2025-2026 Season — Page 37 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1801 | Rio Grande Elite 18-1 | 1886 | 8-3 | 73% | 18 | TX |
| 1802 | WAVE 14-Haley | 1886 | 27-12 | 69% | 14 | CA |
| 1803 | Aspire NW 15-1 vancouver | 1886 | 16-7 | 70% | 15 | WA |
| 1804 | Elevation 16-Bouyer | 1886 | 39-14 | 74% | 16 | OH |
| 1805 | Premier 13-Black r | 1886 | 29-14 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 1806 | City 15 Gold | 1885 | 36-20 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 1807 | VolleyFX 17 Rapture | 1885 | 37-28 | 56% | 17 | NY |
| 1808 | Tulsa Power 16-1 | 1885 | 44-17 | 71% | 16 | OK |
| 1809 | Top Caliber 14-Nicole | 1885 | 58-10 | 85% | 14 | NC |
| 1810 | Laredo JRS 14-1 navy | 1885 | 45-8 | 85% | 14 | TX |
| 1811 | CIA 16-Black | 1885 | 43-15 | 73% | 16 | IA |
| 1812 | Athlete HQ 12-Burger | 1885 | 36-9 | 80% | 12 | OH |
| 1813 | AVA 14-Elite | 1885 | 33-11 | 75% | 14 | NY |
| 1814 | Ignite 16 National (SC) | 1885 | 36-20 | 64% | 16 | CA |
| 1815 | KEVC 17-1 | 1884 | 32-20 | 62% | 17 | |
| 1816 | CJV 13 National | 1884 | 55-9 | 86% | 13 | AR |
| 1817 | Delaware United 18-Navy | 1884 | 23-12 | 66% | 18 | DE |
| 1818 | PSVC 13 Jamaica | 1884 | 35-17 | 67% | 13 | SC |
| 1819 | GRIT 14-Premier -1 | 1884 | 36-7 | 84% | 14 | AL |
| 1820 | FaR Out 16-Onyx | 1884 | 49-12 | 80% | 16 | MI |
| 1821 | Premier Nebraska 11-Gold | 1884 | 32-8 | 78% | 11 | NE |
| 1822 | Mindset Premier 15-Red | 1884 | 49-12 | 80% | 15 | IL |
| 1823 | SMASH 18-2 | 1884 | 7-1 | 88% | 18 | MA |
| 1824 | CCJ 18-1 | 1884 | 49-4 | 92% | 18 | AL |
| 1825 | Aspire NW 15-1 beaverton | 1883 | 44-20 | 69% | 15 | WA |
| 1826 | Angelo Rise 16-1 | 1883 | 44-10 | 81% | 16 | TX |
| 1827 | CUVC 13 Open | 1883 | 32-33 | 49% | 13 | NC |
| 1828 | BONNEVILLE 16-Carl | 1883 | 29-16 | 64% | 16 | ID |
| 1829 | USA South 14-Premier purple | 1883 | 31-24 | 56% | 14 | FL |
| 1830 | UVC 12-Evren/quillan | 1883 | 30-12 | 71% | 12 | MA |
| 1831 | GSI 14-Green venice | 1883 | 17-13 | 57% | 14 | FL |
| 1832 | Northeast 13-1 | 1883 | 37-19 | 66% | 13 | CT |
| 1833 | 1United 15-N white | 1883 | 39-12 | 75% | 15 | TX |
| 1834 | MVC 16 Danny | 1883 | 41-18 | 69% | 16 | OH |
| 1835 | CoJrs 17-Tara/amy | 1882 | 32-19 | 63% | 17 | CO |
| 1836 | Mobile Storm 18 National | 1882 | 27-5 | 84% | 18 | AL |
| 1837 | PSVA 14-1 | 1882 | 50-22 | 69% | 14 | FL |
| 1838 | Seal Beach 16-Black | 1882 | 38-25 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 1839 | Tri-State Elite 15-White | 1882 | 34-28 | 55% | 15 | OH |
| 1840 | Academy North 13-National | 1882 | 42-30 | 58% | 13 | CA |
| 1841 | Actyve 17-Navy | 1882 | 23-39 | 37% | 17 | CA |
| 1842 | Northeast 15-2 | 1882 | 50-11 | 82% | 15 | CT |
| 1843 | PSVC 15-Maya | 1882 | 46-14 | 77% | 15 | SC |
| 1844 | Carolina Rogue 18-Black | 1882 | 14-9 | 61% | 18 | SC |
| 1845 | BVC 15-National drennan | 1882 | 45-15 | 75% | 15 | AL |
| 1846 | Illini Elite 14-Cardinal | 1882 | 29-6 | 83% | 14 | IL |
| 1847 | LA6 12 | 1881 | 41-4 | 91% | 12 | LA |
| 1848 | AP 14-Baden | 1881 | 40-31 | 56% | 14 | TX |
| 1849 | Goldenwest 16 Asics | 1881 | 36-21 | 63% | 16 | CA |
| 1850 | TAV Houston 17-Black j | 1881 | 33-29 | 53% | 17 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.