Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 46 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2251 K2 15-2 elite 1848 49-41 54% 15 TN
2252 Red Rock 14-Cristine 1848 15-13 54% 14 CA
2253 MAVS KC 14 Premier 1848 43-14 75% 14 KS
2254 OK Charge 12-Ua 1848 36-14 72% 12 OK
2255 MPV 16-National green 1848 36-30 55% 16 UT
2256 Fusion 12-U kris 1848 5-0 100% 12 UT
2257 BRVBA Blue Royals 16-Emerald 1848 7-2 78% 16 NV
2258 SC Rockstar 15-Lance 1848 31-21 60% 15 CA
2259 River City Jrs 14 Navy 1848 33-15 69% 14 IA
2260 DNVB 14-Red 1848 7-8 47% 14 MA
2261 ARIZONA STORM 12-Lightning 1848 41-20 67% 12 AZ
2262 Rockwall Heat 16-National 1848 9-3 75% 16 TX
2263 Empire 15-National emily 1847 7-1 88% 15 CA
2264 Lawrence Landsharks 13-1 1847 20-2 91% 13 KS
2265 Top Flight 12-Psi 1847 15-0 100% 12 IL
2266 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 11-Blue 1847 38-15 72% 11 FL
2267 RockCity 14 N1 1847 41-25 62% 14 OH
2268 VCNebraska 13-Black 1847 14-10 58% 13 NE
2269 PAO STL 16-Rda black 1847 71-13 85% 16 MO
2270 PJVBC 13-National 1847 50-14 78% 13 WA
2271 Fusion Elite 14 1847 36-16 69% 14 IA
2272 Royal Legends 17-Orange 1847 36-33 52% 17 PA
2273 TPV 17-Paragon 1847 52-25 68% 17 TN
2274 Paramount VBC 12 Jaz 1847 28-10 74% 12 VA
2275 AVC 13-Navy 1846 16-5 73% 13 FL
2276 Calcasieu Impact 13 1846 29-8 76% 13 LA
2277 MVSA 15 Charge 1846 44-25 63% 15 MD
2278 MVA 15-Ana 1846 38-35 52% 15 FL
2279 1United 14-N white 1846 30-18 57% 14 TX
2280 PineappleHP 18 1846 25-35 42% 18 IN
2281 1st Alliance 15-Grey 1846 48-10 83% 15 IL
2282 NKJV 14-Blue 1846 39-17 70% 14 KY
2283 MoCo Volleyball Club 15 MOCO Menace (CH) 1845 49-17 74% 15
2284 Wildfire 17-N open 1845 9-24 27% 17 FL
2285 BVC 16-National lance 1845 44-14 76% 16 AL
2286 LEGACY 12-Elite vivi 1845 32-34 48% 12 FL
2287 Top Tier VC 18 Select 1845 35-22 61% 18 NJ
2288 EIVA Kunz 14 1845 14-3 74% 14 ID
2289 305VBC 13-N christian 1845 32-28 53% 13 FL
2290 BRAVO 13-Black 1845 47-10 82% 13 KY
2291 Mintonette Sports 16-3 1845 44-24 65% 16 OH
2292 Triple Attack Volleyball 14-Black 1845 56-28 67% 14 IL
2293 USANY 18 USANY Fortitude 1845 7-7 50% 18 NY
2294 Decatur Force 12 Teal 1845 47-6 89% 12 IN
2295 NorthShore 17-Kalizewski 1845 26-11 70% 17 OH
2296 London Elite 16-American 1845 52-6 90% 16 OH
2297 COAST 15-3 charley 1845 33-17 66% 15 CA
2298 Shonto 14-S green 1845 8-0 100% 14 CA
2299 MAVA 12-Select 1845 54-21 72% 12 KY
2300 Pipeline 18-Adidas 1845 35-22 61% 18 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.