Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 37 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
1801 Pgh Elite 17-Elite 1887 33-30 52% 17 PA
1802 1st Alliance 17 Onyx 1887 45-12 79% 17 IL
1803 BONNEVILLE 16-Carl 1887 29-16 64% 16 ID
1804 TAV 16-Blue (NT) 1887 23-20 53% 16 TX
1805 ATOMIC 15-Smack premier 1887 58-32 64% 15 AZ
1806 MiElite 18 Elite 1887 29-20 59% 18 MI
1807 Happy Volley 15 Elite 1887 34-13 72% 15 PA
1808 Epic United 15-Elite 1887 35-26 57% 15 IL
1809 NRG VBC 15-Ampd navy 1886 44-20 66% 15 TX
1810 Delaware United Volleyball Club 18-Navy 1886 23-12 66% 18 DE
1811 FaR Out 16-Onyx 1886 49-12 80% 16 MI
1812 Madfrog 12-N white 1886 51-14 72% 12 TX
1813 Premier Nebraska 11-Gold 1886 32-8 78% 11 NE
1814 417 MoJrs 18 Elite 1886 23-10 70% 18 MO
1815 Northern Lights 16-R 1886 63-15 81% 16 MN
1816 Illini Elite 14-Cardinal 1886 29-6 83% 14 IL
1817 Laredo JRS 14-1 navy 1885 45-8 85% 14 TX
1818 Sanford Fargo 18-UA 1885 38-23 62% 18 MN
1819 USA South 14-Premier purple 1885 31-24 56% 14 FL
1820 GRIT 14-Premier -1 1885 36-7 84% 14 AL
1821 Coastal VBC 16 Navy 1885 51-8 85% 16 DE
1822 TAV Houston 17-Black j 1885 33-29 53% 17 TX
1823 3DGE 16-1 gold 1885 21-26 45% 16 PA
1824 Top Select 18 Elite 1885 36-15 71% 18 FL
1825 SMASH 18-2 1885 7-1 88% 18 MA
1826 Dallas Skyline 17-Black 1884 26-14 63% 17 TX
1827 Fusion 18-Blue 1884 35-12 74% 18 PA
1828 RCVC 13-Unite 1884 26-1 96% 13 NC
1829 Bama Elite 16-E spartans 1884 39-16 71% 16 AL
1830 Top Caliber 14-Nicole 1884 58-10 85% 14 NC
1831 Aspire NW 15-1 beaverton 1883 44-20 69% 15 OR
1832 Lex United 17 Elite 1883 76-68 53% 17 KY
1833 Club Fusion 16-1 national 1883 34-21 62% 16 IL
1834 VolleyFX 17 Rapture 1883 37-28 56% 17 NY
1835 Arete 17-Navy ethos 1883 34-13 71% 17 TX
1836 Athlete HQ 12-Burger 1883 36-9 80% 12 OH
1837 PSVC 15-Maya 1883 46-14 77% 15 SC
1838 Surfside 16-Pv elite 1883 38-26 59% 16 CA
1839 OT 12-T liz 1883 45-23 66% 12 FL
1840 WAVE 14-Nancy 1883 31-23 57% 14 CA
1841 MOVSelect 14-Green 1882 28-2 93% 14 OH
1842 NE Elite 16-Flames 1882 26-13 67% 16 NE
1843 GSI 14-Green venice 1882 17-13 57% 14 FL
1844 PSVC 13 Jamaica 1882 35-17 67% 13 SC
1845 Vision 13-Blue 1882 40-22 65% 13 CA
1846 Goldenwest Volleyball Club 16-Asics 1882 36-21 63% 16 CA
1847 NorthEast Volleyball Club 15-2 1882 50-11 82% 15 CT
1848 CIA 16-Black 1882 43-15 73% 16 IA
1849 ECJVC 17-National 1882 39-30 57% 17 NC
1850 AP 14-Baden 1882 40-31 56% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.