2025-2026 Season — Page 38 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | K1 Bayamon 15-David | 1882 | 3-5 | 38% | 15 | PR |
| 1852 | HRVC Hurricanes 15-1 | 1882 | 7-6 | 54% | 15 | ON |
| 1853 | COVC 18 Nationals | 1881 | 22-13 | 63% | 18 | OR |
| 1854 | 407 17-Orange | 1881 | 48-40 | 55% | 17 | FL |
| 1855 | OT 16-T augusto | 1881 | 51-17 | 75% | 16 | FL |
| 1856 | CJV 13 National | 1881 | 55-9 | 86% | 13 | AR |
| 1857 | WAVE 14-Haley | 1881 | 27-12 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 1858 | KUIKAHI 14-Wahine rsb | 1881 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | HI |
| 1859 | MVC 16 Danny | 1881 | 41-18 | 69% | 16 | OH |
| 1860 | VIPER 14 Elite | 1881 | 49-15 | 77% | 14 | TN |
| 1861 | Prodigy 15-1 premier | 1881 | 58-16 | 78% | 15 | NY |
| 1862 | SynergyForce 15-2 natl | 1881 | 42-31 | 58% | 15 | CA |
| 1863 | MichioChicago 14-Bluesmoke | 1881 | 25-21 | 54% | 14 | IL |
| 1864 | Millennium 14-W/b | 1880 | 44-7 | 86% | 14 | OH |
| 1865 | Jupiter Elite 16-E | 1880 | 18-43 | 30% | 16 | FL |
| 1866 | Legacy 11-1 adidas | 1880 | 50-13 | 79% | 11 | MI |
| 1867 | Legacy 15-3 adidas | 1880 | 44-21 | 68% | 15 | MI |
| 1868 | 208 16-Elite | 1880 | 27-29 | 48% | 16 | ID |
| 1869 | EMV 13-National black mcneider | 1880 | 6-2 | 75% | 13 | TX |
| 1870 | NorCal 13-2 blue | 1880 | 48-30 | 62% | 13 | CA |
| 1871 | Tulsa Power 16-1 | 1880 | 44-17 | 71% | 16 | OK |
| 1872 | Midwest Elite 16-1 | 1880 | 16-8 | 67% | 16 | NE |
| 1873 | PSVA 14-1 | 1880 | 50-22 | 69% | 14 | FL |
| 1874 | Pursuit 17-National | 1879 | 39-27 | 59% | 17 | MO |
| 1875 | Angelo Rise 15-1 | 1879 | 40-10 | 80% | 15 | TX |
| 1876 | LA6 12 | 1879 | 41-4 | 91% | 12 | LA |
| 1877 | Michigan Volleyball Academy 16 MVA - Rise Academy 62 | 1879 | 28-26 | 52% | 16 | MI |
| 1878 | RRHEATVB 17-1 jaz | 1879 | 28-18 | 61% | 17 | UT |
| 1879 | PV Slammers 12 | 1879 | 65-24 | 68% | 12 | IA |
| 1880 | UPONTOP 14-S elite | 1879 | 43-30 | 59% | 14 | FL |
| 1881 | Elite 17-National cd | 1879 | 40-23 | 63% | 17 | FL |
| 1882 | VVB 18-Marj | 1879 | 31-6 | 84% | 18 | GA |
| 1883 | LIBERO 16 HUSKIES | 1878 | 75-38 | 66% | 16 | VA |
| 1884 | Blue Ridge 14-Orange | 1878 | 44-7 | 86% | 14 | VA |
| 1885 | Ka Ulukoa 14 James | 1878 | 17-6 | 74% | 14 | HI |
| 1886 | Academy 15 Crystal | 1878 | 37-27 | 58% | 15 | NC |
| 1887 | TX LEGACY 12-Elite | 1878 | 59-15 | 80% | 12 | TX |
| 1888 | Club V Cache Valley 15 | 1878 | 14-15 | 48% | 15 | UT |
| 1889 | MKE Sting 16 Silver | 1878 | 66-21 | 76% | 16 | WI |
| 1890 | USA South 13-Premier purp | 1878 | 42-16 | 72% | 13 | FL |
| 1891 | EXCEL 17-National white | 1878 | 29-23 | 55% | 17 | TX |
| 1892 | Premier 14-Black aj | 1878 | 29-11 | 69% | 14 | TX |
| 1893 | Rancho 16 Premier | 1878 | 37-31 | 54% | 16 | CA |
| 1894 | Netforce 17-Saige | 1878 | 34-7 | 83% | 17 | AL |
| 1895 | Ultimate VBC 18-Gold | 1878 | 4-4 | 50% | 18 | IL |
| 1896 | Tstreet SN 15-Jackson | 1878 | 31-13 | 70% | 15 | NV |
| 1897 | VC United 16-1 elite | 1878 | 24-26 | 48% | 16 | IL |
| 1898 | SMASH 18-S | 1878 | 15-10 | 60% | 18 | MA |
| 1899 | Premier 15 Trabuco | 1878 | 59-18 | 77% | 15 | OH |
| 1900 | Wildfire 17-N travis | 1878 | 29-22 | 57% | 17 | FL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.