2025-2026 Season — Page 43 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2101 | Kairos 18 Alpha | 1859 | 17-11 | 61% | 18 | SD |
| 2102 | Kairos 14 Gamma | 1859 | 41-16 | 72% | 14 | SD |
| 2103 | Club South 15-1 | 1859 | 39-11 | 78% | 15 | TX |
| 2104 | Colorado Juniors 15-Candace | 1859 | 16-6 | 73% | 15 | CO |
| 2105 | Sportime 18-Gold | 1859 | 38-13 | 75% | 18 | NY |
| 2106 | NE Elite 16-Alpha | 1859 | 16-23 | 41% | 16 | NE |
| 2107 | FVC 16-1 | 1859 | 31-11 | 70% | 16 | CA |
| 2108 | Pgh Elite 13-Elite | 1859 | 40-21 | 66% | 13 | PA |
| 2109 | SA Magic 12 ELITE | 1859 | 47-21 | 68% | 12 | TX |
| 2110 | C2 14-1 regional blue epley | 1858 | 14-2 | 88% | 14 | TN |
| 2111 | ATOMIC 15-Smack elite | 1858 | 59-21 | 74% | 15 | MI |
| 2112 | CTX Juniors 13-Mizuno | 1858 | 35-21 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 2113 | HOVA 18-R red | 1858 | 48-4 | 92% | 18 | OH |
| 2114 | MemphisVBAcademy 12-Red | 1858 | 46-9 | 84% | 12 | MS |
| 2115 | North Shore Raiders 18-1 | 1858 | 37-11 | 77% | 18 | HI |
| 2116 | RVT 16-1 surf | 1858 | 40-14 | 74% | 16 | NY |
| 2117 | APV 16-National black | 1858 | 47-19 | 70% | 16 | TX |
| 2118 | Left Coast 16-1 | 1858 | 32-29 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 2119 | Arete 18-Navy telos | 1858 | 37-15 | 71% | 18 | TX |
| 2120 | Lockdown VBC 17-Phoenix | 1858 | 52-25 | 68% | 17 | MA |
| 2121 | CALI 15-Black | 1858 | 40-31 | 56% | 15 | NY |
| 2122 | Wildfire 15-N open | 1858 | 8-27 | 23% | 15 | FL |
| 2123 | CSVC 13-Black | 1857 | 54-19 | 74% | 13 | NC |
| 2124 | AZ SKY 14-Blue | 1857 | 41-38 | 52% | 14 | AZ |
| 2125 | USJVA 14-National red hp | 1857 | 30-22 | 58% | 14 | AL |
| 2126 | Prime 14-Adidas o | 1857 | 24-24 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 2127 | 305VBC 17-E rafa | 1857 | 27-36 | 43% | 17 | FL |
| 2128 | Arete 14-Navy ethos | 1857 | 30-12 | 68% | 14 | TX |
| 2129 | Elevation 13-Oc | 1857 | 38-11 | 78% | 13 | OH |
| 2130 | HVC SHOJI 16-1 | 1857 | 17-3 | 85% | 16 | |
| 2131 | LIVEWIRE 16 Boost | 1856 | 55-19 | 74% | 16 | AZ |
| 2132 | AZ SKY 16-Blue | 1856 | 38-32 | 54% | 16 | AZ |
| 2133 | Aus Velocity 14-1 diamond | 1856 | 39-14 | 74% | 14 | TX |
| 2134 | CVBC 12-1s | 1856 | 29-2 | 94% | 12 | VA |
| 2135 | GJ 17 ADIDAS | 1856 | 38-33 | 54% | 17 | FL |
| 2136 | MN North 17-1 navy | 1856 | 64-20 | 76% | 17 | MN |
| 2137 | Spa City 16 Aqua | 1856 | 46-22 | 68% | 16 | NY |
| 2138 | SLO VBC 16 Dede | 1856 | 26-25 | 51% | 16 | CA |
| 2139 | Wildfire 16-N markia | 1856 | 26-24 | 52% | 16 | FL |
| 2140 | Wisconsin Elite 18-Elite | 1856 | 31-28 | 53% | 18 | WI |
| 2141 | RVBC 15-White | 1856 | 22-1 | 96% | 15 | PA |
| 2142 | Club Four 15-Boost | 1856 | 40-14 | 74% | 15 | IL |
| 2143 | Boston United 16-National | 1856 | 36-24 | 60% | 16 | MA |
| 2144 | Maricopa 15-Navy | 1856 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | |
| 2145 | AZ Sky 15-N1 | 1855 | 39-15 | 72% | 15 | AZ |
| 2146 | AVA 13-N poh | 1855 | 30-17 | 64% | 13 | OH |
| 2147 | Austin Skyline 15 Royal | 1855 | 31-32 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 2148 | Delaware United 14-Navy | 1855 | 34-30 | 53% | 14 | DE |
| 2149 | TEJAS 18-Black shelby | 1855 | 24-10 | 71% | 18 | TX |
| 2150 | NPJ Bend 14 National | 1855 | 58-21 | 73% | 14 | OR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.