2025-2026 Season — Page 42 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2051 | Legacy 15-3 adidas | 1864 | 44-21 | 68% | 15 | MI |
| 2052 | TAV 15-Blue (NT) | 1863 | 19-9 | 58% | 15 | TX |
| 2053 | FeVA 14 | 1863 | 43-23 | 65% | 14 | WA |
| 2054 | EVA 16-Elite | 1863 | 47-21 | 68% | 16 | AR |
| 2055 | OT 12-O cristobal | 1863 | 40-23 | 63% | 12 | FL |
| 2056 | Webfoot 14-Elite | 1863 | 28-20 | 58% | 14 | OR |
| 2057 | CVH SELECT 17-1 | 1863 | 14-15 | 48% | 17 | PR |
| 2058 | MN Select 17-3 | 1863 | 53-16 | 77% | 17 | MN |
| 2059 | Delta Valley 12-Blue | 1863 | 27-9 | 75% | 12 | CA |
| 2060 | NY Warrior Attack 15 | 1863 | 39-8 | 83% | 15 | NY |
| 2061 | Miami Wave 14-Aqua | 1863 | 54-25 | 68% | 14 | FL |
| 2062 | Northern Lights 15-R | 1863 | 59-12 | 83% | 15 | MN |
| 2063 | Yuba Elite VBC 12-Pink | 1863 | 21-2 | 91% | 12 | CA |
| 2064 | Kokoro Volleyball 14-1 | 1862 | 40-35 | 53% | 14 | MN |
| 2065 | ARIZONA STORM 17-Lightning | 1862 | 39-40 | 49% | 17 | AZ |
| 2066 | COA 14-Phoenix | 1862 | 41-23 | 64% | 14 | IN |
| 2067 | Venom 13-Black | 1862 | 61-24 | 72% | 13 | AZ |
| 2068 | Red Rock 13-Steph | 1862 | 42-24 | 64% | 13 | CA |
| 2069 | TX SPARKS 11-1 thay | 1862 | 38-0 | 95% | 11 | TX |
| 2070 | Aces Hawaii 16 | 1862 | 25-17 | 60% | 16 | HI |
| 2071 | VEVA 16 Elite | 1861 | 38-22 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 2072 | AZ EVJ 15 Elite | 1861 | 42-37 | 53% | 15 | AZ |
| 2073 | USJVA 15-National red hp | 1861 | 30-9 | 77% | 15 | AL |
| 2074 | Rev 15-2 jaguars | 1861 | 52-17 | 75% | 15 | IN |
| 2075 | Vision 12-Blue | 1861 | 30-16 | 65% | 12 | CA |
| 2076 | Tulsa Power 15-1 | 1861 | 38-13 | 73% | 15 | OK |
| 2077 | Avoli 16-F milton | 1861 | 16-11 | 59% | 16 | PR |
| 2078 | LSV Lemons 10 | 1861 | 52-13 | 80% | 10 | FL |
| 2079 | SoCal Legends 15-Elite | 1861 | 16-3 | 84% | 15 | CA |
| 2080 | Ama Xtreme 16-Tuf | 1861 | 9-1 | 82% | 16 | |
| 2081 | NorCal 14-1 black | 1861 | 35-31 | 53% | 14 | CA |
| 2082 | Blue Ridge 13-Blue | 1861 | 9-3 | 75% | 13 | VA |
| 2083 | SCVC 15-Darice | 1860 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | |
| 2084 | Athlete HQ 16-Encalado | 1860 | 23-29 | 44% | 16 | OH |
| 2085 | Circle City 12-Black | 1860 | 45-23 | 66% | 12 | IN |
| 2086 | Happy Volley 15 Elite | 1860 | 34-13 | 72% | 15 | PA |
| 2087 | Sharks 14 Navy | 1860 | 50-17 | 75% | 14 | FL |
| 2088 | SG Elite 16 Excel | 1860 | 53-16 | 77% | 16 | CA |
| 2089 | Synergy 18 Kryptonite | 1860 | 49-15 | 77% | 18 | CA |
| 2090 | 540 VB 14 Elite | 1860 | 39-24 | 62% | 14 | VA |
| 2091 | ONE Volleyball 12 | 1860 | 62-14 | 82% | 12 | GA |
| 2092 | PAO STL 16-Rda black | 1860 | 71-13 | 85% | 16 | MO |
| 2093 | NRG 15-Ampd white | 1860 | 43-12 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 2094 | United 15 National | 1860 | 44-15 | 75% | 15 | AL |
| 2095 | Excel 11-National red | 1860 | 8-1 | 89% | 11 | TX |
| 2096 | LIBERO 16 HUSKIES | 1860 | 75-38 | 66% | 16 | VA |
| 2097 | HBJ 15-Elite | 1859 | 44-9 | 83% | 15 | AR |
| 2098 | Fusion 14-Blue | 1859 | 41-9 | 82% | 14 | PA |
| 2099 | 501 Volley 14-1 national | 1859 | 47-17 | 73% | 14 | AR |
| 2100 | ZTV 14-1 select | 1859 | 32-9 | 78% | 14 | MT |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.