2025-2026 Season — Page 46 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2251 | K2 15-2 elite | 1848 | 49-41 | 54% | 15 | TN |
| 2252 | Red Rock 14-Cristine | 1848 | 15-13 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 2253 | MAVS KC 14 Premier | 1848 | 43-14 | 75% | 14 | KS |
| 2254 | OK Charge 12-Ua | 1848 | 36-14 | 72% | 12 | OK |
| 2255 | MPV 16-National green | 1848 | 36-30 | 55% | 16 | UT |
| 2256 | Fusion 12-U kris | 1848 | 5-0 | 100% | 12 | UT |
| 2257 | BRVBA Blue Royals 16-Emerald | 1848 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | NV |
| 2258 | SC Rockstar 15-Lance | 1848 | 31-21 | 60% | 15 | CA |
| 2259 | River City Jrs 14 Navy | 1848 | 33-15 | 69% | 14 | IA |
| 2260 | DNVB 14-Red | 1848 | 7-8 | 47% | 14 | MA |
| 2261 | ARIZONA STORM 12-Lightning | 1848 | 41-20 | 67% | 12 | AZ |
| 2262 | Rockwall Heat 16-National | 1848 | 9-3 | 75% | 16 | TX |
| 2263 | Empire 15-National emily | 1847 | 7-1 | 88% | 15 | CA |
| 2264 | Lawrence Landsharks 13-1 | 1847 | 20-2 | 91% | 13 | KS |
| 2265 | Top Flight 12-Psi | 1847 | 15-0 | 100% | 12 | IL |
| 2266 | Florida's Sports Coast Elite 11-Blue | 1847 | 38-15 | 72% | 11 | FL |
| 2267 | RockCity 14 N1 | 1847 | 41-25 | 62% | 14 | OH |
| 2268 | VCNebraska 13-Black | 1847 | 14-10 | 58% | 13 | NE |
| 2269 | PAO STL 16-Rda black | 1847 | 71-13 | 85% | 16 | MO |
| 2270 | PJVBC 13-National | 1847 | 50-14 | 78% | 13 | WA |
| 2271 | Fusion Elite 14 | 1847 | 36-16 | 69% | 14 | IA |
| 2272 | Royal Legends 17-Orange | 1847 | 36-33 | 52% | 17 | PA |
| 2273 | TPV 17-Paragon | 1847 | 52-25 | 68% | 17 | TN |
| 2274 | Paramount VBC 12 Jaz | 1847 | 28-10 | 74% | 12 | VA |
| 2275 | AVC 13-Navy | 1846 | 16-5 | 73% | 13 | FL |
| 2276 | Calcasieu Impact 13 | 1846 | 29-8 | 76% | 13 | LA |
| 2277 | MVSA 15 Charge | 1846 | 44-25 | 63% | 15 | MD |
| 2278 | MVA 15-Ana | 1846 | 38-35 | 52% | 15 | FL |
| 2279 | 1United 14-N white | 1846 | 30-18 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 2280 | PineappleHP 18 | 1846 | 25-35 | 42% | 18 | IN |
| 2281 | 1st Alliance 15-Grey | 1846 | 48-10 | 83% | 15 | IL |
| 2282 | NKJV 14-Blue | 1846 | 39-17 | 70% | 14 | KY |
| 2283 | MoCo Volleyball Club 15 MOCO Menace (CH) | 1845 | 49-17 | 74% | 15 | |
| 2284 | Wildfire 17-N open | 1845 | 9-24 | 27% | 17 | FL |
| 2285 | BVC 16-National lance | 1845 | 44-14 | 76% | 16 | AL |
| 2286 | LEGACY 12-Elite vivi | 1845 | 32-34 | 48% | 12 | FL |
| 2287 | Top Tier VC 18 Select | 1845 | 35-22 | 61% | 18 | NJ |
| 2288 | EIVA Kunz 14 | 1845 | 14-3 | 74% | 14 | ID |
| 2289 | 305VBC 13-N christian | 1845 | 32-28 | 53% | 13 | FL |
| 2290 | BRAVO 13-Black | 1845 | 47-10 | 82% | 13 | KY |
| 2291 | Mintonette Sports 16-3 | 1845 | 44-24 | 65% | 16 | OH |
| 2292 | Triple Attack Volleyball 14-Black | 1845 | 56-28 | 67% | 14 | IL |
| 2293 | USANY 18 USANY Fortitude | 1845 | 7-7 | 50% | 18 | NY |
| 2294 | Decatur Force 12 Teal | 1845 | 47-6 | 89% | 12 | IN |
| 2295 | NorthShore 17-Kalizewski | 1845 | 26-11 | 70% | 17 | OH |
| 2296 | London Elite 16-American | 1845 | 52-6 | 90% | 16 | OH |
| 2297 | COAST 15-3 charley | 1845 | 33-17 | 66% | 15 | CA |
| 2298 | Shonto 14-S green | 1845 | 8-0 | 100% | 14 | CA |
| 2299 | MAVA 12-Select | 1845 | 54-21 | 72% | 12 | KY |
| 2300 | Pipeline 18-Adidas | 1845 | 35-22 | 61% | 18 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.