2025-2026 Season — Page 39 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1901 | Club Fusion 16-1 national | 1876 | 34-21 | 62% | 16 | IL |
| 1902 | MVA 18-Chino | 1876 | 24-18 | 57% | 18 | FL |
| 1903 | MOVSelect 12-Green | 1876 | 39-4 | 91% | 12 | OH |
| 1904 | NIVA 17-WHITE | 1876 | 43-11 | 80% | 17 | IN |
| 1905 | NPJ Portland 16 National | 1876 | 48-37 | 56% | 16 | OR |
| 1906 | Premier 15 Trabuco | 1876 | 59-18 | 77% | 15 | OH |
| 1907 | Texas Tornados 16-Adidas | 1876 | 28-6 | 82% | 16 | TX |
| 1908 | 208 16-Elite | 1876 | 27-29 | 48% | 16 | WA |
| 1909 | Lions 14-Blue | 1876 | 34-22 | 61% | 14 | IL |
| 1910 | NE Elite 16-Flames | 1876 | 26-13 | 67% | 16 | NE |
| 1911 | AVC 15-1 (NT) | 1876 | 16-8 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 1912 | Coastal VBC 16 Navy | 1876 | 51-8 | 85% | 16 | MD |
| 1913 | SWMNVB 17-1 | 1875 | 33-9 | 79% | 17 | |
| 1914 | AZ SKY 15-Blue | 1875 | 48-34 | 59% | 15 | AZ |
| 1915 | Premier 14-Black aj | 1875 | 29-11 | 69% | 14 | TX |
| 1916 | ENCORE 16-Navy | 1875 | 42-34 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 1917 | TLVC Waves 14-1 | 1875 | 33-8 | 80% | 14 | NC |
| 1918 | Top Select 15-Top white | 1875 | 66-10 | 87% | 15 | FL |
| 1919 | VC United 16-1 elite | 1875 | 24-26 | 48% | 16 | IL |
| 1920 | MINOI 17-Black | 1875 | 47-20 | 70% | 17 | UT |
| 1921 | Vision 13-Blue | 1875 | 40-22 | 65% | 13 | CA |
| 1922 | RCVC 13-Unite | 1875 | 26-1 | 96% | 13 | NC |
| 1923 | NorCal 13-2 blue | 1875 | 48-30 | 62% | 13 | CA |
| 1924 | SynergyForce 15-2 natl | 1875 | 42-31 | 58% | 15 | CA |
| 1925 | Yuba Elite 12-Pink | 1875 | 43-5 | 90% | 12 | CA |
| 1926 | MVA 17-National (EV) | 1874 | 25-9 | 74% | 17 | |
| 1927 | Netforce 17-Saige | 1874 | 34-7 | 83% | 17 | |
| 1928 | MemphisVBAcademy 13-Red | 1874 | 43-20 | 68% | 13 | MS |
| 1929 | Surfside 16-Pv elite | 1874 | 38-26 | 59% | 16 | CA |
| 1930 | Southwest 14-N ashley | 1874 | 37-30 | 55% | 14 | OH |
| 1931 | Dallas Skyline 17-Black | 1874 | 26-14 | 63% | 17 | TX |
| 1932 | TX LEGACY 12-Elite | 1874 | 59-15 | 80% | 12 | TX |
| 1933 | Midwest Elite 16-1 | 1874 | 16-8 | 67% | 16 | WI |
| 1934 | Apex 14-Bobby | 1874 | 28-5 | 78% | 14 | SC |
| 1935 | Buckeyefire 16-1 | 1873 | 57-7 | 89% | 16 | OH |
| 1936 | Circle City 11-Purple | 1873 | 50-16 | 76% | 11 | IN |
| 1937 | H Skyline 16-White | 1873 | 47-17 | 73% | 16 | TX |
| 1938 | Angelo Rise 15-1 | 1873 | 40-10 | 80% | 15 | TX |
| 1939 | GCVC 14 Silver | 1873 | 36-31 | 54% | 14 | OH |
| 1940 | FSJ 13 Elite | 1873 | 39-13 | 75% | 13 | AR |
| 1941 | MOVSelect 14-Green | 1873 | 28-2 | 93% | 14 | OH |
| 1942 | Millennium 14-W/b | 1873 | 44-7 | 86% | 14 | OH |
| 1943 | WF Waves 13-Dannielle | 1873 | 34-11 | 76% | 13 | FL |
| 1944 | Wildfire 17-N travis | 1873 | 29-22 | 57% | 17 | FL |
| 1945 | Kairos 15 Gamma | 1873 | 55-12 | 82% | 15 | SD |
| 1946 | UPONTOP 14-S elite | 1873 | 43-30 | 59% | 14 | FL |
| 1947 | LSV Orange 11 | 1873 | 41-13 | 76% | 11 | FL |
| 1948 | BVC 18-Mallori | 1873 | 28-11 | 72% | 18 | CA |
| 1949 | ATOMIC 15-Smack premier | 1872 | 58-32 | 64% | 15 | MI |
| 1950 | EXCEL 17-National white | 1872 | 29-23 | 55% | 17 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.