Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 47 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2301 CRU MAX 18 1845 16-6 73% 18 WA
2302 TW Skyline 15-Black 1844 31-21 60% 15 TX
2303 Rancho 18-Premier 1844 33-22 60% 18 CA
2304 NVA 15-Black 1844 50-27 65% 15 PA
2305 Adversity-WI 13-1 1844 38-5 88% 13 WI
2306 K1 Bayamon 16-A 1844 13-4 76% 16 PR
2307 FORZA1 NORTH 16 ONE 1844 33-28 54% 16 CA
2308 Vision 12-1 1844 34-6 85% 12 TX
2309 MN Select 12-1 1844 41-32 56% 12 MN
2310 Texas One 16-Royal 1844 50-18 74% 16 TX
2311 Countdown 17-Elite 1844 46-18 72% 17 FL
2312 HP South 15-Premier 1844 39-21 65% 15 MO
2313 Temecula Viper 18-1 kurstan/natalie 1843 28-25 53% 18 CA
2314 Niceville Sharks Volleyball Club 18-Navy 1843 32-6 84% 18 AL
2315 Kokoro Volleyball 14-1 1843 58-52 53% 14 MN
2316 Renaissance 15-Black (KE) 1843 37-7 84% 15 PA
2317 Maricopa 15-Navy 1843 7-2 78% 15 CA
2318 FVA 17 Inferno 1843 33-9 77% 17 AK
2319 OVA 15-Black 1843 44-33 57% 15 FL
2320 Circle City 13-Black 1843 45-23 66% 13 IN
2321 SASVBC G 13 BRYAN 1843 26-15 63% 13 HI
2322 Academy 16 Jade 1843 45-11 80% 16 NC
2323 CSCV 18-1 1843 10-0 100% 18 MA
2324 MODE 15 Premier 1843 28-16 64% 15 WA
2325 VAQUERAS 14-F samuel k 1842 22-19 54% 14 PR
2326 MAVS KC 13-1 1842 8-0 100% 13 KS
2327 SVC 15-Blue 1842 34-21 62% 15 FL
2328 GVA 12-Pink 1842 15-18 45% 12 PR
2329 Stars 17 Jacob 1842 55-18 75% 17 SC
2330 Rockwood Thunder 12-White 1842 47-17 70% 12 MO
2331 MN Select 12-2 1842 51-17 75% 12 MN
2332 NY Warrior Attack 15 1842 65-19 77% 15 NY
2333 WVBA 15-Adidas 1842 32-30 52% 15 WA
2334 PVA 12 ELITE 1841 29-20 59% 12 MO
2335 GJ 18 ADIDAS 1841 38-19 67% 18 FL
2336 Roots 13-1 green 1841 42-18 70% 13 TX
2337 MSVB 12-Blue 1841 14-0 100% 12 AK
2338 M2 Volleyball 18-E1 1841 31-23 57% 18 GA
2339 UNION 16-Green 1841 55-30 65% 16 IN
2340 GVA 13-White 1841 22-0 100% 13 PR
2341 DYNASTY 17-Blue 1841 39-29 57% 17 KS
2342 Impact 16-Rey 1841 29-13 69% 16 MI
2343 NPJ Seattle 16-National 1841 51-26 66% 16 WA
2344 AZ REV 15-Black 1841 52-14 79% 15 AZ
2345 Club Four 17-Boost 1841 42-9 81% 17 MO
2346 LAV 15-Regional black 1841 41-4 91% 15 AL
2347 EliteVBTC 15-Blue 1841 36-34 51% 15 OH
2348 Dead Frog 17-Black 1840 39-15 72% 17 MI
2349 AZ REV 12-Premier 1840 63-29 68% 12 AZ
2350 SOL 12-1 1840 25-7 78% 12 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.