Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 40 · Ranked by Elo rating

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is TAV 16-Black yun with a 2270 Elo rating and 48-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1951 CVC 10-Black 1740 32-4 89% 10 OH
1952 Momentous 17-Dan 1740 6-2 75% 17
1953 A5 15-Jennie 1740 39-14 74% 15 GA
1954 MVA 16-Stephania 1740 28-19 60% 16 FL
1955 Goldenwest 16 Asics 1740 25-13 66% 16 CA
1956 Dal Skyline 17-Royal-ping 1740 11-16 41% 17 TX
1957 Riptide 18-Tsunami 1740 40-12 77% 18 FL
1958 Buckeye 18-Black national 1740 31-13 69% 18 OH
1959 ELLEVATE Academy 14-Steel 1740 35-5 88% 14 LA
1960 Netforce 14-Kelly 1740 30-4 88% 14 IL
1961 A5 16-Kristina 1740 33-9 79% 16 GA
1962 Calcasieu Impact 13 1739 29-8 76% 13 LA
1963 Direction 15 Royal 1739 26-2 93% 15 NC
1964 SCVB 16 Riley 1739 20-6 77% 16 RI
1965 Ultimate G15 Gold 1739 17-10 63% 15 IL
1966 KCV 11 NATIONAL 1739 30-9 77% 11 TX
1967 UNION 14-In white 1739 37-6 86% 14 CA
1968 VAQUERAS 16-F heyner 1739 14-4 78% 16 PR
1969 NRG VBC 17-Ampd navy 1739 16-13 55% 17
1970 1United 16-N blue 1739 15-7 68% 16 TX
1971 HPRIME 14-Gold 1739 28-10 74% 14 TX
1972 Buffalo Stampeders 16-1 1739 32-12 73% 16 FL
1973 AVA 14-Elite 1739 28-10 74% 14 NY
1974 Michio Chicago 17-Premier 1739 24-8 75% 17 IL
1975 AVB Fire 18-1 1739 25-3 89% 18 MN
1976 Sharks 18-Navy 1739 24-8 75% 18 FL
1977 Allegro 18-West 1739 26-15 63% 18 NJ
1978 Fearless 12 1739 23-0 100% 12 IA
1979 RRIV 15 Regional 1739 38-9 81% 15 ND
1980 Airstrike 14 1739 29-2 94% 14 PA
1981 Omni 16-N1 1739 34-26 57% 16 AZ
1982 Ark Volley 14-National 1738 43-7 86% 14
1983 HNLV 14-Black 1738 13-8 62% 14
1984 Giants 16-1 1738 30-4 88% 16
1985 CVH SELECT 16-1 1738 17-12 59% 16
1986 Victory 15-National black 1738 16-5 76% 15 TX
1987 Coastal VBC 15 Navy 1738 34-8 81% 15 FL
1988 FUSION 12-Blue 1738 29-6 83% 12 IL
1989 Erie Elite Maui 17 1738 27-2 93% 17
1990 863 Elite 15-1 black 1738 26-8 76% 15 FL
1991 Aspire NW 16-2 royal 1738 35-14 71% 16 WA
1992 PEAK 16-2 1738 24-8 75% 16 AZ
1993 Xcel VB 17-1 adidas 1738 27-8 77% 17 TX
1994 DaKine 17-National navy 1738 42-23 63% 17 WA
1995 DYNASTY 15-Blue 1738 22-12 65% 15 KS
1996 VIRAGO 15 Elite 1738 36-11 77% 15 OK
1997 Xtreme 16-Usa braulio 1738 37-14 73% 16 NJ
1998 MiElite 15-National 1738 26-9 74% 15 MI
1999 OK Charge 14-National 1737 33-12 73% 14 OK
2000 H Skyline 13-Royal 1737 18-9 67% 13 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings increase when teams win and decrease when they lose. The amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team.

Rating Calculation

New Rating = Old Rating + K × (Actual Score - Expected Score). K-factor: 32. Actual Score: 1 for win, 0.5 for tie, 0 for loss. Expected Score is calculated based on rating difference. The system processes all matches chronologically to ensure accurate historical progression.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for ranking. Aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Applies filters to show relevant divisions and gender categories.