2025-2026 Season — Page 44 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2151 | SF TREMORS 12 WOLVERINES | 1855 | 33-15 | 69% | 12 | CA |
| 2152 | Triangle 18-Blue | 1855 | 31-23 | 57% | 18 | NC |
| 2153 | 864 Elite 18-Quinn | 1855 | 23-7 | 77% | 18 | SC |
| 2154 | BORINQUEN COQUI 16-1f | 1855 | 19-8 | 70% | 16 | PR |
| 2155 | LEVBC 16-National | 1855 | 49-25 | 65% | 16 | MD |
| 2156 | RRHEAT 14-1 shai | 1855 | 17-12 | 59% | 14 | UT |
| 2157 | HNL Volleyball 17-Black | 1855 | 5-11 | 31% | 17 | HI |
| 2158 | UPONTOP 11-1 | 1855 | 21-3 | 88% | 11 | FL |
| 2159 | Red Rock 14-Cristine/robin - redwood city | 1855 | 17-12 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 2160 | ASKYL 17-1 | 1855 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | |
| 2161 | South Central NE 14-Black | 1854 | 25-13 | 66% | 14 | |
| 2162 | K2 14 Force | 1854 | 41-8 | 84% | 14 | TN |
| 2163 | 417 MoJrs 17-Elite black | 1854 | 32-10 | 76% | 17 | MO |
| 2164 | Cowlitz 18-1 black | 1854 | 30-10 | 75% | 18 | WA |
| 2165 | HPRIME 16-Gold | 1854 | 40-23 | 63% | 16 | TX |
| 2166 | NORCO 13-Blue | 1854 | 46-8 | 85% | 13 | CO |
| 2167 | MVSA 16 Sparks | 1854 | 63-23 | 73% | 16 | MD |
| 2168 | Southwest 13-N kate | 1854 | 45-21 | 68% | 13 | OH |
| 2169 | South County 16 Sarah | 1854 | 42-25 | 63% | 16 | RI |
| 2170 | Synergy 18 HeatWave | 1854 | 39-10 | 80% | 18 | CA |
| 2171 | Dunes 16-Black | 1854 | 47-25 | 65% | 16 | IN |
| 2172 | South County 14-Erika/roger | 1854 | 23-7 | 77% | 14 | RI |
| 2173 | Florida's Sports Coast Elite 11-Blue | 1854 | 38-15 | 72% | 11 | FL |
| 2174 | PVC 15-Black | 1854 | 36-12 | 75% | 15 | OH |
| 2175 | MAVS KC 14-3 | 1854 | 10-0 | 91% | 14 | KS |
| 2176 | Storm 17 Adidas | 1854 | 33-16 | 67% | 17 | AR |
| 2177 | HVC Shoji 16 | 1854 | 33-9 | 79% | 16 | |
| 2178 | Absolute 15-Pink | 1854 | 43-21 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 2179 | LIVEWIRE 13-Prime | 1853 | 47-25 | 65% | 13 | AZ |
| 2180 | Apex VBTC 13-Apex red | 1853 | 34-9 | 79% | 13 | OH |
| 2181 | Next 16-Blue | 1853 | 38-20 | 66% | 16 | OH |
| 2182 | Tribe 17-Vktry white | 1853 | 39-39 | 50% | 17 | FL |
| 2183 | Colorado Juniors 12-Mal | 1853 | 30-6 | 83% | 12 | CO |
| 2184 | AJV 14-Molten | 1853 | 39-26 | 60% | 14 | TX |
| 2185 | Banzai VBC 18-Select | 1853 | 24-9 | 73% | 18 | NE |
| 2186 | TPV 17-Paragon | 1852 | 52-25 | 68% | 17 | |
| 2187 | Cincy Crush 14-1 | 1852 | 45-14 | 76% | 14 | OH |
| 2188 | Drive Nation 18-Red | 1852 | 17-15 | 53% | 18 | TX |
| 2189 | PVA 18 ELITE | 1852 | 24-16 | 60% | 18 | MO |
| 2190 | Triangle 14-Blue | 1852 | 34-31 | 52% | 14 | NC |
| 2191 | Tribe 14-Premier cardinal | 1852 | 44-4 | 92% | 14 | FL |
| 2192 | Valley Heat AZ 16-Black | 1852 | 41-30 | 58% | 16 | AZ |
| 2193 | A5 14-Tina | 1852 | 67-19 | 78% | 14 | GA |
| 2194 | RVA 17-K.palea | 1852 | 43-18 | 70% | 17 | IA |
| 2195 | Madfrog 10-N green | 1852 | 31-14 | 67% | 10 | TX |
| 2196 | DNVB 14-Red | 1852 | 7-8 | 47% | 14 | |
| 2197 | McHenry C. Jr's 13-1 | 1852 | 65-10 | 87% | 13 | IL |
| 2198 | Premier 17-Black m | 1851 | 31-14 | 66% | 17 | TX |
| 2199 | OK Charge 12-Ua | 1851 | 36-14 | 72% | 12 | OK |
| 2200 | Ignite 15 Elite | 1851 | 34-29 | 54% | 15 | IN |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.