2025-2026 Season — Page 36 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2626 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1751 | A5 15-Jennie | 1892 | 47-21 | 69% | 15 | GA |
| 1752 | Big Sky 18-1 | 1892 | 8-6 | 57% | 18 | MT |
| 1753 | ARVC 15-Black | 1892 | 8-2 | 80% | 15 | NM |
| 1754 | WAVE 16-Nancy | 1891 | 32-28 | 53% | 16 | CA |
| 1755 | South County 18-Josh/kayli | 1891 | 23-10 | 70% | 18 | RI |
| 1756 | A5 15-Myca | 1891 | 67-14 | 83% | 15 | GA |
| 1757 | NRG VBC 15-Ampd navy | 1891 | 44-20 | 66% | 15 | TX |
| 1758 | Academy 17 Diamond | 1891 | 19-38 | 33% | 17 | NC |
| 1759 | BVC 16 Casie | 1891 | 46-14 | 77% | 16 | CA |
| 1760 | HEAT 12-Red | 1891 | 52-15 | 78% | 12 | TX |
| 1761 | Red Rock 11-Cristine | 1891 | 44-13 | 77% | 11 | CA |
| 1762 | 1st Alliance 17-Elite | 1891 | 3-3 | 50% | 17 | IL |
| 1763 | SDVBC 16-Lindsey | 1891 | 21-19 | 53% | 16 | CA |
| 1764 | AZ REV 16 Elite | 1890 | 50-30 | 63% | 16 | AZ |
| 1765 | BCS Skyline H 18 Royal | 1890 | 29-19 | 60% | 18 | TX |
| 1766 | Lions 14-Red | 1890 | 31-27 | 53% | 14 | IL |
| 1767 | St. Pete 18-Teal | 1890 | 49-10 | 83% | 18 | FL |
| 1768 | Vibe 14-Black | 1890 | 28-21 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 1769 | FRVBC 17-Black | 1890 | 17-7 | 71% | 17 | CO |
| 1770 | Madison 14-Keanu | 1890 | 23-15 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 1771 | Club V Cache Valley 15 | 1890 | 14-15 | 48% | 15 | UT |
| 1772 | Actyve 14-Navy | 1890 | 26-24 | 52% | 14 | CA |
| 1773 | FH 18-Ikaika-andy | 1890 | 34-22 | 61% | 18 | TX |
| 1774 | SCVB 16 Riley | 1890 | 26-10 | 72% | 16 | RI |
| 1775 | Iowa Rockets 13 R | 1889 | 47-24 | 65% | 13 | IA |
| 1776 | CVC 18-Black | 1889 | 32-22 | 59% | 18 | OH |
| 1777 | HOV 16 National | 1889 | 28-13 | 68% | 16 | VA |
| 1778 | MARIN 14-Black | 1889 | 46-28 | 62% | 14 | CA |
| 1779 | TAV 14-Black | 1889 | 66-38 | 63% | 14 | IL |
| 1780 | Vibe VBC 14-1 | 1889 | 10-0 | 100% | 14 | CA |
| 1781 | Coast United 14 | 1889 | 41-17 | 71% | 14 | CA |
| 1782 | Absolute 13-Black | 1889 | 32-41 | 44% | 13 | CA |
| 1783 | MAVS 11 Elite | 1888 | 37-14 | 73% | 11 | KS |
| 1784 | Monon 14-2e blast | 1888 | 54-31 | 64% | 14 | IN |
| 1785 | SC Rockstar 13-Lacey | 1888 | 31-25 | 55% | 13 | CA |
| 1786 | Six Pack 18 | 1888 | 38-13 | 75% | 18 | IA |
| 1787 | Jupiter Elite 16-E | 1888 | 18-43 | 30% | 16 | FL |
| 1788 | Panda 15-1 | 1888 | 38-15 | 72% | 15 | CA |
| 1789 | Nebraska ONE 13-Thunder | 1888 | 32-13 | 71% | 13 | NE |
| 1790 | HNLV 14-Black | 1888 | 17-9 | 65% | 14 | |
| 1791 | ARIZONA STORM 15-Lightning | 1887 | 45-42 | 52% | 15 | AZ |
| 1792 | SG Elite 15 Excel | 1887 | 54-15 | 78% | 15 | CA |
| 1793 | Academy 16-E phoenix | 1887 | 50-31 | 62% | 16 | IN |
| 1794 | Epic United 15-Elite | 1887 | 35-26 | 57% | 15 | IN |
| 1795 | COAST 14-2 andy | 1887 | 28-15 | 65% | 14 | CA |
| 1796 | Northeast 16-2 | 1887 | 44-16 | 73% | 16 | CT |
| 1797 | Premier Nebraska 15-Silver | 1887 | 38-9 | 81% | 15 | NE |
| 1798 | CINCY EAST 15-1 black | 1887 | 35-27 | 56% | 15 | OH |
| 1799 | Club Idaho 13-Blue | 1887 | 6-1 | 86% | 13 | ID |
| 1800 | Bama Elite 16-E spartans | 1886 | 39-16 | 71% | 16 | AL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.