2025-2026 Season — Page 48 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2351 | AZ SKY 11-Gold | 1840 | 42-22 | 66% | 11 | AZ |
| 2352 | HPSTL 14-White | 1840 | 40-21 | 66% | 14 | MO |
| 2353 | COA 15-Gophers | 1840 | 32-25 | 56% | 15 | IN |
| 2354 | Brandywine Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1840 | 22-9 | 67% | 18 | DE |
| 2355 | Headlines VBC 15 Navy | 1840 | 48-12 | 80% | 15 | OH |
| 2356 | Stars Columbia 17 Tiffner | 1840 | 37-25 | 60% | 17 | SC |
| 2357 | 3DGE 18-1 gold | 1840 | 24-36 | 40% | 18 | PA |
| 2358 | MiElite 17-Elite | 1840 | 29-32 | 48% | 17 | MI |
| 2359 | OPVC 15-Beams | 1840 | 44-23 | 66% | 15 | OH |
| 2360 | RRHVB 18-1 annie | 1839 | 33-18 | 65% | 18 | UT |
| 2361 | CVVBH 14-1 charlie | 1839 | 6-4 | 60% | 14 | PR |
| 2362 | Virginia Elite Volleyball Club 15 | 1839 | 53-40 | 56% | 15 | VA |
| 2363 | AZ OUTLAWS 17 ELITE | 1839 | 41-21 | 66% | 17 | AZ |
| 2364 | DYNASTY 11-Blue | 1839 | 16-9 | 64% | 11 | KS |
| 2365 | AVB Fire 16-1 black | 1839 | 39-12 | 76% | 16 | MN |
| 2366 | NPJ Bend 16 National | 1839 | 40-35 | 53% | 16 | OR |
| 2367 | CSDP Volleyball Club 12-1 | 1839 | 23-15 | 61% | 12 | MO |
| 2368 | United 13 GJ | 1839 | 11-5 | 69% | 13 | CO |
| 2369 | SPVB 18-White | 1839 | 23-6 | 79% | 18 | IL |
| 2370 | Invasion Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1839 | 8-6 | 57% | 17 | MO |
| 2371 | Spike It Pure 14-1 | 1839 | 47-13 | 78% | 14 | OR |
| 2372 | OT 15-T kesha | 1839 | 51-14 | 78% | 15 | FL |
| 2373 | Aus Velocity 15-1 diamond | 1839 | 36-17 | 68% | 15 | TX |
| 2374 | Club One AZ 14-Titanium | 1839 | 35-40 | 47% | 14 | AZ |
| 2375 | SoCal VBC 15-Beacons | 1839 | 32-28 | 53% | 15 | CA |
| 2376 | MSVC 14-Adidas manny | 1839 | 57-9 | 86% | 14 | FL |
| 2377 | 1United 15-N black | 1839 | 39-11 | 71% | 15 | TX |
| 2378 | RRHVBC 17-1 jaz | 1839 | 7-2 | 78% | 17 | NV |
| 2379 | VCN 15-Elite | 1839 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | NE |
| 2380 | SNVF 18 SECRET | 1838 | 46-20 | 69% | 18 | WA |
| 2381 | ECVC 16-Pink | 1838 | 52-21 | 71% | 16 | VA |
| 2382 | MAVS KC 14-3 | 1838 | 10-0 | 91% | 14 | KS |
| 2383 | Rhythm 17 Grant | 1838 | 38-28 | 56% | 17 | TN |
| 2384 | Valley Flames 11-Black | 1838 | 25-6 | 81% | 11 | TX |
| 2385 | ID Crush IF 15-Noah | 1838 | 23-9 | 72% | 15 | ID |
| 2386 | COA 13-Kangaroos | 1838 | 28-21 | 57% | 13 | IN |
| 2387 | VA Juniors 14-Elite | 1838 | 49-28 | 63% | 14 | VA |
| 2388 | CVA 15-1 kelly | 1838 | 32-10 | 76% | 15 | IA |
| 2389 | Mighty Mo 17-Simmons | 1838 | 37-12 | 73% | 17 | MT |
| 2390 | ProPlay 15 Gracee | 1838 | 44-27 | 62% | 15 | CA |
| 2391 | Blue Royals 15 Platinum | 1838 | 45-19 | 70% | 15 | WA |
| 2392 | SVE 16-1 | 1838 | 48-22 | 69% | 16 | GA |
| 2393 | MKE Sting 15 Silver | 1838 | 60-25 | 71% | 15 | WI |
| 2394 | Phoenix Volleyball 18 Phoenix Legacy | 1838 | 8-7 | 53% | 18 | ON |
| 2395 | Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 13-N carly | 1837 | 32-17 | 65% | 13 | NJ |
| 2396 | Gulfside 13-Prime | 1837 | 50-12 | 81% | 13 | FL |
| 2397 | RAGE 18 CARMELO | 1837 | 33-24 | 58% | 18 | CA |
| 2398 | VolleyFX 16 Mantra | 1837 | 34-26 | 55% | 16 | NY |
| 2399 | Alamo 16-Elite 1 | 1837 | 42-14 | 75% | 16 | TX |
| 2400 | SOSVBC 16-N cooper | 1837 | 11-7 | 61% | 16 | NY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.