Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 41 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
2001 Premier Nebraska 15-Red 1868 31-20 61% 15 NE
2002 Ka Ulukoa 14 James 1868 17-6 74% 14 HI
2003 Colorado Juniors 14-Jen 1868 21-4 84% 14 CO
2004 808 Athletic Club 14-Sheri 1868 13-0 100% 14 HI
2005 CMASS EDGE 13-Blue 1868 39-17 70% 13 MA
2006 DN 16-Red 1868 15-4 79% 16 TX
2007 DN 15-Black 1868 18-8 62% 15 TX
2008 DN 14-Red 1868 16-11 53% 14 TX
2009 FH 11-Ikaika-toa 1868 16-3 84% 11 TX
2010 RRHEATVB 17-1 jaz 1868 16-11 59% 17
2011 Summit 15-Blue elite 1868 26-31 46% 15 IN
2012 Absolute 17-Pink 1868 43-24 64% 17 CA
2013 Apex NW 18-Summit 1867 28-17 62% 18 WA
2014 Corpus Christi Storm 16-1 1867 52-13 79% 16 TX
2015 GCVC 13 Silver 1867 38-19 67% 13 OH
2016 1st Alliance 17-Red 1867 38-15 72% 17 IL
2017 KNVBC 17 Showtime 1867 30-19 61% 17 KS
2018 Aces Hawaii 17 1867 22-8 73% 17 HI
2019 Idaho ONE 14-White 1867 51-8 84% 14 ID
2020 FW Fire 13-Purple 1867 40-10 78% 13 TX
2021 AVA 16-Elite 1867 35-12 74% 16 NY
2022 BVC 13-1 1867 42-11 76% 13 DE
2023 Sky High 15-Black 1867 44-41 51% 15 IL
2024 I AM VBC 16-Red 1866 48-33 59% 16 WI
2025 Molten 16-Red 1866 22-10 69% 16 AZ
2026 OT 11-O omi 1866 55-9 86% 11 FL
2027 Pohaku 17-1 1866 20-32 38% 17 KS
2028 AJ 14-Gold 1866 44-8 85% 14 LA
2029 Rampage 16-S black 1866 30-18 63% 16 UT
2030 HPRIME 13-Gold 1866 40-14 74% 13 TX
2031 Tsunami 13-1e kristine 1866 48-17 74% 13 GA
2032 Northern Lights 16-R 1866 60-13 82% 16 MN
2033 OK PEAK 17-1 1866 7-2 78% 17
2034 573 14-Premier a 1865 22-3 88% 14 MO
2035 Club One AZ 16-Titanium 1865 50-38 57% 16 AZ
2036 SC Elite 18-Blue-jordan 1865 14-12 54% 18 SC
2037 SMASH 17-S 1865 18-12 60% 17 MA
2038 EVA 15-Blue 1865 41-18 69% 15 KY
2039 Legacy 16-2 adidas 1865 28-40 41% 16 MI
2040 OK PEAK 15-1 1865 5-2 71% 15
2041 FC Elite 15-White 1864 44-14 76% 15 WI
2042 MKE Sting 18-Black 1864 33-25 57% 18 WI
2043 MVSA 13-Wahoo! 1864 55-23 70% 13 MD
2044 PVA 12 ELITE 1864 29-20 59% 12 MO
2045 575 15-Lpe russell 1864 43-28 61% 15 GA
2046 COAST 14-3 sydney 1864 41-11 79% 14 CA
2047 Lockdown VBC 14-Mockingjays 1864 39-15 72% 14 MA
2048 Tri-State Elite 12-Blue 1864 24-22 52% 12 OH
2049 A5 14-3 kip 1864 6-1 86% 14 GA
2050 K1 Bayamon 14-Moncho 1864 7-1 88% 14 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.