Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 44 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2151 SF TREMORS 12 WOLVERINES 1855 33-15 69% 12 CA
2152 Triangle 18-Blue 1855 31-23 57% 18 NC
2153 864 Elite 18-Quinn 1855 23-7 77% 18 SC
2154 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-1f 1855 19-8 70% 16 PR
2155 LEVBC 16-National 1855 49-25 65% 16 MD
2156 RRHEAT 14-1 shai 1855 17-12 59% 14 UT
2157 HNL Volleyball 17-Black 1855 5-11 31% 17 HI
2158 UPONTOP 11-1 1855 21-3 88% 11 FL
2159 Red Rock 14-Cristine/robin - redwood city 1855 17-12 59% 14 CA
2160 ASKYL 17-1 1855 6-2 75% 17
2161 South Central NE 14-Black 1854 25-13 66% 14
2162 K2 14 Force 1854 41-8 84% 14 TN
2163 417 MoJrs 17-Elite black 1854 32-10 76% 17 MO
2164 Cowlitz 18-1 black 1854 30-10 75% 18 WA
2165 HPRIME 16-Gold 1854 40-23 63% 16 TX
2166 NORCO 13-Blue 1854 46-8 85% 13 CO
2167 MVSA 16 Sparks 1854 63-23 73% 16 MD
2168 Southwest 13-N kate 1854 45-21 68% 13 OH
2169 South County 16 Sarah 1854 42-25 63% 16 RI
2170 Synergy 18 HeatWave 1854 39-10 80% 18 CA
2171 Dunes 16-Black 1854 47-25 65% 16 IN
2172 South County 14-Erika/roger 1854 23-7 77% 14 RI
2173 Florida's Sports Coast Elite 11-Blue 1854 38-15 72% 11 FL
2174 PVC 15-Black 1854 36-12 75% 15 OH
2175 MAVS KC 14-3 1854 10-0 91% 14 KS
2176 Storm 17 Adidas 1854 33-16 67% 17 AR
2177 HVC Shoji 16 1854 33-9 79% 16
2178 Absolute 15-Pink 1854 43-21 67% 15 CA
2179 LIVEWIRE 13-Prime 1853 47-25 65% 13 AZ
2180 Apex VBTC 13-Apex red 1853 34-9 79% 13 OH
2181 Next 16-Blue 1853 38-20 66% 16 OH
2182 Tribe 17-Vktry white 1853 39-39 50% 17 FL
2183 Colorado Juniors 12-Mal 1853 30-6 83% 12 CO
2184 AJV 14-Molten 1853 39-26 60% 14 TX
2185 Banzai VBC 18-Select 1853 24-9 73% 18 NE
2186 TPV 17-Paragon 1852 52-25 68% 17
2187 Cincy Crush 14-1 1852 45-14 76% 14 OH
2188 Drive Nation 18-Red 1852 17-15 53% 18 TX
2189 PVA 18 ELITE 1852 24-16 60% 18 MO
2190 Triangle 14-Blue 1852 34-31 52% 14 NC
2191 Tribe 14-Premier cardinal 1852 44-4 92% 14 FL
2192 Valley Heat AZ 16-Black 1852 41-30 58% 16 AZ
2193 A5 14-Tina 1852 67-19 78% 14 GA
2194 RVA 17-K.palea 1852 43-18 70% 17 IA
2195 Madfrog 10-N green 1852 31-14 67% 10 TX
2196 DNVB 14-Red 1852 7-8 47% 14
2197 McHenry C. Jr's 13-1 1852 65-10 87% 13 IL
2198 Premier 17-Black m 1851 31-14 66% 17 TX
2199 OK Charge 12-Ua 1851 36-14 72% 12 OK
2200 Ignite 15 Elite 1851 34-29 54% 15 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.