Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 39 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1901 Absolute 17-Pink 1878 43-24 64% 17 CA
1902 Platform 17-Adidas 1877 52-30 63% 17 IA
1903 Southwest 14-N ashley 1877 37-30 55% 14 OH
1904 AVC CLE 14-Red 1877 25-33 43% 14 OH
1905 NKYVC 13-2 tide 1877 31-23 57% 13 KY
1906 AVC 15-1 (NT) 1877 16-8 67% 15 TX
1907 VVB 15-Alfie 1877 47-16 75% 15 GA
1908 Alliance 15-Red 1876 35-8 81% 15 CA
1909 Circle City 11-Purple 1876 50-16 76% 11 IN
1910 MemphisVBAcademy 13-Red 1876 43-20 68% 13 MS
1911 A5 14-3 kip 1876 6-1 86% 14 GA
1912 H Skyline 16-White 1876 47-17 73% 16 TX
1913 Top Select 15-Top white 1876 66-10 87% 15 FL
1914 NIVA 14-PURPLE 1876 51-27 65% 14 IN
1915 NIVA 16-PURPLE 1876 63-36 64% 16 IN
1916 Michigan Volleyball Academy 14 MVA - Rise Academy 41 (LK) 1876 30-17 64% 14 MI
1917 MINOI 17-Black 1876 47-20 70% 17 UT
1918 Iowa Rockets 15-R 1875 45-27 63% 15 IA
1919 Colorado Elite 17 Grizzly 1875 41-24 63% 17 CO
1920 BVC 16 Casie 1875 51-18 74% 16 CA
1921 GCVC 13 Silver 1875 38-19 67% 13 OH
1922 AVA 14-Elite 1875 33-11 75% 14 NY
1923 OVA 14-Black 1875 64-24 73% 14 FL
1924 Idaho ONE 14-White 1875 51-8 84% 14 ID
1925 FAV 16 Maverick 1875 23-2 92% 16 CA
1926 EVA 16-Elite 1875 47-21 68% 16 AR
1927 Madison 16-Sebastion 1875 13-9 59% 16 UT
1928 Junior BIsons 16-Gold 1875 4-5 44% 16 KY
1929 Texas Tornados 15-Adidas 1875 33-20 62% 15 TX
1930 Iowa Impact 15-1 elite 1875 44-25 64% 15 IA
1931 Hunter's 12-Black 1875 63-13 83% 12 FL
1932 Mintonette Sports 12-1 1875 45-44 51% 12 OH
1933 RISE 15-Jaden 1875 33-8 80% 15 LA
1934 PowerPlex 15-Mendieta 1875 38-25 60% 15 IA
1935 TAV 15-Blue (NT) 1875 34-22 56% 15 TX
1936 Mizuno CNVBC 17-Jessen 1875 29-18 62% 17 MO
1937 AZ SKY 15-Blue 1875 48-34 59% 15 AZ
1938 Durham Rebels Volleyball Club 17 Durham Rebels Blockade 1875 12-3 80% 17 ON
1939 HVC Shoji 16 1874 33-9 79% 16 HI
1940 575 15-Lpe russell 1874 43-28 61% 15 GA
1941 Lockdown VBC 15-Cardinals 1874 41-19 68% 15 MA
1942 AZ EVJ 15 Elite 1874 42-37 53% 15 AZ
1943 Buckeyefire 16-1 1874 57-7 89% 16 OH
1944 Club One AZ 17Gold 1874 54-34 61% 17 AZ
1945 Big Sky 17-1 1874 31-14 67% 17 MT
1946 FSJ 13 Elite 1874 39-13 75% 13 AR
1947 Kairos 14 Gamma 1874 41-16 72% 14 SD
1948 ECVC 16-Black 1874 36-27 57% 16 VA
1949 OPVC 14-Horton 1874 40-24 63% 14 OH
1950 Tribe 13-Elite navy 1874 41-18 69% 13 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.