Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 46 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2251 Idaho ONE 12-White 1848 31-11 74% 12 ID
2252 NorthShore 17-Kalizewski 1848 26-11 70% 17 OH
2253 BVC 16-National lance 1848 44-14 76% 16 AL
2254 Vision 12-1 1848 34-6 85% 12 TX
2255 Memphis Metro 17-Elite black 1848 6-1 86% 17
2256 Mighty Mo 17-Simmons 1847 37-12 73% 17
2257 ARIZONA STORM 12-Lightning 1847 41-20 67% 12 AZ
2258 ARMOR 16 Zulu 1847 30-29 51% 16 AZ
2259 Decatur Force 12 Teal 1847 47-6 89% 12 IN
2260 Fusion Elite 14 1847 36-16 69% 14 IA
2261 Venetian Bay Auburn 17-1 mango 1847 23-11 68% 17 AL
2262 LEGACY 12-Elite vivi 1847 32-34 48% 12 FL
2263 Mizuno Northern Lights 15-1 1847 4-1 80% 15
2264 MVVC 13-Red 1847 33-35 49% 13 CA
2265 K2 15-2 elite 1846 49-41 54% 15 TN
2266 MAVA 16-Select 1846 30-47 39% 16 KY
2267 Columbia 16-Black 1846 48-29 60% 16 MD
2268 MAVA 12-Select 1846 54-21 72% 12 KY
2269 ID Crush TF 16-Melissa 1846 30-16 65% 16 UT
2270 Next Level 15-1 abdell 1846 14-7 67% 15 CA
2271 AVA TX 15-Adidas 1846 26-20 57% 15 TX
2272 OPVC 18-Ostendorf 1846 26-16 62% 18 OH
2273 BONNEVILLE 15-Kiley 1846 20-15 57% 15 ID
2274 AVC 13-Navy 1846 16-5 73% 13 VA
2275 Shonto 14-S green 1846 8-0 100% 14
2276 Lady Strikers Yellow 14 1846 16-1 94% 14
2277 NOLA Hannah/Eva 14 1846 46-17 73% 14
2278 RISE 12 KENNEDY 1846 42-3 93% 12 CA
2279 Lawrence Landsharks 13-1 1845 20-2 91% 13
2280 Circle City 13-Black 1845 45-23 66% 13 IN
2281 FRVBC 16-1 black 1845 36-29 55% 16 CO
2282 MAVS KC 14 Premier 1845 43-14 75% 14 KS
2283 MKE Sting 16-White 1845 60-32 65% 16 WI
2284 PEAK 16-1 elite 1845 29-26 53% 16 AZ
2285 Premier EDGE 16 1845 47-25 65% 16 DE
2286 WF Waves 15-Nylah 1845 43-21 67% 15 FL
2287 1W 15-1 elite 1845 40-33 55% 15 WI
2288 Club Four 17-Boost 1845 42-9 81% 17 IL
2289 Pipeline 18-Adidas 1845 35-22 61% 18 CA
2290 PJVBC 13-National 1845 50-14 78% 13 WA
2291 EIVA Kunz 14 1845 14-3 74% 14
2292 Apex VBC 16-1 1845 3-4 43% 16 GA
2293 Red Rock 14-Cristine 1845 15-13 54% 14 CA
2294 CSDP Volleyball Club 12-1 1844 23-15 61% 12
2295 Paramount VBC 12 Jaz 1844 28-10 74% 12 VA
2296 3DGE 18-1 gold 1844 24-36 40% 18 PA
2297 RVC 12-Jantzen 1844 18-9 64% 12 VA
2298 Whirlwind VBC 18-1 1844 28-8 78% 18 NY
2299 NKJV 14-Blue 1844 39-17 70% 14 KY
2300 Wildfire 17-N open 1844 9-24 27% 17 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.