2025-2026 Season — Page 42 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2051 | Decatur Force 14 Teal | 1864 | 33-10 | 77% | 14 | IN |
| 2052 | SC Elite 18-Blue-jordan | 1864 | 14-12 | 54% | 18 | SC |
| 2053 | Kalamazoo Force 15 | 1864 | 34-21 | 62% | 15 | MI |
| 2054 | Webfoot 14-Elite | 1864 | 28-20 | 58% | 14 | OR |
| 2055 | CSVC 13-Black | 1863 | 54-19 | 74% | 13 | NC |
| 2056 | LSV Lemons 10 | 1863 | 52-13 | 80% | 10 | FL |
| 2057 | YQL Selects 17-1 | 1863 | 8-5 | 62% | 17 | CA |
| 2058 | Ignite VBCF 13-National | 1863 | 8-1 | 89% | 13 | NV |
| 2059 | Sharks 17-Navy | 1863 | 44-17 | 72% | 17 | AL |
| 2060 | RVT 16-1 surf | 1863 | 40-14 | 74% | 16 | NY |
| 2061 | Ama Xtreme 16-Tuf | 1863 | 9-1 | 82% | 16 | |
| 2062 | Vision 12-Blue | 1862 | 30-16 | 65% | 12 | CA |
| 2063 | NorCal 14-1 black | 1862 | 35-31 | 53% | 14 | CA |
| 2064 | Miami Wave 14-Aqua | 1862 | 54-25 | 68% | 14 | FL |
| 2065 | LIVEWIRE 16 Boost | 1862 | 55-19 | 74% | 16 | AZ |
| 2066 | 501 Volley 14-1 national | 1862 | 47-17 | 73% | 14 | AR |
| 2067 | OK PEAK 17-1 | 1862 | 7-2 | 78% | 17 | OK |
| 2068 | Ignite 15 Elite | 1862 | 34-29 | 54% | 15 | IN |
| 2069 | North Shore Raiders 18-1 | 1862 | 37-11 | 77% | 18 | HI |
| 2070 | Sportime 18-Gold | 1862 | 38-13 | 75% | 18 | NY |
| 2071 | SRS 14-Blue | 1862 | 48-7 | 87% | 14 | SC |
| 2072 | Delta Valley 12-Blue | 1861 | 27-9 | 75% | 12 | CA |
| 2073 | Left Coast 16-1 | 1861 | 32-29 | 52% | 16 | CA |
| 2074 | NE Elite 16-Alpha | 1861 | 16-23 | 41% | 16 | NE |
| 2075 | RVBC 15-White | 1861 | 22-1 | 96% | 15 | PA |
| 2076 | MN North 17-1 navy | 1861 | 64-20 | 76% | 17 | MN |
| 2077 | Vision 11 Gold | 1861 | 37-22 | 63% | 11 | CA |
| 2078 | ZTV 14-1 select | 1861 | 32-9 | 78% | 14 | MT |
| 2079 | EVA 13 National | 1861 | 55-11 | 83% | 13 | AR |
| 2080 | Sharks 14 Navy | 1861 | 50-17 | 75% | 14 | AL |
| 2081 | Pgh Elite 13-Elite | 1861 | 40-21 | 66% | 13 | PA |
| 2082 | MN Select 17-3 | 1861 | 53-16 | 77% | 17 | MN |
| 2083 | VEVA 16 Elite | 1861 | 38-22 | 63% | 16 | FL |
| 2084 | Club Four 15-Boost | 1860 | 40-14 | 74% | 15 | MO |
| 2085 | Impulse 12-Red | 1860 | 19-0 | 100% | 12 | IN |
| 2086 | Blacktooth Volleyball Club 16-Black | 1860 | 48-6 | 89% | 16 | WY |
| 2087 | TX SPARKS 11-1 thay | 1860 | 38-0 | 95% | 11 | TX |
| 2088 | Dunes 16-Black | 1860 | 47-25 | 65% | 16 | IN |
| 2089 | COA 14-Phoenix | 1860 | 41-23 | 64% | 14 | IN |
| 2090 | Shockwave VB Academy 14-Black | 1860 | 32-18 | 64% | 14 | KS |
| 2091 | ATOMIC 15-Smack elite | 1860 | 59-21 | 74% | 15 | AZ |
| 2092 | Excel 11-National red | 1860 | 8-1 | 89% | 11 | TX |
| 2093 | ONE Volleyball 12 | 1859 | 62-14 | 82% | 12 | GA |
| 2094 | HBJ 15-Elite | 1859 | 44-9 | 83% | 15 | AR |
| 2095 | ASKYL 17-1 | 1859 | 6-2 | 75% | 17 | MA |
| 2096 | Southwest 13-N kate | 1859 | 45-21 | 68% | 13 | OH |
| 2097 | SLO VBC 16 Dede | 1859 | 26-25 | 51% | 16 | CA |
| 2098 | USJVA 14-National red hp | 1859 | 30-22 | 58% | 14 | AL |
| 2099 | HVC SHOJI 16-1 | 1859 | 17-3 | 85% | 16 | HI |
| 2100 | Delaware United Volleyball Club 14-Navy | 1859 | 34-30 | 53% | 14 | DE |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.