2025-2026 Season — Page 40 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1951 | Miami Wave 16-Aqua | 1872 | 56-29 | 66% | 16 | FL |
| 1952 | Mill City 17 | 1872 | 41-19 | 68% | 17 | MA |
| 1953 | USA South 13-Premier purp | 1872 | 42-16 | 72% | 13 | FL |
| 1954 | SRS 14-Blue | 1872 | 48-7 | 87% | 14 | SC |
| 1955 | 407 15-Blue | 1872 | 51-26 | 66% | 15 | FL |
| 1956 | SoCal VBC 14-Beacons | 1872 | 26-21 | 55% | 14 | CA |
| 1957 | Mintonette Sports 12-1 | 1872 | 45-44 | 51% | 12 | OH |
| 1958 | BEV 16 Empire | 1871 | 45-29 | 61% | 16 | NY |
| 1959 | Alliance 15-Red | 1871 | 35-8 | 81% | 15 | TN |
| 1960 | Colorado Elite 17 Grizzly | 1871 | 41-24 | 63% | 17 | CO |
| 1961 | Club One AZ 17Gold | 1871 | 54-34 | 61% | 17 | AZ |
| 1962 | ECJVC 17-National | 1871 | 39-30 | 57% | 17 | NC |
| 1963 | MIDTN 14-BLACK | 1871 | 21-11 | 66% | 14 | TN |
| 1964 | Victorium 14 UA | 1871 | 36-34 | 51% | 14 | AZ |
| 1965 | Mizuno CNVBC 17-Jessen | 1871 | 29-18 | 62% | 17 | MO |
| 1966 | NLVC 17-National | 1871 | 39-14 | 74% | 17 | NJ |
| 1967 | Texas Tornados 15-Adidas | 1871 | 33-20 | 62% | 15 | TX |
| 1968 | Iowa Impact 15-1 elite | 1871 | 44-25 | 64% | 15 | IA |
| 1969 | Colorado Juniors 16-Bri | 1871 | 19-6 | 76% | 16 | CO |
| 1970 | Hunter's 12-Black | 1871 | 63-13 | 83% | 12 | FL |
| 1971 | A5 Chattanooga 17-1 | 1871 | 19-8 | 70% | 17 | TN |
| 1972 | TAV 16-Blue (NT) | 1871 | 23-20 | 53% | 16 | TX |
| 1973 | Ignite 13 National (SC) | 1871 | 22-15 | 59% | 13 | CA |
| 1974 | TX STORM 13-Smack | 1870 | 35-16 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 1975 | ECVC 16-Black | 1870 | 36-27 | 57% | 16 | VA |
| 1976 | Monon 16-1o pegasus | 1870 | 43-45 | 49% | 16 | IN |
| 1977 | NORCO 14-Black | 1870 | 40-18 | 69% | 14 | CO |
| 1978 | NIVA 16-PURPLE | 1870 | 63-36 | 64% | 16 | IN |
| 1979 | RISE 15-Jaden | 1870 | 33-8 | 80% | 15 | CA |
| 1980 | PowerPlex 15-Mendieta | 1870 | 33-24 | 58% | 15 | IA |
| 1981 | OT 16-T augusto | 1870 | 51-17 | 75% | 16 | FL |
| 1982 | Academy 15 Crystal | 1870 | 37-27 | 58% | 15 | NC |
| 1983 | Big Sky VB 16-1 | 1870 | 11-0 | 100% | 16 | |
| 1984 | Ignite VBCF 13-National | 1870 | 8-1 | 89% | 13 | |
| 1985 | Yorktowne VB 14-Blue | 1870 | 55-20 | 73% | 14 | PA |
| 1986 | Sideout 16-N cooper | 1869 | 49-20 | 71% | 16 | NJ |
| 1987 | Texas Tornados 18-Adidas | 1869 | 23-9 | 72% | 18 | TX |
| 1988 | Illini Elite 17-Black | 1869 | 36-16 | 69% | 17 | IL |
| 1989 | Decatur Force 14 Teal | 1869 | 33-10 | 77% | 14 | IN |
| 1990 | GP 10 National | 1869 | 65-6 | 92% | 10 | FL |
| 1991 | Mindset Premier 17-Red | 1869 | 36-13 | 73% | 17 | IL |
| 1992 | Katy United 14-Adidas | 1869 | 52-19 | 73% | 14 | TX |
| 1993 | KUIKAHI 14-Wahine rsb | 1869 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | HI |
| 1994 | Lockdown VBC 15-Cardinals | 1869 | 41-19 | 68% | 15 | MA |
| 1995 | WAVE 14-Nancy | 1869 | 31-23 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 1996 | Momentous VBC 14-Spencer | 1869 | 26-23 | 53% | 14 | CA |
| 1997 | NorthShore 14 Crocs | 1869 | 40-15 | 73% | 14 | MI |
| 1998 | MemphisVBAcademy 14-Red | 1869 | 51-17 | 75% | 14 | MS |
| 1999 | Aspire 15 Premier | 1868 | 50-24 | 68% | 15 | AB |
| 2000 | NKYVC 13-2 tide | 1868 | 31-23 | 57% | 13 | KY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.