Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 48 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2351 Mintonette Sports 16-3 1839 44-24 65% 16 OH
2352 MSVC 14-Adidas manny 1838 57-9 86% 14 FL
2353 Headlines VBC 15 Navy 1838 48-12 80% 15 OH
2354 Next 15-Blue 1838 31-29 52% 15 OH
2355 Stars Columbia 17 Tiffner 1838 37-25 60% 17 SC
2356 Spike It Pure 14-1 1838 47-13 78% 14 OR
2357 305VBC 13-N christian 1838 32-28 53% 13 FL
2358 OVVC 16-Green 1838 38-15 72% 16 OH
2359 GVA 12-Pink 1838 15-18 45% 12 PR
2360 MPV 16-National green 1838 36-30 55% 16 UT
2361 Bay Area Eagles 15-Oliver 1838 31-14 69% 15 CA
2362 GVA 13-White 1838 22-0 100% 13 PR
2363 Apex 12-Elite 1838 23-4 72% 12 MT
2364 Rockwall Heat 16-National 1838 9-3 75% 16 TX
2365 CVVBH 14-1 charlie 1838 6-4 60% 14 PR
2366 RRHVBC 17-1 jaz 1838 7-2 78% 17
2367 TW Skyline 15-Black 1838 31-21 60% 15 TX
2368 STORM Blizzard 17-1 1837 6-6 50% 17
2369 MVA 15-1 1837 32-27 54% 15 FL
2370 DYNASTY 11-Blue 1837 16-9 64% 11 KS
2371 M2 Volleyball 18-E1 1837 31-23 57% 18 GA
2372 Amarillo Xtreme 14-Icons 1837 29-14 67% 14 TX
2373 HP South 15-Premier 1837 39-21 65% 15 MO
2374 HIC 16-N keano 1837 22-12 65% 16 UT
2375 AZ Outlaws VBC 17-1 1837 9-6 60% 17 AZ
2376 Skyline 11-Black 1837 28-14 67% 11 TX
2377 Rancho Valley 16-Select m 1837 12-5 71% 16 CA
2378 HEAT 12-Red (BG) 1837 23-6 79% 12 WI
2379 Ama Xtreme 15-Icons 1837 4-1 80% 15
2380 Red Rock 15-Chi 1837 30-23 57% 15 CA
2381 AZ OUTLAWS 17 ELITE 1836 41-21 66% 17 AZ
2382 Aus Velocity 15-1 diamond 1836 36-17 68% 15 TX
2383 EliteVBTC 15-Blue 1836 36-34 51% 15 OH
2384 NPJ Bend 16 National 1836 40-35 53% 16 OR
2385 OT 15-T kesha 1836 51-14 78% 15 FL
2386 SCBandits 15-1 1836 17-7 71% 15 ON
2387 VA Juniors 14-Elite 1836 49-28 63% 14 VA
2388 VALLEY VENOM - 15-1 red 1836 19-9 68% 15 TX
2389 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 13-Blue 1836 36-27 57% 13 FL
2390 OPVC 15-Beams 1836 44-23 66% 15 OH
2391 Valley Flames 11-Black 1836 25-6 81% 11 TX
2392 clubSAV 17-Mizuno 1836 17-18 49% 17 GA
2393 South Elite 12-Mariana 1836 13-4 76% 12 PR
2394 ZTV 12-1 diamond 1836 20-4 77% 12 MT
2395 TAV 14-Blue (NT) 1836 11-10 52% 14 TX
2396 SVC 15-Blue 1836 34-21 62% 15 FL
2397 Defensa 18-Ezzy 1836 13-2 87% 18
2398 K1 Bayamon 16-A 1836 13-4 76% 16 PR
2399 VCN 15-Elite 1836 6-3 67% 15 NE
2400 Wildfire 14-N open 1836 11-9 55% 14 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.