Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 45 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2201 HOU STELLAR 13-Elite 1851 53-26 66% 13 TX
2202 MN Select 16-Black 1851 52-22 70% 16 MN
2203 North Point 18 National 1851 40-11 74% 18 TX
2204 Tribe 13-Elite navy 1851 41-18 69% 13 FL
2205 UNION 17-Green 1851 58-23 72% 17 CA
2206 Sharks 17-Navy 1851 44-17 72% 17 FL
2207 575 15-Pcna derick 1851 54-11 83% 15 GA
2208 Adrenaline 16-Dan 1851 38-18 68% 16 IA
2209 JAG VBC 15-1 national 1851 72-15 83% 15 WI
2210 WD Nation 16-Blue 1851 39-11 78% 16 LA
2211 Maverick 17-Maroon 1851 35-23 60% 17 OH
2212 Big Sky 16-2 1851 34-16 63% 16 MT
2213 Club Butte 17-Lacey 1851 8-6 57% 17 MT
2214 KEVC 13-1 1850 15-0 100% 13
2215 Crossfire 18-1 (NO) 1850 13-3 81% 18
2216 Epic United 12 Elite 1850 40-18 69% 12 IN
2217 GP 18 National 1850 37-23 62% 18 FL
2218 XP 16-Elite 1 1850 59-14 81% 16 IL
2219 Sideout 14-N jeff 1850 44-29 59% 14 NJ
2220 TEJAS 13-Black jeff 1850 40-11 75% 13 TX
2221 Empire 15-National emily 1850 7-1 88% 15 CA
2222 Impulse 12-Red 1849 19-0 100% 12 IL
2223 Aspire 14 Alpha 1849 43-37 54% 14 AB
2224 EXCEL 17-National red 1849 27-31 46% 17 TX
2225 MN Select 12-1 1849 40-24 63% 12 MN
2226 NPJ Salem 18 National 1849 34-23 60% 18 OR
2227 OMNI 18 National 1849 30-35 46% 18 CA
2228 RVC Impact 12 1849 53-17 74% 12 VA
2229 River City Jrs 14 Navy 1849 30-10 75% 14 NE
2230 UNION 11-Purple 1849 59-15 80% 11 CA
2231 WDVB 15-1 1849 43-11 80% 15 IA
2232 Actyve 18-Navy 1849 26-26 50% 18 CA
2233 3DGE 13-1 gold 1849 42-30 58% 13 PA
2234 Academy 13-O eagles 1849 29-46 39% 13 IN
2235 SPVB 18-White 1849 23-6 79% 18 IL
2236 FH 18-Ikaika michele 1849 26-20 57% 18 TX
2237 FWFIRE 13-P 1849 12-2 75% 13 TX
2238 Top Flight 12-Psi 1849 15-0 100% 12 IL
2239 Aces 16-S 1849 28-12 67% 16 TX
2240 Bakersfield 18-Mallori 1849 6-2 75% 18 CA
2241 HNLV 17-1 1849 6-2 75% 17
2242 Royal Legends 17-Orange 1849 36-33 52% 17 PA
2243 RockCity 14 N1 1849 41-25 62% 14 OH
2244 Air VBC 16-National 1848 38-2 95% 16 WI
2245 AZ REV 12-Premier 1848 45-23 66% 12 AZ
2246 Beauty2Beast 16-Nike 1848 53-9 85% 16 AZ
2247 South County 18 Josh 1848 20-4 83% 18 RI
2248 Boss CLE 15-2 1848 38-15 72% 15 OH
2249 Core STL 15-Navy 1848 33-20 61% 15 MO
2250 BORINQUEN COQUI 15-1f 1848 24-13 65% 15 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.