Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 42 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2051 Decatur Force 14 Teal 1864 33-10 77% 14 IN
2052 SC Elite 18-Blue-jordan 1864 14-12 54% 18 SC
2053 Kalamazoo Force 15 1864 34-21 62% 15 MI
2054 Webfoot 14-Elite 1864 28-20 58% 14 OR
2055 CSVC 13-Black 1863 54-19 74% 13 NC
2056 LSV Lemons 10 1863 52-13 80% 10 FL
2057 YQL Selects 17-1 1863 8-5 62% 17 CA
2058 Ignite VBCF 13-National 1863 8-1 89% 13 NV
2059 Sharks 17-Navy 1863 44-17 72% 17 AL
2060 RVT 16-1 surf 1863 40-14 74% 16 NY
2061 Ama Xtreme 16-Tuf 1863 9-1 82% 16
2062 Vision 12-Blue 1862 30-16 65% 12 CA
2063 NorCal 14-1 black 1862 35-31 53% 14 CA
2064 Miami Wave 14-Aqua 1862 54-25 68% 14 FL
2065 LIVEWIRE 16 Boost 1862 55-19 74% 16 AZ
2066 501 Volley 14-1 national 1862 47-17 73% 14 AR
2067 OK PEAK 17-1 1862 7-2 78% 17 OK
2068 Ignite 15 Elite 1862 34-29 54% 15 IN
2069 North Shore Raiders 18-1 1862 37-11 77% 18 HI
2070 Sportime 18-Gold 1862 38-13 75% 18 NY
2071 SRS 14-Blue 1862 48-7 87% 14 SC
2072 Delta Valley 12-Blue 1861 27-9 75% 12 CA
2073 Left Coast 16-1 1861 32-29 52% 16 CA
2074 NE Elite 16-Alpha 1861 16-23 41% 16 NE
2075 RVBC 15-White 1861 22-1 96% 15 PA
2076 MN North 17-1 navy 1861 64-20 76% 17 MN
2077 Vision 11 Gold 1861 37-22 63% 11 CA
2078 ZTV 14-1 select 1861 32-9 78% 14 MT
2079 EVA 13 National 1861 55-11 83% 13 AR
2080 Sharks 14 Navy 1861 50-17 75% 14 AL
2081 Pgh Elite 13-Elite 1861 40-21 66% 13 PA
2082 MN Select 17-3 1861 53-16 77% 17 MN
2083 VEVA 16 Elite 1861 38-22 63% 16 FL
2084 Club Four 15-Boost 1860 40-14 74% 15 MO
2085 Impulse 12-Red 1860 19-0 100% 12 IN
2086 Blacktooth Volleyball Club 16-Black 1860 48-6 89% 16 WY
2087 TX SPARKS 11-1 thay 1860 38-0 95% 11 TX
2088 Dunes 16-Black 1860 47-25 65% 16 IN
2089 COA 14-Phoenix 1860 41-23 64% 14 IN
2090 Shockwave VB Academy 14-Black 1860 32-18 64% 14 KS
2091 ATOMIC 15-Smack elite 1860 59-21 74% 15 AZ
2092 Excel 11-National red 1860 8-1 89% 11 TX
2093 ONE Volleyball 12 1859 62-14 82% 12 GA
2094 HBJ 15-Elite 1859 44-9 83% 15 AR
2095 ASKYL 17-1 1859 6-2 75% 17 MA
2096 Southwest 13-N kate 1859 45-21 68% 13 OH
2097 SLO VBC 16 Dede 1859 26-25 51% 16 CA
2098 USJVA 14-National red hp 1859 30-22 58% 14 AL
2099 HVC SHOJI 16-1 1859 17-3 85% 16 HI
2100 Delaware United Volleyball Club 14-Navy 1859 34-30 53% 14 DE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.