Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 43 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2101 Southern Extreme Volleyball 16-1 1859 38-6 86% 16 MN
2102 CTX Juniors 13-Mizuno 1859 35-21 61% 13 TX
2103 Ama Xtreme 15-Icons 1859 4-1 80% 15
2104 Split Mountain Volleyball Club 12 Split Mountain Doris 1858 16-1 94% 12 UT
2105 AJV 14-Molten 1858 39-26 60% 14 TX
2106 Synergy 18 Kryptonite 1858 49-15 77% 18 PA
2107 Armor Elite 14-National 1858 4-3 57% 14 NV
2108 417 MoJrs 17-Elite black 1858 32-10 76% 17 MO
2109 540 VB 14 Elite 1858 39-24 62% 14 VA
2110 KEVC 13-1 1858 15-0 100% 13 MN
2111 AVA 13-N poh 1858 30-17 64% 13 OH
2112 Arete 18-Navy telos 1858 37-15 71% 18 TX
2113 TEJAS 18-Black shelby 1858 24-10 71% 18 TX
2114 ZTV 12-1 diamond 1857 20-4 77% 12 MT
2115 CALI 15-Black 1857 40-31 56% 15 NY
2116 Red Rock 15-Chi 1857 30-23 57% 15 CA
2117 MemphisVBAcademy 12-Red 1857 46-9 84% 12 MS
2118 K2 14 Force 1857 41-8 84% 14 TN
2119 MN Select 16-Black 1857 52-22 70% 16 MN
2120 GJ 17 ADIDAS 1857 38-33 54% 17 FL
2121 ID Crush TF 16-Melissa 1857 30-16 65% 16 ID
2122 HNL Volleyball 17-Black 1857 5-11 31% 17 HI
2123 South Central NE 14-Black 1857 25-13 66% 14 NE
2124 Grandlake 17-A henkle 1857 12-0 100% 17 OH
2125 305VBC 17-E rafa 1857 27-36 43% 17 FL
2126 Tribe 17-Vktry white 1857 39-39 50% 17 FL
2127 South County 16 Sarah 1856 42-25 63% 16 UT
2128 Red Rock 14-Cristine/robin - redwood city 1856 17-12 59% 14 CA
2129 Aus Velocity 14-1 diamond 1856 39-14 74% 14 TX
2130 Avoli 16-F milton 1856 16-11 59% 16 PR
2131 Jax Skyline 13-Royal 1856 42-33 56% 13 FL
2132 Venom 13-Black 1856 61-24 72% 13 AZ
2133 OPVC 18-Ostendorf 1856 26-16 62% 18 OH
2134 Next Level 15-1 abdell 1856 14-7 67% 15 PR
2135 Athlete HQ 16-Encalado 1856 23-29 44% 16 OH
2136 XP 16-Elite 1 1855 59-14 81% 16 IL
2137 BVC 16-1 bandits 1855 7-8 47% 16 DE
2138 AZ SKY 16-Blue 1855 38-32 54% 16 AZ
2139 Elevation 13-Oc 1855 38-11 78% 13 OH
2140 South County 18 Josh 1855 20-4 83% 18 UT
2141 Cowlitz 18-1 black 1855 30-10 75% 18 OR
2142 HOVA 18-R red 1855 48-4 92% 18 OH
2143 NorthEast Volleyball Club 16-2 1855 44-16 73% 16 CT
2144 PVA 18 ELITE 1855 24-16 60% 18 MO
2145 WD Nation 16-Blue 1855 39-11 78% 16 LA
2146 Absolute 15-Pink 1855 43-21 67% 15 CA
2147 OK PEAK 15-1 1855 5-2 71% 15 OK
2148 Wisconsin Elite 18-Elite 1855 31-28 53% 18 WI
2149 Core STL 15-Navy 1855 33-20 61% 15 MO
2150 864 Elite 18-Quinn 1855 23-7 77% 18 SC
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.