 15 | IL |
| 2410 | Rancho Valley 16-Select m | 1837 | 12-5 | 71% | 16 | CA |
| 2411 | City Beach 14-Black | 1837 | 37-18 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 2412 | Sideout 15-Elite | 1837 | 48-17 | 74% | 15 | FL |
| 2413 | USA SOUTH 16-Mizuno | 1837 | 36-25 | 59% | 16 | FL |
| 2414 | Avoli 18-F tony | 1837 | 17-9 | 65% | 18 | PR |
| 2415 | Madfrog 18-N black alford | 1837 | 33-18 | 63% | 18 | TX |
| 2416 | Florida's Sports Coast Elite 13-Blue | 1837 | 36-27 | 57% | 13 | FL |
| 2417 | Hawaiian Style 16-Black | 1837 | 19-9 | 68% | 16 | HI |
| 2418 | Nebraska Juniors VBC 16 Omaha Fusion (GP) (1) | 1837 | 18-7 | 72% | 16 | NE |
| 2419 | Elevate 15-Kari | 1837 | 39-11 | 78% | 15 | SC |
| 2420 | SCBandits 15-1 | 1837 | 17-7 | 71% | 15 | ON |
| 2421 | Team Momentum 13-Navy | 1836 | 36-17 | 68% | 13 | MO |
| 2422 | Laguna Niguel Breakers Volleyball Club 13 Break (SC) (5) | 1836 | 11-1 | 92% | 13 | CA |
| 2423 | HP Illinois 16-National | 1836 | 44-22 | 67% | 16 | MO |
| 2424 | ECVC 14-Pink | 1836 | 50-18 | 74% | 14 | VA |
| 2425 | OPVC 16-Supan | 1836 | 23-36 | 39% | 16 | OH |
| 2426 | AJV 16-Molten | 1836 | 45-20 | 69% | 16 | TX |
| 2427 | Heat 15 Red (TX) | 1836 | 28-8 | 78% | 15 | TX |
| 2428 | Defensa 18-Ezzy | 1836 | 13-2 | 87% | 18 | ON |
| 2429 | K1 Volley 10-1 alondra | 1835 | 21-5 | 81% | 10 | PR |
| 2430 | Amarillo Xtreme 14-Icons | 1835 | 29-14 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 2431 | Maine Juniors Volleyball Club, Inc. 17-National | 1835 | 29-5 | 85% | 17 | ME |
| 2432 | LVL 16 NICK | 1835 | 33-8 | 80% | 16 | LA |
| 2433 | South Elite 12-Mariana | 1835 | 13-4 | 76% | 12 | PR |
| 2434 | Virginia Elite Volleyball Club 17 | 1835 | 49-34 | 59% | 17 | VA |
| 2435 | CCVV 12 FUCHSIA | 1835 | 43-31 | 58% | 12 | FL |
| 2436 | Club Butte 17-Lacey | 1835 | 8-6 | 57% | 17 | ID |
| 2437 | NPJ Salem 18 National | 1835 | 34-23 | 60% | 18 | OR |
| 2438 | RVC Impact 11 | 1835 | 48-18 | 72% | 11 | TX |
| 2439 | Wisconsin Elite 17-Elite | 1835 | 34-30 | 53% | 17 | WI |
| 2440 | Next 15-Blue | 1835 | 31-29 | 52% | 15 | OH |
| 2441 | Tampa North 18-Black | 1835 | 18-24 | 43% | 18 | FL |
| 2442 | TVC 15 | 1835 | 29-22 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 2443 | Skyline 11-Black | 1835 | 28-14 | 67% | 11 | TX |
| 2444 | DACAN 16-2 fury | 1835 | 11-3 | 79% | 16 | ON |
| 2445 | 1United 17-N white | 1834 | 29-17 | 59% | 17 | TX |
| 2446 | Instinct 13-Wild gold | 1834 | 35-6 | 80% | 13 | TX |
| 2447 | Northern Lights 12-1 | 1834 | 61-41 | 60% | 12 | MN |
| 2448 | Lady Strikers Red 14 | 1834 | 26-4 | 87% | 14 | CO |
| 2449 | CLUB 43 12-1 | 1834 | 31-7 | 82% | 12 | MN |
| 2450 | Apex 12-Elite | 1834 | 23-4 | 72% | 12 | MT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.