Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 43 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2101 Kairos 18 Alpha 1859 17-11 61% 18 SD
2102 Kairos 14 Gamma 1859 41-16 72% 14 SD
2103 Club South 15-1 1859 39-11 78% 15 TX
2104 Colorado Juniors 15-Candace 1859 16-6 73% 15 CO
2105 Sportime 18-Gold 1859 38-13 75% 18 NY
2106 NE Elite 16-Alpha 1859 16-23 41% 16 NE
2107 FVC 16-1 1859 31-11 70% 16 CA
2108 Pgh Elite 13-Elite 1859 40-21 66% 13 PA
2109 SA Magic 12 ELITE 1859 47-21 68% 12 TX
2110 C2 14-1 regional blue epley 1858 14-2 88% 14 TN
2111 ATOMIC 15-Smack elite 1858 59-21 74% 15 MI
2112 CTX Juniors 13-Mizuno 1858 35-21 61% 13 TX
2113 HOVA 18-R red 1858 48-4 92% 18 OH
2114 MemphisVBAcademy 12-Red 1858 46-9 84% 12 MS
2115 North Shore Raiders 18-1 1858 37-11 77% 18 HI
2116 RVT 16-1 surf 1858 40-14 74% 16 NY
2117 APV 16-National black 1858 47-19 70% 16 TX
2118 Left Coast 16-1 1858 32-29 52% 16 CA
2119 Arete 18-Navy telos 1858 37-15 71% 18 TX
2120 Lockdown VBC 17-Phoenix 1858 52-25 68% 17 MA
2121 CALI 15-Black 1858 40-31 56% 15 NY
2122 Wildfire 15-N open 1858 8-27 23% 15 FL
2123 CSVC 13-Black 1857 54-19 74% 13 NC
2124 AZ SKY 14-Blue 1857 41-38 52% 14 AZ
2125 USJVA 14-National red hp 1857 30-22 58% 14 AL
2126 Prime 14-Adidas o 1857 24-24 50% 14 CA
2127 305VBC 17-E rafa 1857 27-36 43% 17 FL
2128 Arete 14-Navy ethos 1857 30-12 68% 14 TX
2129 Elevation 13-Oc 1857 38-11 78% 13 OH
2130 HVC SHOJI 16-1 1857 17-3 85% 16
2131 LIVEWIRE 16 Boost 1856 55-19 74% 16 AZ
2132 AZ SKY 16-Blue 1856 38-32 54% 16 AZ
2133 Aus Velocity 14-1 diamond 1856 39-14 74% 14 TX
2134 CVBC 12-1s 1856 29-2 94% 12 VA
2135 GJ 17 ADIDAS 1856 38-33 54% 17 FL
2136 MN North 17-1 navy 1856 64-20 76% 17 MN
2137 Spa City 16 Aqua 1856 46-22 68% 16 NY
2138 SLO VBC 16 Dede 1856 26-25 51% 16 CA
2139 Wildfire 16-N markia 1856 26-24 52% 16 FL
2140 Wisconsin Elite 18-Elite 1856 31-28 53% 18 WI
2141 RVBC 15-White 1856 22-1 96% 15 PA
2142 Club Four 15-Boost 1856 40-14 74% 15 IL
2143 Boston United 16-National 1856 36-24 60% 16 MA
2144 Maricopa 15-Navy 1856 7-2 78% 15
2145 AZ Sky 15-N1 1855 39-15 72% 15 AZ
2146 AVA 13-N poh 1855 30-17 64% 13 OH
2147 Austin Skyline 15 Royal 1855 31-32 49% 15 TX
2148 Delaware United 14-Navy 1855 34-30 53% 14 DE
2149 TEJAS 18-Black shelby 1855 24-10 71% 18 TX
2150 NPJ Bend 14 National 1855 58-21 73% 14 OR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.