Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 44 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2151 Actyve 18-Navy 1855 26-26 50% 18 CA
2152 CVBC 12-1s 1855 29-2 94% 12 IN
2153 RVC 12-Jantzen 1855 18-9 64% 12 UT
2154 Epic United 12 Elite 1855 40-18 69% 12 IL
2155 Cincy Crush 14-1 1855 45-14 76% 14 OH
2156 USANY 16 USANY Five Rivers (XL) 1855 4-7 36% 16 NY
2157 Storm Volleyball Club 17-1 1855 5-2 71% 17 ON
2158 Valley Heat AZ 16-Black 1854 41-30 58% 16 AZ
2159 Oklahoma Peak Performance 14-2 1854 38-14 73% 14 OK
2160 Circle City 12-Black 1854 45-23 66% 12 IN
2161 RISE 14 KUI 1854 34-17 67% 14 LA
2162 North Point 18 National 1854 40-11 74% 18 TX
2163 PowerPlex 18-Wieland 1854 24-21 53% 18 IA
2164 Spiketown VBC 12-3 1854 23-1 96% 12 OH
2165 Momentous VBC 14-Spencer 1854 26-23 53% 14 CA
2166 MVVC 13-Red 1854 33-35 49% 13 CA
2167 Intense 15-S - rae/daisha 1854 53-8 87% 15 LA
2168 EXCEL 17-National red 1854 27-31 46% 17 TX
2169 Crossfire 18-1 (NO) 1854 13-3 81% 18 MN
2170 575 15-Pcna derick 1854 54-11 83% 15 GA
2171 OMNI 18 National 1854 30-35 46% 18 CA
2172 McHenry C. Jr's 13-1 1854 65-10 87% 13 IL
2173 South County 14-Erika/roger 1854 23-7 77% 14 UT
2174 AZ SKY 14-Blue 1854 41-38 52% 14 AZ
2175 Aces 16-S 1853 28-12 67% 16 MT
2176 C2 14-1 regional blue epley 1853 14-2 88% 14 TN
2177 Madfrog 10-N green 1853 31-14 67% 10 TX
2178 WDVB 15-1 1853 43-11 80% 15 IA
2179 Tribe 14-Premier cardinal 1853 44-4 92% 14 FL
2180 HOU STELLAR 13-Elite 1853 53-26 66% 13 TX
2181 Ignite Volleyball Club 16 16U Nationals 1853 33-8 79% 16 UT
2182 RVA 17-K.palea 1853 43-18 70% 17 IA
2183 TEJAS 13-Black jeff 1853 40-11 75% 13 TX
2184 SBVC Girls 14-Molten 1853 37-10 79% 14 CA
2185 AVC CLE 16-White 1853 36-25 59% 16 OH
2186 Premier 17-Black m 1852 31-14 66% 17 TX
2187 West Florida Volleyball Club 15-Nylah 1852 43-21 67% 15 AL
2188 Paramount VBC 14 Kelly 1852 16-8 67% 14 VA
2189 ARMOR 16 Zulu 1852 30-29 51% 16 SC
2190 Kokoro Volleyball 16-1 1852 73-46 61% 16 MN
2191 LIVEWIRE 13-Prime 1852 47-25 65% 13 AZ
2192 NORCO 13-Blue 1852 46-8 85% 13 CO
2193 NPJ Bend 14 National 1852 58-21 73% 14 OR
2194 Tsunami 17-1e alex 1852 43-18 70% 17 GA
2195 FWFIRE 13-P 1852 12-2 75% 13 TX
2196 Tulsa Power 15-1 1852 38-13 73% 15 OK
2197 AZ Sky 15-N1 1852 39-15 72% 15 AZ
2198 Adrenaline 16-Dan 1852 38-18 68% 16 IA
2199 A5 14-Tina 1852 67-19 78% 14 GA
2200 PVC 15-Black 1852 36-12 75% 15 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.