2025-2026 Season — Page 43 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2101 | Southern Extreme Volleyball 16-1 | 1859 | 38-6 | 86% | 16 | MN |
| 2102 | CTX Juniors 13-Mizuno | 1859 | 35-21 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 2103 | Ama Xtreme 15-Icons | 1859 | 4-1 | 80% | 15 | |
| 2104 | Split Mountain Volleyball Club 12 Split Mountain Doris | 1858 | 16-1 | 94% | 12 | UT |
| 2105 | AJV 14-Molten | 1858 | 39-26 | 60% | 14 | TX |
| 2106 | Synergy 18 Kryptonite | 1858 | 49-15 | 77% | 18 | PA |
| 2107 | Armor Elite 14-National | 1858 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | NV |
| 2108 | 417 MoJrs 17-Elite black | 1858 | 32-10 | 76% | 17 | MO |
| 2109 | 540 VB 14 Elite | 1858 | 39-24 | 62% | 14 | VA |
| 2110 | KEVC 13-1 | 1858 | 15-0 | 100% | 13 | MN |
| 2111 | AVA 13-N poh | 1858 | 30-17 | 64% | 13 | OH |
| 2112 | Arete 18-Navy telos | 1858 | 37-15 | 71% | 18 | TX |
| 2113 | TEJAS 18-Black shelby | 1858 | 24-10 | 71% | 18 | TX |
| 2114 | ZTV 12-1 diamond | 1857 | 20-4 | 77% | 12 | MT |
| 2115 | CALI 15-Black | 1857 | 40-31 | 56% | 15 | NY |
| 2116 | Red Rock 15-Chi | 1857 | 30-23 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 2117 | MemphisVBAcademy 12-Red | 1857 | 46-9 | 84% | 12 | MS |
| 2118 | K2 14 Force | 1857 | 41-8 | 84% | 14 | TN |
| 2119 | MN Select 16-Black | 1857 | 52-22 | 70% | 16 | MN |
| 2120 | GJ 17 ADIDAS | 1857 | 38-33 | 54% | 17 | FL |
| 2121 | ID Crush TF 16-Melissa | 1857 | 30-16 | 65% | 16 | ID |
| 2122 | HNL Volleyball 17-Black | 1857 | 5-11 | 31% | 17 | HI |
| 2123 | South Central NE 14-Black | 1857 | 25-13 | 66% | 14 | NE |
| 2124 | Grandlake 17-A henkle | 1857 | 12-0 | 100% | 17 | OH |
| 2125 | 305VBC 17-E rafa | 1857 | 27-36 | 43% | 17 | FL |
| 2126 | Tribe 17-Vktry white | 1857 | 39-39 | 50% | 17 | FL |
| 2127 | South County 16 Sarah | 1856 | 42-25 | 63% | 16 | UT |
| 2128 | Red Rock 14-Cristine/robin - redwood city | 1856 | 17-12 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 2129 | Aus Velocity 14-1 diamond | 1856 | 39-14 | 74% | 14 | TX |
| 2130 | Avoli 16-F milton | 1856 | 16-11 | 59% | 16 | PR |
| 2131 | Jax Skyline 13-Royal | 1856 | 42-33 | 56% | 13 | FL |
| 2132 | Venom 13-Black | 1856 | 61-24 | 72% | 13 | AZ |
| 2133 | OPVC 18-Ostendorf | 1856 | 26-16 | 62% | 18 | OH |
| 2134 | Next Level 15-1 abdell | 1856 | 14-7 | 67% | 15 | PR |
| 2135 | Athlete HQ 16-Encalado | 1856 | 23-29 | 44% | 16 | OH |
| 2136 | XP 16-Elite 1 | 1855 | 59-14 | 81% | 16 | IL |
| 2137 | BVC 16-1 bandits | 1855 | 7-8 | 47% | 16 | DE |
| 2138 | AZ SKY 16-Blue | 1855 | 38-32 | 54% | 16 | AZ |
| 2139 | Elevation 13-Oc | 1855 | 38-11 | 78% | 13 | OH |
| 2140 | South County 18 Josh | 1855 | 20-4 | 83% | 18 | UT |
| 2141 | Cowlitz 18-1 black | 1855 | 30-10 | 75% | 18 | OR |
| 2142 | HOVA 18-R red | 1855 | 48-4 | 92% | 18 | OH |
| 2143 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 16-2 | 1855 | 44-16 | 73% | 16 | CT |
| 2144 | PVA 18 ELITE | 1855 | 24-16 | 60% | 18 | MO |
| 2145 | WD Nation 16-Blue | 1855 | 39-11 | 78% | 16 | LA |
| 2146 | Absolute 15-Pink | 1855 | 43-21 | 67% | 15 | CA |
| 2147 | OK PEAK 15-1 | 1855 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | OK |
| 2148 | Wisconsin Elite 18-Elite | 1855 | 31-28 | 53% | 18 | WI |
| 2149 | Core STL 15-Navy | 1855 | 33-20 | 61% | 15 | MO |
| 2150 | 864 Elite 18-Quinn | 1855 | 23-7 | 77% | 18 | SC |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.