2025-2026 Season — Page 41 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Premier Nebraska 15-Red | 1868 | 31-20 | 61% | 15 | NE |
| 2002 | Ka Ulukoa 14 James | 1868 | 17-6 | 74% | 14 | HI |
| 2003 | Colorado Juniors 14-Jen | 1868 | 21-4 | 84% | 14 | CO |
| 2004 | 808 Athletic Club 14-Sheri | 1868 | 13-0 | 100% | 14 | HI |
| 2005 | CMASS EDGE 13-Blue | 1868 | 39-17 | 70% | 13 | MA |
| 2006 | DN 16-Red | 1868 | 15-4 | 79% | 16 | TX |
| 2007 | DN 15-Black | 1868 | 18-8 | 62% | 15 | TX |
| 2008 | DN 14-Red | 1868 | 16-11 | 53% | 14 | TX |
| 2009 | FH 11-Ikaika-toa | 1868 | 16-3 | 84% | 11 | TX |
| 2010 | RRHEATVB 17-1 jaz | 1868 | 16-11 | 59% | 17 | |
| 2011 | Summit 15-Blue elite | 1868 | 26-31 | 46% | 15 | IN |
| 2012 | Absolute 17-Pink | 1868 | 43-24 | 64% | 17 | CA |
| 2013 | Apex NW 18-Summit | 1867 | 28-17 | 62% | 18 | WA |
| 2014 | Corpus Christi Storm 16-1 | 1867 | 52-13 | 79% | 16 | TX |
| 2015 | GCVC 13 Silver | 1867 | 38-19 | 67% | 13 | OH |
| 2016 | 1st Alliance 17-Red | 1867 | 38-15 | 72% | 17 | IL |
| 2017 | KNVBC 17 Showtime | 1867 | 30-19 | 61% | 17 | KS |
| 2018 | Aces Hawaii 17 | 1867 | 22-8 | 73% | 17 | HI |
| 2019 | Idaho ONE 14-White | 1867 | 51-8 | 84% | 14 | ID |
| 2020 | FW Fire 13-Purple | 1867 | 40-10 | 78% | 13 | TX |
| 2021 | AVA 16-Elite | 1867 | 35-12 | 74% | 16 | NY |
| 2022 | BVC 13-1 | 1867 | 42-11 | 76% | 13 | DE |
| 2023 | Sky High 15-Black | 1867 | 44-41 | 51% | 15 | IL |
| 2024 | I AM VBC 16-Red | 1866 | 48-33 | 59% | 16 | WI |
| 2025 | Molten 16-Red | 1866 | 22-10 | 69% | 16 | AZ |
| 2026 | OT 11-O omi | 1866 | 55-9 | 86% | 11 | FL |
| 2027 | Pohaku 17-1 | 1866 | 20-32 | 38% | 17 | KS |
| 2028 | AJ 14-Gold | 1866 | 44-8 | 85% | 14 | LA |
| 2029 | Rampage 16-S black | 1866 | 30-18 | 63% | 16 | UT |
| 2030 | HPRIME 13-Gold | 1866 | 40-14 | 74% | 13 | TX |
| 2031 | Tsunami 13-1e kristine | 1866 | 48-17 | 74% | 13 | GA |
| 2032 | Northern Lights 16-R | 1866 | 60-13 | 82% | 16 | MN |
| 2033 | OK PEAK 17-1 | 1866 | 7-2 | 78% | 17 | |
| 2034 | 573 14-Premier a | 1865 | 22-3 | 88% | 14 | MO |
| 2035 | Club One AZ 16-Titanium | 1865 | 50-38 | 57% | 16 | AZ |
| 2036 | SC Elite 18-Blue-jordan | 1865 | 14-12 | 54% | 18 | SC |
| 2037 | SMASH 17-S | 1865 | 18-12 | 60% | 17 | MA |
| 2038 | EVA 15-Blue | 1865 | 41-18 | 69% | 15 | KY |
| 2039 | Legacy 16-2 adidas | 1865 | 28-40 | 41% | 16 | MI |
| 2040 | OK PEAK 15-1 | 1865 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | |
| 2041 | FC Elite 15-White | 1864 | 44-14 | 76% | 15 | WI |
| 2042 | MKE Sting 18-Black | 1864 | 33-25 | 57% | 18 | WI |
| 2043 | MVSA 13-Wahoo! | 1864 | 55-23 | 70% | 13 | MD |
| 2044 | PVA 12 ELITE | 1864 | 29-20 | 59% | 12 | MO |
| 2045 | 575 15-Lpe russell | 1864 | 43-28 | 61% | 15 | GA |
| 2046 | COAST 14-3 sydney | 1864 | 41-11 | 79% | 14 | CA |
| 2047 | Lockdown VBC 14-Mockingjays | 1864 | 39-15 | 72% | 14 | MA |
| 2048 | Tri-State Elite 12-Blue | 1864 | 24-22 | 52% | 12 | OH |
| 2049 | A5 14-3 kip | 1864 | 6-1 | 86% | 14 | GA |
| 2050 | K1 Bayamon 14-Moncho | 1864 | 7-1 | 88% | 14 | PR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.