Girls 16 Volleyball Team · DN · TX
DN 16-Red is the #410 ranked girls 16 club volleyball team for the 2025-2026 season, with an Elo rating of 1868 and a 15-4 record (79% win rate) across 19 matches. The team competes as part of DN (TX).
| Date | Event | Opponent | Score | W/L | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-03 | NRG 16 AMPD White | 2-1 | W | 18-25, 25-18, 15-5 | |
| 2026-05-03 | TAV 16 Blue | 0-2 | L | 25-22, 25-14 | |
| 2026-05-03 | APV 16 National Black | 0-2 | L | 25-18, 27-25 | |
| 2026-05-02 | Instinct 16 WIld Gold | 3-0 | W | 25-13, 25-6, 25-14 | |
| 2026-05-02 | ACCEL 16 BLACK BEASLEY | 3-0 | W | 25-18, 25-14, 25-10 | |
| 2026-03-08 | Skyline 16 White David | 2-0 | W | 25-22, 25-12 | |
| 2026-03-08 | Austin Skyline 16 Black-Ellie | 2-1 | W | 20-25, 25-22, 15-12 | |
| 2026-03-07 | Skyline 16 White Stephen | 2-0 | W | 25-18, 25-18 | |
| 2026-03-07 | Endless 16 Navy Williams | 2-0 | W | 25-14, 25-13 | |
| 2026-03-07 | Ama Xtreme 16 AGTG | 2-0 | W | 25-16, 25-8 | |
| 2026-02-22 | Heat 16 National | 2-0 | W | 25-23, 25-12 | |
| 2026-02-01 | Arete 16 Navy Ethos | 2-1 | W | 25-17, 25-27, 16-14 | |
| 2026-01-31 | VIP 16 Elite | 3-0 | W | 25-17, 25-16, 25-19 | |
| 2026-01-31 | Madfrog 16N White | 2-1 | W | 25-20, 25-13, 21-25 | |
| 2026-01-11 | TAV 16 Black Josh | 0-2 | L | 25-16, 25-12 | |
| 2026-01-11 | Heat 16 National | 2-0 | W | 25-20, 25-9 | |
| 2026-01-10 | EMV 16 Black Creshia | 2-0 | W | 25-11, 25-13 | |
| 2026-01-10 | Image 16 Red | 2-0 | W | 25-11, 25-11 | |
| 2026-01-10 | Madfrog 16N Black CJ | 0-2 | L | 10-25, 23-25 |
| Date | Opponent | Score | W/L | Division | Opp Elo | Elo Before | Elo After | Change | K | SoS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-03 | TAV 16 Blue | 0-2 | L | AMERICAN | 1923 | 1889 | 1868 | -21 | 50 | 1.00 |
| 2026-05-03 | APV 16 National Black | 0-2 | L | AMERICAN | 1880 | 1909 | 1889 | -20 | 44 | 1.00 |
| 2026-05-03 | NRG 16 AMPD White | 2-1 | W | AMERICAN | 1798 | 1902 | 1909 | +7 | 35 | 1.00 |
| 2026-05-02 | Instinct 16 WIld Gold | 3-0 | W | AMERICAN | 1651 | 1898 | 1902 | +4 | 19 | 1.00 |
| 2026-05-02 | ACCEL 16 BLACK BEASLEY | 3-0 | W | AMERICAN | 1688 | 1882 | 1898 | +16 | 26 | 1.00 |
| 2026-03-08 | Austin Skyline 16 Black-Ellie | 2-1 | W | OPEN | 1694 | 1882 | 1882 | 0 | 26 | 1.00 |
| 2026-03-08 | Skyline 16 White David | 2-0 | W | OPEN | 1735 | 1848 | 1882 | +34 | 28 | 1.00 |
| 2026-03-07 | Ama Xtreme 16 AGTG | 2-0 | W | OPEN | 1535 | 1837 | 1848 | +11 | 19 | 1.00 |
| 2026-03-07 | Endless 16 Navy Williams | 2-0 | W | OPEN | 1490 | 1828 | 1837 | +9 | 19 | 1.00 |
| 2026-03-07 | Skyline 16 White Stephen | 2-0 | W | OPEN | 1623 | 1806 | 1828 | +22 | 26 | 1.00 |
| 2026-02-22 | Heat 16 National | 2-0 | W | OPEN | 1677 | 1765 | 1806 | +41 | 32 | 1.00 |
| 2026-02-01 | Arete 16 Navy Ethos | 2-1 | W | OPEN | 1734 | 1716 | 1765 | +49 | 37 | 1.00 |
| 2026-01-31 | VIP 16 Elite | 3-0 | W | OPEN | 1634 | 1661 | 1716 | +55 | 32 | 1.00 |
| 2026-01-31 | Madfrog 16N White | 2-1 | W | OPEN | 1481 | 1646 | 1661 | +15 | 26 | 1.00 |
| 2026-01-11 | Heat 16 National | 2-0 | W | OPEN | 1600 | 1576 | 1646 | +70 | 35 | 1.00 |
| 2026-01-11 | TAV 16 Black Josh | 0-2 | L | OPEN | 1714 | 1594 | 1576 | -18 | 42 | 1.00 |
| 2026-01-10 | Madfrog 16N Black CJ | 0-2 | L | OPEN | 1679 | 1611 | 1594 | -17 | 35 | 1.00 |
| 2026-01-10 | Image 16 Red | 2-0 | W | OPEN | 1505 | 1560 | 1611 | +51 | 32 | 1.00 |
| 2026-01-10 | EMV 16 Black Creshia | 2-0 | W | OPEN | 1500 | 1500 | 1560 | +60 | 32 | 1.00 |
DN 16-Red is the #410 ranked girls 16 club volleyball team in the country for the 2025-2026 season, with an Elo rating of 1868 based on 19 matches. Rankings update daily after match results.
15 wins, 4 losses (79% win rate) across 19 matches in the 2025-2026 season. Every match played against any opponent in the country counts toward this record.
DN 16-Red is part of DN, based in TX. View the full DN club page to see every team in the program and the club's overall ranking.
VolleyLens uses an Elo rating system tuned for volleyball: every team starts at 1500, ratings update after every match using K-factor 32 with margin-of-victory adjustment, and a strength-of-schedule multiplier accounts for opponent difficulty. Read the full methodology at /insights/volleylens-volleyball-ranking-methodology.