2025-2026 Season — Page 41 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Aspire 15 Premier | 1869 | 50-24 | 68% | 15 | AZ |
| 2002 | Red Rock 13-Steph | 1869 | 42-24 | 64% | 13 | CA |
| 2003 | ECJVC 15-National | 1869 | 39-27 | 59% | 15 | NC |
| 2004 | Pohaku 17-1 | 1869 | 20-32 | 38% | 17 | KS |
| 2005 | Lockdown VBC 17-Phoenix | 1868 | 52-25 | 68% | 17 | MA |
| 2006 | LEVBC 16-National | 1868 | 49-25 | 65% | 16 | MD |
| 2007 | Miami Wave 16-Aqua | 1868 | 56-29 | 66% | 16 | FL |
| 2008 | SoCal VBC 14-Beacons | 1868 | 26-21 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 2009 | CUVC 13 Open | 1868 | 32-33 | 49% | 13 | NC |
| 2010 | SMASH 17-S | 1867 | 18-12 | 60% | 17 | MA |
| 2011 | Aces Hawaii 17 | 1867 | 22-8 | 73% | 17 | HI |
| 2012 | OT 11-O omi | 1867 | 55-9 | 86% | 11 | FL |
| 2013 | Tsunami 13-1e kristine | 1867 | 48-17 | 74% | 13 | GA |
| 2014 | Cape Coast 16 TITAN | 1867 | 26-34 | 43% | 16 | FL |
| 2015 | SA Magic 12 ELITE | 1867 | 47-21 | 68% | 12 | TX |
| 2016 | TX STORM 13-Smack | 1867 | 35-16 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 2017 | MVSA 16 Sparks | 1867 | 63-23 | 73% | 16 | MD |
| 2018 | Aces Hawaii 16 | 1867 | 25-17 | 60% | 16 | HI |
| 2019 | A5 Chattanooga 17-1 | 1867 | 23-13 | 64% | 17 | GA |
| 2020 | Lockdown VBC 14-Mockingjays | 1867 | 39-15 | 72% | 14 | MA |
| 2021 | Rev 15-2 jaguars | 1867 | 52-17 | 75% | 15 | IN |
| 2022 | Austin Skyline 15 Royal | 1867 | 31-32 | 49% | 15 | TX |
| 2023 | CVH SELECT 17-1 | 1867 | 19-18 | 51% | 17 | PR |
| 2024 | DN 14-Red | 1867 | 16-11 | 53% | 14 | TX |
| 2025 | SCVC 15-Darice | 1866 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | NV |
| 2026 | OT 12-O cristobal | 1866 | 40-23 | 63% | 12 | FL |
| 2027 | FW Fire 13-Purple | 1866 | 40-10 | 78% | 13 | TX |
| 2028 | Idaho ONE 12-White | 1866 | 31-11 | 74% | 12 | ID |
| 2029 | Club One AZ 16-Titanium | 1866 | 50-38 | 57% | 16 | AZ |
| 2030 | Sky High 15-Black | 1866 | 44-41 | 51% | 15 | IL |
| 2031 | KNVBC 17 Showtime | 1866 | 30-19 | 61% | 17 | KS |
| 2032 | Banzai VBC 18-Select | 1866 | 30-9 | 77% | 18 | NE |
| 2033 | MVA 17-National (EV) | 1866 | 25-9 | 74% | 17 | MT |
| 2034 | DN 16-Red | 1865 | 15-4 | 79% | 16 | TX |
| 2035 | NorthShore 14 Crocs | 1865 | 40-15 | 73% | 14 | MI |
| 2036 | Tri-State Elite 12-Blue | 1865 | 24-22 | 52% | 12 | KY |
| 2037 | ENCORE 16-Navy | 1865 | 42-34 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 2038 | Club South 15-1 | 1865 | 39-11 | 78% | 15 | TX |
| 2039 | Spa City 16 Aqua | 1865 | 46-22 | 68% | 16 | NY |
| 2040 | RVA WEST 14-Navy | 1865 | 68-30 | 69% | 14 | WI |
| 2041 | 573 14-Premier a | 1865 | 22-3 | 88% | 14 | MO |
| 2042 | 2026 Nola Katherine/Bob 13-S | 1865 | 102-37 | 72% | 13 | LA |
| 2043 | United 15 National | 1865 | 44-15 | 75% | 15 | AL |
| 2044 | CMASS EDGE 13-Blue | 1864 | 39-17 | 70% | 13 | MA |
| 2045 | USJVA 15-National red hp | 1864 | 30-9 | 77% | 15 | AL |
| 2046 | Wildfire 15-N open | 1864 | 8-27 | 23% | 15 | FL |
| 2047 | JAG VBC 15-1 national | 1864 | 72-15 | 83% | 15 | WI |
| 2048 | Tampa North 12-Black | 1864 | 46-13 | 78% | 12 | FL |
| 2049 | SG Elite 16 Excel | 1864 | 53-16 | 77% | 16 | CA |
| 2050 | BORINQUEN COQUI 16-1f | 1864 | 19-8 | 70% | 16 | PR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.