2025-2026 Season — Page 44 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2151 | Actyve 18-Navy | 1855 | 26-26 | 50% | 18 | CA |
| 2152 | CVBC 12-1s | 1855 | 29-2 | 94% | 12 | IN |
| 2153 | RVC 12-Jantzen | 1855 | 18-9 | 64% | 12 | UT |
| 2154 | Epic United 12 Elite | 1855 | 40-18 | 69% | 12 | IL |
| 2155 | Cincy Crush 14-1 | 1855 | 45-14 | 76% | 14 | OH |
| 2156 | USANY 16 USANY Five Rivers (XL) | 1855 | 4-7 | 36% | 16 | NY |
| 2157 | Storm Volleyball Club 17-1 | 1855 | 5-2 | 71% | 17 | ON |
| 2158 | Valley Heat AZ 16-Black | 1854 | 41-30 | 58% | 16 | AZ |
| 2159 | Oklahoma Peak Performance 14-2 | 1854 | 38-14 | 73% | 14 | OK |
| 2160 | Circle City 12-Black | 1854 | 45-23 | 66% | 12 | IN |
| 2161 | RISE 14 KUI | 1854 | 34-17 | 67% | 14 | LA |
| 2162 | North Point 18 National | 1854 | 40-11 | 74% | 18 | TX |
| 2163 | PowerPlex 18-Wieland | 1854 | 24-21 | 53% | 18 | IA |
| 2164 | Spiketown VBC 12-3 | 1854 | 23-1 | 96% | 12 | OH |
| 2165 | Momentous VBC 14-Spencer | 1854 | 26-23 | 53% | 14 | CA |
| 2166 | MVVC 13-Red | 1854 | 33-35 | 49% | 13 | CA |
| 2167 | Intense 15-S - rae/daisha | 1854 | 53-8 | 87% | 15 | LA |
| 2168 | EXCEL 17-National red | 1854 | 27-31 | 46% | 17 | TX |
| 2169 | Crossfire 18-1 (NO) | 1854 | 13-3 | 81% | 18 | MN |
| 2170 | 575 15-Pcna derick | 1854 | 54-11 | 83% | 15 | GA |
| 2171 | OMNI 18 National | 1854 | 30-35 | 46% | 18 | CA |
| 2172 | McHenry C. Jr's 13-1 | 1854 | 65-10 | 87% | 13 | IL |
| 2173 | South County 14-Erika/roger | 1854 | 23-7 | 77% | 14 | UT |
| 2174 | AZ SKY 14-Blue | 1854 | 41-38 | 52% | 14 | AZ |
| 2175 | Aces 16-S | 1853 | 28-12 | 67% | 16 | MT |
| 2176 | C2 14-1 regional blue epley | 1853 | 14-2 | 88% | 14 | TN |
| 2177 | Madfrog 10-N green | 1853 | 31-14 | 67% | 10 | TX |
| 2178 | WDVB 15-1 | 1853 | 43-11 | 80% | 15 | IA |
| 2179 | Tribe 14-Premier cardinal | 1853 | 44-4 | 92% | 14 | FL |
| 2180 | HOU STELLAR 13-Elite | 1853 | 53-26 | 66% | 13 | TX |
| 2181 | Ignite Volleyball Club 16 16U Nationals | 1853 | 33-8 | 79% | 16 | UT |
| 2182 | RVA 17-K.palea | 1853 | 43-18 | 70% | 17 | IA |
| 2183 | TEJAS 13-Black jeff | 1853 | 40-11 | 75% | 13 | TX |
| 2184 | SBVC Girls 14-Molten | 1853 | 37-10 | 79% | 14 | CA |
| 2185 | AVC CLE 16-White | 1853 | 36-25 | 59% | 16 | OH |
| 2186 | Premier 17-Black m | 1852 | 31-14 | 66% | 17 | TX |
| 2187 | West Florida Volleyball Club 15-Nylah | 1852 | 43-21 | 67% | 15 | AL |
| 2188 | Paramount VBC 14 Kelly | 1852 | 16-8 | 67% | 14 | VA |
| 2189 | ARMOR 16 Zulu | 1852 | 30-29 | 51% | 16 | SC |
| 2190 | Kokoro Volleyball 16-1 | 1852 | 73-46 | 61% | 16 | MN |
| 2191 | LIVEWIRE 13-Prime | 1852 | 47-25 | 65% | 13 | AZ |
| 2192 | NORCO 13-Blue | 1852 | 46-8 | 85% | 13 | CO |
| 2193 | NPJ Bend 14 National | 1852 | 58-21 | 73% | 14 | OR |
| 2194 | Tsunami 17-1e alex | 1852 | 43-18 | 70% | 17 | GA |
| 2195 | FWFIRE 13-P | 1852 | 12-2 | 75% | 13 | TX |
| 2196 | Tulsa Power 15-1 | 1852 | 38-13 | 73% | 15 | OK |
| 2197 | AZ Sky 15-N1 | 1852 | 39-15 | 72% | 15 | AZ |
| 2198 | Adrenaline 16-Dan | 1852 | 38-18 | 68% | 16 | IA |
| 2199 | A5 14-Tina | 1852 | 67-19 | 78% | 14 | GA |
| 2200 | PVC 15-Black | 1852 | 36-12 | 75% | 15 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.