Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 47 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2301 MVVC G 18-Red 1844 38-21 64% 18 CA
2302 DYNASTY 17-Blue 1843 39-29 57% 17 KS
2303 BRAVO 13-Black 1843 47-10 82% 13 KY
2304 Gulfside 13-Prime 1843 50-12 81% 13 FL
2305 VolleyFX 16 Mantra 1843 34-26 55% 16 NY
2306 NVA 15-Black 1843 50-27 65% 15 PA
2307 Tsunami 17-1e alex 1843 43-18 70% 17 GA
2308 Top Tier VC 18 Select 1843 35-22 61% 18 NJ
2309 Vision 11 Gold 1843 37-22 63% 11 CA
2310 Iowa Select 15 Mizuno 1843 36-39 48% 15 IA
2311 AJV 16-Molten 1843 45-20 69% 16 TX
2312 Tampa North 12-Black 1843 46-13 78% 12 FL
2313 Fusion 12-U kris 1843 5-0 100% 12 IL
2314 FEVA 18-Fernando 1842 59-17 78% 18 FL
2315 City Beach 14-Black 1842 37-18 67% 14 CA
2316 MVA 15-Ana 1842 38-35 52% 15 FL
2317 Paramount VBC 14 Kelly 1842 16-8 67% 14 VA
2318 PineappleHP 18 1842 25-35 42% 18 IN
2319 Stars 17 Jacob 1842 55-18 75% 17 SC
2320 Alamo 14-Elite 2 1842 60-24 71% 14 TX
2321 LAV 14-Regional black 1842 40-6 87% 14 AL
2322 OPVC 16-Supan 1842 23-36 39% 16 OH
2323 Invasion VBC 17-1 1842 6-3 67% 17 MO
2324 CSCV 18-1 1842 10-0 100% 18
2325 AVA Texas 15-Adidas 1842 6-2 75% 15 TX
2326 UNION 16-Green 1841 55-30 65% 16 CA
2327 Sharks 18-Navy 1841 44-12 79% 18 FL
2328 Rockwood Thunder 12-White 1841 47-17 70% 12 MO
2329 Countdown 17-Elite 1841 46-18 72% 17 FL
2330 Impact 16-Rey 1841 29-13 69% 16 MI
2331 YQL Selects 17-1 1840 8-5 62% 17
2332 MN Select 12-2 1840 51-17 75% 12 MN
2333 RVJ 18 Nationals 1840 33-9 79% 18 VA
2334 RISE 14 KUI 1840 34-17 67% 14 CA
2335 Intense 15-S - rae/daisha 1840 53-8 87% 15 SC
2336 ECJVC 15-National 1840 39-27 59% 15 NC
2337 Jax Skyline 13-Royal 1840 42-33 56% 13 FL
2338 NPJ Seattle 16-National 1840 51-26 66% 16 WA
2339 LOVB 18-Joy 1840 13-8 62% 18 MI
2340 NYC Juniors 13-National 1840 50-19 72% 13 NY
2341 Spiketown VBC 12-3 1840 23-1 96% 12 OH
2342 1United 14-N white 1840 30-18 57% 14 TX
2343 308 Exclusive VBC 18-Gold 1840 30-4 88% 18 NE
2344 EVA 13 National 1839 55-11 83% 13 AR
2345 Club One AZ 14-Titanium 1839 35-40 47% 14 AZ
2346 COAST 15-3 charley 1839 33-17 66% 15 CA
2347 HPSTL 14-White 1839 40-21 66% 14 MO
2348 HOS 16U Blue 1839 35-3 92% 16 NY
2349 London Elite 16-American 1839 52-6 90% 16 OH
2350 864 Elite 13-Carla 1839 45-9 83% 13 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.