Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 42 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2051 Legacy 15-3 adidas 1864 44-21 68% 15 MI
2052 TAV 15-Blue (NT) 1863 19-9 58% 15 TX
2053 FeVA 14 1863 43-23 65% 14 WA
2054 EVA 16-Elite 1863 47-21 68% 16 AR
2055 OT 12-O cristobal 1863 40-23 63% 12 FL
2056 Webfoot 14-Elite 1863 28-20 58% 14 OR
2057 CVH SELECT 17-1 1863 14-15 48% 17 PR
2058 MN Select 17-3 1863 53-16 77% 17 MN
2059 Delta Valley 12-Blue 1863 27-9 75% 12 CA
2060 NY Warrior Attack 15 1863 39-8 83% 15 NY
2061 Miami Wave 14-Aqua 1863 54-25 68% 14 FL
2062 Northern Lights 15-R 1863 59-12 83% 15 MN
2063 Yuba Elite VBC 12-Pink 1863 21-2 91% 12 CA
2064 Kokoro Volleyball 14-1 1862 40-35 53% 14 MN
2065 ARIZONA STORM 17-Lightning 1862 39-40 49% 17 AZ
2066 COA 14-Phoenix 1862 41-23 64% 14 IN
2067 Venom 13-Black 1862 61-24 72% 13 AZ
2068 Red Rock 13-Steph 1862 42-24 64% 13 CA
2069 TX SPARKS 11-1 thay 1862 38-0 95% 11 TX
2070 Aces Hawaii 16 1862 25-17 60% 16 HI
2071 VEVA 16 Elite 1861 38-22 63% 16 FL
2072 AZ EVJ 15 Elite 1861 42-37 53% 15 AZ
2073 USJVA 15-National red hp 1861 30-9 77% 15 AL
2074 Rev 15-2 jaguars 1861 52-17 75% 15 IN
2075 Vision 12-Blue 1861 30-16 65% 12 CA
2076 Tulsa Power 15-1 1861 38-13 73% 15 OK
2077 Avoli 16-F milton 1861 16-11 59% 16 PR
2078 LSV Lemons 10 1861 52-13 80% 10 FL
2079 SoCal Legends 15-Elite 1861 16-3 84% 15 CA
2080 Ama Xtreme 16-Tuf 1861 9-1 82% 16
2081 NorCal 14-1 black 1861 35-31 53% 14 CA
2082 Blue Ridge 13-Blue 1861 9-3 75% 13 VA
2083 SCVC 15-Darice 1860 4-4 50% 15
2084 Athlete HQ 16-Encalado 1860 23-29 44% 16 OH
2085 Circle City 12-Black 1860 45-23 66% 12 IN
2086 Happy Volley 15 Elite 1860 34-13 72% 15 PA
2087 Sharks 14 Navy 1860 50-17 75% 14 FL
2088 SG Elite 16 Excel 1860 53-16 77% 16 CA
2089 Synergy 18 Kryptonite 1860 49-15 77% 18 CA
2090 540 VB 14 Elite 1860 39-24 62% 14 VA
2091 ONE Volleyball 12 1860 62-14 82% 12 GA
2092 PAO STL 16-Rda black 1860 71-13 85% 16 MO
2093 NRG 15-Ampd white 1860 43-12 75% 15 TX
2094 United 15 National 1860 44-15 75% 15 AL
2095 Excel 11-National red 1860 8-1 89% 11 TX
2096 LIBERO 16 HUSKIES 1860 75-38 66% 16 VA
2097 HBJ 15-Elite 1859 44-9 83% 15 AR
2098 Fusion 14-Blue 1859 41-9 82% 14 PA
2099 501 Volley 14-1 national 1859 47-17 73% 14 AR
2100 ZTV 14-1 select 1859 32-9 78% 14 MT
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.