2025-2026 Season — Page 47 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2301 | CRU MAX 18 | 1845 | 16-6 | 73% | 18 | WA |
| 2302 | TW Skyline 15-Black | 1844 | 31-21 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 2303 | Rancho 18-Premier | 1844 | 33-22 | 60% | 18 | CA |
| 2304 | NVA 15-Black | 1844 | 50-27 | 65% | 15 | PA |
| 2305 | Adversity-WI 13-1 | 1844 | 38-5 | 88% | 13 | WI |
| 2306 | K1 Bayamon 16-A | 1844 | 13-4 | 76% | 16 | PR |
| 2307 | FORZA1 NORTH 16 ONE | 1844 | 33-28 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 2308 | Vision 12-1 | 1844 | 34-6 | 85% | 12 | TX |
| 2309 | MN Select 12-1 | 1844 | 41-32 | 56% | 12 | MN |
| 2310 | Texas One 16-Royal | 1844 | 50-18 | 74% | 16 | TX |
| 2311 | Countdown 17-Elite | 1844 | 46-18 | 72% | 17 | FL |
| 2312 | HP South 15-Premier | 1844 | 39-21 | 65% | 15 | MO |
| 2313 | Temecula Viper 18-1 kurstan/natalie | 1843 | 28-25 | 53% | 18 | CA |
| 2314 | Niceville Sharks Volleyball Club 18-Navy | 1843 | 32-6 | 84% | 18 | AL |
| 2315 | Kokoro Volleyball 14-1 | 1843 | 58-52 | 53% | 14 | MN |
| 2316 | Renaissance 15-Black (KE) | 1843 | 37-7 | 84% | 15 | PA |
| 2317 | Maricopa 15-Navy | 1843 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | CA |
| 2318 | FVA 17 Inferno | 1843 | 33-9 | 77% | 17 | AK |
| 2319 | OVA 15-Black | 1843 | 44-33 | 57% | 15 | FL |
| 2320 | Circle City 13-Black | 1843 | 45-23 | 66% | 13 | IN |
| 2321 | SASVBC G 13 BRYAN | 1843 | 26-15 | 63% | 13 | HI |
| 2322 | Academy 16 Jade | 1843 | 45-11 | 80% | 16 | NC |
| 2323 | CSCV 18-1 | 1843 | 10-0 | 100% | 18 | MA |
| 2324 | MODE 15 Premier | 1843 | 28-16 | 64% | 15 | WA |
| 2325 | VAQUERAS 14-F samuel k | 1842 | 22-19 | 54% | 14 | PR |
| 2326 | MAVS KC 13-1 | 1842 | 8-0 | 100% | 13 | KS |
| 2327 | SVC 15-Blue | 1842 | 34-21 | 62% | 15 | FL |
| 2328 | GVA 12-Pink | 1842 | 15-18 | 45% | 12 | PR |
| 2329 | Stars 17 Jacob | 1842 | 55-18 | 75% | 17 | SC |
| 2330 | Rockwood Thunder 12-White | 1842 | 47-17 | 70% | 12 | MO |
| 2331 | MN Select 12-2 | 1842 | 51-17 | 75% | 12 | MN |
| 2332 | NY Warrior Attack 15 | 1842 | 65-19 | 77% | 15 | NY |
| 2333 | WVBA 15-Adidas | 1842 | 32-30 | 52% | 15 | WA |
| 2334 | PVA 12 ELITE | 1841 | 29-20 | 59% | 12 | MO |
| 2335 | GJ 18 ADIDAS | 1841 | 38-19 | 67% | 18 | FL |
| 2336 | Roots 13-1 green | 1841 | 42-18 | 70% | 13 | TX |
| 2337 | MSVB 12-Blue | 1841 | 14-0 | 100% | 12 | AK |
| 2338 | M2 Volleyball 18-E1 | 1841 | 31-23 | 57% | 18 | GA |
| 2339 | UNION 16-Green | 1841 | 55-30 | 65% | 16 | IN |
| 2340 | GVA 13-White | 1841 | 22-0 | 100% | 13 | PR |
| 2341 | DYNASTY 17-Blue | 1841 | 39-29 | 57% | 17 | KS |
| 2342 | Impact 16-Rey | 1841 | 29-13 | 69% | 16 | MI |
| 2343 | NPJ Seattle 16-National | 1841 | 51-26 | 66% | 16 | WA |
| 2344 | AZ REV 15-Black | 1841 | 52-14 | 79% | 15 | AZ |
| 2345 | Club Four 17-Boost | 1841 | 42-9 | 81% | 17 | MO |
| 2346 | LAV 15-Regional black | 1841 | 41-4 | 91% | 15 | AL |
| 2347 | EliteVBTC 15-Blue | 1841 | 36-34 | 51% | 15 | OH |
| 2348 | Dead Frog 17-Black | 1840 | 39-15 | 72% | 17 | MI |
| 2349 | AZ REV 12-Premier | 1840 | 63-29 | 68% | 12 | AZ |
| 2350 | SOL 12-1 | 1840 | 25-7 | 78% | 12 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.