Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 45 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2201 RISE 12 KENNEDY 1852 42-3 93% 12 LA
2202 Synergy 18 HeatWave 1852 39-10 80% 18 PA
2203 SF TREMORS 12 WOLVERINES 1852 33-15 69% 12 CA
2204 GP 18 National 1851 37-23 62% 18 FL
2205 Big Sky 16-2 1851 34-16 63% 16 MT
2206 OVVC 16-Green 1851 38-15 72% 16 OH
2207 IVBA 16-Ren 1851 25-23 52% 16 MS
2208 Drive Nation 18-Red 1851 17-15 53% 18 TX
2209 Iowa Select 15 Mizuno 1851 36-39 48% 15 IA
2210 AVA Texas 15-Adidas 1851 6-2 75% 15 NV
2211 Triangle 18-Blue 1851 31-23 57% 18 NC
2212 Memphis Volleyball Academy 16-1 1851 8-1 89% 16 TN
2213 Kairos 18 Alpha 1851 17-11 61% 18 SD
2214 Boss CLE 15-2 1851 38-15 72% 15 OH
2215 VALLEY VENOM - 15-1 red 1851 19-9 68% 15 TX
2216 MAVA 16-Select 1851 30-47 39% 16 KY
2217 Molten 16-Red (ry) 1851 30-10 75% 16 AZ
2218 Lions 14-Red 1851 62-48 56% 14 IL
2219 Next 16-Blue 1851 38-20 66% 16 OH
2220 Xcel VB 16-1 adidas 1851 29-18 62% 16 TX
2221 1W 15-1 elite 1851 40-33 55% 15 WI
2222 Aspire 14 Alpha 1851 43-37 54% 14 AZ
2223 UNION 17-Green 1850 58-23 72% 17 IN
2224 HOS 16U Blue 1850 35-3 92% 16 NY
2225 MKE Sting 16-White 1850 60-32 65% 16 WI
2226 FH 18-Ikaika michele 1850 26-20 57% 18 TX
2227 FEVA 18-Fernando 1850 59-17 78% 18 FL
2228 3DGE 13-1 gold 1850 42-30 58% 13 PA
2229 UPONTOP 11-1 1850 21-3 88% 11 FL
2230 Venetian Bay Auburn 17-1 mango 1850 23-11 68% 17 AL
2231 PEAK 16-1 elite 1850 29-26 53% 16 OK
2232 Wildfire 16-N markia 1850 26-24 52% 16 FL
2233 SynergyForce 16-2 natl 1849 39-31 56% 16 CA
2234 Academy 13-O eagles 1849 29-46 39% 13 IN
2235 FRVBC 16-1 black 1849 36-29 55% 16 CO
2236 Triangle 14-Blue 1849 34-31 52% 14 NC
2237 Storm 17 Adidas 1849 33-16 67% 17 AR
2238 Air VBC 16-National 1849 38-2 95% 16 WI
2239 LAV 14-Regional black 1849 40-6 87% 14 AL
2240 UNION 11-Purple 1849 59-15 80% 11 IN
2241 BORINQUEN COQUI 15-1f 1849 24-13 65% 15 PR
2242 AVC 15-Navy 1849 18-7 69% 15 FL
2243 360 Volleyball Club 16 16 Kaos Black 1849 8-2 80% 16 TX
2244 HNLV 17-1 1849 6-2 75% 17 HI
2245 Memphis Metro 17-Elite black 1849 6-1 86% 17 TN
2246 Beauty2Beast 16-Nike 1849 58-12 83% 16 AZ
2247 Boston United 16-National 1849 36-24 60% 16 MA
2248 MVVC G 18-Red 1849 38-21 64% 18 CA
2249 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 15-N matt 1849 34-11 76% 15 NJ
2250 Maverick 17-Maroon 1849 35-23 60% 17 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.