2025-2026 Season — Page 46 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2251 | Idaho ONE 12-White | 1848 | 31-11 | 74% | 12 | ID |
| 2252 | NorthShore 17-Kalizewski | 1848 | 26-11 | 70% | 17 | OH |
| 2253 | BVC 16-National lance | 1848 | 44-14 | 76% | 16 | AL |
| 2254 | Vision 12-1 | 1848 | 34-6 | 85% | 12 | TX |
| 2255 | Memphis Metro 17-Elite black | 1848 | 6-1 | 86% | 17 | |
| 2256 | Mighty Mo 17-Simmons | 1847 | 37-12 | 73% | 17 | |
| 2257 | ARIZONA STORM 12-Lightning | 1847 | 41-20 | 67% | 12 | AZ |
| 2258 | ARMOR 16 Zulu | 1847 | 30-29 | 51% | 16 | AZ |
| 2259 | Decatur Force 12 Teal | 1847 | 47-6 | 89% | 12 | IN |
| 2260 | Fusion Elite 14 | 1847 | 36-16 | 69% | 14 | IA |
| 2261 | Venetian Bay Auburn 17-1 mango | 1847 | 23-11 | 68% | 17 | AL |
| 2262 | LEGACY 12-Elite vivi | 1847 | 32-34 | 48% | 12 | FL |
| 2263 | Mizuno Northern Lights 15-1 | 1847 | 4-1 | 80% | 15 | |
| 2264 | MVVC 13-Red | 1847 | 33-35 | 49% | 13 | CA |
| 2265 | K2 15-2 elite | 1846 | 49-41 | 54% | 15 | TN |
| 2266 | MAVA 16-Select | 1846 | 30-47 | 39% | 16 | KY |
| 2267 | Columbia 16-Black | 1846 | 48-29 | 60% | 16 | MD |
| 2268 | MAVA 12-Select | 1846 | 54-21 | 72% | 12 | KY |
| 2269 | ID Crush TF 16-Melissa | 1846 | 30-16 | 65% | 16 | UT |
| 2270 | Next Level 15-1 abdell | 1846 | 14-7 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 2271 | AVA TX 15-Adidas | 1846 | 26-20 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 2272 | OPVC 18-Ostendorf | 1846 | 26-16 | 62% | 18 | OH |
| 2273 | BONNEVILLE 15-Kiley | 1846 | 20-15 | 57% | 15 | ID |
| 2274 | AVC 13-Navy | 1846 | 16-5 | 73% | 13 | VA |
| 2275 | Shonto 14-S green | 1846 | 8-0 | 100% | 14 | |
| 2276 | Lady Strikers Yellow 14 | 1846 | 16-1 | 94% | 14 | |
| 2277 | NOLA Hannah/Eva 14 | 1846 | 46-17 | 73% | 14 | |
| 2278 | RISE 12 KENNEDY | 1846 | 42-3 | 93% | 12 | CA |
| 2279 | Lawrence Landsharks 13-1 | 1845 | 20-2 | 91% | 13 | |
| 2280 | Circle City 13-Black | 1845 | 45-23 | 66% | 13 | IN |
| 2281 | FRVBC 16-1 black | 1845 | 36-29 | 55% | 16 | CO |
| 2282 | MAVS KC 14 Premier | 1845 | 43-14 | 75% | 14 | KS |
| 2283 | MKE Sting 16-White | 1845 | 60-32 | 65% | 16 | WI |
| 2284 | PEAK 16-1 elite | 1845 | 29-26 | 53% | 16 | AZ |
| 2285 | Premier EDGE 16 | 1845 | 47-25 | 65% | 16 | DE |
| 2286 | WF Waves 15-Nylah | 1845 | 43-21 | 67% | 15 | FL |
| 2287 | 1W 15-1 elite | 1845 | 40-33 | 55% | 15 | WI |
| 2288 | Club Four 17-Boost | 1845 | 42-9 | 81% | 17 | IL |
| 2289 | Pipeline 18-Adidas | 1845 | 35-22 | 61% | 18 | CA |
| 2290 | PJVBC 13-National | 1845 | 50-14 | 78% | 13 | WA |
| 2291 | EIVA Kunz 14 | 1845 | 14-3 | 74% | 14 | |
| 2292 | Apex VBC 16-1 | 1845 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | GA |
| 2293 | Red Rock 14-Cristine | 1845 | 15-13 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 2294 | CSDP Volleyball Club 12-1 | 1844 | 23-15 | 61% | 12 | |
| 2295 | Paramount VBC 12 Jaz | 1844 | 28-10 | 74% | 12 | VA |
| 2296 | 3DGE 18-1 gold | 1844 | 24-36 | 40% | 18 | PA |
| 2297 | RVC 12-Jantzen | 1844 | 18-9 | 64% | 12 | VA |
| 2298 | Whirlwind VBC 18-1 | 1844 | 28-8 | 78% | 18 | NY |
| 2299 | NKJV 14-Blue | 1844 | 39-17 | 70% | 14 | KY |
| 2300 | Wildfire 17-N open | 1844 | 9-24 | 27% | 17 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.