2025-2026 Season — Page 47 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2301 | MVVC G 18-Red | 1844 | 38-21 | 64% | 18 | CA |
| 2302 | DYNASTY 17-Blue | 1843 | 39-29 | 57% | 17 | KS |
| 2303 | BRAVO 13-Black | 1843 | 47-10 | 82% | 13 | KY |
| 2304 | Gulfside 13-Prime | 1843 | 50-12 | 81% | 13 | FL |
| 2305 | VolleyFX 16 Mantra | 1843 | 34-26 | 55% | 16 | NY |
| 2306 | NVA 15-Black | 1843 | 50-27 | 65% | 15 | PA |
| 2307 | Tsunami 17-1e alex | 1843 | 43-18 | 70% | 17 | GA |
| 2308 | Top Tier VC 18 Select | 1843 | 35-22 | 61% | 18 | NJ |
| 2309 | Vision 11 Gold | 1843 | 37-22 | 63% | 11 | CA |
| 2310 | Iowa Select 15 Mizuno | 1843 | 36-39 | 48% | 15 | IA |
| 2311 | AJV 16-Molten | 1843 | 45-20 | 69% | 16 | TX |
| 2312 | Tampa North 12-Black | 1843 | 46-13 | 78% | 12 | FL |
| 2313 | Fusion 12-U kris | 1843 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | IL |
| 2314 | FEVA 18-Fernando | 1842 | 59-17 | 78% | 18 | FL |
| 2315 | City Beach 14-Black | 1842 | 37-18 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 2316 | MVA 15-Ana | 1842 | 38-35 | 52% | 15 | FL |
| 2317 | Paramount VBC 14 Kelly | 1842 | 16-8 | 67% | 14 | VA |
| 2318 | PineappleHP 18 | 1842 | 25-35 | 42% | 18 | IN |
| 2319 | Stars 17 Jacob | 1842 | 55-18 | 75% | 17 | SC |
| 2320 | Alamo 14-Elite 2 | 1842 | 60-24 | 71% | 14 | TX |
| 2321 | LAV 14-Regional black | 1842 | 40-6 | 87% | 14 | AL |
| 2322 | OPVC 16-Supan | 1842 | 23-36 | 39% | 16 | OH |
| 2323 | Invasion VBC 17-1 | 1842 | 6-3 | 67% | 17 | MO |
| 2324 | CSCV 18-1 | 1842 | 10-0 | 100% | 18 | |
| 2325 | AVA Texas 15-Adidas | 1842 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 2326 | UNION 16-Green | 1841 | 55-30 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 2327 | Sharks 18-Navy | 1841 | 44-12 | 79% | 18 | FL |
| 2328 | Rockwood Thunder 12-White | 1841 | 47-17 | 70% | 12 | MO |
| 2329 | Countdown 17-Elite | 1841 | 46-18 | 72% | 17 | FL |
| 2330 | Impact 16-Rey | 1841 | 29-13 | 69% | 16 | MI |
| 2331 | YQL Selects 17-1 | 1840 | 8-5 | 62% | 17 | |
| 2332 | MN Select 12-2 | 1840 | 51-17 | 75% | 12 | MN |
| 2333 | RVJ 18 Nationals | 1840 | 33-9 | 79% | 18 | VA |
| 2334 | RISE 14 KUI | 1840 | 34-17 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 2335 | Intense 15-S - rae/daisha | 1840 | 53-8 | 87% | 15 | SC |
| 2336 | ECJVC 15-National | 1840 | 39-27 | 59% | 15 | NC |
| 2337 | Jax Skyline 13-Royal | 1840 | 42-33 | 56% | 13 | FL |
| 2338 | NPJ Seattle 16-National | 1840 | 51-26 | 66% | 16 | WA |
| 2339 | LOVB 18-Joy | 1840 | 13-8 | 62% | 18 | MI |
| 2340 | NYC Juniors 13-National | 1840 | 50-19 | 72% | 13 | NY |
| 2341 | Spiketown VBC 12-3 | 1840 | 23-1 | 96% | 12 | OH |
| 2342 | 1United 14-N white | 1840 | 30-18 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 2343 | 308 Exclusive VBC 18-Gold | 1840 | 30-4 | 88% | 18 | NE |
| 2344 | EVA 13 National | 1839 | 55-11 | 83% | 13 | AR |
| 2345 | Club One AZ 14-Titanium | 1839 | 35-40 | 47% | 14 | AZ |
| 2346 | COAST 15-3 charley | 1839 | 33-17 | 66% | 15 | CA |
| 2347 | HPSTL 14-White | 1839 | 40-21 | 66% | 14 | MO |
| 2348 | HOS 16U Blue | 1839 | 35-3 | 92% | 16 | NY |
| 2349 | London Elite 16-American | 1839 | 52-6 | 90% | 16 | OH |
| 2350 | 864 Elite 13-Carla | 1839 | 45-9 | 83% | 13 | SC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.