Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 39 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1901 Club Fusion 16-1 national 1876 34-21 62% 16 IL
1902 MVA 18-Chino 1876 24-18 57% 18 FL
1903 MOVSelect 12-Green 1876 39-4 91% 12 OH
1904 NIVA 17-WHITE 1876 43-11 80% 17 IN
1905 NPJ Portland 16 National 1876 48-37 56% 16 OR
1906 Premier 15 Trabuco 1876 59-18 77% 15 OH
1907 Texas Tornados 16-Adidas 1876 28-6 82% 16 TX
1908 208 16-Elite 1876 27-29 48% 16 WA
1909 Lions 14-Blue 1876 34-22 61% 14 IL
1910 NE Elite 16-Flames 1876 26-13 67% 16 NE
1911 AVC 15-1 (NT) 1876 16-8 67% 15 TX
1912 Coastal VBC 16 Navy 1876 51-8 85% 16 MD
1913 SWMNVB 17-1 1875 33-9 79% 17
1914 AZ SKY 15-Blue 1875 48-34 59% 15 AZ
1915 Premier 14-Black aj 1875 29-11 69% 14 TX
1916 ENCORE 16-Navy 1875 42-34 55% 16 CA
1917 TLVC Waves 14-1 1875 33-8 80% 14 NC
1918 Top Select 15-Top white 1875 66-10 87% 15 FL
1919 VC United 16-1 elite 1875 24-26 48% 16 IL
1920 MINOI 17-Black 1875 47-20 70% 17 UT
1921 Vision 13-Blue 1875 40-22 65% 13 CA
1922 RCVC 13-Unite 1875 26-1 96% 13 NC
1923 NorCal 13-2 blue 1875 48-30 62% 13 CA
1924 SynergyForce 15-2 natl 1875 42-31 58% 15 CA
1925 Yuba Elite 12-Pink 1875 43-5 90% 12 CA
1926 MVA 17-National (EV) 1874 25-9 74% 17
1927 Netforce 17-Saige 1874 34-7 83% 17
1928 MemphisVBAcademy 13-Red 1874 43-20 68% 13 MS
1929 Surfside 16-Pv elite 1874 38-26 59% 16 CA
1930 Southwest 14-N ashley 1874 37-30 55% 14 OH
1931 Dallas Skyline 17-Black 1874 26-14 63% 17 TX
1932 TX LEGACY 12-Elite 1874 59-15 80% 12 TX
1933 Midwest Elite 16-1 1874 16-8 67% 16 WI
1934 Apex 14-Bobby 1874 28-5 78% 14 SC
1935 Buckeyefire 16-1 1873 57-7 89% 16 OH
1936 Circle City 11-Purple 1873 50-16 76% 11 IN
1937 H Skyline 16-White 1873 47-17 73% 16 TX
1938 Angelo Rise 15-1 1873 40-10 80% 15 TX
1939 GCVC 14 Silver 1873 36-31 54% 14 OH
1940 FSJ 13 Elite 1873 39-13 75% 13 AR
1941 MOVSelect 14-Green 1873 28-2 93% 14 OH
1942 Millennium 14-W/b 1873 44-7 86% 14 OH
1943 WF Waves 13-Dannielle 1873 34-11 76% 13 FL
1944 Wildfire 17-N travis 1873 29-22 57% 17 FL
1945 Kairos 15 Gamma 1873 55-12 82% 15 SD
1946 UPONTOP 14-S elite 1873 43-30 59% 14 FL
1947 LSV Orange 11 1873 41-13 76% 11 FL
1948 BVC 18-Mallori 1873 28-11 72% 18 CA
1949 ATOMIC 15-Smack premier 1872 58-32 64% 15 MI
1950 EXCEL 17-National white 1872 29-23 55% 17 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.