2025-2026 Season — Page 40 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1951 | Elite Alliance 16-1 | 1874 | 22-11 | 67% | 16 | SD |
| 1952 | Premier Nebraska 15-Red | 1874 | 31-20 | 61% | 15 | NE |
| 1953 | Summit 15-Blue elite | 1874 | 26-31 | 46% | 15 | IN |
| 1954 | DN 15-Black | 1874 | 18-8 | 62% | 15 | TX |
| 1955 | Apex 14-Bobby | 1873 | 28-5 | 78% | 14 | UT |
| 1956 | NLVC 17-National | 1873 | 39-14 | 74% | 17 | TX |
| 1957 | NORCO 14-Black | 1873 | 40-18 | 69% | 14 | CO |
| 1958 | EVA 15-Blue | 1873 | 41-18 | 69% | 15 | KY |
| 1959 | APV 16-National black | 1873 | 47-19 | 70% | 16 | TX |
| 1960 | FaR Out 14-Gold | 1873 | 32-15 | 68% | 14 | MI |
| 1961 | Texas Tornados 18-Adidas | 1873 | 23-9 | 72% | 18 | TX |
| 1962 | Corpus Christi Storm 16-1 | 1873 | 52-13 | 79% | 16 | TX |
| 1963 | MKE Sting 18-Black | 1873 | 33-25 | 57% | 18 | WI |
| 1964 | MVA 18-Chino | 1873 | 24-18 | 57% | 18 | FL |
| 1965 | NPJ Portland 16 National | 1873 | 48-37 | 56% | 16 | OR |
| 1966 | GCVC 14 Silver | 1873 | 36-31 | 54% | 14 | OH |
| 1967 | Prime 14-Adidas o | 1873 | 24-24 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 1968 | Gulfside 14-Prime | 1873 | 54-20 | 73% | 14 | FL |
| 1969 | MVSA 13-Wahoo! | 1872 | 55-23 | 70% | 13 | MD |
| 1970 | COAST 14-3 sydney | 1872 | 41-11 | 79% | 14 | CA |
| 1971 | Apex NW 18-Summit | 1872 | 28-17 | 62% | 18 | WA |
| 1972 | SWMNVB 14-1 | 1872 | 31-8 | 79% | 14 | MN |
| 1973 | HPRIME 16-Gold | 1872 | 40-23 | 63% | 16 | TX |
| 1974 | Mill City Volleyball Club 17 | 1872 | 36-17 | 68% | 17 | MA |
| 1975 | Fusion 14-Blue | 1872 | 41-9 | 82% | 14 | PA |
| 1976 | FC Elite 15-White | 1872 | 44-14 | 76% | 15 | WI |
| 1977 | AVA 16-Elite | 1872 | 35-12 | 74% | 16 | NY |
| 1978 | Bonneville Volleyballl Club 15-Kiley | 1872 | 16-13 | 55% | 15 | ID |
| 1979 | TLVC Waves 14-1 | 1872 | 40-13 | 75% | 14 | NC |
| 1980 | I AM VBC 16-Red | 1871 | 48-33 | 59% | 16 | WI |
| 1981 | Brooklyn Elite Volleyball 16-Empire | 1871 | 41-26 | 61% | 16 | NY |
| 1982 | FeVA 14 | 1871 | 43-23 | 65% | 14 | WA |
| 1983 | Monon 16-1o pegasus | 1871 | 43-45 | 49% | 16 | IN |
| 1984 | AVA TX 15-Adidas | 1871 | 26-20 | 57% | 15 | TX |
| 1985 | Illini Elite 17-Black | 1871 | 36-16 | 69% | 17 | IL |
| 1986 | MVP 60450 16U Black | 1871 | 31-4 | 89% | 16 | IL |
| 1987 | Mabel-Canton Jrs. 14 Mabel-Canton Jrs. | 1871 | 24-2 | 92% | 14 | MN |
| 1988 | NorthEast Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1871 | 37-19 | 66% | 13 | CT |
| 1989 | MemphisVBAcademy 14-Red | 1871 | 51-17 | 75% | 14 | MS |
| 1990 | NRG 15-Ampd white | 1871 | 43-12 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 1991 | Yorktowne VB 14-Blue | 1871 | 55-20 | 73% | 14 | PA |
| 1992 | 407 15-Blue | 1871 | 51-26 | 66% | 15 | FL |
| 1993 | MJVA 17-Elite black | 1871 | 36-22 | 62% | 17 | TN |
| 1994 | Mindset Premier 17-Red | 1870 | 36-13 | 73% | 17 | IL |
| 1995 | GP 10 National | 1870 | 65-6 | 92% | 10 | FL |
| 1996 | HPRIME 13-Gold | 1870 | 40-14 | 74% | 13 | TX |
| 1997 | NIVA 17-WHITE | 1870 | 43-11 | 80% | 17 | IN |
| 1998 | Legacy 16-2 adidas | 1870 | 28-40 | 41% | 16 | MI |
| 1999 | Victorium 14 UA | 1870 | 36-34 | 51% | 14 | AZ |
| 2000 | ARIZONA STORM 17-Lightning | 1869 | 39-40 | 49% | 17 | AZ |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.