Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 48 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2351 AZ SKY 11-Gold 1840 42-22 66% 11 AZ
2352 HPSTL 14-White 1840 40-21 66% 14 MO
2353 COA 15-Gophers 1840 32-25 56% 15 IN
2354 Brandywine Volleyball Club 18-1 1840 22-9 67% 18 DE
2355 Headlines VBC 15 Navy 1840 48-12 80% 15 OH
2356 Stars Columbia 17 Tiffner 1840 37-25 60% 17 SC
2357 3DGE 18-1 gold 1840 24-36 40% 18 PA
2358 MiElite 17-Elite 1840 29-32 48% 17 MI
2359 OPVC 15-Beams 1840 44-23 66% 15 OH
2360 RRHVB 18-1 annie 1839 33-18 65% 18 UT
2361 CVVBH 14-1 charlie 1839 6-4 60% 14 PR
2362 Virginia Elite Volleyball Club 15 1839 53-40 56% 15 VA
2363 AZ OUTLAWS 17 ELITE 1839 41-21 66% 17 AZ
2364 DYNASTY 11-Blue 1839 16-9 64% 11 KS
2365 AVB Fire 16-1 black 1839 39-12 76% 16 MN
2366 NPJ Bend 16 National 1839 40-35 53% 16 OR
2367 CSDP Volleyball Club 12-1 1839 23-15 61% 12 MO
2368 United 13 GJ 1839 11-5 69% 13 CO
2369 SPVB 18-White 1839 23-6 79% 18 IL
2370 Invasion Volleyball Club 17-1 1839 8-6 57% 17 MO
2371 Spike It Pure 14-1 1839 47-13 78% 14 OR
2372 OT 15-T kesha 1839 51-14 78% 15 FL
2373 Aus Velocity 15-1 diamond 1839 36-17 68% 15 TX
2374 Club One AZ 14-Titanium 1839 35-40 47% 14 AZ
2375 SoCal VBC 15-Beacons 1839 32-28 53% 15 CA
2376 MSVC 14-Adidas manny 1839 57-9 86% 14 FL
2377 1United 15-N black 1839 39-11 71% 15 TX
2378 RRHVBC 17-1 jaz 1839 7-2 78% 17 NV
2379 VCN 15-Elite 1839 6-3 67% 15 NE
2380 SNVF 18 SECRET 1838 46-20 69% 18 WA
2381 ECVC 16-Pink 1838 52-21 71% 16 VA
2382 MAVS KC 14-3 1838 10-0 91% 14 KS
2383 Rhythm 17 Grant 1838 38-28 56% 17 TN
2384 Valley Flames 11-Black 1838 25-6 81% 11 TX
2385 ID Crush IF 15-Noah 1838 23-9 72% 15 ID
2386 COA 13-Kangaroos 1838 28-21 57% 13 IN
2387 VA Juniors 14-Elite 1838 49-28 63% 14 VA
2388 CVA 15-1 kelly 1838 32-10 76% 15 IA
2389 Mighty Mo 17-Simmons 1838 37-12 73% 17 MT
2390 ProPlay 15 Gracee 1838 44-27 62% 15 CA
2391 Blue Royals 15 Platinum 1838 45-19 70% 15 WA
2392 SVE 16-1 1838 48-22 69% 16 GA
2393 MKE Sting 15 Silver 1838 60-25 71% 15 WI
2394 Phoenix Volleyball 18 Phoenix Legacy 1838 8-7 53% 18 ON
2395 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 13-N carly 1837 32-17 65% 13 NJ
2396 Gulfside 13-Prime 1837 50-12 81% 13 FL
2397 RAGE 18 CARMELO 1837 33-24 58% 18 CA
2398 VolleyFX 16 Mantra 1837 34-26 55% 16 NY
2399 Alamo 16-Elite 1 1837 42-14 75% 16 TX
2400 SOSVBC 16-N cooper 1837 11-7 61% 16 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.